{"id":484363,"date":"2026-05-14T13:50:19","date_gmt":"2026-05-14T13:50:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/484363\/"},"modified":"2026-05-14T13:50:19","modified_gmt":"2026-05-14T13:50:19","slug":"why-we-should-thank-einstein-for-our-smartphone-cameras","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/484363\/","title":{"rendered":"Why we should thank Einstein for our smartphone cameras"},"content":{"rendered":"

Learn more about how the photoelectric effect has shaped technologies such as burglar alarms, solar panels and the camera in your smartphone.<\/p>\n

The engineer picked up a camera flash gun, aimed it at the tiny circuit board computer on the desk, and fired. For a fraction of a second, light flooded the room. Everyone blinked \u2013 and saw that the computer had crashed.<\/p>\n

\nThe Raspberry Pi team had just confirmed that their product, a budget computer sold to schools and electronics enthusiasts, hated having its picture taken. At least when you took the picture with a big xenon flash lamp.\n<\/p>\n

\"RaspberryThe Raspberry Pi 2 (model B.)\u00a0Evan-Amos, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons<\/p>\n

\u201cWe all had fun crashing it,\u201d recalls Eben Upton, founder of Raspberry Pi. They had realised that a chip on the computer was susceptible to the photoelectric effect \u2013 when light triggers the release of electrons, and thus an electrical current. A kind of reverse \u201clight switch\u201d, if you like.<\/p>\n

Upton and his colleagues had not anticipated this problem. It was discovered by a Raspberry Pi 2 user less than a week after the device went on sale in early 2015. In subsequent versions of the computer, the troublesome chip featured a black coating thick enough to soak up incoming light.<\/p>\n

More than a century earlier, Albert Einstein<\/a> had described the photoelectric effect in a ground-breaking paper \u2013 one of four seminal papers he published in 1905 while working as a clerk in the Swiss patent office. Later, in 1921, he received the Nobel Prize in Physics <\/a>for it.<\/p>\n

The photoelectric effect has gone on to shape all kinds of technologies \u2013 from burglar alarms to solar panels and the camera in your smartphone.<\/p>\n

\u2018Weird phenomena\u2019<\/p>\n

\"AlbertAlbert Einstein lecturing in Vienna, 1921.\u00a0Photo: Ferdinand Schmutzer. Public domain via Wikimedia Commons<\/p>\n

To understand it better, consider the question that gripped Einstein back in 1905: what is light made of?<\/p>\n

At the time, many scientists theorised that light existed purely as a wave, which some suggested travelled across the universe in an intangible \u201clight-bearing ether\u201d. But to Einstein, this idea seemed ridiculous \u2013 \u201clike Father Christmas\u201d, says Steve Gimbel at Gettysburg College in the US.<\/p>\n

Scientists including Heinrich Hertz had already demonstrated versions of the photoelectric effect by using light to generate tiny sparks, or to electrically charge pieces of gold leaf, causing them to repel each other.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere were certain weird, unexplained phenomena where light could create electricity and that just blew people\u2019s minds \u2013 that seemed to make no sense,\u201d says Gimbel.<\/p>\n

\"IllustrationIn the electromagnetic spectrum, visible light sits between infrared and ultraviolet radiation.\u00a0Credit: BBC<\/p>\n

The weirdest thing was that the intensity of light didn\u2019t affect the energy of the electrons produced whereas the frequency, or colour, of the light did. This was mind-boggling. More light should mean more energy, right?<\/p>\n

Well, Einstein realised that if light wasn\u2019t just made up of waves but also discrete packets or particles (which later came to be known as photons) travelling in waves, then it could be that the energy of those individual particles would explain this.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen a single photon hits an electron, it [the electron] gets excited,\u201d explains Paul Davies, at the University of York. So long as that photon lands with enough energy, then the photoelectric effect occurs \u2013 and the electron is freed from the material.<\/p>\n

Think of it like throwing tiny sticks of dynamite into an open barrel of cannonballs. The little explosions won\u2019t be enough to knock out a cannonball, no matter how many times you fling one in. But if you use stronger dynamite, with more energy, that will make the cannonballs fly.<\/p>\n

The energy value of a photon is directly related to the colour of visible light \u2013 photons in blue light travel on shorter waves and have more energy than those in red light, for instance. That\u2019s why Hertz found that especially energetic ultraviolet light would produce stronger sparks during one of his experiments.<\/p>\n

Foghorns and photovoltaic cells<\/p>\n

Gimbel stresses that Einstein didn\u2019t come up with this theory out of nowhere. He drew not only on work by Hertz and others, but also on physicist Max Planck<\/a>\u2019s theory of \u201cquanta\u201d \u2013 the idea that radiation, including light, consists of discrete packets of energy, for which Planck also received a Nobel Prize in Physics<\/a>, in 1918. But in 1905 this concept was still controversial.<\/p>\n

\"NobelFrom left to right: Nobel Prize laureates Walther Nernst, Albert Einstein, Max Planck, Robert A. Millikan and Max von Laue at a dinner given by von Laue in Berlin, 11 November 1931.\u00a0Nationaal Archief, Photographer unknown, Public domain via Wikimedia Commons<\/p>\n

\u201cEinstein had this revolutionary mind where he was willing to consider other approaches,\u201d says Gimbel. \u201cHe took seriously this idea that light could be quantised.\u201d<\/p>\n

