{"id":592549,"date":"2026-07-18T20:01:28","date_gmt":"2026-07-18T20:01:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/592549\/"},"modified":"2026-07-18T20:01:28","modified_gmt":"2026-07-18T20:01:28","slug":"jeff-bezos-blue-origin-boosts-employee-pay-to-compete-with-spacex-but-advisor-warns-of-catch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/592549\/","title":{"rendered":"Jeff Bezos&#8217; Blue Origin boosts employee pay to compete with SpaceX\u2014but advisor warns of catch"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The space race is getting more complex. Instead of Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk just trying to one-up each other with space-related projects, they\u2019re trying to land and secure the best talent to make that happen.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To compete with the fact that many SpaceX employees became millionaires following the company\u2019s recent IPO, Blue Origin is <a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/blue-origin-new-employee-stock-option-plan-non-compete-spacex-2026-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/blue-origin-new-employee-stock-option-plan-non-compete-spacex-2026-7\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">reportedly rolling out<\/a> a more generous equity plan after internal backlash over an older scheme that left workers holding effectively worthless options while their counterparts at SpaceX got rich, according to agreements obtained by Business Insider.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But the new plan comes with an unusual non-compete clause: Employees would have to forfeit all of their stock options if they join a competitor (say, SpaceX) within 18 months of leaving the company, according to Business Insider.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Clearly, the timing isn\u2019t a coincidence. Just weeks ago, Blue Origin\u2019s biggest competitor, SpaceX, went public on the Nasdaq on June 12 in the largest IPO in history, turning an estimated 4,400 current and former employees into paper millionaires,<a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/fortune.com\/2026\/06\/11\/spacex-ipo-wealth-jumps-executives-to-skilled-trade-welders-becoming-millionaires-elon-musk-trillionaire-status\/\" href=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/2026\/06\/11\/spacex-ipo-wealth-jumps-executives-to-skilled-trade-welders-becoming-millionaires-elon-musk-trillionaire-status\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> from executives down to welders and machinists<\/a> who\u2019d been granted stock over the years. About 400 of them are <a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/06\/10\/technology\/spacex-ipo-employee-millionaires.html\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/06\/10\/technology\/spacex-ipo-employee-millionaires.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">now worth $100 million or more<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For a Blue Origin employee weighing a bigger equity package given that context, the trade-off is sharper than it looks, Evan Mills, an associate financial advisor at Scholar Financial Advising who counts SpaceX employees among his clients, told Fortune.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A clause like this means \u201cyou\u2019re basically trading off the upside you can have with the stock against the mobility you give up if you leave for a competitor,\u201d he said. Vested or unvested, an employee who leaves for a rival \u201ccould lose everything they gained.\u201d The equity, he added, \u201cisn\u2019t just illiquid, it\u2019s conditional.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Blue Origin didn\u2019t immediately respond to Fortune\u2019s request for comment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That dilemma is what he called \u201cgolden handcuffs,\u201d meaning there is real upside if the company performs well, but no clean way out if you want to keep the equity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So one company just showed its workforce exactly what employee equity is worth when there\u2019s a way to cash out. The other is offering bigger packages while keeping tight control over whether, when, and how employees ever see the money.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Employees never actually own the stock<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What\u2019s most interesting about Blue Origin\u2019s equity plan is how it actually works. According to Business Insider, Blue Origin employees would never actually own company shares.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Once options vest and are exercised during a liquidity event (like an IPO, company sale, or some funding rounds) the shares are \u201cimmediately and mandatorily\u201d repurchased by Blue Origin, which also has \u201csole discretion\u201d about whether a given funding round even qualifies as a liquidity event.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In other words, the company controls both the exit and the price of the shares. The options are offered at a fixed price of $9.50, vest up to 25% in the first year, and then in quarterly installments, according to BI. They expire 18 months after an employee leaves if no liquidity event has happened, separate from the non-compete.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>Is a stock-forfeiture clause really a non-compete?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Edward Hones, an employment attorney and owner of <a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/www.honeslaw.com\/\" href=\"https:\/\/www.honeslaw.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Hones Law Seattle Employment Lawyers<\/a>, told Fortune the forfeiture provision is essentially a non-compete wearing a different outfit. Washington looks at what a provision does, not what it\u2019s called. So a rule that strips you of your equity for taking a competitor\u2019s job is still a restriction on competition, he argued.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIf you lose your equity for taking a job at a competitor, that\u2019s still a restriction on competing, just written differently,\u201d he added. \u201c[It\u2019s] worth noting that Blue Origin reportedly left Washington and California employees out of this clause, which suggests their own lawyers were worried it wouldn\u2019t hold up here.\u201d Both states sharply limit non-competes, and California bans most outright.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But the carve-out still leaves most of the workforce covered, since Blue Origin\u2019s employees are concentrated in Florida, Texas, and Alabama, states where the clause applies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It also matters whether options are vested or unvested. Vested options are \u201cpay you already earned for work you already did,\u201d Hones said, and courts are generally more reluctant to let a company claw those back than unvested ones.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tying stock forfeiture to competition like this remains unusual outside private-equity-style firms, he added, and 18 months is longer than what he typically sees.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>What is the equity actually worth?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This leaves Blue Origin employees with one major question: Is it really worth it if you can\u2019t easily sell your shares, the company sets the price, and you might lose it?<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While equity like this can be a meaningful part of a balance sheet, it isn\u2019t cash or public stock, Osman R. Minkara, founder and managing director of CIG Capital Advisors, told Fortune.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt is only when a liquidity event takes place that value and access to the funds become more certain,\u201d he said, which is exactly what SpaceX employees just got, and Blue Origin\u2019s have not. When an asset is contingent on staying employed, he added, he urges clients to be cautious about making major financial decisions based on its expected value.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA sound financial plan should encompass multiple scenario planning and remain durable even if circumstances change,\u201d he added.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">All of this said, SpaceX employees shouldn\u2019t feel completely sound quite yet because of concentration risk.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe work with a lot of SpaceX employees, and it\u2019s really hard when you work with people at companies that have grown into massive companies to explain the need for diversification,\u201d Mills said. \u201cThey believe so strongly in what they do and the vision they have; they feel like these companies can never go down.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But when someone\u2019s entire portfolio hinges on one company, it\u2019s \u201cdangerous,\u201d Mills warned.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cEvery single person believes their company is going to change the world and the price is just going to go to the moon,\u201d he added. \u201cAnd that could be reality, but are you willing to bet your retirement on that dream?\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The space race is getting more complex. Instead of Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk just trying to one-up&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":592550,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[270],"tags":[2965,18,1647,19,17,9791,133,451,2731,1086,5644],"class_list":["post-592549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-space","tag-blue-origin","tag-eire","tag-elon-musk","tag-ie","tag-ireland","tag-jeff-bezos","tag-science","tag-space","tag-spacex","tag-stock","tag-wealth"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/116942765144425675","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/592549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=592549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/592549\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/592550"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=592549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=592549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=592549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}