{"id":566536,"date":"2026-07-03T07:22:14","date_gmt":"2026-07-03T07:22:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/566536\/"},"modified":"2026-07-03T07:22:14","modified_gmt":"2026-07-03T07:22:14","slug":"spacex-might-be-the-most-valuable-money-losing-company-in-market-history-should-investors-care","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/566536\/","title":{"rendered":"SpaceX Might Be the Most Valuable Money-Losing Company in Market History. Should Investors Care?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

SpaceX<\/strong> (NASDAQ: SPCX) went public on June 12 at $135 per share, raising $75 billion in the largest initial public offering (IPO) in history. Three weeks later, the rocket, satellite-internet, and artificial intelligence (AI)<\/a> company commands a market capitalization of about $2.1 trillion. Only a handful of companies have ever been worth that much — and every one of them earned billions in profits when it got there. <\/p>\n

SpaceX<\/a> is different. Across 2025 and the first quarter of 2026, its reported losses add up to a trailing net loss of about $9.4 billion, set against roughly $19.3 billion in trailing revenue. <\/p>\n

Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again.<\/strong>\u00a0In 2009, a “Double Down” signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia.\u00a0For the first time in years, that same “Total Conviction” signal is flashing for a company 1\/100th the size of Nvidia.\u00a0Continue \u00bb<\/strong><\/a> <\/p>\n

That combination raises a question worth answering before the company joins the Nasdaq-100 on July 7 — an event that will make index funds automatic buyers of the stock. Has a money-losing business ever been valued this highly? And if it hasn’t, should investors care? <\/p>\n

\"A<\/a> Image source: Getty Images. A price arguably without precedent <\/p>\n

Start with the historical check. The market has valued unprofitable companies richly before, but the previous standard-bearers operated on a different scale entirely. Rivian<\/strong>, the electric-truck maker, briefly commanded a market value of about $150 billion in late 2021 while deeply unprofitable — and that stood out as extreme at the time. Uber<\/strong> ran years of losses with a valuation that topped out around $100 billion. Amazon<\/strong>, the dot-com era’s favorite money-loser, was worth only tens of billions back when it was losing money. <\/p>\n

SpaceX’s $2.1 trillion is roughly 14 times the Rivian benchmark. I can’t find a money-losing company in market history that has come anywhere close. So it’s safe to say that SpaceX appears to be the most valuable unprofitable company the market has ever seen. <\/p>\n

Now, the loss itself deserves a closer look, because it isn’t the loss of a struggling business. According to the company’s IPO prospectus, SpaceX — whose filings also include xAI, the AI business it absorbed — generated $18.7 billion of revenue in 2025, up 33% year over year, and lost $4.9 billion. Then it lost another $4.28 billion in the first quarter of 2026. <\/p>\n

But the composition matters. Starlink, the satellite-internet business, produced $11.4 billion of 2025 revenue — about 61% of the total — and generated $4.4 billion in operating profit. The losses come from everything surrounding it: about $3 billion a year of research and development spending on the Starship rocket program, plus the enormous computing costs of the AI operation. In plain terms, one highly profitable business is funding two gigantic bets. <\/p>\n

Story Continues <\/p>\n

What a $2.1 trillion price tag demands <\/p>\n

What makes the record more than trivia is what it implies about expectations. At about $2.1 trillion, SpaceX trades at more than 100 times its trailing revenue — not its earnings, its revenue. A price like that requires nearly everything to go right: Starlink must keep compounding for years, Starship must eventually turn its development spending into dramatically cheaper access to space, and the AI bet must justify losses that are widening, not narrowing. The $75 billion raised in the IPO buys time, but it doesn’t change what has to happen. <\/p>\n

Fresh evidence is coming. SpaceX hasn’t yet announced the date of its first earnings report as a public company, but that report — expected this summer — will offer the first new numbers since the prospectus, including whether Starlink’s growth and margins are holding up and how fast the Starship and AI spending is scaling. <\/p>\n

The answer to the headline question, then, is yes: Investors should care — not because losses disqualify a stock, but because of the expectations this price locks in. Amazon lost money for years and became one of the great investments of all time. The difference is that Amazon’s doubters could buy it for tens of billions. SpaceX asks investors to pay a price that already assumes the bets pay off, from a company that has yet to file a single quarterly report as a publicly traded company, with fortunes still closely tied to CEO Elon Musk. <\/p>\n

Personally, I’ll let the first few earnings reports answer the questions the prospectus can’t. Records are fascinating. That doesn’t make them buyable. <\/p>\n

Should you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies right now? <\/p>\n

Before you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies, consider this: <\/p>\n

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the\u00a010 best stocks<\/strong><\/a> for investors to buy now\u2026 and Space Exploration Technologies wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. <\/p>\n

Consider when Netflix<\/strong> made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation,\u00a0you’d have $400,101<\/strong>!* Or when Nvidia<\/strong> made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,212,683<\/strong>!* <\/p>\n

Now, it’s worth noting\u00a0Stock Advisor’s total average return is 911% \u2014 a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500.\u00a0Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with\u00a0Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors. <\/p>\n

See the 10 stocks \u00bb<\/strong><\/a> <\/p>\n

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 2, 2026. <\/p>\n

Daniel Sparks<\/a> and his clients have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy<\/a>. <\/p>\n

SpaceX Might Be the Most Valuable Money-Losing Company in Market History. Should Investors Care?<\/a> was originally published by The Motley Fool <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) went public on June 12 at $135 per share, raising $75 billion in the largest…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":566537,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[270],"tags":[1463,18,19,36247,17,22693,138575,133,451,2731],"class_list":["post-566536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-space","tag-amazon","tag-eire","tag-ie","tag-initial-public-offering","tag-ireland","tag-market-capitalization","tag-market-history","tag-science","tag-space","tag-spacex"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/116854846063805734","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/566536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=566536"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/566536\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/566537"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=566536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=566536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=566536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}