{"id":475360,"date":"2026-05-08T21:39:12","date_gmt":"2026-05-08T21:39:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/475360\/"},"modified":"2026-05-08T21:39:12","modified_gmt":"2026-05-08T21:39:12","slug":"composite-artemis-ii-animation-shows-just-how-much-stuff-is-in-low-earth-orbit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/475360\/","title":{"rendered":"Composite Artemis II Animation Shows Just How Much Stuff Is in Low Earth Orbit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We often hear about the number of objects that are whizzing around our planet, but it\u2019s rare that we actually get to see the situation for ourselves. NASA released a decent <a href=\"https:\/\/svs.gsfc.nasa.gov\/5258\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">visualization<\/a> a couple of years ago, but the recent Artemis II mission provided an unexpected first-hand glimpse of just how crowded low Earth orbit is getting.<\/p>\n<p>Along with a bunch of <a href=\"https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/nasa-released-a-massive-trove-of-artemis-2-images-here-are-gizmodos-favorites-2000754754\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">stunning photos<\/a> of the moon, the Artemis II mission captured a heap of images of the Earth. Those images include a bunch of small points of light near the Earth. At first glance, it\u2019s easy to mistake them for stars\u2014especially in a single still image\u2014but as various users on the Artemis <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/ArtemisProgram\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">subreddit<\/a> were delighted to discover, some are in fact satellites in low Earth orbit. And happily, there are enough photos taken in rapid succession that you can string them together to create an animation.<\/p>\n<p>One particularly striking example of such an animation was <a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/theseaning.bsky.social\/post\/3ml7vni47a22g\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">posted by Se\u00e1n Doran on Bluesky<\/a>. In it, you can clearly see a bunch of tiny objects in orbit around the Earth, their surfaces gleaming as they catch the light of the sun.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s unclear exactly what these objects are, but the fact that there are so many visible in only a couple of seconds of composite footage really drives home just how much manmade orbital material there is. The numbers vary depending on which source you use\u2014as of the date of publication, CelesTrak\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/celestrak.org\/satcat\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">satellite catalog<\/a> listed 15,731 active satellites, along with 2,915 dead ones, 2,269 rocket bodies, 12,518 pieces of debris and 51 unknown thingamajigs for a total of 33,484 objects in orbit; the similar Kayhan <a href=\"https:\/\/www.satcat.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">SATCAT<\/a> listed a total of 36,899, and the US Space Force\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.space-track.org\/auth\/login\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">estimate<\/a> is even higher, at 50,600 objects. The majority is in low Earth orbit (LEO), i.e., <a href=\"https:\/\/www.earthdata.nasa.gov\/learn\/earth-observation-data-basics\/orbits\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">less than 2,000 km<\/a> from the surface.<\/p>\n<p>The number is increasing, too. This <a href=\"https:\/\/ourworldindata.org\/grapher\/space-objects-by-orbit\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">visualization<\/a>, which is based on Space Force data and excludes debris, suggests that the number of objects in low Earth orbit has nearly tripled since the start of the decade, increasing from 6,068 in 2020 to 16,084 today.<\/p>\n<p>By pretty much every metric, then, there\u2019s a whole lot of junk up there already, and there\u2019s more arriving every day. This is a problem. Every time we launch a rocket, we have to calculate a window that will ensure that there\u2019s no risk of intersecting with a piece of junk, let alone a satellite\u2014at LEO altitudes, objects orbiting the earth travel at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.esa.int\/ESA_Multimedia\/Images\/2020\/03\/Low_Earth_orbit\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">around<\/a> 7.8 meters per second, or 17,550 mph, making even tiny pieces of debris extremely dangerous. Such a fragment of debris could cause severe damage to a launch, and any significant collision would be catastrophic.<\/p>\n<p>Aerospace.org provides a <a href=\"https:\/\/aerospace.org\/article\/space-debris-101\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">frankly terrifying description<\/a> of what an on-orbit collision would be like: \u201cA hyper-velocity collision like those at orbital speed doesn\u2019t behave like collisions that we are used to seeing. The objects are moving so fast that they travel through each other faster than the shock waves can travel\u2026 [and the result] looks more like an explosion of each object, as if they passed through each other and exploded on the other side.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The same piece contains a handy table of the kinetic energy of the impact of various objects, from one the same size as a poppy seed (.0003 kg of TNT, or a pitched baseball) to one the size of a football field (up to 1013 kg TNT, or a \u201cvery large bomb\u201d, which feels like something of an understatement: it\u2019s the equivalent of 200 Tsar Bombas or 10 <a href=\"https:\/\/thebulletin.org\/2021\/11\/the-untold-story-of-the-worlds-biggest-nuclear-bomb\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Project Sundials<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>So, yeah. This is a beautiful view of our planet, but it\u2019s also mildly terrifying.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"We often hear about the number of objects that are whizzing around our planet, but it\u2019s rare that&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":475361,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[270],"tags":[127958,18,19,17,6144,133,451],"class_list":{"0":"post-475360","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-space","8":"tag-artemis-ii","9":"tag-eire","10":"tag-ie","11":"tag-ireland","12":"tag-satellites","13":"tag-science","14":"tag-space"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/116541126640023707","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/475360","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=475360"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/475360\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/475361"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=475360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=475360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=475360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}