{"id":575501,"date":"2026-07-08T18:04:33","date_gmt":"2026-07-08T18:04:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/575501\/"},"modified":"2026-07-08T18:04:33","modified_gmt":"2026-07-08T18:04:33","slug":"people-systematically-under-and-overestimate-public-engagement-in-climate-action","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/575501\/","title":{"rendered":"People systematically under- and overestimate public engagement in climate action"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Stern, P. C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56<\/b>, 407\u2013424 (2000).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50<\/b>, 179\u2013211 (1991).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Farrow, K., Grolleau, G. & Ibanez, L. Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: a review of the evidence. Ecol. Econ. 140<\/b>, 1\u201313 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Helferich, M., Th\u00f8gersen, J. & Bergquist, M. Direct and mediated impacts of social norms on pro-environmental behavior. Glob. Environ. Change 80<\/b>, 102680 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Kalof, L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6<\/b>, 81\u201397 (1999).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bergquist, M., Nilsson Hed, A. & Schultz, W. P. A meta-analysis of field-experiments using social norms to promote pro-environmental behaviors. Glob. Environ. Change 59<\/b>, 101941 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Constantino, S. M. et al. Scaling up change: a critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for climate action. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 23<\/b>, 50\u201397 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schneider, C. R. & van der Linden, S. Social norms as a powerful lever for motivating pro-climate actions. One Earth 6<\/b>, 346\u2013351 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andre, P., Boneva, T., Chopra, F. & Falk, A. Misperceived social norms and willingness to act against climate change. Rev. Econ. Stat. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/rest_a_01468<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andre, P. et al. Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action. Nat. Clim. Change 14<\/b>, 253\u2013259 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Leviston, Z., Walker, I. & Morwinski, S. Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nat. Clim. Change 3<\/b>, 334\u2013337 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mildenberger, M. & Tingley, D. Beliefs about climate beliefs: the importance of second-order opinions for climate politics. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 49<\/b>, 1279\u20131307 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sparkman, G., Geiger, N. & Weber, E. U. Americans experience a false social reality by underestimating popular climate policy support by nearly half. Nat. Commun. 13<\/b>, 4779 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Geiger, S. J. et al. Understanding the role of pluralistic ignorance in biodiversity conservation: a research agenda. Glob. Environ. Change 95<\/b>, 103043 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Geiger, N. & Swim, J. K. Climate of silence: pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. J. Environ. Psychol. 47<\/b>, 79\u201390 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Noelle-Neumann, E. The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion\u2014Our Social Skin. 2nd edn (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1993).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Geiger, S. J. et al. What we think others think and do about climate change: a multicountry test of pluralistic ignorance and public-consensus messaging. Psychol. Sci. 36<\/b>, 421\u2013442 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sevincer, A. T., Hostloesky, L., Styhler, F. & Hofmann, W. Politicians underestimate support for climate action even more than the general public. Preprint at Open Science Framework https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31219\/osf.io\/kav53_v4<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dablander, F., Lange, F., Brick, C. & Aron, A. R. Expressing intentions is not climate action. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122<\/b>, e2512457122 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sheeran, P. & Webb, T. L. The intention\u2013behavior gap. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 10<\/b>, 503\u2013518 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dixon, G., Clarke, C., Jacquet, J., Evensen, D. T. N. & Hart, P. S. The complexity of pluralistic ignorance in Republican climate change policy support in the United States. Commun. Earth Environ. 5<\/b>, 76 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Guay, B., Marghetis, T., Wong, C. & Landy, D. Quirks of cognition explain why we dramatically overestimate the size of minority groups. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122<\/b>, e2413064122 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Landy, D., Guay, B. & Marghetis, T. Bias and ignorance in demographic perception. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25<\/b>, 1606\u20131618 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fennell, J. & Baddeley, R. Uncertainty plus prior equals rational bias: an intuitive Bayesian probability weighting function. Psychol. Rev. 119<\/b>, 878\u2013887 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Betsch, C. et al. Modelling the readiness for climate action across individual and system-related behaviours. Preprint at Open Science Framework https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31219\/osf.io\/enkwy<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Castiglione, A., Brick, C., Holden, S., Miles-Urdan, E. & Aron, A. R. Discovering the psychological building blocks underlying climate action: a longitudinal study of real-world activism. