{"id":165940,"date":"2025-11-06T11:30:08","date_gmt":"2025-11-06T11:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/165940\/"},"modified":"2025-11-06T11:30:08","modified_gmt":"2025-11-06T11:30:08","slug":"paris-accord-will-defeat-fossil-fuels-eventually","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/165940\/","title":{"rendered":"Paris accord will defeat fossil fuels \u2013 eventually"},"content":{"rendered":"

MELBOURNE, Nov 6 (Reuters Breakingviews) – The transition to green energy is messy, contradictory and too slow. It’s roughly a decade since 195 countries struck the Paris Agreement, opens new tab<\/a> at the United Nations\u2019s 21st Conference of the Parties (COP) in France, pledging to hold the average global temperature to \u201cwell below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels\u201d. UN Secretary-General Ant\u00f3nio Guterres has effectively declared dead, opens new tab<\/a> the more stretching goal of limiting the increase to 1.5 C. The climate denialism of U.S. President Donald Trump is indeed impeding the fight. Yet the future is brighter for renewables than it seems.<\/p>\n

As delegates head to next week\u2019s COP30 summit in the Brazilian city of Bel\u00e9m, two conflicting accounts of the energy transition are true. For the first time, solar, wind and other renewable power is now generating more electricity globally than coal, per research outfit Ember. Yet more of the carbon-heavy rock is being burned than at any point in history. It helps stoke the argument, popularised by Daniel Yergin, author and founder of Cambridge Energy Research Associates, that renewables are not replacing fossil fuels, but merely adding to the mix as energy use increases.<\/p>\n

Sign up here.<\/a><\/p>\n

That story requires ignoring some basic facts. The process is called a transition for a reason: it takes time. The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change\u2019s 2018 report on how to limit the average global temperature rise to 1.5 C assumed that emissions wouldn\u2019t peak until this year in any event. On top of that, money talks. The low-carbon economy will attract some $2 trillion in investment globally this year, according to Aniket Shah, head of sustainability at Jefferies. He points out that number has grown more than fivefold since the Paris Agreement, and is roughly double what\u2019s heading to fossil fuel-related projects. More solar and wind energy is now being installed than was projected a decade ago by the IEA and others.<\/p>\n

The trouble is, it\u2019s not enough: the planet is warming faster than scientists had expected, in part due to emissions increasing and in part due to knock-on effects like reduced ice sheets meaning less solar radiation gets reflected back into space. Limiting the global average temperature rise to 2 C by hitting net zero emissions in 2060 – 10 years later than the stated goal – would require spending an average of $4.3 trillion a year, estimate analysts at Wood Mackenzie. The consulting firm reckons emissions may not now hit their peak until 2028 and will only decline 2% a year for a while afterwards. Based on decarbonisation plans submitted over the past year by 60 or so countries, the UN calculates that greenhouse gas pollution will only fall 10% by 2035 from 2005 levels, compared with the required level of 60% as estimated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.<\/p>\n

There are plenty of reasons for the shortfall. But the person who made the most succinct explanation in a prescient speech<\/a>, also a decade ago, was then-governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney. He dubbed the problem the tragedy of the horizon, opens new tab<\/a>, pointing out that the \u201ccatastrophic impacts of climate change will be felt beyond the traditional horizons of most actors,\u201d meaning business and political cycles as well as the remits of agencies like central banks, and thus \u201cimposing a cost on future generations that the current generation has no direct incentive to fix\u201d. So once global warming becomes a pressing financial problem, it may be too late to stop. Carney himself now arguably risks falling victim to his own prognostication. Since becoming prime minister of Canada in March, he has rolled back some of predecessor Justin Trudeau\u2019s climate-related initiatives, opens new tab<\/a>and tried to improve relations with the country\u2019s fossil-fuel industry.<\/p>\n

Going too slow is a big problem: it locks more carbon, methane and other planet-warming gases in the atmosphere, pushing up temperatures and increasing the likelihood and intensity of floods, droughts, wildfires and the like. But global momentum is on decarbonisation’s side. Renewables projects are now cheaper than their fossil fuel counterparts nine times out of 10, reckons Christina Figueres, who as executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change played a key role in COP21. Assuming a 5% annual growth rate for clean energy \u2013 far slower than it has managed to date \u2013 renewables would effectively oust fossil fuels by 2065, calculates EcoPragma Capital co-Managing Partner Michael Liebreich. Granted, that would mean missing the 2050 net zero target by miles. And some sectors of the economy that are big emitters, like steel and cement production, remain in the very early stages of transitioning. But adoption, as Liebreich points out, is likely to go much faster than his deliberately understated model suggests.<\/p>\n

Moreover, most places are not like Canada: 80% of people live in countries with limited or no local oil, coal or natural gas. Those states have an interest in reducing their dependence on dirty energy imports, which raise the risk of price fluctuations and give geopolitical leverage to possible adversaries. Add in power plants\u2019 unreliability in some countries, and the impetus to transition quickly is big: Pakistan, for example, has in just 18 months added enough solar panels to generate a third of its electricity. On top of that, the top trading partner for around 150 countries is China, which is at the forefront of developing everything from electric vehicles to solar panels to high-voltage cables for power grids.<\/p>\n

Washington, though, is pushing back \u2013 and not just with rhetoric<\/a>. Trump has used his tariff war to push partners including the European Union, Vietnam and Japan to include increased purchases of U.S. liquefied natural gas in their new trade agreements. And in October his administration succeeded in delaying<\/a> by a year a vote on the International Maritime Organization\u2019s net-zero framework for shipping, by threatening to impose further levies on states and revoke individuals\u2019 U.S. visas if they supported the plan.<\/p>\n

Such tactics will, at least, be harder to pull off in person at COP30 and beyond. That’s because the U.S. might not even send a delegation to Bel\u00e9m – and will only be able to attend future confabs as an observer because of Trump\u2019s decision to pull out of the Paris Agreement, for the second time.<\/p>\n

Success at this year\u2019s COP will be defined by whether attendees can prove that international diplomacy still has a positive role to play in speeding up carbon emissions cuts. But at least the economic fundamentals point in the right direction.<\/p>\n

Follow Antony Currie on Bluesky, opens new tab<\/a> and LinkedIn, opens new tab<\/a><\/p>\n

For more insights like these, click here, opens new tab<\/a> to try Breakingviews for free.<\/p>\n

Editing by Liam Proud; Production by Aditya Srivastav<\/p>\n

Breakingviews<\/strong>
Reuters Breakingviews is the world’s leading source of agenda-setting financial insight. As the Reuters brand for financial commentary, we dissect the big business and economic stories as they break around the world every day. A global team of about 30 correspondents in New York, London, Hong Kong and other major cities provides expert analysis in real time.<\/p>\n

Sign up for a free trial of our full service at https:\/\/www.breakingviews.com\/trial<\/a> and follow us on Twitter @Breakingviews<\/a> and at www.breakingviews.com<\/a>. All opinions expressed are those of the authors.<\/p>\n

Purchase Licensing Rights<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n

Antony Currie joined Breakingviews when it opened its New York bureau in 2005, working there until moving to Melbourne, Australia in late 2020. He has covered everything from the car industry to investment banking, more recently adding sustainable finance and water security to his beats.
\n
\nHe holds a bachelor’s degree in German language and literature and a master’s degree in international relations, both from the University of Bristol.<\/p>\n