{"id":155788,"date":"2025-10-31T18:40:11","date_gmt":"2025-10-31T18:40:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/155788\/"},"modified":"2025-10-31T18:40:11","modified_gmt":"2025-10-31T18:40:11","slug":"emily-simpson-sure-tamra-judge-leaked-rhoc-storylines-it-was-detailed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/155788\/","title":{"rendered":"Emily Simpson \u2018Sure\u2019 Tamra Judge Leaked RHOC Storylines: \u2018It Was Detailed\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

Is everyone talking to bloggers these days? After the shocking finale of The Real Housewives of Orange County<\/strong> seemingly exposed Tamra Judge<\/strong> for leaking storylines, Emily Simpson<\/strong> has admitted that she completely believes the anonymous source. She thinks they finally caught Tamra red-handed. The audience, on the other hand? They have a slightly different take.<\/p>\n

Tamra Judge was seemingly exposed in the RHOC Season 19 finale\"Jennifer<\/p>\n

Photo Credit: Skip Bolen\/Bravo<\/p>\n

The final moments of RHOC Season 19<\/a> showed Jennifer Pedranti, Shannon Beador, and Gina Kirschenheiter getting tea from an anonymous source, who said that Tamra was talking to bloggers and leaking information. We\u2019re still trying to figure out who this RHOC Deep Throat is, but Emily doesn\u2019t seem to care. She told Us Weekly<\/a> that she believes everything they said.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m sure she did, because the amount of information that this person knew \u2014 it was detailed,\u201d Emily said.<\/p>\n

Specifically, Emily found it odd that the source knew about Gretchen Rossi\u2019s alleged anti-LBGTQ+ social media activity<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat\u2019s detailed information that only cast and production would know about,\u201d Emily claimed. \u201cSo, clearly, someone leaked it, and the fact that they said it was Tamra? I mean, I believe them. I\u2019m sure that she does or has done it for years. I think it just caught up with her. There\u2019s no reason for me not to believe that it was her. It seemed very black and white.\u201d<\/p>\n

Emily\u2019s stance on the situation seems to mirror that of the rest of the RHOC cast. However, on social media, viewers didn\u2019t seem as compelled by this new \u2018evidence\u2019 against Tamra. Plenty of fans are just frustrated that \u201cleaking storylines\u201d has become a storyline<\/a> on so many franchises.<\/p>\n

One person wrote, \u201cAll this last scene from #RHOC proved was the group\u2019s \u2018grudge\u2019 against Katie [Ginella] was dumb and unfounded. They ALL leak stories to bloggers, but Katie had to fall on the sword.\u201d<\/p>\n

Clearly, everyone is processing this information differently. Regardless of how it landed for you, we can at least breathe a sigh of relief knowing they have something new to discuss at the upcoming reunion. It will be three parts<\/a>, and now, they plenty to talk about.<\/p>\n

The Real Housewives of Orange County<\/a> reunion kicks off next Thursday at 8\/7c on Bravo.<\/p>\n

TELL US \u2013 DO YOU THINK TAMRA LEAKED INFORMATION TO BLOGGERS? WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON EMILY\u2019S COMMENTS?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The post Emily Simpson \u2018Sure\u2019 Tamra Judge Leaked RHOC Storylines: \u2018It Was Detailed\u2019<\/a> appeared first on Reality Tea<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Is everyone talking to bloggers these days? After the shocking finale of The Real Housewives of Orange County…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":155789,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[265],"tags":[90968,18,81414,117,19,17,1288,128],"class_list":{"0":"post-155788","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-tv","8":"tag-anonymous-source","9":"tag-eire","10":"tag-emily-simpson","11":"tag-entertainment","12":"tag-ie","13":"tag-ireland","14":"tag-tamra-judge","15":"tag-tv"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/115470246113161145","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155788"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155788\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/155789"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}