{"id":656633,"date":"2026-08-26T01:39:22","date_gmt":"2026-08-26T01:39:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/656633\/"},"modified":"2026-08-26T01:39:22","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T01:39:22","slug":"our-ancient-ancestors-may-have-climbed-trees-with-monkey-feet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/656633\/","title":{"rendered":"Our Ancient Ancestors May Have Climbed Trees with \u2018Monkey\u2019 Feet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>An enduring debate in paleoanthropology asks what kind of foot the last common ancestor (LCA) of humans and chimpanzees had: one built like a modern ape\u2019s for climbing straight up trees, or one built more like a generalized monkey\u2019s, less suited to vertical climbing. In new research, paleoanthropologists from Dartmouth College and Ohio State University found that vertically-climbing monkeys called <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sci.news\/othersciences\/anthropology\/downclimbing-apes-12249.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">sooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys)<\/a> can flex their feet nearly as much as chimpanzees while climbing vertical trunks, suggesting that the LCA could have been a tree climber even if it had a more monkey-like anatomy.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-18363\" class=\"size-full wp-image-18363\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/image_1675-Ardipithecus-ramidus.jpg\" alt=\"Ardipithecus ramidus, a hominid that lived in Africa more then 4 million years ago. Illustration by Arturo Asensio, via Quo.es.\" width=\"580\" height=\"386\"  \/><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-18363\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Ardipithecus ramidus, a hominid that lived in Africa more then 4 million years ago. Illustration by Arturo Asensio, via Quo.es.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPeople are making behavioral inferences from fossils, and some say a monkey can\u2019t vertically climb as well as an ape can,\u201d said Ohio State\u2019s Dr. Luke Fannin.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re saying there\u2019s a functional equivalence here. So you can\u2019t rule out vertical climbing just because something doesn\u2019t have a chimpanzee-like foot.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIdentifying the last common ancestor is considered key to helping us understand what led to bipedalism, which is done habitually only by humans.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe know we\u2019re apes, but this study makes the point that even if the ancestor had a more monkey-like foot morphology, it could still climb like an ape.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPart of paleoanthropology is understanding how our evolution happened, and it\u2019s often through the hallmark of how we move because modern humans move quite differently than our cousins, the chimpanzees, do, and they\u2019re the living primate we\u2019re most closely related to. And we\u2019re trying to understand why that is.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Fannin and colleagues spent time in Ivory Coast\u2019s Ta\u00ef National Park filming the sooty mangabey, a species of large, forest-dwelling African monkey that is a terrestrial forager and climber of vertical trunks.<\/p>\n<p>Using video captured at 30 frames per second, the researchers measured how far the primates bent their ankles and their midfeet during climbing.<\/p>\n<p>Chimpanzees and other African apes climb by hyperextending their ankles more than 45 degrees, a maneuver that keeps their center of mass close to the tree and reduces the risk of tipping backward. Monkeys, by contrast, lack the ankle anatomy to pull off that same trick.<\/p>\n<p>What the scientists found is that mangabeys compensate with an entirely different joint: rather than bending sharply at the ankle, they bend sharply at the midfoot, the flexible region between the heel and the toes sometimes called a midfoot break.<\/p>\n<p>Mangabeys flexed their midfeet by an average of nearly 46 degrees while climbing \u2014 almost identical to the degree of ankle flexion recorded in climbing chimpanzees, and even slightly greater than the ankle flexion measured in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Twa\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Twa hunter-gatherers<\/a>, a Central African population known for climbing trees to harvest honey.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the mangabeys\u2019 own ankles barely moved by comparison, flexing roughly 23 degrees on average \u2014 far less than either the chimpanzees or the Twa climbers.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, two very different joints, in two very different feet, were producing strikingly similar climbing performance.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-94338\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-94338\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/image_12249-Cercocebus-atys.jpg\" alt=\"Sooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys). Image credit: Luke Fannin, Dartmouth College.\" width=\"580\" height=\"435\"  \/><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-94338\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys). Image credit: Luke Fannin, Dartmouth College.<\/p>\n<p>The finding matters because it undercuts one of the pillars of the \u2018monkey-footed LCA\u2019 argument: the idea that a monkey-like midfoot would have made vertical climbing difficult, or even off the table, for early members of the human lineage.<\/p>\n<p>If a flexible midfoot can substitute for a flexible ankle as effectively as the mangabey data suggest, then an ancestor with a more monkey-like foot could still have climbed trees safely and often.<\/p>\n<p>The authors note that their results don\u2019t settle which foot the common ancestor actually had. What they do show is that either version \u2014 ape-like or monkey-like \u2014 could have supported a life that regularly included climbing trees.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat\u2019s neat about this paper is it adds clarity, but it also makes the broader picture more fuzzy,\u201d said Ohio State\u2019s Professor W. Scott McGraw.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBecause this notion that you have to have a foot like an advanced ape to vertically climb, which is a difficult task, is not true.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou\u2019ve got a bunch of monkeys that aren\u2019t extinct \u2014 and which can be filmed \u2014 that are very competent at performing a biomechanically challenging behavior right now in a forest in West Africa.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cArboreality is fundamental to understanding primates \u2014 including ourselves \u2014 because it has shaped our body to a large degree: hands and feet, wrists and ankles, nails instead of claws, etc.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRegardless of where you\u2019re starting from, which we don\u2019t know yet, vertical climbing is universal and the anatomy is going to perform that behavior,\u201d Dr. Fannin added.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo I think that to get at the question of a monkey-like or ape-like last common ancestor, we need more fossils.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pnas.org\/doi\/10.1073\/pnas.2608183123\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">findings<\/a> were published this month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.<\/p>\n<p>_____<\/p>\n<p>Luke D. Fannin et al. 2026. A kinematic convergence in ape and monkey vertical climbing informs debates on early hominin arborealism. PNAS 123 (35): e2608183123; doi: 10.1073\/pnas.2608183123<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"An enduring debate in paleoanthropology asks what kind of foot the last common ancestor (LCA) of humans and&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":656634,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[77],"tags":[156641,277510,277511,277512,45911,80840,18,8101,14976,80841,13645,3290,3292,3293,263705,19,17,277513,30207,277514,48989,78928,186483,133,273562,267447],"class_list":["post-656633","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-science","tag-ape","tag-arboreality","tag-cercocebus","tag-cercocebus-atys","tag-chimpanzee","tag-climbing","tag-eire","tag-evolution","tag-foot","tag-great-ape","tag-hominin","tag-homo","tag-homo-sapiens","tag-human","tag-hunter-gatherer","tag-ie","tag-ireland","tag-lca","tag-locomotion","tag-mangabey","tag-monkey","tag-pan","tag-pan-troglodytes","tag-science","tag-sooty-mangabey","tag-twa"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/117159263295118470","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/656633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=656633"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/656633\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/656634"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=656633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=656633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=656633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}