{"id":483401,"date":"2026-05-13T23:49:14","date_gmt":"2026-05-13T23:49:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/483401\/"},"modified":"2026-05-13T23:49:14","modified_gmt":"2026-05-13T23:49:14","slug":"bank-of-ireland-discourteous-to-supreme-court-the-irish-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/483401\/","title":{"rendered":"Bank of Ireland \u2018discourteous\u2019 to Supreme Court \u2013 The Irish Times"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/bank-of-ireland\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/bank-of-ireland\/\">Bank of Ireland<\/a> was discourteous and imprudent by failing to tell the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/supreme-court\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/supreme-court\/\">Supreme Court<\/a> that it had sold a \u20ac200,000 loan at the centre of an appeal, according to Chief Justice Donal O\u2019Donnell.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The Supreme Court rejected an appeal by Brian Murray of Killybegs, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/donegal\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/donegal\/\">Co Donegal<\/a>, that he repay \u20ac132,355 to Bank of Ireland against a \u20ac200,000 loan secured on their home given to his wife Attracta Murray.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">However, Bank of Ireland was \u201cboth discourteous and imprudent\u201d not to tell the State\u2019s highest court that it had agreed to sell the Murrays\u2019 loan to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/pepper-finance\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/pepper-finance\/\">Pepper Finance<\/a> two days before a hearing relating to the appeal on December 5th, 2024, O\u2019Donnell\u2019s ruling states.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The bank was discourteous as it failed to tell the court of a deal affecting the loan and which could have affected the appeal, the Chief Justice said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">Bank of Ireland ought to have anticipated that the court would want to be told of the transaction, and to have ensured that Murray was informed, so he could make any submissions that he considered appropriate, his ruling added.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The lender was imprudent as it could have avoided extra \u201celaborate\u201d proceedings had it told the Supreme Court of the sale, O\u2019Donnell noted, saying it might be reasonable for the costs to reflect this.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" class=\"c-image audio_image\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1776101724_424_1754647931518-c07d65db-55b5-463e-ae51-976300c5837e.jpeg\"\/>Could we be heading toward a world recession if Trump can\u2019t broker a deal with Iran?<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">However, he disagreed with Murray\u2019s claim that Bank of Ireland was reckless and guilty of abuse of process. The lender did not comment on Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">Details of the bank\u2019s sale of the loan to Pepper emerged only last year after the Supreme Court had heard Murray\u2019s appeal and upheld lower courts\u2019 findings that he had to repay \u20ac132,355 of the original loan amount.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">Murray\u2019s lawyers asked the court to set aside the judgment for a rehearing of some aspects of the case.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The bank\u2019s failure to disclose the sale prevented Murray from arguing that its transfer eliminated its loss and so prevented the lender from bringing its claim against him, they said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">Murray is a full-time fisherman and spends long periods at sea. Attracta Murray borrowed \u20ac240,000 in total in 2003 and 2007, secured on the family home, without his knowledge.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">Repayments stopped in 2012 and the bank began proceedings to recover its debt the following year.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">It emerged that Brian Murray never signed any loan agreements or other documents required by consumer credit law, although his signature appeared on those materials.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The courts accepted Murray\u2019s case that he did not sign any documents relating to the mortgage and that he had no contract with Bank of Ireland as a result.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">However, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/high-court\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/high-court\/\">High Court<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/court-of-appeal\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/court-of-appeal\/\">Court of Appeal<\/a> found that as he had benefited from the money, the bank was entitled to recover \u20ac132,355 from him for \u201cunjust enrichment\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">As both husband and wife are liable for the debt, together and individually, the bank also obtained judgment against Attracta Murray for \u20ac202,000.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">Once Pepper took over the loan, giving it the right to seek its repayment, Murray argued that the bank\u2019s claim for \u201cunjust enrichment\u201d was no longer valid.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">However, O\u2019Donnell maintained that irrespective of this, the fact remained that Murray still benefited from money transferred to the couple\u2019s joint account.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">He also said it was not possible for Bank of Ireland and Pepper to obtain the full amounts of both judgments against the couple. Credit would have to be given to either Brian or Attracta Murray for any money paid by the other, he added.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bank of Ireland was discourteous and imprudent by failing to tell the Supreme Court that it had sold&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":483402,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[73],"tags":[625,79,21031,6368,18,10476,19,17,99254,2324],"class_list":{"0":"post-483401","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-business","8":"tag-bank-of-ireland","9":"tag-business","10":"tag-court-of-appeal","11":"tag-donegal","12":"tag-eire","13":"tag-high-court","14":"tag-ie","15":"tag-ireland","16":"tag-pepper-finance","17":"tag-supreme-court"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/116569949170917758","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/483401","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=483401"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/483401\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/483402"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=483401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=483401"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=483401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}