• Rad, H. A. et al. Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer. Nature 638, 912–919 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Larsen, M. V. et al. Integrated photonic source of Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill qubits. Nature 642, 587–591 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • PsiQuantum Team A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing. Nature 641, 876–883 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Konno, S. et al. Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light. Science 383, 289–292 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bente, I. et al. The potential of multidimensional photonic computing. Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 439–450 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vučković, J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photonics 3, 687–695 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bartolucci, S. et al. Fusion-based quantum computation. Nat. Commun. 14, 912 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maring, N. et al. A versatile single-photon-based quantum computing platform. Nat. Photonics 18, 603–609 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kawasaki, A. et al. Real-time observation of picosecond-timescale optical quantum entanglement towards ultrafast quantum information processing. Nat. Photonics 19, 271–276 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lib, O. et al. Resource-efficient photonic quantum computation with high-dimensional cluster states. Nat. Photonics 18, 1218–1224 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, S. et al. A universal programmable Gaussian boson sampler for drug discovery. Nat. Comput. Sci. 3, 839–848 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Noh, K. & Chamberland, C. Fault-tolerant bosonic quantum error correction with the surface-Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill code. Phys. Rev. A 101, 012316 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Madsen, L. S. et al. Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature 606, 75–81 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Biagi, N., Francesconi, S., Zavatta, A. & Bellini, M. Photon-by-photon quantum light state engineering. Prog. Quantum Electron. 84, 100414 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Costanzo, L. S. et al. Measurement-induced strong Kerr nonlinearity for weak quantum states of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 013601 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lloyd, S. & Braunstein, S. L. Quantum computation over continuous variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1784 (1999).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bartlett, S. D. & Sanders, B. C. Universal continuous-variable quantum computation: requirement of optical nonlinearity for photon counting. Phys. Rev. A 65, 042304 (2002).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Braunstein, S. L. & van Loock, P. Quantum information with continuous variables. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shapiro, J. H. Single-photon Kerr nonlinearities do not help quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 73, 062305 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miwa, Y. et al. Exploring a new regime for processing optical qubits: squeezing and unsqueezing single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 013601 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jeong, H., Lund, A. P. & Ralph, T. C. Production of superpositions of coherent states in traveling optical fields with inefficient photon detection. Phys. Rev. A 72, 013801 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gottesman, D., Kitaev, A. & Preskill, J. Encoding a qubit in an oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 64, 012310 (2001).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vasconcelos, H. M., Sanz, L. & Glancy, S. All-optical generation of states for ‘Encoding a qubit in an oscillator’. Opt. Lett. 35, 3261–3263 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bloch, I., Dalibard, J. & Zwerger, W. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yonezu, K., Enomoto, Y., Yoshida, T. & Takeda, S. Time-domain universal linear-optical operations for universal quantum information processing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 040601 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Enomoto, Y., Yonezu, K., Mitsuhashi, Y., Takase, K. & Takeda, S. Programmable and sequential Gaussian gates in a loop-based single-mode photonic quantum processor. Sci. Adv. 7, eabj6624 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, S. et al. Topological network analysis using a programmable photonic quantum processor. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08157 (2025).

  • Asavanant, W. et al. Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state. Science 366, 373–376 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Larsen, M. V., Guo, X., Breum, C. R., Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S. & Andersen, U. L. Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state. Science 366, 369–372 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, D. E., Vuletić, V. & Lukin, M. D. Quantum nonlinear optics—photon by photon. Nat. Photonics 8, 685–694 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patel, R. B., Ho, J., Ferreyrol, F., Ralph, T. C. & Pryde, G. J. A quantum Fredkin gate. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501531 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C. & Branning, D. Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate. Nature 426, 264–267 (2003).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Simon, H., Caron, L., Journet, R., Cotte, V. & Tualle-Brouri, R. Experimental demonstration of a versatile and scalable scheme for iterative generation of non-Gaussian states of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 173603 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sychev, D. V. et al. Enlargement of optical Schrödinger’s cat states. Nat. Photonics 11, 379–382 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lvovsky, A. I. & Raymer, M. G. Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299–332 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weigand, D. J. & Terhal, B. M. Generating grid states from Schrödinger-cat states without postselection. Phys. Rev. A 97, 022341 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Crescimanna, V., Yu, S., Heshami, K. & Patel, R. B. Adaptive non-Gaussian quantum state engineering. Phys. Rev. A 112, 053705 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zurek, W. H. Sub-Planck structure in phase space and its relevance for quantum decoherence. Nature 412, 712–717 (2001).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baragiola, B. Q., Pantaleoni, G., Alexander, R. N., Karanjai, A. & Menicucci, N. C. All-Gaussian universality and fault tolerance with the Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill code. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 200502 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kalajdzievski, T., Weedbrook, C. & Rebentrost, P. Continuous-variable gate decomposition for the Bose–Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. A 97, 062311 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Daley, A. J. et al. Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation. Nature 607, 667–676 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aspuru-Guzik, A. & Walther, P. Photonic quantum simulators. Nat. Phys. 8, 285–291 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lloyd, S. Universal quantum simulators. Science 273, 1073–1078 (1996).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fadrný, J. et al. Experimental preparation of multiphoton-added coherent states of light. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 89 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luo, H., Shah, P. S., Yang, F., Mirhosseini, M. & Mahmoodian, S. Dynamic stimulated emission for deterministic addition and subtraction of propagating photons. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09711 (2025).

  • Uppu, R., Midolo, L., Zhou, Y., Carolan, J. & Lodahl, P. Femtosecond few-fermion dynamics and deterministic single-photon gain in a quantum dot. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1308–1317 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sotier, F. et al. Femtosecond few-fermion dynamics and deterministic single-photon gain in a quantum dot. Nat. Phys. 5, 352–356 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Steindl, P. et al. Artificial coherent states of light by multiphoton interference in a single-photon stream. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 143601 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lund, M. M., Yang, F., Christiansen, V. R., Kornovan, D. & Mølmer, K. Subtraction and addition of propagating photons by two-level emitters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 103601 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hastrup, J. & Andersen, U. L. Protocol for generating optical Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill states with cavity QED. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 170503 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tiarks, D., Schmidt-Eberle, S., Stolz, T., Rempe, G. & Dürr, S. A photon–photon quantum gate based on Rydberg interactions. Nat. Phys. 15, 124–126 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Staunstrup, M. J. R. et al. Direct observation of a few-photon phase shift induced by a single quantum emitter in a waveguide. Nat. Commun. 15, 7583 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Winnel, M. S., Guanzon, J. J., Singh, D. & Ralph, T. C. Deterministic preparation of optical squeezed cat and Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 230602 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harris, T. B., Matsuura, T., Baragiola, B. Q. & Menicucci, N. C. Logical channel for heralded and pure loss with the Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill code. Phys. Rev. A 112, 042417 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Finco, G. et al. Time-bin entangled Bell state generation and tomography on thin-film lithium niobate. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 135 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, S. et al. Shedding light on the future: exploring quantum neural networks through optics. Adv. Quantum Technol. 8, 2400074 (2025).

  • Yang, B. et al. Observation of gauge invariance in a 71-site Bose–Hubbard quantum simulator. Nature 587, 392–396 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar