{"id":127250,"date":"2025-10-17T04:26:15","date_gmt":"2025-10-17T04:26:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/127250\/"},"modified":"2025-10-17T04:26:15","modified_gmt":"2025-10-17T04:26:15","slug":"using-generative-ai-to-increase-sceptics-engagement-with-climate-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/127250\/","title":{"rendered":"Using generative AI to increase sceptics\u2019 engagement with climate science"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Meng, Y., Broom, M. & Li, A. Impact of misinformation in the evolution of collective cooperation on networks. J. R. Soc. Interface 20<\/b>, 20230295 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kopp, C., Korb, K. B. & Mills, B. I. Information-theoretic models of deception: modelling cooperation and diffusion in populations exposed to \u2018fake news\u2019. PLoS ONE 13<\/b>, e0207383 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Levin, S. A. & Weber, E. U. Polarization and the psychology of collectives. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 19<\/b>, 335\u2013343 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Loomba, S., de Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S. J., de Graaf, K. & Larson, H. J. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5<\/b>, 337\u2013348 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Abascal, M., Huang, T. J. & Tran, V. C. Intervening in anti-immigrant sentiments: the causal effects of factual information on attitudes toward immigration. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 697<\/b>, 174\u2013191 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G. & Fielding, K. S. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6<\/b>, 622\u2013626 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A. & Maibach, E. The gateway belief model: a large-scale replication. J. Environ. Psychol. 62<\/b>, 49\u201358 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lewandowsky, S. Climate change disinformation and how to combat it. Annu. Rev. Public Health 42<\/b>, 1\u201321 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D. & Maibach, E. W. The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence. PLoS ONE 10<\/b>, e0118489 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Maibach, E. & Leiserowitz, A. Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116<\/b>, 14804\u201314805 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ve\u0107kalov, B. et al. A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change. Nat. Hum. Behav. 8<\/b>, 1892\u20131905 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bago, B., Rand, D. G. & Pennycook, G. Reasoning about climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2<\/b>, pgad100 (2023).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Feldman, L. & Hart, P. S. Broadening exposure to climate change news? How framing and political orientation interact to influence selective exposure. J. Commun. 68<\/b>, 503\u2013524 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Peterson, E. & Iyengar, S. Partisan gaps in political information and information seeking behavior: motivated reasoning or cheerleading? Am. J. Political Sci. 65<\/b>, 133\u2013147.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Areni, C. S. Motivated reasoning and climate change: comparing news sources, politicization, intensification, and qualification in denier versus believer subreddit comments. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 38<\/b>, e4167 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Newman, T. P., Nisbet, E. C. & Nisbet, M. C. Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Pub. Understand. Sci. 27<\/b>, 985\u20131002 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bolin, J. L. & Hamilton, L. C. The news you choose: news media preferences amplify views on climate change. Environ. Polit. 27<\/b>, 455\u2013476 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, Y. & Jaidka, K. Confirmation bias in seeking climate information: employing relative search volume to predict partisan climate opinions. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 42<\/b>, 4\u201324 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sweeny, K., Melnyk, D., Miller, W. & Shepperd, J. A. Information avoidance: who, what, when, and why. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 14<\/b>, 340\u2013353 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    B\u00e9nabou, R. & Tirole, J. Identity, morals, and taboos: beliefs as assets. Q. J. Econ. 126<\/b>, 805\u2013855 (2011).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Golman, R., Hagmann, D. & Loewenstein, G. Information avoidance. J. Econ. Lit. 55<\/b>, 96\u2013135 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andersen, K., Toff, B. & Ytre-Arne, B. Introduction: what we (don\u2019t) know about news avoidance. Journal. Stud. 25<\/b>, 1367\u20131384 (2024).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Skovsgaard, M. & Andersen, K. Conceptualizing news avoidance: towards a shared understanding of different causes and potential solutions. Journal. Stud. 21<\/b>, 459\u2013476 (2020).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mangold, F., Schoch, D. & Stier, S. Ideological self-selection in online news exposure: evidence from europe and the us. Sci. Adv. 10<\/b>, eadg9287 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hickman, C. et al. Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: a global survey. Lancet Planet. Health 5<\/b>, e863\u2013e873 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bayes, R. & Druckman, J. N. Motivated reasoning and climate change. Curr. Opin Behav. Sci. 42<\/b>, 27\u201335 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T. & Nielsen, R. K. