{"id":325998,"date":"2026-02-08T01:19:08","date_gmt":"2026-02-08T01:19:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/325998\/"},"modified":"2026-02-08T01:19:08","modified_gmt":"2026-02-08T01:19:08","slug":"falcon-9-returns-to-flight-after-upper-stage-engine-investigation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/325998\/","title":{"rendered":"Falcon 9 returns to flight after upper stage engine investigation"},"content":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON \u2014 A Falcon 9 launched a batch of Starlink satellites on Feb. 7 after SpaceX completed an investigation into an engine malfunction during the rocket\u2019s previous launch five days earlier.<\/p>\n

The Falcon 9 lifted off from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California at 3:58 p.m. Eastern time. The rocket deployed its payload of 25 Starlink satellites into orbit about 62 minutes after liftoff.<\/p>\n

The launch was the first Falcon 9 mission since Feb. 2, when the rocket carried another set of Starlink satellites into orbit from Vandenberg. While that mission successfully deployed its payload, SpaceX later said an \u201coff-nominal condition\u201d with the upper stage prevented it from performing a planned deorbit burn<\/a>. The company delayed upcoming launches to investigate the issue.<\/p>\n

The Federal Aviation Administration said Feb. 6 that it had authorized SpaceX to return the Falcon 9 to flight.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe final mishap report cites the probable root cause as the Falcon 9 second-stage engine\u2019s failure to ignite prior to the deorbit burn,\u201d the agency stated. \u201cSpaceX identified technical and organizational preventive measures to avoid a recurrence of the event.\u201d<\/p>\n

The FAA did not provide additional details about the cause of the failed deorbit burn. SpaceX said<\/a> Feb. 7 that a gas bubble in a transfer tube prevented the upper-stage engine from igniting for its deorbit burn. The stage reentered the atmosphere about 10\u00bd hours later over the Indian Ocean.<\/p>\n

SpaceX did not explain what caused the gas bubble but suggested it was linked to efforts to refine procedures for upper-stage deorbit burns.<\/p>\n

\u201cSpaceX teams have actively and safely been testing opportunities to refine the pre-burn engine chill profiles, specifically targeting the deorbit burn after the safe deployment of Starlink satellites,\u201d the company said. \u201cThe goal of this testing is to ultimately ensure space safety, effectively ensuring that all Falcon second stages completely deorbit, leaving behind no space debris.\u201d<\/p>\n

The company noted that in 2024, 13 of 134 Falcon 9 upper stages remained in orbit after payload deployment, while only three of 165 did so in 2025. Six of those 16 upper stages have since reentered naturally.<\/p>\n

Completion of the investigation also allows SpaceX and NASA to proceed with the launch of the Crew-12 mission to the International Space Station, scheduled for no earlier than Feb. 11. NASA was an observer during the investigation into the Falcon 9 deorbit burn failure.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019re pressing toward our Crew-12 window,\u201d NASA Associate Administrator Amit Kshatriya said at a Feb. 3 briefing about the Artemis 2 mission. \u201cThat\u2019s going to be contingent on the return-to-flight rationale.\u201d<\/p>\n

NASA conducted a flight readiness review for Crew-12 on Feb. 6 and concluded that the upper-stage deorbit burn incident did not pose a safety risk to the mission, even before the FAA cleared Falcon 9 to resume flights.<\/p>\n

\u201cNASA and SpaceX have determined that since the Falcon 9 second stage flies a different deorbit profile for NASA\u2019s crewed missions, there is no increased risk to crew safety during ascent,\u201d NASA said in a statement after the review. \u201cThe agency and SpaceX are \u2018go\u2019 for Crew-12 to launch to the International Space Station.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n\tRelated<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"WASHINGTON \u2014 A Falcon 9 launched a batch of Starlink satellites on Feb. 7 after SpaceX completed an…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":325999,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[270],"tags":[18,156615,9130,19,17,1024,133,3977,451,2731],"class_list":{"0":"post-325998","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-space","8":"tag-eire","9":"tag-faa-office-of-commercial-space-transportation","10":"tag-falcon-9","11":"tag-ie","12":"tag-ireland","13":"tag-nasa","14":"tag-science","15":"tag-sn","16":"tag-space","17":"tag-spacex"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/116032383413803517","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325998","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325998"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325998\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/325999"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325998"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325998"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325998"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}