{"id":612108,"date":"2026-07-30T18:22:24","date_gmt":"2026-07-30T18:22:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/612108\/"},"modified":"2026-07-30T18:22:24","modified_gmt":"2026-07-30T18:22:24","slug":"artificial-intelligence-for-representing-and-characterizing-quantum-systems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/612108\/","title":{"rendered":"Artificial intelligence for representing and characterizing quantum systems"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Van Damme, J. et al. Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers. Nature 634<\/b>, 74\u201379 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shaw, A. L. et al. Benchmarking highly entangled states on a 60-atom analogue quantum simulator. Nature 628<\/b>, 71\u201377 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Manetsch, H. J. et al. tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits. Nature 647<\/b>, 60 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    King, A. D. et al. Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation. Science 388<\/b>, 199\u2013204 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bourgund, D. et al. Formation of individual stripes in a mixed-dimensional cold-atom Fermi\u2013Hubbard system. Nature 637<\/b>, 57\u201362 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Xu, S. et al. Non-Abelian braiding of Fibonacci anyons with a superconducting processor. Nat. Phys. 20<\/b>, 1469\u20131475 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Manovitz, T. et al. Quantum coarsening and collective dynamics on a programmable simulator. Nature 638<\/b>, 86\u201392 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andersen, T. I. et al. Thermalization and criticality on an analogue\u2013digital quantum simulator. Nature 638<\/b>, 79\u201385 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    DeCross, M. et al. Computational power of random quantum circuits in arbitrary geometries. Phys. Rev. X 15<\/b>, 021052 (2025).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bluvstein, D. et al. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. Nature 626<\/b>, 58\u201365 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Google Quantum AI and Collaborators. Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature 638<\/b>, 920\u2013926 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gao, D. et al. Establishing a new benchmark in quantum computational advantage with 105-qubit Zuchongzhi 3.0 processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134<\/b>, 090601 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Preskill, J. Beyond NISQ: the megaquop machine. ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. 6<\/b>, 18 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Eisert, J. & Preskill, J. Mind the gaps: the fraught road to quantum advantage. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2510.19928<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Or\u00fas, R. Tensor networks for complex quantum systems. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1<\/b>, 538\u2013550 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Aaronson, S. & Gottesman, D. Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits. Phys. Rev. A 70<\/b>, 052328 (2004).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bravyi, S. & Gosset, D. Improved classical simulation of quantum circuits dominated by Clifford gates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116<\/b>, 250501 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Aharonov, D., Gao, X., Landau, Z., Liu, Y. & Vazirani, U. A polynomial-time classical algorithm for noisy random circuit sampling. In Proc. 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 945\u2013957 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gebhart, V. et al. Learning quantum systems. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5<\/b>, 141\u2013156 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Radford, A. et al. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. Preprint at https:\/\/paperswithcode.com\/paper\/improving-language-understanding-by<\/a> (2018).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Anshu, A. & Arunachalam, S. A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states. Nat. Rev. Phys. 6<\/b>, 59\u201369 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R., Torlai, G., Albert, V. V. & Preskill, J. Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems. Science 377<\/b>, eabk3333 (2022).\u00a0First to prove that a classical algorithm can predict ground-state properties of a gapped phase with polynomial sample and time complexity.<\/b><\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cho, G. & Kim, D. Machine learning on quantum experimental data toward solving quantum many-body problems. Nat. Commun. 15<\/b>, 7552 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wu, Y.-D., Zhu, Y., Wang, Y. & Chiribella, G. Learning quantum properties from short-range correlations using multi-task networks. Nat. Commun. 15<\/b>, 8796 (2024).\u00a0A multi-task learning model for predicting quantum properties, which can be further used for transfer learning and out-of-distribution test.\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Qian, Y., Du, Y., He, Z., Hsieh, M.-H. & Tao, D. Multimodal deep representation learning for quantum cross-platform verification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133<\/b>, 130601 (2024).A multimodal deep network for cross-platform quantum verification that jointly processes heterogeneous measurement data from different quantum hardware.<\/b><\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Du, Y., Hsieh, M.-H. & Tao, D. Efficient learning for linear properties of bounded-gate quantum circuits. Nat. Commun. 16<\/b>, 3790 (2025).\u00a0The first machine-learning algorithm with provable sample-complexity guarantees for predicting linear properties of bounded-gate quantum circuits.<\/b><\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Eisert, J. et al. Quantum certification and benchmarking. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2<\/b>, 382\u2013390 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Alexeev, Y. et al. Artificial intelligence for quantum computing. Nat. Commun. 