{"id":281740,"date":"2026-01-13T05:33:09","date_gmt":"2026-01-13T05:33:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/281740\/"},"modified":"2026-01-13T05:33:09","modified_gmt":"2026-01-13T05:33:09","slug":"singapore-defends-gic-temasek-returns-as-reasonable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/281740\/","title":{"rendered":"Singapore defends GIC, Temasek returns as reasonable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>SINGAPORE, Jan 12 (Reuters) &#8211; Returns generated by Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC and state investor Temasek are reasonable and within expectations given their mandates and risk profiles, a minister said on Monday, amid criticism of their performance.<\/p>\n<p>\n              Lawmakers in the city-state queried the performance of the two globally influential investors, which cumulatively manage hundreds of billions of dollars of assets. A Financial Times report in December called Singapore&#8217;s sovereign wealth returns &#8220;poor&#8221; in comparison to peers.<\/p>\n<p>\n              &#8220;Our focus has always been on long-term performance, rather than on short-term or year-to-year fluctuations,&#8221; Jeffrey Siow, a Singapore senior minister of state for finance, told parliament in a live-streamed address.<\/p>\n<p>\n              Temasek reported a 10-year total shareholder return of 5% for the year ended March 31, 2025, which lagged the MSCI ACWI&#8217;s 9% and Singapore&#8217;s Straits Times Index&#8217;s 6%, though its 20-year return of 7% is broadly in line with both benchmarks.<\/p>\n<p>\n              Asked why Temasek&#8217;s 20-year returns appeared to only match the broader market&#8217;s despite its unlisted assets shielding it from public market volatility, Siow said such comparisons are &#8220;not always appropriate or meaningful&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>\n              &#8220;Temasek is not quite the same as a typical sovereign wealth fund, it is an active bottom-up investor and has a history as a holding company for Singapore portfolio companies,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>\n              GIC&#8217;s 20-year annualised real return came in at 3.8% for the year to March 31, 2025, marginally below the 3.9% it posted a year earlier, its weakest performance since 2020 when returns hit 2.7%.<\/p>\n<p>\n              Temasek wrote down its $275 million investment in collapsed crypto exchange FTX and eventually cut pay for senior executives after an internal review, while its portfolio holding, Indonesian aquaculture tech startup eFishery, faces a probe into alleged misconduct including fraud.<\/p>\n<p>\n              Temasek, which managed a S$434 billion ($338.35 billion) portfolio as of March 2025, will launch a new structure from April 1, it said in August.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\n              GIC was also in the spotlight last year after filing a U.S. lawsuit against Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO, alleging NIO and two executives misled investors with false statements and withheld information about its business and prospects.<\/p>\n<p>\n              Siow said the government does not intervene in Temasek&#8217;s individual investment decisions, and works with GIC&#8217;s board to ensure its mandate is met.<\/p>\n<p>\n              The minister said given investment markets have been uncertain and volatile, &#8220;GIC&#8217;s returns over shorter periods could be low or even negative, but the government is able to absorb these short-term market fluctuations and risks because it has a strong balance sheet.&#8221;\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\n               (Reporting by Xinghui Kok, Jun Yuan Yong and Yantoultra Ngui; Editing by David Stanway, Thomas Derpinghaus and Muralikumar Anantharaman)<\/p>\n<p>\n            By Jun Yuan   Yong and Xinghui Kok<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"SINGAPORE, Jan 12 (Reuters) &#8211; Returns generated by Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC and state investor Temasek are&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":281741,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[174],"tags":[79,179,18,19,17,188],"class_list":{"0":"post-281740","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-economy","8":"tag-business","9":"tag-economy","10":"tag-eire","11":"tag-ie","12":"tag-ireland","13":"tag-markets"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/115886162076227823","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281740","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281740"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281740\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/281741"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281740"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281740"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281740"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}