{"id":649159,"date":"2026-08-21T14:18:17","date_gmt":"2026-08-21T14:18:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/649159\/"},"modified":"2026-08-21T14:18:17","modified_gmt":"2026-08-21T14:18:17","slug":"why-your-weather-app-sucks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/649159\/","title":{"rendered":"Why your weather app sucks."},"content":{"rendered":"

Sign up for the Slatest<\/a> to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.<\/p>\n

A few weeks ago, I biked to meet a source for coffee, since my Android phone\u2019s AccuWeather widget had seemingly projected a low, low chance of precipitation in the area. You can guess what happened then. The clouds decided to cluster above and surprise me midtrip, releasing the rain down hard as I finished the journey, weaving as strategically as possible to avoid getting splashed by the cars next to me. I showed up to the appointment late, soaked, and embarrassed.<\/p>\n

As it turns out, I\u2019m hardly the only person to have felt hoodwinked, bamboozled, and\/or flat-out deceived<\/a> by my smartphone\u2019s forecasts in 2026. Throughout this year, the entire country seems to have been afflicted with the weather-app blues. Over in San Francisco, which faced down a severe heat wave in March, Google Weather users were left flummoxed by the charts of low-70s temps<\/a>, way milder than the 90-degree record<\/a> felt by downtown residents. Not long after, Philadelphians underwent a round of spring-showers confusion on April 22, when the Weather Channel told them that the storms would quiet down at 7:15 a.m. \u2026\u00a0even though it hadn\u2019t rained at all<\/a> that morning.<\/p>\n

\u201cI honestly think weather apps have gotten worse in the new AI world we live in,\u201d a North Carolina meteorologist wrote on Facebook<\/a> in December, noting that Apple\u2019s weather app got the forecast that day \u201ccompletely wrong.\u201d Their conclusion: \u201cHuman-made forecasting is still the best way to go, and even that is still wrong.\u201d<\/p>\n

Such incidents have left many Americans mistrustful of weather apps as a whole, and desperate for viable alternatives. The stakes go far beyond daily routines or vacation itineraries; small businesses lose out on potential foot traffic and revenue<\/a> whenever a thunderstorm icon appears, even if it\u2019s bright and sunny outside. Yet it\u2019s difficult to know where to turn. Social media platforms and message boards are crawling with asks<\/a> for reliable weather app recommendations, and the answers can vary wildly. Vincenza Berardo, a philosophy instructor based in Massachusetts, told me she has four alternate weather apps on her iPhone\u2014EverythingWeather<\/a>, MyRadar<\/a>, WTForecast<\/a>, and Weather Underground<\/a>\u2014but finds them all equally likely to forecast rain on days when it doesn\u2019t, and vice versa.<\/p>\n

Complaints over smartphone weather apps are nothing new; my colleague Lizzie O\u2019Leary has been on this beat<\/a> for years. But they feel especially discombobulating and urgent at a time when the United States\u2019 world-class weather-monitoring infrastructure has been decimated<\/a>, private actors<\/a> are attempting to fill the monitoring gaps, and the changing climate makes freak events<\/a> like this summer\u2019s heat domes, floods, and wildfires harder to prepare for.<\/p>\n

Maybe, however, it isn\u2019t all on the apps themselves. \u201cUsers have always thought that weather apps are inaccurate, but they\u2019re also incredibly untrustworthy about their experiences,\u201d Steve Gifford, co-founder and CEO of the data-processing startup Wet Dog Weather<\/a>, told me.<\/p>\n

Daniel Swain, a California-based climate scientist, tends to agree with that assessment. \u201cPeople\u2019s expectations are increasingly misaligned with what the apps are actually telling you, and with what weather prediction can tell you in the first place,\u201d he told me.<\/p>\n

As Swain described it, most weather apps tend to be \u201copaque\u201d in disclosing what informs their forecasts, but there are a few key, gold-standard data sources utilized by almost every relevant program on the app store. \u201cGlobal weather forecasts are made using predictive models\u2014huge mathematical systems with thousands of lines of code, run on supercomputers,\u201d he said. \u201cEvery part of the Earth\u2019s surface is mapped out into a grid cell with relevant information, and that\u2019s run through the models to create initial predictions that get assimilated, often in raw form, by app data providers.\u201d<\/p>\n

