{"id":313346,"date":"2026-01-31T13:04:13","date_gmt":"2026-01-31T13:04:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/313346\/"},"modified":"2026-01-31T13:04:13","modified_gmt":"2026-01-31T13:04:13","slug":"lattice-surgery-realized-on-two-distance-three-repetition-codes-with-superconducting-qubits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/313346\/","title":{"rendered":"Lattice surgery realized on two distance-three repetition codes with superconducting qubits"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Shor, P. W. Fault-tolerant quantum computation. In Proc. 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science 56\u201365 (IEEE, 1996); https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/SFCS.1996.548464<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kitaev, A. Y. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Phys. 303<\/b>, 2\u201330 (2003).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dennis, E., Kitaev, A., Landahl, A. & Preskill, J. Topological quantum memory. J. Math. Phys. 43<\/b>, 4452\u20134505 (2002).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fowler, A. G., Stephens, A. M. & Groszkowski, P. High-threshold universal quantum computation on the surface code. Phys. Rev. A 80<\/b>, 052312 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Raussendorf, R., Harrington, J. & Goyal, K. Topological fault-tolerance in cluster state quantum computation. N. J. Phys. 9<\/b>, 199 (2007).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M. & Cleland, A. N. Surface codes: towards practical large-scale quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 86<\/b>, 032324 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Krinner, S. et al. Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code. Nature 605<\/b>, 669\u2013674 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhao, Y. et al. Realization of an error-correcting surface code with superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129<\/b>, 030501 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Google Quantum AI. Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit. Nature 614<\/b>, 676\u2013681 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ryan-Anderson, C. et al. Realization of real-time fault-tolerant quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. X 11<\/b>, 041058 (2021).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ryan-Anderson, C. et al. High-fidelity teleportation of a logical qubit using transversal gates and lattice surgery. Science 385<\/b>, 1327\u20131331 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lacroix, N. et al. Scaling and logic in the colour code on a superconducting quantum processor. Nature 645<\/b>, 614\u2013619 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bluvstein, D. et al. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. Nature 626<\/b>, 58\u201365 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Acharya, R. et al. Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-024-08449-y<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Postler, L. et al. Demonstration of fault-tolerant universal quantum gate operations. Nature 605<\/b>, 675\u2013680 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Horsman, C., Fowler, A. G., Devitt, S. & Meter, R. V. Surface code quantum computing by lattice surgery. N. J. Phys. 14<\/b>, 123011 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bombin, H. & Martin-Delgado, M. A. Quantum measurements and gates by code deformation. J. Phys. A 42<\/b>, 095302 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Terhal, B. M. Quantum error correction for quantum memories. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87<\/b>, 307\u2013346 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Landahl, A. J. & Ryan-Anderson, C. Quantum computing by color-code lattice surgery. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1407.5103<\/a> (2014).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Litinski, D. Magic state distillation: not as costly as you think. Quantum 3<\/b>, 205 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Erhard, A. et al. Entangling logical qubits with lattice surgery. Nature 589<\/b>, 220\u2013224 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Het\u00e9nyi, B. & Wootton, J. R. Creating entangled logical qubits in the heavy-hex lattice with topological codes. PRX Quant. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1103\/PRXQuantum.5.040334<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bennett, C. H. et al. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein\u2013Podolsky\u2013Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70<\/b>, 1895\u20131899 (1993).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    H\u00f8yer, P. & \u0160palek, R. Quantum fan-out is powerful. Theory Comput. 1<\/b>, 81\u2013103 (2004).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Versluis, R. et al. Scalable quantum circuit and control for a superconducting surface code. Phys. Rev. Appl. 8<\/b>, 034021 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Heinsoo, J. et al. Rapid high-fidelity multiplexed readout of superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10<\/b>, 034040 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Geh\u00e9r, G. P., Jastrzebski, M., Campbell, E. T. & Crawford, O. To reset, or not to reset\u2014that is the question. npj Quantum Inf. 11<\/b>, 39 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tomita, Y. & Svore, K. M. Low-distance surface codes under realistic quantum noise. Phys. Rev. A 90<\/b>, 062320 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    O’Brien, T. E., Tarasinski, B. & DiCarlo, L. Density-matrix simulation of small surface codes under current and projected experimental noise. npj Quantum Inf. 3<\/b>, 39 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Edmonds, J. Paths, trees, and flowers. Can. J. Math. 17<\/b>, 449\u2013467 (1965).