16<\/b>, 10829 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cerezo, M. et al. Variational quantum algorithms. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3<\/b>, 625\u2013644 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dawid, A. et al. Machine learning in quantum sciences (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Arunachalam, S. & de Wolf, R. Guest Column: A survey of quantum learning theory. ACM SIGACT News 48<\/b>, 41\u201367 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carleo, G. et al. Machine learning and the physical sciences. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91<\/b>, 045002 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Das Sarma, S., Deng, D.-L. & Duan, L.-M. Machine learning meets quantum physics. Phys. Today 72<\/b>, 48\u201354 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wetzel, S. J., Ha, S., Iten, R., Klopotek, M. & Liu, Z. Interpretable machine learning in physics: a review. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2503.23616<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Acampora, G. et al. Quantum computing and artificial intelligence: status and perspectives. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2505.23860<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Krenn, M., Landgraf, J., Foesel, T. & Marquardt, F. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies. Phys. Rev. A 107<\/b>, 010101 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Varela, J. M., de Palhares Jr, A. B. & Duarte, D. H. Entanglement detection and quantification through machine learning: a comprehensive review. Braz. J. Phys. 56<\/b>, 25 (2026).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Melko, R. G. & Carrasquilla, J. Language models for quantum simulation. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4<\/b>, 11\u201318 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carrasquilla, J. & Torlai, G. How to use neural networks to investigate quantum many-body physics. PRX Quantum 2<\/b>, 040201 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lange, H., Van de Walle, A., Abedinnia, A. & Bohrdt, A. From architectures to applications: a review of neural quantum states. Quantum Sci. Tech. 9<\/b>, 040501 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bharti, K. et al. Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94<\/b>, 015004 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Du, Y. et al. A Gentle Introduction to Quantum Machine Learning (Springer, 2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dunjko, V. & Briegel, H. J. Machine learning & artificial intelligence in the quantum domain: a review of recent progress. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81<\/b>, 074001 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Krenn, M., Malik, M., Fickler, R., Lapkiewicz, R. & Zeilinger, A. Automated search for new quantum experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116<\/b>, 090405 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Melnikov, A. A. et al. Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115<\/b>, 1221\u20131226 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sachdev, S. Quantum phase transitions. Phys. World\u00a012<\/b>, 33 (1999).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Elben, A. et al. The randomized measurement toolbox. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5<\/b>, 9\u201324 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhu, Y. et al. Flexible learning of quantum states with generative query neural networks. Nat. Commun. 13<\/b>, 6222 (2022).\u00a0Uses generative query networks to build implicit, query-driven representations of quantum states for downstream property prediction.<\/b><\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kim, H. et al. Attention to quantum complexity. Sci. Adv. 11<\/b>, eadu0059 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A. & Talwalkar, A. Foundations of Machine Learning (MIT Press, 2018).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bishop, C. M. & Nasrabadi, N. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning Vol. 4 (Springer, 2006).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zou, H. & Hastie, T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 67<\/b>, 301\u2013320 (2005).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nat. Phys. 16<\/b>, 1050\u20131057 (2020).\u00a0Enables prediction of quantum properties from a number of measurements logarithmic in the number of target properties.<\/b><\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Grafakos, L. Classical Fourier Analysis (Springer, 2008).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lewis, L. et al. Improved machine learning algorithm for predicting ground state properties. Nat. Commun. 15<\/b>, 895 (2024).\u00a0Reduces the sample complexity for predicting ground state properties of gapped local Hamiltonians from polynomial in system size to logarithmic.<\/b><\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wanner, M., Lewis, L., Bhattacharyya, C., Dubhashi, D. & Gheorghiu, A. Predicting ground state properties: constant sample complexity and deep learning algorithms. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33962\u201334024 (Curran Associates, 2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Che, Y., Gneiting, C. & Nori, F. Exponentially improved efficient machine learning for quantum many-body states with provable guarantees. Phys. Rev. Res. 6<\/b>, 033035 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    \u0160m\u00edd, \u0160 & Bondesan, R. Efficient learning of long-range and equivariant quantum systems. Quantum 9<\/b>, 1597 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    \u0160m\u00edd, \u0160. & Bondesan, R. Accurate learning of equivariant quantum systems from a single ground state. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2405.12309<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schuld, M., Sweke, R. & Meyer, J. J. Effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum-machine-learning models. Phys. Rev. A 103<\/b>, 032430 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vidal, J. G. & Theis, D. O. Input redundancy for parameterized quantum circuits. