![\"Houses](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0023b5ee-614.jpg\"\/)
\nPolls indicate that Greenland’s population strongly opposes a US takeover<\/p>\n
Denmark’s prime minister has said her country faces a “decisive moment” in its diplomatic battle with the United States over Greenland, after President Donald Trump again suggested using force to seize the Arctic territory.<\/p>\n
Ahead of meetings in Washington from today on the global scramble for key raw materials, Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said that “there is a conflict over Greenland”.<\/p>\n
“This is a decisive moment” with stakes that go beyond the immediate issue of Greenland’s future, she added in a debate with other Danish political leaders.<\/p>\n
Ms Frederiksen posted on Facebook that “we are ready to defend our values – wherever it is necessary – also in the Arctic. We believe in international law and in peoples’ right to self-determination.”<\/p>\n
\nPolls indicate that Greenland’s population strongly opposes a US takeover<\/p>\n
Germany and Sweden backed Denmark against Mr Trump’s latest claims to the self-governing Danish territory.<\/p>\n
Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson condemned US for using “threatening rhetoric” after Mr Trump repeated that the US was “going to do something on Greenland, whether they like it or not”.<\/p>\n
“Sweden, the Nordic countries, the Baltic states, and several major European countries stand together with our Danish friends,” he told a defence conference in Salen where the US general in charge of NATO took part.<\/p>\n
Mr Kristersson said a US takeover of mineral-rich Greenland would be “a violation of international law and risks encouraging other countries to act in exactly the same way”.<\/p>\n
No ‘immediate threat’<\/b><\/p>\n
Germany reiterated its support for Denmark and Greenland ahead of the Washington discussions.<\/p>\n
Before meeting US counterpart Marco Rubio, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadehpul held talks in Iceland to address the “strategic challenges of the Far North”, according to a foreign ministry statement.<\/p>\n
“Security in the arctic is becoming more and more important” and “is part of our common interest in NATO”, he said at a joint news conference with Icelandic Foreign Minister Thorgerdur Katrin Gunnarsdottir.<\/p>\n
“If the American president is looking at what threats might come from Russian or Chinese ships or submarines in the region, we can of course find answers to that together,” he added.<\/p>\n
However, “the future of Greenland must be decided by the people of Greenland” and Denmark, he said.<\/p>\n
Asked about a possible strengthening of NATO’s commitment in the Arctic, Mr Wadephul said Germany was “ready to assume greater responsibilities”.<\/p>\n
Earlier, German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil said: “We are strengthening security in the Arctic together, as NATO allies, and not against one another.”<\/p>\n
He was speaking ahead of an international meeting on critical raw materials in Washington.<\/p>\n
European nations have scrambled to coordinate a response after the White House said this week that Mr Trump wanted to buy Greenland and refused to rule out military action.<\/p>\n
![\"US](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0023b833-614.jpg\"\/)
\nThe US president has said controlling the island is crucial for US national security<\/p>\n
On Tuesday, leaders of seven European countries including France, Britain, Germany and Italy signed a letter saying it is “only” for Denmark and Greenland to decide the territory’s future.<\/p>\n
The US president has said controlling the island is crucial for US national security because of the rising Russian and Chinese military activity in the Arctic.<\/p>\n
NATO Supreme Allied Commander General Alexus Grynkewich told the Swedish conference that alliance members were discussing Greenland’s status.<\/p>\n
While there was “no immediate threat” to NATO territory, the Arctic’s strategic importance was fast growing, the US general added.<\/p>\n
Mr Grynkewich said he would not comment on “the political dimensions of recent rhetoric” but talks on Greenland were being held at the North Atlantic Council.<\/p>\n