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Spitz, S. T., Tarasinski, B., Beenakker, C. W. J. & O\u2019Brien, T. E. Adaptive weight estimator for quantum error correction in a time-dependent environment. Adv. Quant. Technol. 1<\/b>, 1800012 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Remm, A. et al. Experimentally informed decoding of stabilizer codes based on syndrome correlations. Phys. Rev. Research 8<\/b>, 013044 (2026).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liang, Y.-C. et al. Quantum fidelity measures for mixed states. Rep. Prog. Phys. 82<\/b>, 076001 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lao, L. & Criger, B. Magic state injection on the rotated surface code. In Proc. 19th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers 113\u2013120 (ACM, 2022); https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3528416.3530237<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ye, Y. et al. Logical magic state preparation with fidelity beyond the distillation threshold on a superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131<\/b>, 210603 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bravyi, S. & Kitaev, A. Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas. Phys. Rev. A 71<\/b>, 022316 (2005).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gupta, R. S. et al. Encoding a magic state with beyond break-even fidelity. Nature 625<\/b>, 259\u2013263 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schwartz, I. et al. Deterministic generation of a cluster state of entangled photons. Science 354<\/b>, 434\u2013437 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Motzoi, F., Gambetta, J. M., Rebentrost, P. & Wilhelm, F. K. Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103<\/b>, 110501 (2009).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Laz\u0103r, S. et al. Calibration of drive nonlinearity for arbitrary-angle single-qubit gates using error amplification. Phys. Rev. Appl. 20<\/b>, 024036 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Walter, T. et al. Rapid high-fidelity single-shot dispersive readout of superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 7<\/b>, 054020 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gambetta, J. et al. Protocols for optimal readout of qubits using a continuous quantum nondemolition measurement. Phys. Rev. A 76<\/b>, 012325 (2007).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Swiadek, F. et al. Enhancing dispersive readout of superconducting qubits through dynamic control of the dispersive shift: experiment and theory. PRX Quant. 5<\/b>, 040326 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    McEwen, M. et al. Removing leakage-induced correlated errors in superconducting quantum error correction. Nat. Commun. 12<\/b>, 1761 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lacroix, N. et al. Fast flux-activated leakage reduction for superconducting quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134<\/b>, 120601 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    DiCarlo, L. et al. Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor. Nature 460<\/b>, 240\u2013244 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rol, M. A. et al. Time-domain characterization and correction of on-chip distortion of control pulses in a quantum processor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116<\/b>, 054001 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rol, M. A. et al. Fast, high-fidelity conditional-phase gate exploiting leakage interference in weakly anharmonic superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123<\/b>, 120502 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Negirneac, V. et al. High-fidelity controlled-Z gate with maximal intermediate leakage operating at the speed limit in a superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126<\/b>, 220502 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lisenfeld, J. et al. Observation of directly interacting coherent two-level systems in an amorphous material. Nat. Commun. 6<\/b>, 6182 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Krinner, S. et al. Benchmarking coherent errors in controlled-phase gates due to spectator qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14<\/b>, 024042 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Shor, P. W. Fault-tolerant quantum computation. In Proc. 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science 56\u201365 (IEEE, 1996);…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":313347,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[271],"tags":[3554,3553,3557,914,18,910,19,17,3552,3555,3556,452,1097,13324,133,3551],"class_list":{"0":"post-313346","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-atomic","9":"tag-classical-and-continuum-physics","10":"tag-complex-systems","11":"tag-condensed-matter-physics","12":"tag-eire","13":"tag-general","14":"tag-ie","15":"tag-ireland","16":"tag-mathematical-and-computational-physics","17":"tag-molecular","18":"tag-optical-and-plasma-physics","19":"tag-physics","20":"tag-quantum-information","21":"tag-qubits","22":"tag-science","23":"tag-theoretical"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/115989857695088253","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=313346"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313346\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/313347"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=313346"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=313346"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=313346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}