\nEinstein\u2019s work was divisive \u2013 especially his special theory of relativity. Some members of the Nobel physics committee at the time hesitated to award him a prize and, when they did, they chose to award it for his work on the photoelectric effect, rather than relativity.\n<\/p>\n

Scientists have long debated whether this was the best choice but there is little doubt that harnessing the photoelectric effect has changed the way our world works, since so many technologies rely on it.<\/p>\n

Motion sensors in burglar alarm systems, for example, emit a beam of infrared light. When this beam is interrupted by an intruder, the light received by the sensor changes, altering the electrical current \u2013 and that sets off the alarm.<\/p>\n

\"IllustrationTechnologies like photo and image sensors rely on the photoelectric effect.\u00a0Credit: Getty Images<\/p>\n

Finish lines at races held in the Olympic Games have used photoelectric cells to detect exactly when runners cross. Such technology has allowed ships to sense fog, and automatically switch on foghorns. It has also enabled cars to turn on their windscreen wipers spontaneously when it rains.<\/p>\n

Strictly speaking, the photoelectric effect refers to a phenomenon in which electrons escape a material \u2013 but Davies says this is closely related to the photovoltaic effect, where movement of electrons facilitates an electrical current flowing through adjacent materials.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s what solar cells in solar panels do when they turn sunlight into electricity, contributing clean, renewable energy to electricity grids and tackling climate change.<\/p>\n

Silicon sensors<\/p>\n

Another popular application of the photoelectric effect is in camera sensors, the light-sensitive part of a digital camera that captures images. Nearly all use CMOS technology, which was fine-tuned at Nasa in the 1990s for use in space, but came to be installed on billions of smartphones. \u201cThe CMOS image sensor was the perfect device, let\u2019s say, for that. It turned out to be the killer application,\u201d says engineer Eric Fossum, who worked on the project.<\/p>\n

Silicon is the key material used in CMOS sensors and Fossum, now at Dartmouth College, notes that the photoelectric effect in silicon is triggered by many colours of light.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt doesn\u2019t matter whether it\u2019s green light, red light, or blue light \u2013 a photon will liberate exactly one electron. We\u2019re kind of lucky that way.\u201d This really helps when you want to capture a subject\u2019s colour in full detail.<\/p>\n

\"CMOSMost smartphone cameras use CMOS sensors.\u00a0Credit: Getty Images\/BBC<\/p>\n

Now, Fossum and colleagues are working on image sensors sensitive to the smallest imaginable amount of light \u2013 a single photon. These devices, also known as photon-counters, are already used for laboratory experiments but they could also revolutionise digital imaging technologies, for example by improving image quality in medical CT scanners, and exposing patients to less radiation. The potential applications don\u2019t stop there. \u201cWe\u2019ll have the capability to practically see in the dark with this new technology,\u201d says Fossum.<\/p>\n

Another scientist working on devices that harness the photoelectric effect is Dimitra Georgiadou at the University of Southampton. She and her colleagues are developing technologies that can detect light and process information about it without having to send data to a central computer system for analysis. \u201cThis reduces significantly the amount of energy it needs,\u201d says Georgiadou.<\/p>\n

This might help researchers develop highly advanced bionic eyes and give sight to blind people by enabling the design of smaller, easier to implant, and more energy-efficient devices. It could also enable self-driving cars to make faster decisions about when to brake for safety reasons.<\/p>\n

Lunar glow<\/p>\n

The light-sensing technology Georgiadou is focused on does not rely on silicon but rather organic, carbon-containing, materials \u2013 these can be tuned to respond only to specific colours of light, and also printed on flexible substrates.<\/p>\n

Such technology could turn up in wearable, low-power light sensors able to track the heart rate and blood oxygen levels of premature babies, for example, by shining small amounts of light through their skin and into their veins.<\/p>\n

Since Einstein wrote down his theory on the photoelectric effect in 1905, we\u2019ve certainly come up with a lot of fun things to do with it. But there\u2019s more. Understanding this incredible interaction of light and matter has revealed curious details about the way the universe works.<\/p>\n

In the 1960s, some of the earliest moon landers took pictures of the lunar horizon and noticed something strange: a weird glow, almost like a gently fading sunset. Except that the moon doesn\u2019t have an atmosphere like Earth\u2019s, and it\u2019s the scattering of light by particles in our atmosphere that creates sunrises and sunsets as the planet turns on its axis.<\/p>\n

Where was this lunar glow coming from? It turned out that light from the sun was striking dust on the moon\u2019s surface and, through the photoelectric effect, giving it a positive electrical charge.<\/p>\n

These little dust particles thus repelled each other, periodically levitating above the lunar surface. As they did so, they caught the light of the recently set sun \u2013 and created that magical glow.<\/p>\n

By Chris Baraniuk, BBC World Service. This content was created as a co-production between Nobel Prize Outreach and the BBC.<\/p>\n

Published May 2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Learn more about how the photoelectric effect has shaped technologies such as burglar alarms, solar panels and the…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":484364,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[271],"tags":[18,19,17,452,133],"class_list":{"0":"post-484363","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-eire","9":"tag-ie","10":"tag-ireland","11":"tag-physics","12":"tag-science"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/116573257416164898","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/484363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=484363"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/484363\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/484364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=484363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=484363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=484363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}