• Hueting, R. & Reijnders, L. Sustainability is an objective concept. Ecol. Econ. 27, 139–147 (1998).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Brundtland, G. H. Our common future—call for action. Environ. Conserv. 14, 291–294 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sachs, J. D. et al. Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustain. 2, 805–814 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sanz-Pérez, E. S., Murdock, C. R., Didas, S. A. & Jones, C. W. Direct capture of CO2 from ambient air. Chem. Rev. 116, 11840–11876 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Petersen, K. et al. Potential of biobased materials for food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 10, 52–68 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aucone, E. et al. Drone-assisted collection of environmental DNA from tree branches for biodiversity monitoring. Sci. Robot. 8, eadd5762 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Junge, K., Pires, C. & Hughes, J. Lab2Field transfer of a robotic raspberry harvester enabled by a soft sensorized physical twin. Commun. Eng. 2, 40 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hawkes, E. W., Blumenschein, L. H., Greer, J. D. & Okamura, A. M. A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth. Sci. Robot. 2, eaan3028 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, K. et al. Aerial additive manufacturing with multiple autonomous robots. Nature 609, 709–717 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dunbabin, M. & Marques, L. Robots for environmental monitoring: significant advancements and applications. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19, 24–39 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guenat, S. et al. Meeting sustainable development goals via robotics and autonomous systems. Nat. Commun. 13, 3559 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wiesemüller, F., Miriyev, A. & Kovac, M. Zero-footprint eco-robotics: A new perspective on biodegradable robots. In Proc. Aerial Robotic Systems Physically Interacting with the Environment 1–6 (IEEE, 2021).

  • Wiesemüller, F. et al. Biopolymer cryogels for transient ecology-drones. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2300037 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mazzolai, B. & Laschi, C. A vision for future bioinspired and biohybrid robots. Sci. Robot. 5, eaba6893 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Floreano, D. et al. Towards edible robots and robotic food. Nat. Rev. Mater. 9, 589–599 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Grady, R. et al. Swarm-bots to the rescue. In Advances in Artificial Life: Darwin Meets von Neumann (eds Kampis, G. et al.), 165–172 (Springer, 2011).

  • Pfeifer, R. & Bongard, J. How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence (MIT Press, 2006).

  • Sitti, M. Physical intelligence as a new paradigm. Extreme Mech. Lett. 46, 101340 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miriyev, A. & Kovač, M. Skills for physical artificial intelligence. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 658–660 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ji, Y. et al. Direct observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmion motion driven by ultra-low current density in van der Waals ferromagnets. Adv. Mater. 36, 2312013 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smirnova, L. et al. Organoid intelligence (OI): the new frontier in biocomputing and intelligence-in-a-dish. Front. Sci. 1, 1017235 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gorecki, J. et al. Chemical computing with reaction–diffusion processes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140219 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baltussen, M. G., de Jong, T. J., Duez, Q., Robinson, W. E. & Huck, W. T. S. Chemical reservoir computation in a self-organizing reaction network. Nature 631, 549–555 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Takinoue, M. DNA droplets for intelligent and dynamical artificial cells: from the viewpoint of computation and non-equilibrium systems. Interface Focus 13, 20230021 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, C. et al. Advancing physical intelligence for autonomous soft robots. Sci. Robot. 10, eads1292 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin, C., Zhao, X. & Sun, H. Analysis on the risk factors of intracranial infection secondary to traumatic brain injury. Chin. J. Traumatol. 18, 81–83 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mack, M. J. Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 285, 568–572 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dreyfus, R. et al. Dexterous helical magnetic robot for improved endovascular access. Sci. Robot. 9, eadh0298 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Song, S., Fallegger, F., Trouillet, A., Kim, K. & Lacour, S. P. Deployment of an electrocorticography system with a soft robotic actuator. Sci. Robot. 8, eadd1002 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Upchurch, M. Robots and AI at work: the prospects for singularity. New Technol. Work Employ. 33, 205–218 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Iskandar, M., Albu-Schäffer, A. & Dietrich, A. Intrinsic sense of touch for intuitive physical human-robot interaction. Sci. Robot. 9, eadn4008 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zoss, A. B., Kazerooni, H. & Chu, A. Biomechanical design of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 11, 128–138 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, J. et al. Reducing the metabolic rate of walking and running with a versatile, portable exosuit. Science 365, 668–672 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Häusermann, D. et al. FireDrone: multi-environment thermally agnostic aerial robot. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2300101 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, L. et al. Aerial-aquatic robots capable of crossing the air-water boundary and hitchhiking on surfaces. Sci. Robot. 7, eabm6695 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sethi, S. S., Kovac, M., Wiesemüller, F., Miriyev, A. & Boutry, C. M. Biodegradable sensors are ready to transform autonomous ecological monitoring. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1245–1247 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Papanek, V. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change 2nd edn (Chicago Review, 2005).