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023. Tech. Rep. (Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2023); https:\/\/reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk\/digital-news-report\/2023<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chinn, S., Hart, P. S. & Soroka, S. Politicization and polarization in climate change news content, 1985\u20132017. Science Communication 42<\/b>, 112\u2013129 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A. & Langer, G. The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Anal. 29<\/b>, 633\u2013647 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Hmielowski, J. D. & Leiserowitz, A. The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. J. Commun. 64<\/b>, 590\u2013611 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Edenbrandt, A. K., Lagerkvist, C. J. & Nordstr\u00f6m, J. Interested, indifferent or active information avoiders of carbon labels: cognitive dissonance and ascription of responsibility as motivating factors. Food Policy 101<\/b>, 102036 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    d\u2019Adda, G., Gao, Y., Golman, R. & Tavoni, M. Strategic information avoidance, belief manipulation and the effectiveness of green nudges. Ecol. Econ. 222<\/b>, 108191 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sharot, T. & Sunstein, C. R. How people decide what they want to know. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4<\/b>, 14\u201319 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dorison, C. A., Minson, J. A. & Rogers, T. Selective exposure partly relies on faulty affective forecasts. Cognition 188<\/b>, 98\u2013107 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Simge, A. & Nielsen, R. K. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. Tech. Rep. (Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2020); https:\/\/reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk\/sites\/default\/files\/2020-06\/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T. & Nielsen, R. K. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022. Tech. Rep. (Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2022); https:\/\/reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk\/digital-news-report\/2022<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gonz\u00e1lez-Bail\u00f3n, S. et al. Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on facebook. Science 381<\/b>, 392\u2013398 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Iyengar, S. & Hahn, K. S. Red media, blue media: evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. J. Commun. 59<\/b>, 19\u201339 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Petersen, A. M., Vincent, E. M. & Westerling, A. L. Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. Nat. Commun. 10<\/b>, 3502 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Koehler, D. J. Can journalistic \u2018false balance\u2019 distort public perception of consensus in expert opinion? J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 22<\/b>, 24 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G. & Rand, D. G. Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychol. Sci. 31<\/b>, 770\u2013780 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pennycook, G. et al. Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature 592<\/b>, 590\u2013595 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Frimer, J. A., Skitka, L. J. & Motyl, M. Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another\u2019s opinions. J. Exper. Soc. Psychol. 72<\/b>, 1\u201312 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nyhan, B. et al. Like-minded sources on facebook are prevalent but not polarizing. Nature 620<\/b>, 137\u2013144 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Robertson, R. E. et al. Users choose to engage with more partisan news than they are exposed to on Google search. Nature 618<\/b>, 342\u2013348 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jan\u00e9t, K., Richards, O. & Landrum, A. R. Headline format influences evaluation of, but not engagement with, environmental news. Journal. Pract. 16<\/b>, 35\u201355 (2022).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Feldman, L. & Hart, P. S. Upping the ante? The effects of \u2018emergency\u2019 and \u2018crisis\u2019 framing in climate change news. Clim. Change 169<\/b>, 10 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chapman, D. A., Lickel, B. & Markowitz, E. M. Reassessing emotion in climate change communication. Nat. Clim. Change 7<\/b>, 850\u2013852 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Robertson, C. E. et al. Negativity drives online news consumption. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7<\/b>, 812\u2013822 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhang, M. et al. Negative news headlines are more attractive: negativity bias in online news reading and sharing. Curr. Psychol. 43<\/b>, 30156\u201330169 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vlasceanu, M. et al. Addressing climate change with behavioral science: a global intervention tournament in 63 countries. Sci. Adv. 10<\/b>, eadj5778 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Maertens, R., Anseel, F. & van der Linden, S. Combatting climate change misinformation: evidence for longevity of inoculation and consensus messaging effects. J. Environ. Psychol. 70<\/b>, 101455 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nyhan, B., Porter, E. & Wood, T. J. Time and skeptical opinion content erode the effects of science coverage on climate beliefs and attitudes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119<\/b>, e2122069119 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dubey, A. et al. The Llama3 herd of models. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2407.21783<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Howe, P. D., Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J. R. & Leiserowitz, A. Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the usa. Nat. Clim. Change 5<\/b>, 596\u2013603 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Marlon, J. R. et al. Change in us state-level public opinion about climate change: 2008\u20132020. Environ. Res. Lett. 17<\/b>, 124046 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Capraro, V. et al. The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making. PNAS Nexus 3<\/b>, pgae191 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Spitale, G., Biller-Andorno, N. & Germani, F. AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humans. Sci. Adv. 9<\/b>, eadh1850 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kidd, C. & Birhane, A. How AI can distort human beliefs. Science 380<\/b>, 1222\u20131223 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shin, S. Y. & Lee, J. The effect of deepfake video on news credibility and corrective influence of cost-based knowledge about deepfakes. Digit. Journal. 10<\/b>, 412\u2013432 (2022).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Simchon, A., Edwards, M. & Lewandowsky, S. The persuasive effects of political microtargeting in the age of generative artificial intelligence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 3<\/b>, 035 (2024).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Augenstein, I. et al. Factuality challenges in the era of large language models and opportunities for fact-checking. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6<\/b>, 852\u2013863 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Costello, T. H., Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. Durably reducing conspiracy beliefs through dialogues with AI. Science 385<\/b>, eadq1814 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bago, B. & Bonnefon, J.-F. Generative AI as a tool for truth. Science 385<\/b>, 1164\u20131165 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tessler, M. H. et al. AI can help humans find common ground in democratic deliberation. Science 386<\/b>, eadq2852 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    D\u00f6rr, K. N. Mapping the field of algorithmic journalism. Digit. Journal. 4<\/b>, 700\u2013722 (2016).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Diakopoulos, N. Automating the News: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Media (Harvard Univ. Press, 2019).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cools, H. & Diakopoulos, N. Uses of generative AI in the newsroom: mapping journalists\u2019 perceptions of perils and possibilities. Journal. Pract. 1\u201319 (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Guenther, L., Kunert, J. & Goodwin, B. \u2018Away from this duty of chronicler and towards the unicorn\u2019: how German science journalists assess their future with (generative) artificial intelligence. J. Sci. Commun. 24<\/b>, A06 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Opdahl, A. L. et al. Trustworthy journalism through AI. Data Knowl. Eng. 146<\/b>, 102182 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nishal, S. & Diakopoulos, N. Envisioning the applications and implications of generative AI for news media. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2402.18835<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nishal, S., Sinchai, J. & Diakopoulos, N. Understanding practices around computational news discovery tools in the domain of science journalism. Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. 8<\/b>, 1\u201336 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ren, J., Zhao, Y., Vu, T., Liu, P. J. & Lakshminarayanan, B. In Proc. Machine Learning Research 49\u201364 (PMLR, 2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kadavath, S. et al. Language models (mostly) know what they know. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2207.05221<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gomila, R. Logistic or linear? estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 150<\/b>, 700 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    News personalization. AsPredicted https:\/\/aspredicted.org\/wfvn-c2tg.pdf<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bago, B., Muller, P., Bonnefon, J.-F. Dataset and analysis for using generative AI to increase skeptics\u2019 engagement with climate science. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.16755109<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Meng, Y., Broom, M. & Li, A. Impact of misinformation in the evolution of collective cooperation on networks.…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":127251,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[269],"tags":[442,6134,12280,18,440,29959,910,19,17,4226,76921,133],"class_list":{"0":"post-127250","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-climate-change","9":"tag-climate-change-climate-change-impacts","10":"tag-communication","11":"tag-eire","12":"tag-environment","13":"tag-environmental-law-policy-ecojustice","14":"tag-general","15":"tag-ie","16":"tag-ireland","17":"tag-psychology","18":"tag-psychology-and-behaviour","19":"tag-science"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127250","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=127250"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127250\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/127251"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=127250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=127250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=127250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}