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.1901.11434<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schreiber, F. J., Eisert, J. & Meyer, J. J. Classical surrogates for quantum learning models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131<\/b>, 100803 (2023).\u00a0Shows that broad families of parameterized quantum learning models admit classical surrogates with provable approximation guarantees.<\/b><\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Landman, J., Thabet, S., Dalyac, C., Mhiri, H. & Kashefi, E. Classically approximating variational quantum machine learning with random Fourier features. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2210.13200<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sweke, R. et al. Potential and limitations of random Fourier features for dequantizing quantum machine learning. Quantum 9<\/b>, 1640 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gan, B. Y., Huang, P.-W., Gil-Fuster, E. & Rebentrost, P. Concept learning of parameterized quantum models from limited measurements. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2408.05116<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liao, W.-Y. et al. Demonstration of efficient predictive surrogates for large-scale quantum processors. Nat. Commun. 17<\/b>, 4731 (2026).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Servedio, R. A. & Gortler, S. J. Equivalences and separations between quantum and classical learnability. SIAM J. Comput. 33<\/b>, 1067\u20131092 (2004).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gyurik, C. & Dunjko, V. On establishing learning separations between classical and quantum machine learning with classical data. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2208.06339<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gyurik, C. & Dunjko, V. Exponential separations between classical and quantum learners. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2306.16028<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Molteni, R., Gyurik, C. & Dunjko, V. Exponential quantum advantages in learning quantum observables from classical data. npj Quantum Inf. 12<\/b>, 19 (2026).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bouland, A. et al. Public-key pseudoentanglement and the hardness of learning ground state entanglement structure. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2311.12017<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bouland, A., Zhang, C. & Zhou, Z. On the hardness of learning ground state entanglement of geometrically local Hamiltonians. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2411.04353<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Thabet, S., Monbroussou, L., Mamon, E. Z. & Landman, J. When quantum and classical models disagree: learning beyond minimum norm least square. npj Quantum Inf. 12<\/b>, 81 (2026).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gil-Fuster, E., Gyurik, C., Perez-Salinas, A. & Dunjko, V. On the relation between trainability and dequantization of variational quantum learning models. In Proc. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR \u201925) (Curran Associates, 2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sadoune, N., Giudici, G., Liu, K. & Pollet, L. Unsupervised interpretable learning of phases from many-qubit systems. Phys. Rev. Res. 5<\/b>, 013082 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Che, Y., Gneiting, C., Wang, X. & Nori, F. Quantum circuit complexity and unsupervised machine learning of topological order. Nat. Commun. 17<\/b>, 5179 (2026).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dawid, A. Machine Learning in Quantum Sciences (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rocchetto, A. Stabiliser states are efficiently PAC-learnable. Quantum Inf. Comput. 18<\/b>, 541\u2013552 (2018).<\/p>\n

    MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Grewal, S., Iyer, V., Kretschmer, W. & Liang, D. Efficient learning of quantum states prepared with few non-Clifford gates. Quantum 9<\/b>, 1907 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Leone, L., Oliviero, S. F. & Hamma, A. Learning t-doped stabilizer states. Quantum 8<\/b>, 1361 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Landau, Z. & Liu, Y. Learning quantum states prepared by shallow circuits in polynomial time. In Proc. 57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC \u201925) 1828\u20131838 (ACM, 2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Huang, H.-Y. et al. Learning shallow quantum circuits. In Proc. 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC \u201924) 1343\u20131351 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Huang, H.-Y., Chen, S. & Preskill, J. Learning to predict arbitrary quantum processes. PRX Quantum 4<\/b>, 040337 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, S. et al. Predicting quantum channels over general product distributions. In Proc. 38th Conference on Learning Theory (COLT ’25) 986\u20131007 (PMLR, 2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pouyanfar, S. et al. A survey on deep learning: Algorithms, techniques, and applications. ACM Comput. Surv. 51<\/b>, 1\u201336 (2018).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. Deep Learning (MIT Press, 2016).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, H. et al. TorchQuantum case study for robust quantum circuits. In Proc. 41st IEEE\/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD \u201922) https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3508352.3561118<\/a> (ACM, 2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carrasquilla, J., Torlai, G., Melko, R. G. & Aolita, L. Reconstructing quantum states with generative models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1<\/b>, 155\u2013161 (2019).\u00a0Reduces quantum state tomography to the unsupervised learning of outcome statistics of an informationally complete measurement.