{"id":640382,"date":"2026-08-16T16:16:13","date_gmt":"2026-08-16T16:16:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/640382\/"},"modified":"2026-08-16T16:16:13","modified_gmt":"2026-08-16T16:16:13","slug":"should-you-spend-your-money-on-retirement-or-give-it-to-your-kids","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/640382\/","title":{"rendered":"Should you spend your money on retirement or give it to your kids?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hi readers! Shayla Love here, science journalist and longtime fan of Your Mileage May Vary. I\u2019m honored to be subbing for Sigal Samuel while she\u2019s out on parental leave. I\u2019m diving into your questions as a way to help understand human nature and our choices through multiple lenses: philosophical, psychological, and beyond. Please send in<\/a> any emotional, body\/brain, sociological, perceptual, or other kind of life quandaries you might have.<\/p>\n

I am a (gracefully?) aging mother of three and proud grandmother of four. I keep hearing about how my generation (okay, I am a boomer) is hoarding wealth and failing to pass it down. <\/strong><\/p>\n

When I look at my lifestyle, I\u2019m facing a fork in the road. Either I splurge on a lovely retirement, or I save so my kids and their kids can have an easier life. We\u2019re all middle-class, so this is not a question of survival. The kids have college funds. Do I owe it to my descendants to scrimp as I age? Surely it\u2019s not right for me to spend my savings on bucket-list vacations\u2026How should I balance spending on myself and on the others that will come after me?<\/strong><\/p>\n

I\u2019m so glad to hear you\u2019re not in financial survival mode. But you are facing some economic constraints<\/a>: You can\u2019t splurge on a luxurious retirement while at the same time saving a substantial nest egg for your kids and grandkids.<\/p>\n

Have a question you want answered in the next Your Mileage May Vary column?<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

Fill out this anonymous form<\/a>! Newsletter subscribers will get my column before anyone else does and their questions will be prioritized for future editions. Sign up here!<\/a><\/p>\n

It sounds like this feeling of either-or is causing you some anguish. The instinctual response is, as you suggest, to hoard as much as possible for your progeny to use later on. But at the same time, that feels like it\u2019s zero-summing your own experience in your golden years.<\/p>\n

So I\u2019d like to introduce you to an economic thinker who has some advice that might surprise you. John Maynard Keynes, 19th-century British economist, would say: Don\u2019t save your money!<\/p>\n

Keynes wrote that when times are tough, people react by keeping their money close, and not spending it. But this sets in motion what he called the paradox of thrift<\/a>. One person\u2019s expenses are actually another person\u2019s income, he pointed out; if everyone saved their money, no one would make money either, and a recession could drag on and on. In the end, people\u2019s savings would, paradoxically, go down, even though they were scrimping.<\/p>\n

We can apply the paradox of thrift to your own family as a mini-economy. Inheritance has traditionally worked by setting aside large chunks of your assets to pass along to your children and grandchildren \u2014 which could be helpful when the day of windfall comes. But why wait? And would waiting actually stymie your family\u2019s financial potential?<\/p>\n

In past generations, an inheritance like this often happened far earlier. I\u2019m comforted that we are living longer (an average of a decade or more longer) than in the mid-20th century, but this sets up new issues, as you\u2019re stuck in, with when and in what quantity to transfer any extra resources.<\/p>\n

Now, as people retire with decades of good life to enjoy ahead of them, they are often doing so at the very same time their adult children are the most financially stressed: They are trying to buy homes, they\u2019re in the busiest middle part of their careers, and many have children of their own they\u2019re raising and trying to save for.<\/p>\n

This doesn\u2019t mean you have to give away all your money to your family so that they can spend it on the pleasures you have given up. Keynes wasn\u2019t anti-savings so that money could be spent frivolously. He did believe that spending money was one of the best ways to give the greater economy a boost. Perhaps there are ways you could think about spending your money that stimulate your family\u2019s internal economy, that also help you enjoy your retirement.<\/p>\n

For example, you could invest in a lakeside property to kick your feet up at \u2014 an asset that will appreciate in value over time and be sold at a profit, or be passed down through the generations to enjoy for many summers to come. Maybe you assist your children in buying a home \u2014 one with a comfortable guest suite. You could invest in a business your children want to start, and help them grow something that could accrue more wealth over time. Using your money these ways may even feel more like splurging than scrimping! Yet, it ideally would achieve both: a fun way to spend your hard-earned money now, and create more abundance for your family\u2019s future.<\/p>\n

A hidden bonus of non-traditional inheritance moves like these is that they all involve spending more time together with your family and potentially even strengthening those relationships along the way. The Greek philosopher Aristotle wrote in The Nicomachean Ethics that there were three kinds of friends. Some are based on utility, and exist only because of what people can get from one another. Other friendships are based on pleasure, when you like doing things with someone. Finally, friendships of virtue persist because you stick by people who inspire you by their strong character. Simply setting aside your money is a relationship that leans utilitarian. Working on a shared meaningful project could help deepen your relationships with your kids and grandkids in those pleasurable and virtuous directions.<\/p>\n

Speaking of, I don\u2019t think you need to be making these decisions alone.<\/p>\n

You used an interesting word in your question: Do you, as an individual, owe it to your family <\/a>to set them up with a more comfortable financial future, at the expense of personal indulgences? A lot of the discussion around older generations\u2019 money, and whether or how they should pass it on, avoids dealing with this sticky moral component. Why should parents give their kids money?<\/p>\n

I think there\u2019s clarity to be found in thinking more closely about why we owe each other anything.<\/p>\n

There are few better thinkers to turn to than Confucius to consider our obligations to family. The fifth-century Chinese philosopher believed that we can\u2019t understand ourselves only as individuals<\/a>. You are nobody when you are alone; you only come alive as a mother, a daughter, or a sister. These relational roles each come with specific duties and ways of interacting. Successfully fulfilling these roles within the family has a bigger impact, according to Confucius. It\u2019s what creates the foundations for a harmonious and functional society. For children in this web of relations, it\u2019s critical to uphold filial piety, or the need to respect, honor, and care for parents as well as all of their other elders and ancestors.<\/p>\n

Filial piety has, over the years, been criticized for being too rigid, and setting overly high expectations for blind obedience and conformity in children. So I\u2019ve been interested to see the concept of reciprocal filial piety<\/a> emerge. In reciprocal filial piety, children have a genuine feeling of gratitude to their parents for raising them, and any obligation they feel is heartfelt \u2014 they want to return the favor and care for their parents too.<\/p>\n

As a half-Chinese person, I find it interesting that in family life in the West, filial piety is often reversed. There\u2019s a lot of air time discussing what parents owe their children, and not so much the other way around.<\/p>\n

For example, I noticed that you don\u2019t mention how your family intends to care for you in the future, or what they might feel a sense of owing you. If you do take a Keynesian approach to your family and decide to spend your money in ways that could benefit everyone, it might be worth engaging in some Confucian-tinted conversations not only about what you owe everyone else, but what you all appreciate about each other.<\/p>\n

You can reflect, together, on how your family is stronger because of all the ways you\u2019ve chosen to look after one another, not only because of how much money is in the bank.<\/p>\n

Bonus: What I\u2019m reading<\/strong><\/p>\n