{"id":248148,"date":"2025-12-23T20:45:09","date_gmt":"2025-12-23T20:45:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/248148\/"},"modified":"2025-12-23T20:45:09","modified_gmt":"2025-12-23T20:45:09","slug":"why-californias-milk-cartons-may-lose-their-coveted-recycling-symbol","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/248148\/","title":{"rendered":"Why California&#8217;s milk cartons may lose their coveted recycling symbol"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>California milk cartons may lose their coveted recycling symbol, the one with the chasing arrows, potentially threatening the existence of the ubiquitous beverage containers. <\/p>\n<p>In a letter Dec. 15, Waste Management, one of the nation\u2019s largest waste companies, told the state the company would no longer sort cartons out of the waste stream for recycling at its Sacramento facility. Instead, it will send the milk- and food-encrusted packaging to the landfill. <\/p>\n<p>Marcus Nettz, Waste Management\u2019s director of recycling for Northern California and Nevada, cited concerns from buyers and overseas regulators that cartons \u2014 even in small amounts \u2014 could contaminate valuable material, such as paper, leading them to reject the imports.<\/p>\n<p>The company decision means the number of Californians with access to beverage carton recycling falls below the threshold in the state\u2019s \u201cTruth in Recycling\u201d law, or Senate Bill 343.<\/p>\n<p>And according to the law, that means the label has to come off.<\/p>\n<p>The recycling label is critical for product and packaging companies to keep selling cartons in California as the state\u2019s single-use packaging law goes fully into effect. That law, Senate Bill 54, calls for all single-use packaging to be recyclable or compostable by 2032. If it isn\u2019t, it can\u2019t be sold or distributed in the state.<\/p>\n<p>The labels also provide a feel-good marketing symbol suggesting to consumers the cartons won\u2019t end up in a landfill when they\u2019re discarded, or find their way into the ocean where plastic debris is a large and growing problem.<\/p>\n<p>On Tuesday, the state agency in charge of waste, CalRecycle, acknowledged Waste Management\u2019s change. <\/p>\n<p>In updated guidelines for the Truth in Recycling law, recycling rates for carton material have fallen below the state threshold.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a setback for carton manufacturers and their customers, including soup- and juice-makers. Their trade group, the National Carton Council, has been lobbying the state, providing evidence that Waste Management\u2019s Sacramento Recycling and Transfer Station successfully combines cartons with <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/wiki.ban.org\/images\/8\/8f\/BAN_LBC_Fact_Brief_on_California_Paper_Waste_Exports.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">mixed paper and ships<\/a> it to Malaysia and other Asian countries including Vietnam, proving that there is a market. The Carton Council persuaded CalRecycle to reverse a decision it made earlier this year that beverage cartons did not meet the recycling requirements of the Truth in Recycling law. <\/p>\n<p>Brendon Holland, a spokesman for the trade group, said in an email that his organization is aware of Waste Management\u2019s decision, but its understanding is that the company will now sort the cartons into their own dedicated waste stream \u201conce a local end market is available.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He added that even with \u201cthis temporary local adjustment,\u201d food and beverage cartons are collected and sorted in most of California, and said this is just a \u201ctemporary end market adjustment \u2014 not a long-term shift away from historical momentum.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In 2022, Malaysia and Vietnam banned imports of mixed paper bales \u2014 which include colored paper, newspapers, magazines and other paper products \u2014 from the U.S. because they were so often contaminated with non-paper products and plastic, such as beverage cartons. Waste Management told The Times on Dec. 5 that it has a \u201cCertificate of Approval\u201d by Malaysia\u2019s customs agency to export \u201csorted paper material.\u201d CalRecycle said it has no regulatory authority on \u201cwhat materials may or may not be exported.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Adding the Sacramento facility to the list of waste companies that were recycling cartons meant that the threshold required by the state had been met: More than 60% of the state\u2019s counties had access to carton recycling.<\/p>\n<p>At the time, <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/environment\/story\/2025-08-27\/milk-cartons-fight-recycling-label\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">CalRecycle\u2019s decision to give the recycling stamp <\/a>to beverage cartons was controversial. Many in the environmental, anti-plastic and no-waste sectors saw it as a sign that CalRecycle was doing the bidding of the plastic and packaging industry, as opposed to trying to rid the state of non-recyclable, polluting waste \u2014 which is not only required by law, but is something state Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta is investigating.<\/p>\n<p>Others said it was a sign that the Truth in Recycling law was working: Markets were being discovered and in some cases, created, to provide recycling.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRecyclability isn\u2019t static, it depends on a complicated system of sorting, transportation, processing, and, ultimately, manufacturers buying the recycled material to make a new product,\u201d said Nick Lapis, director of advocacy for Californians Against Waste.