Bonan, G. B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).
Bright, R. M. et al. Local temperature response to land cover and management change driven by non-radiative processes. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 296–302 (2017).
De Frenne, P. et al. Global buffering of temperatures under forest canopies. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 744–749 (2019).
Seidl, R. et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 395–402 (2017).
Forzieri, G. et al. Emergent vulnerability to climate-driven disturbances in European forests. Nat. Commun. 12, 1081 (2021).
Bednar-Friedl, B. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 1817–1928 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023); https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.015
Li, Y. et al. Local cooling and warming effects of forests based on satellite observations. Nat. Commun. 6, 6603 (2015).
Vargas Zeppetello, L. R. et al. Large scale tropical deforestation drives extreme warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 084012 (2020).
Boysen, L. R. et al. Global climate response to idealized deforestation in CMIP6 models. Biogeosciences 17, 5615–5638 (2020).
Lawrence, D., Coe, M., Walker, W., Verchot, L. & Vandecar, K. The unseen effects of deforestation: biophysical effects on climate. Front. For. Glob. Change 5, 756115 (2022).
Viana-Soto, A. & Senf, C. The European Forest Disturbance Atlas: a forest disturbance monitoring system using the Landsat archive. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 2373–2404 (2025).
Zhao, J. et al. Forest fire size amplifies postfire land surface warming. Nature 633, 828–834 (2024).
Forzieri, G. et al. Increased control of vegetation on global terrestrial energy fluxes. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 356–362 (2020).
Liu, Z., Ballantyne, A. P. & Cooper, L. A. Biophysical feedback of global forest fires on surface temperature. Nat. Commun. 10, 214 (2019).
Randerson, J. T. et al. The impact of boreal forest fire on climate warming. Science 314, 1130–1132 (2006).
Schwaab, J. et al. Increasing the broad-leaved tree fraction in European forests mitigates hot temperature extremes. Sci. Rep. 10, 14153 (2020).
Yao, Y. et al. Conversion from coniferous to broadleaved trees can make European forests more climate-effective. Nat. Commun. 16, 9536 (2025).
Kim, J. E., Laguë, M. M., Pennypacker, S., Dawson, E. & Swann, A. L. S. Evaporative resistance is of equal importance as surface albedo in high-latitude surface temperatures due to cloud feedbacks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085663 (2020).
Seidl, R., Potterf, M., Müller, J., Turner, M. G. & Rammer, W. Patterns of early post-disturbance reorganization in Central European forests. Proc. R. Soc. B 291, 20240625 (2024).
Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Mapping the forest disturbance regimes of Europe. Nat. Sustain. 4, 63–70 (2020).
Li, J. et al. Contrasting temporal dynamics of land surface temperature responses to different types of forest loss. Innovation 6, 100875 (2025).
Li, Y. et al. Amplified local cooling effect of forestation in warming Europe. Nat. Commun. 16, 8412 (2025).
Grieger, S. et al. Impact of forest disturbance derived from Sentinel-2 time series on Landsat 8/9 land surface temperature: the case of Norway spruce in Central Germany. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 228, 388–407 (2025).
Cooper, L. A., Ballantyne, A. P., Holden, Z. A. & Landguth, E. L. Disturbance impacts on land surface temperature and gross primary productivity in the western United States. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 122, 930–946 (2017).
Zheng, W., Zhang, Y. & Chen, X. The offset of the ecological benefits of decreasing forest disturbance severity in Europe caused by climate change. Forests 16, 852 (2025).
Nabuurs, G.-J. et al. Climate-Smart Forestry: Mitigation Impacts in Three European Regions (European Forest Institute, 2018); https://doi.org/10.36333/fs06
Bowditch, E. et al. What is climate-smart forestry? A definition from a multinational collaborative process focused on mountain regions of Europe. Ecosyst. Serv. 43, 101113 (2020).
Roy, D. P. et al. Landsat-8: science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sens. Environ. 145, 154–172 (2014).
Crawford, C. J. et al. The 50-year Landsat collection 2 archive. Sci. Remote Sens. 8, 100103 (2023).
Wulder, M. A. et al. Fifty years of Landsat science and impacts. Remote Sens. Environ. 280, 113195 (2022).
Yu, X., Guo, X. & Wu, Z. Land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat 8 TIRS—comparison between radiative transfer equation-based method, split window algorithm and single channel method. Remote Sens. 6, 9829–9852 (2014).
Avdan, U. & Jovanovska, G. Algorithm for automated mapping of land surface temperature using LANDSAT 8 satellite data. J. Sens. 2016, 1–8 (2016).
Su, Y. et al. A remote sensing-based assessment of the cooling effects of urban trees in European cities. npj Urban Sustain 6, 96 (2026).
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
Ho, T. K. Random decision forests. In Proc. 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition 1, 278–282 (IEEE Computer Society Press, 1995).
Su, Y., Zhang, H., Gabrielle, B. & Makowski, D. Performances of machine learning algorithms in predicting the productivity of conservation agriculture at a global scale. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 812648 (2022).
