Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Read more
The surge isn’t sustained, but it means another more dour trend is continued. For the fourth tournament in a row, England draw their second game.
Momentum is stalled, expectation drops back again. They weren’t looking like champions in this one. Thomas Tuchel hasn’t changed everything yet. Far from it. Nothing he did seemed to change the game here. Ghana were excellent value for a 0-0 draw, with a supremely disciplined defensive performance. And while Tuchel raged, Carlos Queiroz was punching the air with his delighted players. They celebrated this like a win, and it still could have been that.
England failed to beat Ghana in Boston (Reuters)
Prince Adu probably should have had a penalty in the 82nd minute, when Ezri Konsa desperately cut him down but the referee just waved play on. There followed England’s best chance, as substitute Nico O’Reilly smashed the crossbar with a header and then Harry Kane – of all players – drove the ball well over the bar from just yards out.
That should have been it, the winner and his third of the tournament. Instead, that was pretty much it from England, outside one Marc Guehi header batted away. You could call it a desperate goalline clearance but Ghana were only too happy to play that deep.
Such intensive English attacking also amounted to only about 20 seconds in total, though, compared to the 20 minutes of siege football against Croatia. Here, the subs didn’t work. The set-pieces didn’t work. England could barely even work an opening.
That might not have much material meaning to the group, since England are still in command. A win against Panama keeps them top, but it might have other effects.
One is physical. Given how the schedule now gets very compact and demanding – with the potential of at least two games in very difficult conditions – they could have done with the breather of playing a second string against Panama in New Jersey on Saturday.
That could yet prove important.
The second is psychological.
Maybe England had been too relaxed in the build-up to this. The edge was gone. Now, that momentum is gone.
Thomas Tuchel consoles his players after an under-par performance (Reuters)
Some of the old debates and doubts will be back, summed up by this second-game trend.
England didn’t seek to be cautious but they were not adventurous either.
Not everything from the Gareth Southgate era has gone away.
Talk of producing the best football in this World Cup, as The Independent did only last week, must now go after some of the performances of the last few days.
England again look more laboured than all of France and Spain, and probably Argentina, Germany and the Netherlands too.
Morgan Rogers of England attempts a header against Jerome Opoku of Ghana (Getty)
This, as Tuchel has warned, is going to be much more of a battle than the surge against Croatia suggested.
Some of this does have to be put in context, though.
This is just what Queiroz reduces games to.
This was the Portuguese’s eighth clean sheet in 15 World Cup matches. That figure is also somewhat skewed by nine of those games coming with an Iranian side always expected to go out in the first round, and only kept three clean sheets, but also a Portugal in 2014 who managed three out of four.
A Queiroz team tends to make games a slog.
And there hasn’t been a slog like this in the tournament. It was the first game without a shot on target in the first half, and we didn’t even see one until the 57th.
Jerome Opuku and Jonas Adjetey were that good at the centre of the Ghanaian defence.
Harry Kane is left frustrated after missing a glorious chance (AP)
The greater concern was how England never moved the ball in the way Tuchel would have idealised. There were only two quick interchanges. Everything else was so turgid.
Kane was no longer looking like a star playmaker, as against Croatia, but was instead at left-back in the 88th minute.
Even the subs, like Bukayo Saka, ended up showing why they’ve had fitness issues, rather than bringing a new energy.
It was all such a regression.
Ghana were always going to limit England to little, but there still could have been more.
And yes, it could have been worse, too.
Ghana were otherwise waiting for bursts, hoping to eventually prey on England’s frustration. One seemed to come when Adu was played in over the top, forcing Jordan Pickford to rush out of his area.
Tuchel after the match with Panama next in line (Reuters)
Maybe he was fired by the prospect of finally having something to do, but the goalkeeper was arguably fortunate that Adu led with his foot in trying to nick the ball, committing the foul on the goalkeeper.
England were then fortunate in a different way moments later. Adu – once more giving England real difficulties with his pace – was played in onside and bearing down on goal, with only Ezri Konsa to cover. The centre-half seemed to definitely impede the forward without getting any of the ball, but the referee played on and it wasn’t checked by VAR.
Tuchel is now going to have a bit of a reassessment of his own over the next three days.
England are still in a decent place. They’re just no longer in the same mood.