The computational and informational resources involved in these calculations are hefty. As such, the most thorough, wide-spanning modeling sources belong to governmental organizations that can afford the setups, including the Global Forecast System (run by the U.S. National Weather Service) and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting, among others. The best-known and biggest brands in forecasting\u2014Apple Weather, AccuWeather, Weather Underground, Weathergraph\u2014rely on both, but tend to especially pull from GFS, which is run four times a day and estimates what conditions may look like up to 16 days in advance. \u201cIt all tends to be the same data,\u201d said Gifford. \u201cIf some app tries to tell you it has a fancier forecast, you roll your eyes a bit, because it all mostly comes from governments.\u201d<\/p>\n

It\u2019s true that the NWS\u2019s modeling capacity has been constricted thanks to the DOGE-ordered budget-slashing that hit the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration last year<\/a>, which forced federal scientists to cut back on regional office spaces as well as satellite and balloon launches that help them track weather patterns. (Gifford, for his part, thinks the European Centre has a better modeling system, since it refreshes its daily calculations far more often than GFS does.) And yes, Swain told me, many predictive data sources that relied on physics-based modeling now<\/a> utilize a \u201cblend<\/a>\u201d of physics-based and machine learning\/artificial intelligence methods. But those core modeling differences, which fuel what Swain calls \u201cslight but significant differences\u201d in projecting baseline conditions, don\u2019t make much of a difference as to what reaches your app\u2014because those displays are determined by how appmakers and developers actually curate and present the data at hand.<\/p>\n

\u201cApps have access to various possibilities predicted by various models\u2014but at any particular moment, they\u2019re only going to show one of those numbers instead of showing off the whole picture,\u201d Swain added. \u201cIf the NWS says 30 percent chance of \u2018scattered afternoon thunderstorms,\u2019 that means there\u2019s high confidence of storms, but they won\u2019t be widespread within your area. The app may display that forecast with a partly cloudy icon for the region, which will be correct for 70 percent of the area, but not for the 30 percent that actually gets pouring rain.\u201d Other apps might even be inclined to deploy a sunny icon, because technically it is going to be warm in most of that area, and watery only in a different section.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\n Mary Harris
\n What\u2019s Going On With FEMA?
\n Read More<\/b>\n <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

What makes things even more difficult is that it\u2019s impossible, as of now, to pinpoint the exact time and location of a downpour, even though it can be gauged with marvelous accuracy. And that\u2019s not greatly practical for smartphone devotees, who are already getting a truncated image of one weather possibility that was sent before the model was scheduled to refresh.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n
    \n This Content is Available for Slate Plus members only<\/p>\n

    Is Your Weather App Awful? It Might Be Your Fault.
    \n <\/a>\n <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The good news is, per Gifford, that there are less generalized models out there that are tailored to much more exacting needs. \u201cIf you\u2019re a windsurfer or fisherman or boater\u2014basically, someone who cares about weather in specific locations\u2014there\u2019ve been good<\/a> apps<\/a> out there for a while now,\u201d he said. \u201cI live in San Francisco and worry a lot about rain. One of our clients, CARROT Weather, has a near-term radar I can use to figure out if I\u2019m going to get soaked. That\u2019s more useful for people on the coasts, however.\u201d<\/p>\n

    The most scientifically up-to-snuff apps, in the eyes of both Swain and Gifford, have been developed for niches that aren\u2019t as useful for the general population, which would rather not spend too much time glazing their eyes over multiple numbers at once, but get served instantly. Unfortunately, your phone\u2019s app is more likely to try to satisfy that latent desire than to force you to understand how complex weather modeling really is.<\/p>\n

    But if the apps are getting you down, you can still rely on your local meteorologists on TV and social media to put out a more complete picture of what\u2019s going on, adding the human touch and giving you forecasts far deeper than a simple cloud icon. Contra Bob Dylan, sometimes you do need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.<\/p>\n