<\/b><\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Smith, A. W. R., Gray, J. & Kim, M. S. Efficient quantum state sample tomography with basis-dependent neural networks. PRX Quantum 2<\/b>, 020348 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mohseni, N., F\u00f6sel, T., Guo, L., Navarrete-Benlloch, C. & Marquardt, F. Deep learning of quantum many-body dynamics via random driving. Quantum 6<\/b>, 714 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mohseni, N., Shi, J., Byrnes, T. & Hartmann, M. J. Deep learning of many-body observables and quantum information scrambling. Quantum 8<\/b>, 1417 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Torlai, G. et al. Neural-network quantum state tomography. Nat. Phys. 14<\/b>, 447\u2013450 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cha, P. et al. Attention-based quantum tomography. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 3<\/b>, 01LT01 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schmale, T., Reh, M. & G\u00e4rttner, M. Efficient quantum state tomography with convolutional neural networks. npj Quantum Inf. 8<\/b>, 115 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ahmed, S., Mu\u00f1oz, C. S., Nori, F. & Kockum, A. F. Quantum state tomography with conditional generative adversarial networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127<\/b>, 140502 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ahmed, S., S\u00e1nchez Mu\u00f1oz, C., Nori, F. & Kockum, A. F. Classification and reconstruction of optical quantum states with deep neural networks. Phys. Rev. Res. 3<\/b>, 033278 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Du, Y. et al. ShadowNet for data-centric quantum system learning. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2308.11290<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6000\u20136010 (Curran Associates, 2017).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhang, X. et al. Direct fidelity estimation of quantum states using machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127<\/b>, 130503 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Qin, H. et al. Experimental direct quantum fidelity learning via a data-driven approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132<\/b>, 190801 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Elben, A. et al. Cross-platform verification of intermediate scale quantum devices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124<\/b>, 010504 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wu, Y.-D., Zhu, Y., Bai, G., Wang, Y. & Chiribella, G. Quantum similarity testing with convolutional neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130<\/b>, 210601 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vadali, A., Kshirsagar, R., Shyamsundar, P. & Perdue, G. N. Quantum circuit fidelity estimation using machine learning. Quantum Mach. Intell. 6<\/b>, 1 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ma, Y.-C. & Yung, M.-H. Transforming Bell\u2019s inequalities into state classifiers with machine learning. npj Quantum Inf. 4<\/b>, 34 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gao, J. et al. Experimental machine learning of quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120<\/b>, 240501 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M. & Horodecki, K. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81<\/b>, 865\u2013942 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Harney, C., Pirandola, S., Ferraro, A. & Paternostro, M. Entanglement classification via neural network quantum states. New J. Phys. 22<\/b>, 045001 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, G. & Cheng, S. Detecting quantum entanglement with unsupervised learning. Quantum Sci. Tech. 7<\/b>, 015005 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, C., Ren, C., Lin, H. & Lu, H. Entanglement structure detection via machine learning. Quantum Sci. Tech. 6<\/b>, 035017 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, Z., Lin, X. & Wei, Z. Certifying unknown genuine multipartite entanglement by neural networks. Quantum Sci. Tech. 8<\/b>, 035029 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Huang, Y. et al. Direct entanglement detection of quantum systems using machine learning. npj Quantum Inf. 11<\/b>, 29 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gao, X. et al. Correlation-pattern-based continuous variable entanglement detection through neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132<\/b>, 220202 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Koutny`, D. et al. Deep learning of quantum entanglement from incomplete measurements. Sci. Adv. 9<\/b>, eadd7131 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lin, X., Chen, Z. & Wei, Z. Quantifying quantum entanglement via a hybrid quantum-classical machine learning framework. Phys. Rev. A 107<\/b>, 062409 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rieger, M., Reh, M. & G\u00e4rttner, M. Sample-efficient estimation of entanglement entropy through supervised learning. Phys. Rev. A 109<\/b>, 012403 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Taghadomi, N., Mani, A., Fahim, A., Bakoui, A. & Salami, M. S. Quantum Mach. Intell. 7<\/b>, 40 (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Krawczyk, M., Paw\u0142owski, J., Ma\u015bka, M. M. & Roszak, K. Data-driven criteria for quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. A 109<\/b>, 022405 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cimini, V., Barbieri, M., Treps, N., Walschaers, M. & Parigi, V. Neural networks for detecting multimode Wigner negativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125<\/b>, 160504 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mello, A. F., Lami, G. & Collura, M. Retrieving nonstabilizerness with neural networks. Phys. Rev. A 111<\/b>, 012440 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carrasquilla, J. & Melko, R. G. Machine learning phases of matter. Nat. Phys. 13<\/b>, 431 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Van Nieuwenburg, E. P., Liu, Y.-H. & Huber, S. D. Learning phase transitions by confusion. Nat. Phys. 13<\/b>, 435 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bohrdt, A. et al. Analyzing nonequilibrium quantum states through snapshots with artificial neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127<\/b>, 150504 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Miles, C. et al. Machine learning discovery of new phases in programmable quantum simulator snapshots. Phys. Rev. Res. 5<\/b>, 013026 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhang, H. et al. Experimental demonstration of adversarial examples in learning topological phases. Nat. Commun. 