{"id":263768,"date":"2026-01-02T17:44:10","date_gmt":"2026-01-02T17:44:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/263768\/"},"modified":"2026-01-02T17:44:10","modified_gmt":"2026-01-02T17:44:10","slug":"missed-early-vaccines-tied-to-parents-later-skipping-measles-shots","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/263768\/","title":{"rendered":"Missed early vaccines tied to parents later skipping measles shots"},"content":{"rendered":"

Babies who don\u2019t get their first round of vaccines on time at 2 months of age are much less likely to get vaccinated against measles, mumps, and rubella by age 2, according to a new study that suggests pediatricians may have a narrow window in which to persuade parents to follow the recommended childhood vaccination schedule.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The study<\/a>, published Friday in JAMA Network Open, reports that in the post-Covid-19 pandemic period, babies who didn\u2019t get their shots on time at 2 months \u2014 the age at which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends babies get vaccines against a host of diseases \u2014 were more than seven times more likely not to receive their first measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) shot by age 2, which is months later than when that shot is supposed to be given. Babies are supposed to get their first MMR shot between 12 months and 15 months of age, with a second sometime between the ages of 4 and 6.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s evidence from this study that very early vaccination delays lead to later vaccination delays and even missed vaccination for measles,\u201d said Nina Masters, an epidemiologist who is the lead author of the paper. \u201cThis shows that hesitancy is really starting early and has a long arc.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd as we look at a really bad measles year, it\u2019s really important to do whatever we can to try to increase measles vaccination coverage.\u201d<\/p>\n

The CDC reported this week<\/a> that as of Dec. 30, the U.S. had registered 2,065 confirmed measles cases in 2025, the most in a single year in more than three decades. There are concerns that some of the current cases are linked to an outbreak that was first detected in West Texas last January \u2014 a fact that, if confirmed, would set the country on the path to losing its measles elimination status<\/a> sometime early this year.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\"\"\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\"\"\/
\n\t\t\t\tSTAT Plus: The 3 biggest issues to watch in vaccine policy in 2026<\/a><\/p>\n

The study is based on electronic health records data maintained by Truveta, a health care data analytics company owned and governed by 30 health systems. Truveta\u2019s data pool contains health care usage information for about 120 million individuals \u2014 about a third of the country.<\/p>\n

Masters is a senior applied research scientist at Truveta. She and her co-authors studied de-identified health care data for about 322,000 children born between 2017 and 2023 who received regular care from a health care system in the Truveta network, looking at vaccination patterns within their first two years of life.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The finding that children whose earliest shots are delayed are likely to get subsequent shots later than recommended \u2014 or not at all \u2014 isn\u2019t new; previous studies have also shown this.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cA strong predictor of future vaccination is having received any vaccine in the past,\u201d said Noel Brewer, a professor of health behavior at the University of North Carolina. Brewer was a member of the CDC\u2019s vaccine advisory panel until health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired the entire committee<\/a> last June and appointed people who share his vaccine skepticism to it in their place.\u00a0<\/p>\n

But the period studied in the paper ranged from 2018 to 2024, which allowed the researchers to look for changes that might have happened after the Covid-19 pandemic began. Declines in vaccination rates since the pandemic have been associated with an increase in distrust of public health authorities and resentment over Covid containment measures.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Over the total period, 78.4% of the children received their first MMR shot on time, 13.9% received it late, 1% received it early, and 6.7% did not receive it by 2 years of age.\u00a0<\/p>\n

But the researchers did indeed see a dip in the rate of children who received their first dose of MMR vaccine on time. It declined by three percentage points between 2021 and 2024, Masters noted. \u201cIt\u2019s a pretty substantial drop in three years.\u201d<\/p>\n

Notably, the percentage of children who received the MMR shot late remained relatively constant during the period of the study. What changed was the percentage of children who hadn\u2019t received a first MMR dose by age 2. That figure rose from 5.3% in 2020 to 7.7% in 2024. \u201cIt wasn\u2019t that more people were delaying. It was that more people were not getting the MMR vaccine [for their babies] at all by 2 years,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

