{"id":522405,"date":"2026-06-06T23:27:16","date_gmt":"2026-06-06T23:27:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/522405\/"},"modified":"2026-06-06T23:27:16","modified_gmt":"2026-06-06T23:27:16","slug":"the-loyalty-gap-garmin-and-coros-owners-most-likely-to-switch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/522405\/","title":{"rendered":"The Loyalty Gap: Garmin and Coros Owners Most Likely to Switch"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"CCS<\/p>\n

A new consumer survey puts a number on something the sports watch industry has probably suspected for a while. Nearly 56% of smartwatch owners say they are open to switching brands. Among Apple Watch owners, that figure drops to 38%. Garmin and Coros owners sit well above that<\/strong> \u2013 more willing to switch than any other major sports watch brand.<\/p>\n

The data comes from CCS Insight\u2019s Boost Survey: Wearables<\/a>, published May 2026, covering 1,810 smartwatch owners and users across Germany, Spain, the UK, the US and India.<\/p>\n

The loyalty gap has a straightforward explanation. Apple Watch owners are buying into a phone ecosystem, a health platform, an app library, and a payments system. Switching watch brands means friction across all of those. The cost of leaving is high.<\/p>\n

Garmin and Coros owners face no equivalent switching cost. Their watches talk to third-party platforms. Strava, TrainingPeaks, and Komoot do not care which watch you wear. A Garmin user eyeing a Coros Pace 4, an Apple Watch Ultra, or a Polar Vantage 3 faces an ever-smaller ecosystem penalty for moving. The watch is the product. Nothing else locks them into the downstream analytic and social tools.<\/p>\n

That is a structural problem for the sports watch brands.<\/strong> They compete on hardware and software features in a market where customers have every reason to shop around. Every product cycle is a retention event. Miss on battery life, GPS accuracy, training load metrics, or price, and the door is open.<\/p>\n

Apple only needs to be good enough<\/strong> in sports. The Ultra has closed most of the functional gap with dedicated sports watches for most endurance athletes who are not at the sharp end of performance. For that user, the switching cost calculation runs firmly in Apple\u2019s favour.<\/p>\n

This site has argued at length that the structural cracks in Garmin\u2019s empire are already visible<\/a>. The CCS Insight loyalty data adds consumer evidence to that argument. It is one thing to identify strategic vulnerabilities at the business level. It is another to see them reflected in the willingness of actual customers to walk or, at least, to talk about walking.<\/p>\n

The survey findings also have implications for how sports brands should think about new features. Ecosystem depth \u2014 connecting the watch more tightly to proprietary coaching platforms, health services, or third-party integrations \u2014 is one of the few levers available. Garmin Connect, Garmin Coach, and the Connect IQ platform are moves in that direction. So is Coros\u2019s decision to open its data to AI platforms via MCP<\/a> \u2014 a bet that deeper data access creates stickiness. Neither brand has yet to create the kind of lock-in that keeps a customer as well as Apple.<\/p>\n

The 56% overall switching intention figure is also a market opportunity.<\/strong> More than half of smartwatch owners are, in principle, available. The brands that articulate a clear reason to switch, and remove the friction of doing so, stand to gain.<\/p>\n

For Garmin and Coros, the loyalty data is a warning. For Apple, it is confirmation that the ecosystem strategy is working exactly as intended.<\/p>\n

What the Data Shows<\/p>\n