{"id":472670,"date":"2026-05-07T08:52:32","date_gmt":"2026-05-07T08:52:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/472670\/"},"modified":"2026-05-07T08:52:32","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T08:52:32","slug":"extreme-galaxy-scale-outflows-are-frequent-among-luminous-early-quasars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/472670\/","title":{"rendered":"Extreme galaxy-scale outflows are frequent among luminous early quasars"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Carnall, A. C. et al. A massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.658. Nature 619<\/b>, 716\u2013719 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Glazebrook, K. et al. A massive galaxy that formed its stars at z \u2248 11. Nature 628<\/b>, 277\u2013281 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    de Graaff, A. et al. Efficient formation of a massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.9. Nat. Astron. 9<\/b>, 280\u2013292 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dubois, Y. et al. Blowing cold flows away: the impact of early AGN activity on the formation of a brightest cluster galaxy progenitor. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 428<\/b>, 2885\u20132900 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hartley, A. I. et al. The first quiescent galaxies in TNG300. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 522<\/b>, 3138\u20133144 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lovell, C. C. et al. First light and reionisation epoch simulations (FLARES) \u2013 VIII. The emergence of passive galaxies at z \u2265 5. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 525<\/b>, 5520\u20135539 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fan, X., Ba\u00f1ados, E. & Simcoe, R. A. Quasars and the intergalactic medium at cosmic dawn. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 61<\/b>, 373\u2013426 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Onoue, M. et al. A post-starburst pathway for the formation of massive galaxies and black holes at z\u2009>\u20096. Nat. Astron. 9<\/b>, 1541\u20131552 (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Costa, T., Rosdahl, J., Sijacki, D. & Haehnelt, M. G. Quenching star formation with quasar outflows launched by trapped IR radiation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479<\/b>, 2079\u20132111 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lupi, A., Volonteri, M., Decarli, R., Bovino, S. & Silk, J. High-redshift quasars and their host galaxies – II. Multiphase gas and stellar kinematics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510<\/b>, 5760\u20135779 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bischetti, M. et al. Suppression of black-hole growth by strong outflows at redshifts 5.8\u20136.6. Nature 605<\/b>, 244\u2013247 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shen, Y. et al. Gemini GNIRS near-infrared spectroscopy of 50 quasars at z \u2273 5.7. Astrophys. J. 873<\/b>, 35 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yang, J. et al. Probing early supermassive black hole growth and quasar evolution with near-infrared spectroscopy of 37 reionization-era quasars at 6.3 < z \u2264 7.64. Astrophys. J. 923<\/b>, 262 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Capellupo, D. M., Hamann, F., Shields, J. C., Rodr\u00edguez Hidalgo, P. & Barlow, T. A. Variability in quasar broad absorption line outflows \u2013 I. Trends in the short-term versus long-term data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 413<\/b>, 908\u2013920 (2011).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhu, Y. et al. A potential link between nuclear winds and cold gas outflows on kiloparsec scales in reionization-era quasars. Astrophys. J. 1000<\/b>, 312 (2026).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Spilker, J. S. et al. Direct evidence for active galactic nuclei feedback from fast molecular outflows in reionization-era quasars. Astrophys. J. 982<\/b>, 72 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Maiolino, R. et al. Evidence of strong quasar feedback in the early Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 425<\/b>, L66\u2013L70 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Meyer, R. A. et al. Physical constraints on the extended interstellar medium of the z = 6.42 quasar J1148+5251: [C II]158 \u03bcm, [N II]205 \u03bcm, and [O I]146 \u03bcm observations. Astrophys. J. 927<\/b>, 152 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bischetti, M. et al. Widespread QSO-driven outflows in the early Universe. Astron. Astrophys. 630<\/b>, A59 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Novak, M. et al. No evidence for [CII] halos or high-velocity outflows in z \u2273 6 quasar host galaxies. Astrophys. J. 904<\/b>, 131 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zakamska, N. L. et al. Discovery of extreme [O III] \u03bb5007\u2009\u00c5 outflows in high-redshift red quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 459<\/b>, 3144\u20133160 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liu, W. et al. Integral field spectroscopy of fast outflows in dwarf galaxies with AGNs. Astrophys. J. 905<\/b>, 166 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Veilleux, S. et al. First results from the JWST early release science program Q3D: the warm ionized gas outflow in z \u223c 1.6 quasar XID 2028 and its impact on the host galaxy. Astrophys. J. 953<\/b>, 56 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Marshall, M. A. et al. GA-NIFS: black hole and host galaxy properties of two z \u2243 6.8 quasars from the NIRSpec IFU. Astron. Astrophys. 