13<\/b>, 4993 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jiang, S., Lu, S. & Deng, D.-L. Adversarial machine learning phases of matter. Quantum Front. 2<\/b>, 15 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Skinner, B., Ruhman, J. & Nahum, A. Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entanglement. Phys. Rev. X 9<\/b>, 031009 (2019).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Li, Y., Chen, X. & Fisher, M. P. A. Measurement-driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. B 100<\/b>, 134306 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Barratt, F., Agrawal, U., Potter, A. C., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Vasseur, R. Transitions in the learnability of global charges from local measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129<\/b>, 200602 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ippoliti, M. & Khemani, V. Learnability transitions in monitored quantum dynamics via eavesdropper\u2019s classical shadows. PRX Quantum 5<\/b>, 020304 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Akhtar, A. A., Hu, H.-Y. & You, Y.-Z. Measurement-induced criticality is tomographically optimal. Phys. Rev. B 109<\/b>, 094209 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Agrawal, U., Lopez-Piqueres, J., Vasseur, R., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Potter, A. C. Observing quantum measurement collapse as a learnability phase transition. Phys. Rev. X 14<\/b>, 041012 (2024).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dehghani, H., Lavasani, A., Hafezi, M. & Gullans, M. J. Neural-network decoders for measurement induced phase transitions. Nat. Commun. 14<\/b>, 2918 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kim, H. et al. Learning measurement-induced phase transitions using attention. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2508.15895<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hou, W. et al. Machine learning the effects of many quantum measurements. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2509.08890<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Garratt, S. J. & Altman, E. Probing postmeasurement entanglement without postselection. PRX Quantum 5<\/b>, 030311 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Aaronson, S. Shadow tomography of quantum states. In Proc. 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC \u201918) 325\u2013338 (ACM, 2018).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bengio, Y., Courville, A. & Vincent, P. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35<\/b>, 1798\u20131828 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Xiao, T., Huang, J., Li, H., Fan, J. & Zeng, G. Intelligent certification for quantum simulators via machine learning. npj Quantum Inf. 8<\/b>, 138 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mohseni, N., Marquardt, F. & Schmidt, P. Transfer learning in predicting quantum many-body dynamics: from physical observables to entanglement entropy. Quantum Sci. Tech. 10<\/b>, 025038 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Van Engelen, J. E. & Hoos, H. H. A survey on semi-supervised learning. Mach. Learn. 109<\/b>, 373\u2013440 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tang, Y., Yang, N., Long, M. & Yan, J. Ssl4q: semi-supervised learning of quantum data with application to quantum state classification. In Proc. Forty-First International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML \u201924) (PMLR, 2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wu, D., Wang, L. & Zhang, P. Solving statistical mechanics using variational autoregressive networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122<\/b>, 080602 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sharir, O., Levine, Y., Wies, N., Carleo, G. & Shashua, A. Deep autoregressive models for the efficient variational simulation of many-body quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124<\/b>, 020503 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhong, L., Guo, C. & Wang, X. Quantum state tomography inspired by language modeling. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2212.04940<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhang, Z. & You, Y.-Z. Observing Schr\u00f6dinger\u2019s cat with artificial intelligence: emergent classicality from information bottleneck. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 5<\/b>, 015051 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carleo, G. & Troyer, M. Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks. Science 355<\/b>, 602\u2013606 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Czischek, S., Moss, M. S., Radzihovsky, M., Merali, E. & Melko, R. G. Data-enhanced variational Monte Carlo simulations for Rydberg atom arrays. Phys. Rev. B 105<\/b>, 205108 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Moss, M. S. et al. Enhancing variational Monte Carlo simulations using a programmable quantum simulator. Phys. Rev. A 109<\/b>, 032410 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lange, H. et al. Transformer neural networks and quantum simulators: a hybrid approach for simulating strongly correlated systems. Quantum 9<\/b>, 1675 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Torlai, G. et al. Quantum process tomography with unsupervised learning and tensor networks. Nat. Commun. 14<\/b>, 2858 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ahmed, S., Quijandr\u00eda, F. & Kockum, A. F. Gradient-descent quantum process tomography by learning Kraus operators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130<\/b>, 150402 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhu, Y., Wu, Y.-D., Liu, Q., Wang, Y. & Chiribella, G. Predictive modelling of quantum process with neural networks. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2308.08815<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hartmann, M. J. & Carleo, G. Neural-network approach to dissipative quantum many-body dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122<\/b>, 250502 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carrasquilla, J. Machine learning for quantum matter. Adv. Phys. X 5<\/b>, 1797528 (2020).