Reek, J. E. et al. Forest edges are globally warmer than interiors and exceed optimal temperatures for vegetation productivity. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 635 (2025).
Hesslerová, P., Huryna, H., Pokorný, J. & Procházka, J. The effect of forest disturbance on landscape temperature. Ecol. Eng. 120, 345–354 (2018).
Banbury Morgan, R. & Jucker, T. A unifying framework for understanding how edge effects reshape the structure, composition and function of forests. New Phytol. 248, 529–541 (2025).
Watts, A. C. & Kobziar, L. N. Hydrology and fire regulate edge influence on microclimate in wetland forest patches. Freshwater Sci. 34, 1383–1393 (2015).
Francini, S. et al. An open science and open data approach for the statistically robust estimation of forest disturbance areas. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 106, 102663 (2022).
Huete, A. et al. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 195–213 (2002).
Zeng, Y. et al. Optical vegetation indices for monitoring terrestrial ecosystems globally. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 477–493 (2022).
Balling, J., Herold, M. & Reiche, J. How textural features can improve SAR-based tropical forest disturbance mapping. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 124, 103492 (2023).
Kuplich, T. M., Curran, P. J. & Atkinson, P. M. Relating SAR image texture to the biomass of regenerating tropical forests. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26, 4829–4854 (2005).
Bourgoin, C., Verhegghen, A., Carboni, S., Degrève, L. & Ameztoy Aramendi, I. Global Forest Maps for the Year 2020 to Support the EU Regulation on Deforestation-free Supply Chains – Improved Map of Global Forest Cover (GFC2020) and Preliminary Map of Global Forest Types (GFT2020) (Publications Office of the European Union, 2025); https://doi.org/10.2760/1975879
Bourgoin, C. et al. Global map of forest types 2020 – version 0. European Commission JRC http://data.europa.eu/89h/037ca376-ba92-49db-a8f7-0c277c1e5436 (2024).
Carnicer, J. et al. Forest resilience to global warming is strongly modulated by local-scale topographic, microclimatic and biotic conditions. J. Ecol. 109, 3322–3339 (2021).
Alibakhshi, S. et al. Natural forest regeneration is projected to reduce local temperatures. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 577 (2024).
Wang, Z. et al. Early spring post-fire snow albedo dynamics in high latitude boreal forests using Landsat-8 OLI data. Remote Sens. Environ. 185, 71–83 (2016).
Seidl, R. & Rammer, W. Climate change amplifies the interactions between wind and bark beetle disturbances in forest landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. 32, 1485–1498 (2017).
Zhang, H. & Makowski, D. Assessment of the climatic suitability for invasive agricultural insect pests in a warming Europe based on Köppen-Geiger classification. Entomol. Gen. 45, 1029–1035 (2025).
Tang, R., Huang, X., Zhou, D. & Ding, A. Biomass-burning-induced surface darkening and its impact on regional meteorology in eastern China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 6177–6191 (2020).
Vargas Zeppetello, L. R., Battisti, D. S. & Baker, M. B. The origin of soil moisture evaporation ‘regimes’. J. Clim. 32, 6939–6960 (2019).
Alessi, M. J., Herrera, D. A., Evans, C. P., DeGaetano, A. T. & Ault, T. R. Soil moisture conditions determine land–atmosphere coupling and drought risk in the northeastern United States. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 127, e2021JD034740 (2022).
Kelly, L. T. et al. Fire and biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Science 370, eabb0355 (2020).
Perry, K. I. & Herms, D. A. Dynamic responses of ground-dwelling invertebrate communities to disturbance in forest ecosystems. Insects 10, 61 (2019).
Thom, D. & Seidl, R. Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests. Biol. Rev. 91, 760–781 (2016).
Scherrer, D. et al. Canopy disturbances catalyse tree species shifts in Swiss forests. Ecosystems 25, 199–214 (2022).
Thom, D., Rammer, W. & Seidl, R. Disturbances catalyze the adaptation of forest ecosystems to changing climate conditions. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 269–282 (2017).
Fenberg, P. B. & Roy, K. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know? Mol. Ecol. 17, 209–220 (2008).
Andriuzzi, W. Thinning benefits small trees. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 1384–1384 (2024).
Piazza, N., Malanchini, L., Nevola, E. & Vacchiano, G. Where to start with climate-smart forest management? Climatic risk for forest-based mitigation. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 3579–3595 (2024).
Hlásny, T., Augustynczik, A. L. D. & Dobor, L. Time matters: resilience of a post-disturbance forest landscape. Sci. Total Environ. 799, 149377 (2021).
Cerioni, M. et al. Recovery and resilience of European temperate forests after large and severe disturbances. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17159 (2024).
Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Post-disturbance canopy recovery and the resilience of Europe’s forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 25–36 (2022).
Cerioni, M., Klopčič, M., Roženbergar, D. & Nagel, T. A. Multiple dimensions of forest resilience to compound disturbances in a mixed sub-montane forest landscape. For. Ecol. Manage. 577, 122400 (2025).
