{"id":656543,"date":"2026-08-26T00:25:21","date_gmt":"2026-08-26T00:25:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/656543\/"},"modified":"2026-08-26T00:25:21","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T00:25:21","slug":"scientists-reconstruct-sound-of-jurassic-insects","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/656543\/","title":{"rendered":"Scientists Reconstruct Sound of Jurassic Insects"},"content":{"rendered":"

Using lasers, computer models and AI, researchers reconstructed the calls of 165-million-year-old relatives of modern crickets and katydids from fossilized wing fragments found in China; one of these fossil insects called at frequencies beyond human hearing, challenging the long-held assumption that bat predation was what pushed insects into the ultrasonic realm.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cVery little is known about the acoustic landscape of long-gone environments, such as the Jurassic forests,\u201d Dr. Jun-Jie Gu of Sichuan Agricultural University and colleagues wrote in their paper.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe sounds made by dinosaurs and other charismatic vertebrates are not definitively known because their vocal organs rarely preserve well in fossils.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cUnlike tetrapod vocal cords, the sound-producing organs present in the sclerotized cuticle of some arthropods do fossilize well.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cFor example, the stridulatory structures (file, plectrum) can be observed and measured in the fossilized forewings of male crickets and allies.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThese fossils incorporate a fingerprint of the acoustic signals they generated, offering a unique window into the soundscapes of the past.\u201d<\/p>\n

In their research, the authors analyzed 20 fossilized ensiferan insects \u2014 seven species within the Prophalangopsidae<\/a> and two within Haglidae<\/a>, an extinct family that existed from the Triassic to Cretaceous \u2014 unearthed from the Jiulongshan Formation in Inner Mongolia, China.<\/p>\n

Dated to the Middle Jurassic, roughly 165 million years ago, the fossils preserved the delicate wing structures these insects used to \u2018sing\u2019 by rubbing one wing against the other \u2014 a process called stridulation<\/a>.<\/p>\n

To decode these ancient songs, the researchers combined several techniques: phylogenetic analysis comparing the fossils to nearly 100 living insect species, laser vibrometry measurements of modern insect wings, computer simulations of how the fossilized wings would have vibrated, and machine-learning models trained to predict call patterns from wing shape.<\/p>\n

Their results show a surprisingly diverse soundscape: most of the nine species produced low, pure-tone calls around 5 kHz (kilohertz), similar to those of some living crickets.<\/p>\n

But one species, Sigmaboilus peregrinus<\/a>, appears to have called at frequencies above 20 kHz, in the ultrasonic range, beyond what humans can hear.<\/p>\n

The finding is significant because it predates the emergence of bats, which appeared roughly 55 million years later and are typically credited with driving the evolution of ultrasonic communication and hearing in insects, as a way to evade echolocating predators.<\/p>\n

The new evidence suggests ultrasonic signaling in insects was already established long before bats existed.<\/p>\n

This means bats were not the sole force behind the evolution of high-frequency insect calls.<\/p>\n

Instead, the scientists propose that early mammals and other predators could have pressured insects to develop quieter, harder-to-localize pure-tone signals.<\/p>\n

Competition for acoustic space among many calling species in a crowded environment may have played a role as well.<\/p>\n

\"Fossilized<\/a><\/p>\n

Fossilized wings of the nine ensiferan species analyzed by Gu et al. Image credit: Gu et al., doi: 10.1073\/pnas.2615107123.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor now, we can only confirm that Jurassic ensiferans were communicating with a broad range of frequencies from low audio to moderate ultrasound,\u201d the authors wrote in the paper.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe show that ultrasonic communication was likely adopted by katydid ancestors during the Middle Jurassic, some 165 million years ago, the oldest record known for ultrasound communication in animals.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIn addition, these ancient ensiferans had already started to diversify in their acoustic signaling strategies, through changes in body size and stridulatory file morphology, producing pure-tone and high-pitch calls.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWhile the observed diversity of extant katydid acoustic signaling strategies and the predominant use of pure-tone ultrasound are thought to have been driven by predator eavesdropping, we here reject the hypothesis that bats were the sole driver of ultrasound evolution in katydids.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cInstead, it is likely that early mammals and non-mammalian ancestors were also listening in to the songs of ensiferans, driving early diversification of acoustic signaling strategies.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe evolution of ultrasound could have also been driven by acoustic niche partitioning due to interspecific competition.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThis, combined with evidence for ultrasound in Cretaceous moths, implies that bats emerged \u2014 nearly 100 million years after singing ensiferans \u2014 into a soundscape already busy with ultrasounds.\u201d<\/p>\n

The paper<\/a> appears today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.<\/p>\n

_____<\/p>\n

Jun-Jie Gu et al. 2026. Reconstruction of an extinct soundscape reveals ultrasonic communication in the Jurassic. PNAS 123 (36): e2615107123; doi: 10.1073\/pnas.2615107123<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Using lasers, computer models and AI, researchers reconstructed the calls of 165-million-year-old relatives of modern crickets and katydids…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":656544,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[77],"tags":[381,12280,13084,18,277474,4696,277475,19,5213,8102,17,277476,28931,177440,277477,133,277478,277479,15428,277480,1948,81467,8103],"class_list":["post-656543","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-science","tag-china","tag-communication","tag-cricket","tag-eire","tag-ensifera","tag-fossil","tag-haglidae","tag-ie","tag-inner-mongolia","tag-insect","tag-ireland","tag-jiulongshan-formation","tag-jurassic","tag-katydid","tag-prophalangopsidae","tag-science","tag-sigmaboilus","tag-sigmaboilus-peregrinus","tag-sound","tag-stridulation","tag-ultrasound","tag-vocalization","tag-wing"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/117158971994390625","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/656543","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=656543"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/656543\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/656544"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=656543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=656543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=656543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}