The biggest indicator of whether children would receive their first dose of MMR vaccine on time came very early in the vaccination process \u2014 whether babies received those vaccines that were recommended at 2 months old on time.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Vaccination against multiple pathogens begins with a visit to the pediatrician at 2 months of age, when the CDC recommends<\/a> babies be immunized against hepatitis B, rotavirus, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and pneumococcal disease. (This doesn\u2019t involve eight separate inoculations; when possible, pediatricians use multivalent vaccines that protect against five or six of these diseases with a single shot.)<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\"\"\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\tTrump administration\u2019s plan to shrink vaccine schedule sends health sector scrambling<\/a><\/p>\n

Masters said that the findings suggest pediatricians should begin talking with parents about the importance of vaccinating \u2014 and vaccinating on time \u2014 before the appointment at 2 months.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe three biggest influences on vaccination are past vaccine receipt, intending to vaccinate, and a doctor\u2019s recommendation,\u201d said Brewer, who was not involved in the study. \u201cThe most promising avenue for intervention is a doctor\u2019s recommendation.\u201d<\/p>\n

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends<\/a> frequent contact between pediatricians and babies early in the children\u2019s lives. Those visits include within the first week, at 1 month and 2 months of age, and again at 4 months, 6 months, and 9 months.<\/p>\n

Studies show that the best way to persuade parents to vaccinate their children is to have them receive a recommendation from a trusted medical practitioner. But with multiple shots scheduled for the 2-month visit, there isn\u2019t a lot of time for pediatricians to establish a relationship of trust with the parents of a new patient, Masters said.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cSo it does create this window of opportunity that\u2019s quite short and puts the onus, I think, on those pediatricians really to talk about vaccines early, build trust early, build education [and] familiarity right off the bat. Don\u2019t wait for that 2-month visit, when the parent might decline or delay, but really do it right away,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

Adding to that challenge is the fact that many babies do not see pediatricians on that recommended schedule. The study found that within the cohort studied, just under half the babies saw their medical providers according to the AAP\u2019s schedule. And these were babies with a medical home, the study noted. They had a pediatrician. Their parents had health insurance. The numbers were probably lower still, Masters said, among children whose parents didn\u2019t have insurance or who hadn\u2019t managed to register with a pediatric practice.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cI think it\u2019s conservative,\u201d she said of the findings. \u201cI think if we had a way to look at the parents that aren\u2019t bringing their children in, that aren\u2019t vaccinating their children, that don\u2019t have a medical home \u2014 which we don\u2019t have the ability to do \u2014 we would likely see lower coverage, lower timeliness, just in general lower opportunities for intervention to get children back on track once they fall off the schedule.\u201d<\/p>\n

Brewer said most children receive some vaccines, but a willingness on the part of parents to deviate from the recommended schedule for some shots is typically a sign of things to come.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cPeople who skip one vaccine are more likely to skip other vaccines,\u201d he said. \u201cOnly around 2% of people will never get any vaccines. So most people get most vaccines. But the people who don\u2019t get some vaccines are also less likely to get others.\u201d<\/p>\n

Masters noted the paper does not capture any impact of the changes to vaccination policy that have occurred since Kennedy \u2014 a longtime proponent of disproven claims about the safety of vaccines \u2014\u00a0was named as the country\u2019s top health official.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Among those changes: an early December decision<\/a> by the CDC\u2019s vaccine advisory committee to jettison a 30-plus year recommendation that all babies be offered hepatitis B vaccination within 24 hours of birth. It now recommends at-birth vaccination only for babies whose mothers tested positive for hepatitis B during pregnancy or whose test status is unknown. Other babies should begin hepatitis B vaccination \u2014 if their parents want it \u2014\u00a0at 2 months of age, the CDC now recommends.<\/p>\n

Masters said she and her colleagues are considering trying to look at the implications of the hepatitis B vaccine changes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Babies who don\u2019t get their first round of vaccines on time at 2 months of age are much…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":263769,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[78],"tags":[5606,18,135,19,2913,17,2101,14160],"class_list":{"0":"post-263768","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-health","8":"tag-childrens-health","9":"tag-eire","10":"tag-health","11":"tag-ie","12":"tag-infectious-disease","13":"tag-ireland","14":"tag-public-health","15":"tag-vaccines"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/115826751225453391","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263768","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=263768"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263768\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/263769"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=263768"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=263768"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=263768"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}