678<\/b>, A191 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yang, J. et al. A SPectroscopic survey of biased halos In the Reionization Era (ASPIRE): a first Look at the rest-frame optical spectra of z > 6.5 quasars using JWST. Astrophys. J. Lett. 951<\/b>, L5 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Loiacono, F. et al. A quasar-galaxy merger at z \u223c 6.2: black hole mass and quasar properties from the NIRSpec spectrum. Astron. Astrophys. 685<\/b>, A121 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Decarli, R. et al. A quasar-galaxy merger at z \u223c 6.2: rapid host growth via the accretion of two massive satellite galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 689<\/b>, A219 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liu, W. et al. Fast outflow in the host galaxy of the luminous z = 7.5 quasar J1007+2115. Astrophys. J. 976<\/b>, 33 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lyu, J. et al. Fading light, fierce winds: JWST snapshot of a sub-Eddington quasar at cosmic dawn. Astrophys. J. Lett. 981<\/b>, L20 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yue, M. et al. EIGER. V. Characterizing the host galaxies of luminous quasars at z \u2273 6. Astrophys. J. 966<\/b>, 176 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shen, Y. Rest-frame optical properties of luminous 1.5 < z < 3.5 quasars: the H\u03b2-[O II] region. Astrophys. J. 817<\/b>, 55 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wu, Q. & Shen, Y. A catalog of quasar properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 16. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 263<\/b>, 42 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cameron, E. On the estimation of confidence intervals for binomial population proportions in astronomy: the simplicity and superiority of the Bayesian approach. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 28<\/b>, 128\u2013139 (2011).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mann, H. B. & Whitney, D. R. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 18<\/b>, 50\u201360 (1947).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Perrotta, S. et al. ERQs are the BOSS of quasar samples: the highest velocity [O III] quasar outflows. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 488<\/b>, 4126\u20134148 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vayner, A. et al. First results from the JWST early release science program Q3D: powerful quasar-driven galactic scale outflow at z = 3. Astrophys. J. 960<\/b>, 126 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ross, N. P. et al. The SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: quasar target selection for data release nine. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 199<\/b>, 3 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hamann, F. et al. Extremely red quasars in BOSS. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464<\/b>, 3431\u20133463 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kendall, M. G. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30<\/b>, 81\u201393 (1938).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Costa, T. et al. AGN-driven outflows and the formation of Ly\u03b1 nebulae around high-z quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517<\/b>, 1767\u20131790 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Farina, E. P. et al. The REQUIEM survey. I. A search for extended Ly\u03b1 nebular emission around 31 z > 5.7 quasars. Astrophys. J. 887<\/b>, 196 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nguyen, N. H. et al. ALMA observations of quasar host galaxies at z \u2243 4.8. Astrophys. J. 895<\/b>, 74 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Decarli, R. et al. An ALMA [C II] survey of 27 quasars at z > 5.94. Astrophys. J. 854<\/b>, 97 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, F. et al. A spatially resolved [C II] survey of 31 z \u223c 7 massive galaxies hosting luminous quasars. Astrophys. J. 968<\/b>, 9 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Valentino, F. et al. An atlas of color-selected quiescent galaxies at z > 3 in public JWST fields. Astrophys. J. 947<\/b>, 20 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nanayakkara, T. et al. A population of faint, old, and massive quiescent galaxies at 3 < z < 4 revealed by JWST NIRSpec spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 14<\/b>, 3724 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ji, Z. et al. JADES: rest-frame UV-to-NIR size evolution of massive quiescent galaxies from redshift z = 5 to z = 0.5. Astrophys. J. 998<\/b>, 239 (2026).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    King, A. & Pounds, K. Powerful outflows and feedback from active galactic nuclei. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53<\/b>, 115\u2013154 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Harrison, C. M. et al. AGN outflows and feedback twenty years on. Nat. Astron. 2<\/b>, 198\u2013205 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    B\u00f6ker, T. et al. The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope. III. Integral-field spectroscopy. Astron. Astrophys. 661<\/b>, A82 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jakobsen, P. et al. The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope. I. Overview of the instrument and its capabilities. Astron. Astrophys. 661<\/b>, A80 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, F. et al. A survey of luminous high-redshift quasars with SDSS and WISE. I. Target selection and optical spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. 819<\/b>, 24 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yang, J. et al. A survey of luminous high-redshift quasars with SDSS and WISE. II. the bright end of the quasar luminosity function at z \u223c 5. Astrophys. J. 829<\/b>, 33 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rauscher, B. J. NSClean: an algorithm for removing correlated noise from JWST NIRSpec images. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 136<\/b>, 015001 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vayner, A. et al. First results from the JWST early release science program Q3D: ionization cone, clumpy star formation, and shocks in a z = 3 extremely red quasar host. Astrophys. J. 955<\/b>, 92 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Law, D. R. et al. A 3D drizzle algorithm for JWST and practical application to the MIRI medium resolution spectrometer. Astron. J. 166<\/b>, 45 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Richards, G. T. et al. Spectroscopic target selection in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: the quasar sample. Astron. J. 123<\/b>, 2945\u20132975 (2002).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lyke, B. W. et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasar catalog: sixteenth data release. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 250<\/b>, 8 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chambers, K. C. et al. The Pan-STARRS1 surveys. Preprint at arxiv.org\/abs\/1612.05560<\/a> (2016).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shen, Y. The mass of quasars. Bull. Astron. Soc. India 41<\/b>, 61\u2013115 (2013).<\/p>\n

    ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Risaliti, G., Salvati, M. & Marconi, A. [O III] equivalent width and orientation effects in quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 411<\/b>, 2223\u20132229 (2011).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bisogni, S., Marconi, A. & Risaliti, G. Orientation effects on spectral emission features of quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464<\/b>, 385\u2013397 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vietri, G. et al. The WISSH quasars project. IV. Broad line region versus kiloparsec-scale winds. Astron. Astrophys. 617<\/b>, A81 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Guo, H., Shen, Y. & Wang, S. PyQSOFit: Python code to fit the spectrum of quasars. https:\/\/ui.adsabs.harvard.edu\/abs\/2018ascl.soft09008G<\/a> (Astrophysics Source Code Library, 2018).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Boroson, T. A. & Green, R. F. The emission-line properties of low-redshift quasi-stellar objects. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 80<\/b>, 109 (1992).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vestergaard, M. & Wilkes, B. J. An empirical ultraviolet template for iron emission in quasars as derived from I Zwicky 1. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 134<\/b>, 1\u201333 (2001).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    V\u00e9ron-Cetty, M.-P., Joly, M. & V\u00e9ron, P. The unusual emission line spectrum of I Zw 1. Astron. Astrophys. 417<\/b>, 515\u2013525 (2004).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kova\u010devi\u0107, J., Popovi\u0107, L. \u010c & Dimitrijevi\u0107, M. S. Analysis of optical Fe II emission in a sample of active galactic nucleus spectra. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 189<\/b>, 15\u201336 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Osterbrock, D. E. & Ferland, G. J. Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei (Univ. Science Books, 2006).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Richards, G. T. et al. Spectral energy distributions and multiwavelength selection of type 1 quasars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 166<\/b>, 470\u2013497 (2006).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vestergaard, M. & Peterson, B. M. Determining central black hole masses in distant active galaxies and quasars. II. Improved optical and UV scaling relationships. Astrophys. J. 641<\/b>, 689\u2013709 (2006).