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Harrington, P. M., Mueller, E. J. & Murch, K. W. Engineered dissipation for quantum information science. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4<\/b>, 660\u2013671 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dugan, O. M., Lu, P. Y., Dangovski, R., Luo, D. & Soljacic, M. Q-Flow: generative modeling for differential equations of open quantum dynamics with normalizing flows. In Proc. 40th International Conference on Machine Learning 8879\u20138901 (PMLR, 2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Campaioli, F., Cole, J. H. & Hapuarachchi, H. Quantum master equations: tips and tricks for quantum optics, quantum computing, and beyond. PRX Quantum 5<\/b>, 020202 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Valenti, A., van Nieuwenburg, E., Huber, S. & Greplova, E. Hamiltonian learning for quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. Res. 1<\/b>, 033092 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Valenti, A., Jin, G., L\u00e9onard, J., Huber, S. D. & Greplova, E. Scalable Hamiltonian learning for large-scale out-of-equilibrium quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 105<\/b>, 023302 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nandy, S., Schmitt, M., Bukov, M. & Lenar\u010di\u010d, Z. Reconstructing effective Hamiltonians from nonequilibrium thermal and prethermal steady states. Phys. Rev. Res. 6<\/b>, 023160 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Che, L. et al. Learning quantum Hamiltonians from single-qubit measurements. Phys. Rev. Res. 3<\/b>, 023246 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Proctor, T., Young, K., Baczewski, A. D. & Blume-Kohout, R. Benchmarking quantum computers. Nat. Rev. Phys. 7<\/b>, 1\u201314 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hothem, D., Miller, A. & Proctor, T. What is my quantum computer good for? Quantum capability learning with physics-aware neural networks. In Proc. The Thirty-Eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates, 2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hartnett, G. S. et al. Learning to rank quantum circuits for hardware-optimized performance enhancement. Quantum 8<\/b>, 1542 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cai, Z. et al. Quantum error mitigation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95<\/b>, 045005 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kim, C., Park, K. D. & Rhee, J.-K. Quantum error mitigation with artificial neural network. IEEE Access 8<\/b>, 188853\u2013188860 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sack, S. H. & Egger, D. J. Large-scale quantum approximate optimization on nonplanar graphs with machine learning noise mitigation. Phys. Rev. Res. 6<\/b>, 013223 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bao, T. et al. Beyond circuit connections: a non-message passing graph transformer approach for quantum error mitigation. In Proc. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR \u201925) (OpenReview, 2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liao, H. et al. Machine learning for practical quantum error mitigation. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6<\/b>, 1478\u20131486 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liao, M., Zhu, Y., Chiribella, G. & Yang, Y. Noise-agnostic quantum error mitigation with data augmented neural models. npj Quantum Inf. 11<\/b>, 8 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sweke, R., Kesselring, M. S., van Nieuwenburg, E. P. L. & Eisert, J. Reinforcement learning decoders for fault-tolerant quantum computation. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2<\/b>, 025005 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhou, Y. et al. Learning to decode logical circuits. Nat. Comput. Sci. 5<\/b>, 1158\u20131167 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, H. et al. Transformer-QEC: quantum error correction code decoding with transferable transformers. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2311.16082<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bausch, J. et al. Learning high-accuracy error decoding for quantum processors. Nature 635<\/b>, 834\u2013840 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cao, H., Pan, F., Feng, D., Wang, Y. & Zhang, P. Generative decoding for quantum error-correcting codes. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2503.21374<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Olle, J., Zen, R., Puviani, M. & Marquardt, F. Simultaneous discovery of quantum error correction codes and encoders with a noise-aware reinforcement learning agent. npj Quantum Inf. 10<\/b>, 126 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zeng, Y., Qin, W., Chen, Y.-H., Gneiting, C. & Nori, F. Neural-network-based design of approximate Gottesman\u2013Kitaev\u2013Preskill code. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134<\/b>, 060601 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cervera-Lierta, A., Kottmann, J. S. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Meta-variational quantum eigensolver: learning energy profiles of parameterized Hamiltonians for quantum simulation. PRX Quantum 2<\/b>, 020329 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jain, N., Coyle, B., Kashefi, E. & Kumar, N. Graph neural network initialisation of quantum approximate optimisation. Quantum 6<\/b>, 861 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Luo, D., Shen, J., Dangovski, R. & Soljacic, M. Quack: accelerating gradient-based quantum optimization with Koopman operator learning. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25662\u201325692 (Curran Associates, 2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lee, J., Cho, J. & Kim, S. Q-MAML: quantum model-agnostic meta-learning for variational quantum algorithms. In Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Vol. 39, 18137\u201318144 (AAAI, 2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhang, S.-X., Hsieh, C.-Y., Zhang, S. & Yao, H. Neural predictor based quantum architecture search. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2<\/b>, 045027 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    He, Z. et al. A GNN-based predictor for quantum architecture search. Quantum Inf. Process. 