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9<\/b>, 210006 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bechtoldt, M. & Schermelleh-Engel, K. Worry\u2019s clout: concern, not positive affectivity, drives climate activism. J. Environ. Psychol. 101<\/b>, 102517 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pew Research Center. How Americans View Future Harms From Climate Change in Their Community and Around the US. (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Goerg, S., Pondorfer, A. & St\u00f6hr, V. Regional variation in social norm nudges. Sci Rep. 14<\/b>, 16773 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Barnfield, M. et al. Information on public opinion has lasting effects on second-order climate beliefs, but minimal and ephemeral effects on first-order beliefs. J. Environ. Psychol. 110<\/b>, 102901 (2026).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rinscheid, A., Pianta, S. & Weber, E. U. What shapes public support for climate change mitigation policies? The role of descriptive social norms and elite cues. Behav. Public Policy 5<\/b>, 503\u2013527 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vlasceanu, M. et al. Addressing climate change with behavioral science: a global intervention tournament in 63 countries. Sci. Adv. 10<\/b>, eadj5778 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tiede, K. E., Maur, K. & Betsch, C. People systematically under- and overestimate public engagement in climate action. Preregistrations, materials, data, and analytical code. Preprint at Open Science Framework https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/KCQ37<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lange, F. & Dewitte, S. The Work for Environmental Protection Task: a consequential web-based procedure for studying pro-environmental behavior. Behav. Res. Methods 54<\/b>, 133\u2013145 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lange, F. & Dewitte, S. Validity and scope sensitivity of the Work for Environmental Protection Task. J. Environ. Psychol. 86<\/b>, 101967 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lange, F. & Dewitte, S. Behavioral paradigms for studying pro-environmental behavior: a systematic review. Behav. Res. Methods 55<\/b>, 600\u2013622 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lehrer, L. et al. Study protocol of the planetary health action survey PACE: a serial cross-sectional survey to assess the readiness to act against climate change. BMJ Open 14<\/b>, e091093 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lees, J., Colaizzi, G., Goldberg, M. H. & Constantino, S. M. Misperceptions of support for climate policy represent multiple phenomena predicted by different factors across intergroup boundaries. Preprint at Open Science Framework https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31219\/osf.io\/vfbq4<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Poortinga, W. The role of policy appraisals and second-order beliefs in public support for climate policies in the UK. Clim. Policy https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14693062.2025.2539977<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sheeran, P. Intention\u2013behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 12<\/b>, 1\u201336 (2002).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Todorova, B. et al. Machine learning identifies key individual and nation-level factors predicting climate-relevant beliefs and behaviors. npj Clim. Action 4<\/b>, 46 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Drews, S., Savin, I. & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. Biased perceptions of other people\u2019s attitudes to carbon taxation. Energy Policy 167<\/b>, 113051 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. & Griskevicius, V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms: reprise. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13<\/b>, 249\u2013254 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ai, P. & Rosenthal, S. The model of norm-regulated responsibility for proenvironmental behavior in the context of littering prevention. Sci. Rep. 14<\/b>, 9289 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bhanot, S. P. Isolating the effect of injunctive norms on conservation behavior: new evidence from a field experiment in California. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 163<\/b>, 30\u201342 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bonan, J., Cattaneo, C., d\u2019Adda, G. & Tavoni, M. The interaction of descriptive and injunctive social norms in promoting energy conservation. Nat. Energy 5<\/b>, 900\u2013909 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Steiger, A. & K\u00fchberger, A. A meta-analytic re-appraisal of the framing effect. Z. Psychol. 226<\/b>, 1\u201319 (2018).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211<\/b>, 453\u2013458 (1981).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Goldwert, D. & Vlasceanu, M. An individual\u2013collective\u2013systemic behavioral climate intervention framework. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 65<\/b>, 101569 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bergquist, M., Thiel, M., Goldberg, M. H. & van der Linden, S. Field interventions for climate change mitigation behaviors: a second-order meta-analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120<\/b>, e2214851120 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Varotto, A. & Spagnolli, A. Psychological strategies to promote household recycling: a systematic review with meta-analysis of validated field interventions. J. Environ. Psychol. 