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liu, W. et al. A JWST\/NIRSpec integral field unit survey of luminous quasars at z ~ 5-6 (Q-IFU): rest-frame optical nuclear properties and extended nebulae. Preprint at arxiv.org\/abs\/2511.06085<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S. & White, S. D. M. The structure of cold dark matter halos. Astrophys. J. 462<\/b>, 563 (1996).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dutton, A. A. & Macci\u00f2, A. V. Cold dark matter haloes in the Planck era: evolution of structural parameters for Einasto and NFW profiles. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441<\/b>, 3359\u20133374 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bovy, J. galpy: a python Library for galactic dynamics. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 216<\/b>, 29 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Costa, T. The host dark matter haloes of the first quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 531<\/b>, 930\u2013944 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, F. et al. A SPectroscopic survey of biased halos In the Reionization Era (ASPIRE): JWST reveals a filamentary structure around a z = 6.61 quasar. Astrophys. J. Lett. 951<\/b>, L4 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Eilers, A.-C. et al. EIGER. VI. The correlation function, host halo mass, and duty cycle of luminous quasars at z \u22736. Astrophys. J. 974<\/b>, 275 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wechsler, R. H. & Tinker, J. L. The connection between galaxies and their dark matter halos. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 56<\/b>, 435\u2013487 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. Coevolution (or not) of supermassive black holes and host galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51<\/b>, 511\u2013653 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zakamska, N. L. & Greene, J. E. Quasar feedback and the origin of radio emission in radio-quiet quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 442<\/b>, 784\u2013804 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liu, W. et al. First results from the JWST early release science program Q3D: the fast outflow in a red quasar at z = 0.44. Astrophys. J. 980<\/b>, 31 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rupke, D. S. N. & Veilleux, S. The multiphase structure and power sources of galactic winds in major mergers. Astrophys. J. 768<\/b>, 75 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Marshall, M. A. et al. JWST\u2019s PEARLS: a z = 6 quasar in a train-wreck galaxy merger system. Astron. Astrophys. 702<\/b>, A174 (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vayner, A. et al. Powerful nuclear outflows and circumgalactic medium shocks driven by the most luminous quasar in the Universe. Astrophys. J. 989<\/b>, 230 (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bischetti, M. et al. The WISSH quasars project. I. Powerful ionised outflows in hyper-luminous quasars. Astron. Astrophys. 598<\/b>, A122 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mingozzi, M. et al. The MAGNUM survey: different gas properties in the outflowing and disc components in nearby active galaxies with MUSE. Astron. Astrophys. 622<\/b>, A146 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liu, G., Zakamska, N. L., Greene, J. E., Nesvadba, N. P. H. & Liu, X. Observations of feedback from radio-quiet quasars – II. Kinematics of ionized gas nebulae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436<\/b>, 2576\u20132597 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Harrison, C. M., Alexander, D. M., Mullaney, J. R. & Swinbank, A. M. Kiloparsec-scale outflows are prevalent among luminous AGN: outflows and feedback in the context of the overall AGN population. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441<\/b>, 3306\u20133347 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nakajima, K. et al. JWST census for the mass-metallicity star formation relations at z = 4-10 with self-consistent flux calibration and proper metallicity calibrators. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 269<\/b>, 33 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Carnall, A. C. et al. A massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.658. Nature 619, 716\u2013719 (2023). Article\u00a0 ADS\u00a0…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":472671,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[270],"tags":[9697,18,40871,1099,19,17,1100,133,451],"class_list":{"0":"post-472670","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-space","8":"tag-early-universe","9":"tag-eire","10":"tag-galaxies-and-clusters","11":"tag-humanities-and-social-sciences","12":"tag-ie","13":"tag-ireland","14":"tag-multidisciplinary","15":"tag-science","16":"tag-space"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/116532452152385309","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=472670"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472670\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/472671"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=472670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=472670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=472670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}