  • Herzog, L., Jansen, T. & Weschler, L. Strandbeest: The Dream Machines of Theo Jansen (TASCHEN, 2014).

  • Hubbard, J. D. et al. Fully 3D-printed soft robots with integrated fluidic circuitry. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe5257 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhai, Y. et al. Desktop fabrication of monolithic soft robotic devices with embedded fluidic control circuits. Sci. Robot. 8, eadg3792 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Song, S., Joshi, S. & Paik, J. CMOS-inspired complementary fluidic circuits for soft robots. Adv. Sci. 8, 2100924 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lange, I. D. et al. Coral restoration can drive rapid reef carbonate budget recovery. Curr. Biol. 34, 1341–1348.e1343 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Farinha, A. T. et al. Off-shore and underwater sampling of aquatic environments with the aerial-aquatic drone MEDUSA. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 1023269 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zych, A. et al. Underwater quick-hardening vegetable oil-based biodegradable putty for sustainable coral reef restoration and rehabilitation. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 8, 2400110 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, D. O. B. et al. Long-term impact and biological recovery in a deep-sea mining track. Nature 642, 112–118 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gibbs, E. P. J. The evolution of One Health: a decade of progress and challenges for the future. Vet. Rec. 174, 85–91 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • One Health High-Level Expert Panel et al. One Health: a new definition for a sustainable and healthy future. PLoS Pathog. 18, e1010537 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blois, J. L., Zarnetske, P. L., Fitzpatrick, M. C. & Finnegan, S. Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science 341, 499–504 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meder, F. et al. Ultraconformable, self-adhering surface electrodes for measuring electrical signals in plants. Adv. Mater. Technol. 6, 2001182 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhu, C., Guo, D., Ye, D., Jiang, S. & Huang, Y. Flexible PZT-integrated, bilateral sensors via transfer-free laser lift-off for multimodal measurements. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 37354–37362 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roderick, W. R. T., Cutkosky, M. R. & Lentink, D. Bird-inspired dynamic grasping and perching in arboreal environments. Sci. Robot. 6, eabj7562 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Adamski, M. Effectiveness analysis of UCAV used in modern military conflicts. Aviation 24, 66–71 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Roijen, E., Miller, S. A. & Davis, S. J. Building materials could store more than 16 billion tonnes of CO2 annually. Science 387, 176–182 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abanades, J. C., Criado, Y. A. & White, H. I. Direct capture of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere using bricks of calcium hydroxide. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 4, 101339 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lura, P. et al. Mining the atmosphere: a concrete solution to global warming. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 212, 107968 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, K. Y. et al. An autonomously swimming biohybrid fish designed with human cardiac biophysics. Science 375, 639–647 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schiavone, G. et al. Soft, implantable bioelectronic interfaces for translational research. Adv. Mater. 32, 1906512 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, K. et al. Reinforced safety-related condition awareness in a motion planning system for remote manipulators in nuclear decommissioning. In Proc. 9th International Conference on Control and Robotics Engineering 196–201 (IEEE, 2024).