• Ruddiman, W. F. The Anthropocene. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 41, 45–68 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Malhi, Y. The concept of the Anthropocene. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 42, 77–104 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewis, S. L. & Maslin, M. A. Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519, 171–180 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, R. The outlook for population growth. Science 333, 569–573 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cardinale, B. J. Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning. Nature 472, 86–89 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Petchey, O. L. & Belgrano, A. Body-size distributions and size-spectra: universal indicators of ecological status? Biol. Lett. 6, 434–437 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peralta-Maraver, I. et al. The riverine bioreactor: an integrative perspective on biological decomposition of organic matter across riverine habitats. Sci. Total Environ. 772, 145494 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., Savage, V. M. & West, G. B. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85, 1771–1789 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bernhardt, J. R., Sunday, J. M. & O’Connor, M. I. Metabolic theory and the temperature-size rule explain the temperature dependence of population carrying capacity. Am. Nat. 192, 687–697 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peters, R. H. Cambridge Studies in Ecology: The Ecological Implications of Body Size (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986).

  • White, E. P., Ernest, S. K. M., Kerkhoff, A. J. & Enquist, B. J. Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 323–330 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Woodward, G. Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and food webs in fresh waters: assembling the jigsaw puzzle. Freshw. Biol. 54, 2171–2187 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Guzman, I. et al. Treated and highly diluted, but wastewater still impacts diversity and energy fluxes of freshwater food webs. J. Environ. Manage. 345, 118510 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collyer, G., Perkins, D. M., Petsch, D. K., Siqueira, T. & Saito, V. Land-use intensification systematically alters the size structure of aquatic communities in the Neotropics. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 4094–4106 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barnes, A. D. et al. Energy flux: the link between multitrophic biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 186–197 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jochum, M. et al. For flux’s sake: general considerations for energy-flux calculations in ecological communities. Ecol. Evol. 11, 12948–12969 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Antunes, A. C. et al. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem function, and Nature’s contributions to people: a macroecological energy flux perspective. Trends Ecol. Evol. 39, 427–434 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Potapov, A. M. et al. Rainforest transformation reallocates energy from green to brown food webs. Nature 627, 116–122 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Putman, B. J. & Tippie, Z. A. Big city living: a global meta-analysis reveals positive impact of urbanization on body size in lizards. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 580745 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Merckx, T. et al. Body-size shifts in aquatic and terrestrial urban communities. Nature 558, 113–116 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Warren, P. H. & Lawton, J. H. Invertebrate predator-prey body size relationships: an explanation for upper triangular food webs and patterns in food web structure? Oecologia 74, 231–235 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Perkins, D. M. et al. Systematic variation in food web body-size structure linked to external subsidies. Biol. Lett. 17, 20200798 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klecka, J. & Boukal, D. S. Foraging and vulnerability traits modify predator–prey body mass allometry: freshwater macroinvertebrates as a case study. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 1031–1041 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saito, V. S. et al. Untangling the complex food webs of tropical rainforest streams. J. Anim. Ecol. 93, 1022–1035 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gauzens, B. et al. fluxweb: an R package to easily estimate energy fluxes in food webs. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 270–279 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Waters, T. F. Secondary production in inland waters. Adv. Ecol. Res. 10, 91–164 (1977).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brown, J. H. & Gillooly, J. F. Ecological food webs: high-quality data facilitate theoretical unification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1467–1468 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Atkinson, A. et al. Steeper size spectra with decreasing phytoplankton biomass indicate strong trophic amplification and future fish declines. Nat. Commun. 15, 381 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cardillo, M. et al. Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science 309, 1239–1241 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Milošević, D. et al. The potential of chironomid larvae-based metrics in the bioassessment of non-wadeable rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 616–617, 472–479 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Verberk, W. C. E. P. et al. Body mass and cell size shape the tolerance of fishes to low oxygen in a temperature-dependent manner. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 5695–5707 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Townsend, C., Dolédec, S. & Scarsbrook, M. Species traits in relation to temporal and spatial heterogeneity in streams: a test of habitat templet theory. Freshw. Biol. 37, 367–387 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Power, M. E. Habitat heterogeneity and the functional significance of fish in river food webs. Ecology 73, 1675–1688 (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Verberk, W. C. E. P., Bilton, D. T., Calosi, P. & Spicer, J. I. Oxygen supply in aquatic ectotherms: partial pressure and solubility together explain biodiversity and size patterns. Ecology 92, 1565–1572 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moi, D. A. et al. Habitat diversity mitigates the impacts of human pressure on stream biodiversity. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17534 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Da-Silva, E. R., Nessimian, J. L. & Coelho, L. B. N. Leptophlebiidae ocorrentes no Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: hábitats, meso-hábitats e hábitos das ninfas (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Biota Neotrop. 10, 87–93 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ewer, R. F. On the function of haemoglobin in Chironomus. J. Exp. Biol. 18, 197–205 (1942).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Relatorio Qualidade das Aguas Interiores no Estado de Sao Paulo (CETESB, 2020); https://www.cetesb.sp.gov.br/dx/api/dam/v1/collections/6144aafa-e5ff-43c5-8e8b-d556d9a45596/items/6fa8a2a4-ba5a-4eab-ad65-b653340df990/renditions/3b364cd0-2c9e-4591-ac62-d2df8fcf22f5?binary=true