51<\/b>, 168\u2013188 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Beiser-McGrath, L. F. & Bernauer, T. Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible?. Sci. Adv. 5<\/b>, eaax3323 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Huber, R. A., Wicki, M. L. & Bernauer, T. Public support for environmental policy depends on beliefs concerning effectiveness, intrusiveness, and fairness. Environ. Polit. 29<\/b>, 649\u2013673 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jagers, S. C. et al. Bridging the ideological gap? How fairness perceptions mediate the effect of revenue recycling on public support for carbon taxes in the United States, Canada and Germany. Rev. Policy Res. 38<\/b>, 529\u2013554 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Baranzini, A. et al. Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. WIREs Clim. Change 8<\/b>, e462 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dechezlepr\u00eatre, A. et al. Fighting climate change: international attitudes toward climate policies. Am. Econ. Rev. 115<\/b>, 1258\u20131300 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Maestre-Andr\u00e9s, S., Drews, S. & Savin, I. Carbon tax acceptability with information provision and mixed revenue uses. Nat. Commun. 12<\/b>, 7017 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Aasen, M. & Vatn, A. Public attitudes toward climate policies: the effect of institutional contexts and political values. Ecol. Econ. 146<\/b>, 106\u2013114 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bertolotti, M. & Catellani, P. Bridging the ideological divide: communicating the positive economic impact of climate policy to persuade the right. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 35<\/b>, e70058 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dasandi, N. et al. Positive, global, and health or environment framing bolsters public support for climate policies. Commun. Earth Environ. 3<\/b>, 239 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Reynolds, J. et al. Communicating the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of government policies and their impact on public support: a systematic review with meta-analysis. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7<\/b>, 190522 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tiede, K. E., Temme, H., Lehrer, L. & Betsch, C. Enhancing perceived effectiveness can increase climate policy acceptance. J. Environ. Psychol. 106<\/b>, 102725 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Walker, B. J. A., Kurz, T. & Russel, D. Towards an understanding of when non-climate frames can generate public support for climate change policy. Environ. Behav. 50<\/b>, 781\u2013806 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Levontin, L., Gilad, Z., Durango-Cohen, E. & Durango-Cohen, P. The impact factor: the effect of actual impact information and perceived donation efficacy on donors\u2019 repeated donations. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 118<\/b>, 104720 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. Beyond WEIRD: towards a broad-based behavioral science. Behav. Brain Sci. 33<\/b>, 111\u2013135 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lejarraga, T. & Hertwig, R. How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality. Psychol. Bull. 147<\/b>, 535\u2013564 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Almaatouq, A. et al. Beyond playing 20 questions with nature: integrative experiment design in the social and behavioral sciences. Behav. Brain Sci. 47<\/b>, e33 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Baribault, B. et al. Metastudies for robust tests of theory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115<\/b>, 2607\u20132612 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bryan, C. J., Tipton, E. & Yeager, D. S. Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5<\/b>, 980\u2013989 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    B\u00fcrkner, P.-C. brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80<\/b>, 1\u201328 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Brooks, S. P. & Gelman, A. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 7<\/b>, 434\u2013455 (1998).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gelman, A., Goodrich, B., Gabry, J. & Vehtari, A. R-squared for Bayesian regression models. Am. Stat. 73<\/b>, 307\u2013309 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Stern, P. C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56, 407\u2013424 (2000). Article\u00a0…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":575502,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[269],"tags":[442,6134,74466,12280,33101,18,440,29959,910,19,17,4226,133],"class_list":["post-575501","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-environment","tag-climate-change","tag-climate-change-climate-change-impacts","tag-climate-change-mitigation","tag-communication","tag-decision-making","tag-eire","tag-environment","tag-environmental-law-policy-ecojustice","tag-general","tag-ie","tag-ireland","tag-psychology","tag-science"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/116885682016445688","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/575501","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=575501"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/575501\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/575502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=575501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=575501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=575501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}