Máliš, F. et al. Microclimate variation and recovery time in managed and old-growth temperate forests. Agric. For. Meteorol. 342, 109722 (2023).
Starck, I. et al. Slow recovery of microclimate temperature buffering capacity after clear-cuts in boreal forests. Agric. For. Meteorol. 363, 110434 (2025).
Landsat 8 Data Users Handbook (USGS, 2019); https://www.usgs.gov/media/files/landsat-8-data-users-handbook
Landsat normalized difference vegetation index. USGS (accessed 01 October 2025). https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions/landsat-normalized-difference-vegetation-index
Momeni, M. & Saradjian, M. Evaluating NDVI-based emissivities of MODIS bands 31 and 32 using emissivities derived by Day/Night LST algorithm. Remote Sens. Environ. 106, 190–198 (2007).
Sobrino, J. A. & Romaguera, M. Land surface temperature retrieval from MSG1-SEVIRI data. Remote Sens. Environ. 92, 247–254 (2004).
Sobrino, J. A comparative study of land surface emissivity retrieval from NOAA data. Remote Sens. Environ. 75, 256–266 (2001).
Sobrino, J. A. et al. Land surface emissivity retrieval from different VNIR and TIR sensors. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 46, 316–327 (2008).
USGS Landsat 8 level 2, collection 2, tier 1. USGS (accessed 01 October 2025). https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/LANDSAT_LC08_C02_T1_L2#description
Dominant Leaf Type 2018-present (raster 10 m), Europe, yearly. European Environment Agency (accessed 01 October 2025). https://land.copernicus.eu/en/products/high-resolution-layer-forests-and-tree-cover/dominant-leaf-type-2018-present-raster-10-m-europe-yearly
Muñoz Sabater, J. ERA5-land monthly averaged data from 1981 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.68d2bb30 (2019).
Copernicus DEM GLO-30: global 30 m digital elevation model. Copernicus (accessed 01 October 2025). https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/COPERNICUS_DEM_GLO30
Hengl, T. Clay content in % (kg / kg) at 6 standard depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m resolution (version v02). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1476854 (2018).
Hengl, T. Sand content in % (kg / kg) at 6 standard depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m resolution (version v02). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1476851 (2018).
Kruskal, W. H. & Wallis, W. A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47, 583–621 (1952).
Lundberg, S. M. et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 56–67 (2020).
Zhu, L. et al. Comparable biophysical and biogeochemical feedbacks on warming from tropical moist forest degradation. Nat. Geosci. 16, 244–249 (2023).
Wani, J. M., Thayyen, R. J., Ojha, C. S. P. & Gruber, S. The surface energy balance in a cold and arid permafrost environment, Ladakh, Himalayas, India. Cryosphere 15, 2273–2293 (2021).
Hartmann, D. L. Chapter 4 the energy balance of the surface. Int. Geophys. 56, 81–114 (1994).
Murray, R. S., Nagler, P. L., Morino, K. & Glenn, E. P. An empirical algorithm for estimating agricultural and riparian evapotranspiration using MODIS enhanced vegetation index and ground measurements of ET. II. application to the Lower Colorado River, U.S. Remote Sens. 1, 1125–1138 (2009).
Nagler, P. L., Morino, K., Murray, R. S., Osterberg, J. & Glenn, E. P. An empirical algorithm for estimating agricultural and riparian evapotranspiration using MODIS enhanced vegetation index and ground measurements of ET. I. description of method. Remote Sens. 1, 1273–1297 (2009).
Wang, K., Wang, P., Li, Z., Cribb, M. & Sparrow, M. A simple method to estimate actual evapotranspiration from a combination of net radiation, vegetation index, and temperature. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 112, D15107 (2007).
Gao, X. Optical–biophysical relationships of vegetation spectra without background contamination. Remote Sens. Environ. 74, 609–620 (2000).
Zhou, S., Yu, B., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y. & Wang, G. Partitioning evapotranspiration based on the concept of underlying water use efficiency. Water Resour. Res. 52, 1160–1175 (2016).
Bonan, G. B. et al. Modeling canopy-induced turbulence in the Earth system: a unified parameterization of turbulent exchange within plant canopies and the roughness sublayer (CLM-ml v0). Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 1467–1496 (2018).
Maurer, K. D., Hardiman, B. S., Vogel, C. S. & Bohrer, G. Canopy-structure effects on surface roughness parameters: observations in a Great Lakes mixed-deciduous forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 177, 24–34 (2013).
Kohavi, R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In Proc. 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2, 1137–1143 (1995).
Han, J., Kamber, M. & Pei, J. in Data Mining 327–391 (Elsevier, 2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381479-1.00008-3
Su, Y. et al. Canopy height and biomass distribution across the forests of Iberian Peninsula. Sci. Data 12, 678 (2025).
Brereton, R. G. in Comprehensive Chemometrics 577–590 (Elsevier, 2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452701-1.00037-5
Su, Y. et al. Code and data used in ‘disturbance characteristics and forest properties regulate surface warming and recovery across Europe’. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31147237 (2026).