  • de Almeida, G. A. & Weber, R. R. Fármacos na represa Billings. Rev. Saúde Amb. 6, 7–12 (2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schiesari, L., Leibold, M. A. Jr & Burton, G. A. Jr Metacommunities, metaecosystems and the environmental fate of chemical contaminants. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 1553–1563 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Travassos, L. & Momm, S. Urban river interventions in São Paulo Municipality (Brazil): the challenge of ensuring justice in sociotechnical transitions. Front. Sustain. Cities 3, 684109 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schiesari, L. et al. Population size, income and poor sanitation interact to explain widespread streamwater contamination by antidepressants in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo. Environ. Pollut. 367, 125658 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Relatório Final: Tomo I—Caracterização e Situação Dos Recursos Hídricos (SIMA, FEHIDRO and COBRAPE, 2020); https://www.sigrh.sp.gov.br/public/uploads/ckfinder/files/Volume%201%20Tomo.pdf

  • Alvares, C. A. et al. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol. Z. 22, 711–728 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coleção 5.0 da Série Anual de Mapas de Cobertura e Uso de Solo do Brasil (MapBiomas, 2021); https://mapbiomas.org/

  • Mapa do Uso e Ocupação da Região Metropolitana de São Paulo (EMPLASA, 2002).

  • Hamada, N., Thorp, J. H. & Rogers, D. C. (eds) Thorp and Covich’s Freshwater Invertebrates: Keys to Neotropical Hexapoda Vol. 3 (Academic Press, 2018).

  • Benke, A. C., Huryn, A. D., Smock, L. A. & Wallace, J. B. Length-mass relationships for freshwater macroinvertebrates in North America with particular reference to the southeastern United States. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 18, 308–343 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Coelho, A. M., do Amaral, P. H. M., Linares, M. S. & Callisto, M. Length-dry mass regressions for Leptonema (Trichoptera, Hydropsychidae) larvae in a Neotropical headwater stream. Acta Limnol. Bras. 35, e5 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zeni, J. O., Pérez-Mayorga, M. A., Roa-Fuentes, C. A., Brejão, G. L. & Casatti, L. How deforestation drives stream habitat changes and the functional structure of fish assemblages in different tropical regions. Aquat. Conserv. 29, 1238–1252 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bolker, B. M. Ecological Models and Data in R (Princeton Univ. Press, 2008).

  • Edwards, A. M., Robinson, J. P. W., Plank, M. J., Baum, J. K. & Blanchard, J. L. Testing and recommending methods for fitting size spectra to data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 57–67 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Perkins, D. M. et al. Bending the rules: exploitation of allochthonous resources by a top-predator modifies size-abundance scaling in stream food webs. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1771–1780 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tomanova, S., Goitia, E. & Helešic, J. Trophic levels and functional feeding groups of macroinvertebrates in neotropical streams. Hydrobiologia 556, 251–264 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ramírez, A. & Gutiérrez-Fonseca, P. E. Functional feeding groups of aquatic insect families in Latin America: a critical analysis and review of existing literature. Rev. Biol. Trop. 62, 155–167 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Briand, F. & Cohen, J. Community food webs have scale-invariant structure. Nature 307, 264–267 (1984).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Glazier, D. S. Beyond the ‘3/4-power law’: variation in the intra- and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 80, 611–662 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lang, B., Ehnes, R. B., Brose, U. & Rall, B. C. Temperature and consumer type dependencies of energy flows in natural communities. Oikos 126, 1717–1725 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kones, J. K., Soetaert, K., van Oevelen, D. & Owino, J. O. Are network indices robust indicators of food web functioning? A Monte Carlo approach. Ecol. Model. 220, 370–382 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pauly, D., Christensen, V. V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R. & Torres, F. Jr Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279, 860–863 (1998).

  • Pauly, D. et al. Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418, 689–695 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hartig, F. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R version 0.4.7 https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.dharma (2016).