22<\/b>, 128 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Qian, Y., Wang, X., Du, Y., Luo, Y. & Tao, D. MG-Net: learn to customize QAOA with circuit depth awareness. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33691\u201333725 (Curran Associates, 2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    F\u00f6sel, T., Niu, M. Y., Marquardt, F. & Li, L. Quantum circuit optimization with deep reinforcement learning. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2103.07585<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    F\u00fcrrutter, F., Mu\u00f1oz-Gil, G. & Briegel, H. J. Quantum circuit synthesis with diffusion models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6<\/b>, 515\u2013524 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ruiz, F. J. et al. Quantum circuit optimization with AlphaTensor. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7<\/b>, 374\u2013385 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Arnold, J. & Sch\u00e4fer, F. Replacing neural networks by optimal analytical predictors for the detection of phase transitions. Phys. Rev. X 12<\/b>, 031044 (2022).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gao, X. & Duan, L.-M. Efficient representation of quantum many-body states with deep neural networks. Nat. Commun. 8<\/b>, 662 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sharir, O., Shashua, A. & Carleo, G. Neural tensor contractions and the expressive power of deep neural quantum states. Phys. Rev. B 106<\/b>, 205136 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhao, L., Guo, N., Luo, M.-X. & Rebentrost, P. Provable learning of quantum states with graphical models. Phys. Rev. Res. 8<\/b>, 013109 (2026).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yang, T.-H., Soleimanifar, M., Bergamaschi, T. & Preskill, J. When can classical neural networks represent quantum states? Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2410.23152<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Iten, R., Metger, T., Wilming, H., del Rio, L. & Renner, R. Discovering physical concepts with neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124<\/b>, 010508 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Miles, C. et al. Correlator convolutional neural networks as an interpretable architecture for image-like quantum matter data. Nat. Commun. 12<\/b>, 3905 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Flam-Shepherd, D. et al. Learning interpretable representations of entanglement in quantum optics experiments using deep generative models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4<\/b>, 544\u2013554 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Frohnert, F. & van Nieuwenburg, E. Explainable representation learning of small quantum states. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 5<\/b>, 015001 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cybi\u0144ski, K. et al. Characterizing out-of-distribution generalization of neural networks: application to the disordered Su\u2013Schrieffer\u2013Heeger model. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 6<\/b>, 015014 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    de Schoulepnikoff, P., Mu\u00f1oz-Gil, G., Nautrup, H. P. & Briegel, H. J. Interpretable representation learning of quantum data enabled by probabilistic variational autoencoders. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2506.11982<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cao, Y. et al. A comprehensive survey of AI-generated content (AIGC): a history of generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2303.04226<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chang, Y. et al. A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 15<\/b>, 1\u201345 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Brown, T. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1877\u20131901 (Curran Associates, 2020).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kaplan, J. et al. Scaling laws for neural language models. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2001.08361<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, H., Weber, M., Izaac, J. & Lin, C. Y.-Y. Predicting properties of quantum systems with conditional generative models. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2211.16943<\/a> (2022). Trains a conditional generative transformer on data from a family of quantum states, enabling property prediction for both unseen states and new observables without retraining.<\/b><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhang, Y.-H. & Di Ventra, M. Transformer quantum state: a multipurpose model for quantum many-body problems. Phys. Rev. B 107<\/b>, 075147 (2023).\u00a0A single transformer-based neural quantum state that covers entire phase diagrams within one model and transfers to new Hamiltonians via fine-tuning.<\/b><\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    An, Z., Wu, J., Yang, M., Zhou, D. L. & Zeng, B. Unified quantum state tomography and Hamiltonian learning: a language-translation-like approach for quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Appl. 21<\/b>, 014037 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yao, J. & You, Y.-Z. ShadowGPT: learning to solve quantum many-body problems from randomized measurements. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2411.03285<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fitzek, D. et al. RydbergGPT. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 6<\/b>, 045057 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tang, Y., Xiong, H., Yang, N., Xiao, T. & Yan, J. Towards LLM4QPE: unsupervised pretraining of quantum property estimation and a benchmark. In Proc. The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR \u201924) (OpenReview, 2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, A. & Heyl, M. Empowering deep neural quantum states through efficient optimization. Nat. Phys. 20<\/b>, 1476\u20131481 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rende, R. et al. Foundation neural-networks quantum states as a unified ansatz for multiple Hamiltonians. Nat. Commun. 16<\/b>, 7213 (2025).