<\/p>\n<p>He said this new information, which will likely remove the recycling label from the cartons, also underscores the effectiveness of the law.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBy prohibiting recyclability claims on products that don\u2019t get recycled, SB 343 doesn\u2019t just protect consumers. It forces manufacturers to either use recyclable materials or come to the table to work with recyclers, local governments and policymakers to develop widespread sustainable and resilient markets,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Beverage and food cartons \u2014 despite their papery appearance \u2014 are composed of layers of paper, plastic and sometimes aluminum. The sandwiched blend extends product shelf life, making it attractive to food and beverage companies. <\/p>\n<p>But the companies and municipalities that receive cartons as waste say the packaging is problematic. They say recycling markets for the material are few and far between. <\/p>\n<p>California, with its roughly 40 million residents, has some of the strictest waste laws in the nation. In 1989, the state passed legislation requiring cities, towns and municipalities to divert at least 50% of their residential waste away from landfills. The idea was to incentivize recycling and reuse. However an increasing number of products have since entered the commercial market and waste stream \u2014 such as single use plastics, polystyrene and beverage cartons \u2014 that have limited (if any) recycling potential, can\u2019t be reused, and are growing in number every year.<\/p>\n<p>Fines for municipalities that fail to achieve the required diversion rates can run $10,000 a day.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, garbage haulers often look for creative ways to deal with the waste, including shipping trash products overseas or across the border. For years, China was the primary destination for California\u2019s plastic, contaminated paper and other waste. But in 2018, China closed its doors to foreign garbage, so U.S. exporters began dumping their waste in smaller southeast Asian countries, including Malaysia and Vietnam.<\/p>\n<p>They too have now tried to close the doors to foreign trash as reports of polluted waterways, chokingly toxic air, and illness grows \u2014 and as they struggle with inadequate infrastructure to deal with their own domestic waste.<\/p>\n<p>Jan Dell, the founder and CEO of Last Beach Cleanup, <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/wiki.ban.org\/images\/8\/8f\/BAN_LBC_Fact_Brief_on_California_Paper_Waste_Exports.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">released a report with the Basel Action Network<\/a>, an anti-plastic organization, earlier this month showing that the Sacramento facility and other California waste companies were sending bales of carton-contaminated paper to Malaysia, Vietnam and other Asian nations.<\/p>\n<p>According to export data, public records searches and photographic evidence collected by Dell and her co-authors at the Basel Action Network, more than 117,000 tons or 4,126 shipping containers worth of mixed paper bales were sent by California waste companies to Malaysia between January and July of this year.<\/p>\n<p>Dell said these exports violate international law. A spokesman for Waste Management said the material they were sending was not illegal \u2014 and that they had received approval from Malaysia.<\/p>\n<p>However, the Dec. 15 letter suggests they were receiving more pushback from their export markets than they\u2019d previously disclosed. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile certain end users maintain &#8230; that paper mills are able to process and recycle cartons,\u201d some of them \u201chave also shared concerns &#8230; that the inclusion of cartons &#8230; may result in rejection,\u201d wrote Nettz.<\/p>\n<p>Dell said she was \u201cpleased\u201d that Waste Management \u201cstopped the illegal sortation of cartons into mixed paper bales. Now we ask them and other waste companies to stop illegally exporting mixed paper waste to countries that have banned it.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"California milk cartons may lose their coveted recycling symbol, the one with the chasing arrows, potentially threatening the&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":248149,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[269],"tags":[129417,1374,129418,129416,18,440,19,17,129420,4164,6093,129419,113373,2375,133,13562,31369,6535,3474,3257],"class_list":{"0":"post-248148","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-beverage-carton","9":"tag-california","10":"tag-calrecycle","11":"tag-carton","12":"tag-eire","13":"tag-environment","14":"tag-ie","15":"tag-ireland","16":"tag-large-waste-company","17":"tag-law","18":"tag-malaysia","19":"tag-mixed-paper","20":"tag-plastic-debris","21":"tag-recycling","22":"tag-science","23":"tag-state","24":"tag-truth","25":"tag-vietnam","26":"tag-waste-management","27":"tag-year"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/115770839912105626","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248148","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248148"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248148\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/248149"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248148"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248148"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248148"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}