{"id":533659,"date":"2026-06-13T18:19:13","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T18:19:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/533659\/"},"modified":"2026-06-13T18:19:13","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T18:19:13","slug":"my-first-24-hours-with-siri-ai-on-the-mac","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/533659\/","title":{"rendered":"My first 24 hours with Siri AI on the Mac"},"content":{"rendered":"

I turned off Siri on the Mac years ago and never looked back. Similarly, I found Apple Intelligence so fruitless I never engage with it. But the new Siri AI coming to macOS 27 Golden Gate has at least got me slightly rethinking things.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m still early in testing Siri AI, as I\u2019ve only had access to it in the macOS 27 developer beta for little more than 24 hours. It\u2019s also in an early preview state on the dev beta, so there should be lots of runway for improvements before it releases later this year. I don\u2019t even know if it\u2019s done indexing my files and folders on our review unit M5 MacBook Air<\/a> and M5 Max MacBook Pro<\/a>. Unlike on the iOS 27 dev beta, there\u2019s no \u201cindexing in progress\u201d box in the settings page. I asked Siri if it could tell me, but it told me to click a button in Settings that isn\u2019t there.<\/p>\n

My colleagues got a headstart testing Siri AI on the iPhone<\/a> and Apple Watch<\/a>, and getting a read on its general vibe<\/a>, and they\u2019ve so far had some positive feedback from using it. My feelings are a little more mixed.<\/p>\n

\"A<\/a><\/p>\n

A frequent reminder that Siri AI is in early preview on a macOS developer beta. I get a fair amount of these.<\/p>\n

When I sit down at a laptop I don\u2019t need a voice assistant for searching things I\u2019m randomly curious about or checking the weather like I would on a phone; I can do that faster and more accurately with keyboard and mouse. So I tried to think of ways to let Siri AI help me on macOS \u2014 things that might actually be useful to me in my everyday work.<\/p>\n

I\u2019d be happy to automate some of the time-consuming benchmarking I do when reviewing laptops, but although Siri AI can launch apps, it can\u2019t take actions inside them (not that Apple ever claimed it could). I then tried to see if vibe coding a couple Shortcuts<\/a> could get me there instead. This isn\u2019t a Siri AI feature, but it is a new part of Apple Intelligence. I asked Shortcuts to run a test in either Geekbench or Cinebench, capture the results in a screenshot, wait a few minutes, and repeat the process two more times. But the resulting automations couldn\u2019t actually run the tests either. Apple Intelligence made a shortcut that opened Geekbench and took screenshots (but forgot about actually running the benchmark), and it made a Cinebench shortcut that had \u201cWait for you to run the test\u201d as an actual step. Maybe if developers continue expanding App Intents<\/a> this could one day work.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Something important is missing here.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

This Shortcut feels passive aggressive.<\/p>\n

So if Siri can\u2019t help me run my benchmarks, maybe it can at least help me be a little faster in logging the data. In my normal workflow, I run each benchmark three times, taking screenshots as I go, and later average out the results before cataloging them in a spreadsheet. Apple\u2019s WWDC keynote showed someone using Ask Siri in Spotlight to analyze data in local files. So I tried selecting batches of those screenshots in Finder and asking Siri to calculate the average scores for me. It worked pretty well \u2014 most of the time.<\/p>\n

It was smart enough to distinguish single-core CPU scores from multicore CPU scores and GPU scores, average the test results, and arrange them in easy-to-read tables. But it could get thrown off if I included screenshots of too many different types of tests, especially if I mixed ones with synthetic score results (Geekbench, PugetBench, etc.) and time-based results (Blender render tests and our 4K video export test). And it sometimes got thrown off by the CPU rankings data that\u2019s visible in Cinebench screenshots. Ideally, I\u2019d be able to have Siri AI accurately calculate the 15 or so averages from my dozens of screenshots all at once \u2014 that would save me some serious time. But for now, it can at best only help me a little bit. And unless it gets better I\u2019m still inclined to continue doing it all myself, especially since Siri messed up the numbers a couple times by pulling the wrong data.<\/p>\n

1\/6<\/strong>Ask Siri is at the top of the right-click menu for macOS 27 Golden Gate.<\/p>\n

So far, Siri AI seems a lot more capable within Apple\u2019s ecosystem than it is outside of it, even for apps and files that are already on my Mac but in non-Apple apps. When I asked Siri to find my pictures of cats or babies, it pulled up results from Apple\u2019s Photos and Messages apps. This could be enough for plenty of people, but not for me. Most of my messaging is done in Signal, and photos from my phone are uploaded to Google Photos, not iCloud. Siri also missed the thousands of images I have in my Lightroom Classic catalog, even though the files are stored locally in the Pictures folder and I kept asking it to access them directly. It\u2019s possible those files haven\u2019t been indexed yet, but I have no way to tell.<\/p>\n

For now, I\u2019m getting similar vibes to when I tested Copilot Vision last year<\/a>. Like Copilot Vision, you can use Siri\u2019s Visual Intelligence to ask questions about things on your screen. And like Copilot, it\u2019s limited. I asked Siri to evaluate benchmark results on a spreadsheet in Google Sheets, but it can\u2019t see all the data if it\u2019s not visible onscreen all at once. I could get it to see the whole spreadsheet by downloading it as an Excel file and pointing Siri at it in Finder, but when I asked for the laptop with the highest single-core Geekbench score it gave me multicore data. Not great.<\/p>\n

\"No,<\/a><\/p>\n

No, Siri, those are not single core scores. And those columns could not be more clearly labeled.<\/p>\n

I opened Siri while running Lightroom Classic, on a black-and-white photo from my Ricoh GR IV Monochrome review<\/a>, and asked Siri how to make it look more like a shot from street photographer Alan Schaller<\/a>. Siri offered specific value adjustments for exposure, contrast, and so on, and adjusting those values gave me a decent result. Unfortunately, when I asked Siri to judge the result, it went sycophant on me, saying I\u2019d nailed the look and achieved an \u201calmost timeless feel,\u201d which is the type of behavior Apple says it\u2019s not supposed to show. (I thought we were past this.)<\/p>\n

Then I uploaded a classic Garry Winograd<\/a> photo and asked how to change my Lightroom settings to match that photo; Siri recommended I set the exposure to the value it was already at. So, some hits and some misses.<\/p>\n

\"This<\/a><\/p>\n

This was an image that just barely made the cut in my Ricoh GR IV Monochrome review, but I guess Siri isn\u2019t going to tell me that my photos are mid at best.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s still very early days for Siri AI, and much can change between now and the final release. But what\u2019s clear already is that the experience is likely to be very different on an iPhone, where so much of your data is held inside Apple\u2019s apps, and on a Mac, where you\u2019re likely to be bouncing between all kinds of apps and ecosystems in ways that limit what Siri can do. Even so, it\u2019s faint praise, but this is still the most useful and helpful Siri has been. It\u2019s baby\u2019s first real AI steps for Apple.<\/p>\n

Follow topics and authors<\/strong> from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.<\/p>\n