\u00a0The first foundation neural-network quantum state: taking spin configurations and Hamiltonian couplings as multimodal inputs, and generalizing to Hamiltonians beyond training.<\/b><\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ho, J., Jain, A. & Abbeel, P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6840\u20136851 (Curran Associates, 2020).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Song, Y. et al. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. In Proc. 9th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR \u201921) (OpenReview, 2021).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yang, L. et al. Diffusion models: a comprehensive survey of methods and applications. ACM Comput. Surv. 56<\/b>, 1\u201339 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tang, Y., Long, M. & Yan, J. QuaDiM: a conditional diffusion model for quantum state property estimation. In Proc. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (OpenReview, 2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dupuis, N. et al. Qiskit code assistant: training LLMs for generating quantum computing code. In Proc. 2024 IEEE LLM Aided Design Workshop (LAD) 1\u20134 (IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yang, R., Wang, Z., Gu, Y., Liang, Y. & Li, T. QCircuitBench: a large-scale dataset for benchmarking quantum algorithm design. In Proc. The Thirty-Ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (OpenReview, 2026).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Campbell, C., Chen, H. M., Luk, W. & Fan, H. Enhancing LLM-based quantum code generation with multi-agent optimization and quantum error correction. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2504.14557<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liang, Z. et al. Unleashing the potential of LLMs for quantum computing: a study in quantum architecture design. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2307.08191<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nakaji, K. et al. The generative quantum eigensolver (GQE) and its application for ground state search. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2401.09253<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Minami, S., Nakaji, K., Suzuki, Y., Aspuru-Guzik, A. & Kadowaki, T. Generative quantum combinatorial optimization by means of a novel conditional generative quantum eigensolver. Digit. Discov. 4<\/b>, 2229\u20132243 (2026).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhao, Y., Zhang, C. & Du, Y. Rethink the role of deep learning towards large-scale quantum systems. In Proc. Forty-Second International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML \u201925) (OpenReview, 2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, H. et al. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature 620<\/b>, 47\u201360 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Romera-Paredes, B. et al. Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models. Nature 625<\/b>, 468\u2013475 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Boiko, D. A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B. & Gomes, G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 624<\/b>, 570\u2013578 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ataides, J., Gu, A., Yelin, S. F. & Lukin, M. D. Neural decoders for universal quantum algorithms. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2509.11370<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ge, Y. et al. Quantum circuit synthesis and compilation optimization: overview and prospects. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2407.00736<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, L. et al. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Front. Comput. Sci. 18<\/b>, 186345 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hafner, D., Pasukonis, J., Ba, J. & Lillicrap, T. Mastering diverse control tasks through world models. Nature 640<\/b>, 647\u2013653 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Baltru\u0161aitis, T., Ahuja, C. & Morency, L.-P. Multimodal machine learning: a survey and taxonomy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 41<\/b>, 423\u2013443 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Han, Z., Gao, C., Liu, J., Zhang, J. & Zhang, S. Q. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for large models: a comprehensive survey. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2403.14608<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bertoni, C. et al. Shallow shadows: expectation estimation using low-depth random Clifford circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133<\/b>, 020602 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schuster, T., Haferkamp, J. & Huang, H.-Y. Random unitaries in extremely low depth. Science 389<\/b>, 92\u201396 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hu, H.-Y. et al. Demonstration of robust and efficient quantum property learning with shallow shadows. Nat. Commun. 16<\/b>, 2943 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sch\u00f6lkopf, B. & Smola, A. J. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization,Optimization, and Beyond (MIT Press, 2001).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Van Damme, J. et al. Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers. Nature 634, 74\u201379…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":612109,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[271],"tags":[1096,18,910,19,17,452,1097,133],"class_list":["post-612108","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-physics","tag-computer-science","tag-eire","tag-general","tag-ie","tag-ireland","tag-physics","tag-quantum-information","tag-science"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/117010323823625318","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/612108","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=612108"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/612108\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/612109"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=612108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=612108"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=612108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}