{"id":679434,"date":"2026-09-09T00:30:18","date_gmt":"2026-09-09T00:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/679434\/"},"modified":"2026-09-09T00:30:18","modified_gmt":"2026-09-09T00:30:18","slug":"andrew-garfield-explains-the-robin-hood-energy-in-the-uprising","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/679434\/","title":{"rendered":"Andrew Garfield Explains the Robin Hood Energy in The Uprising"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n\tAndrew Garfield<\/a> is out of the loop.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n\tThe British actor has been unplugged lately, so much so that he still hasn\u2019t seen Spider-Man: Brand New Day or The Odyssey. As a result, he certainly wasn\u2019t tracking the recent marketing confusion surrounding his new film The Uprising<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n\tOn Aug. 20, the campaign for Paul Greengrass\u2019 period action drama seemingly rebranded<\/a> itself as a stealth Robin Hood movie, prompting a collective \u201cwait, what!?\u201d from the internet. It appeared that the film had been retitled The Uprising: The Rise of Robin Hood, though the subtitle was later clarified to be a tagline rather than a new title. Subsequent promo spots reinforced that the title remains The Uprising. (Greengrass\u2019 original title during the scripting phase was The Hood.)<\/p>\n

\n\tThe commotion recalls what happened with Garfield\u2019s romantic drama We Live in Time<\/a> a couple of years ago. A first-look image of Garfield and co-star Florence Pugh riding a carousel became a viral sensation thanks to the crazed-looking carousel horse sharing the frame with them. Garfield, for his part, welcomes any and all bizarre flukes if they help attract moviegoers to his films that lack radioactive spiders.<\/p>\n

\n\t\u201cWe\u2019re in a time of chaos. There\u2019s no formula to getting people to see a film,\u201d Garfield tells The Hollywood Reporter. \u201cHowever that happens \u2014\u00a0whether it\u2019s me eating chicken wings with hot sauce, or people talking about Robin Hood or a deranged horse \u2014\u00a0I just really believe in [The Uprising]. Whatever gets people to see it in a communal experience, like they\u2019ve been doing all summer with other movies \u2014 that\u2019s my hope, my dream and my prayer. So bring on the deranged horse.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n\tSet in 1381, The Uprising centers on Garfield\u2019s grieving farmer, known only as the Ploughman. Alongside real-life leaders Wat Tyler (Cosmo Jarvis) and John Ball (Jamie Bell), the fictional character sparks the Peasants\u2019 Revolt in an effort to stop the excessive taxation imposed on England\u2019s peasantry by the council of oligarchs acting on behalf of King Richard II.<\/p>\n

\n\tGarfield believes the historical event mirrors the world today, particularly in the United States. Citizens on both sides of the aisle have become increasingly disenchanted with billionaires spending record sums to influence elections and policy while increasing their own net worths and driving up the cost of living for everyone else. Garfield even remarked at a recent Q&A for The Uprising that he hopes the 1 percent are \u201cscared shitless\u201d<\/a> by his and Greengrass\u2019 new film.<\/p>\n

\n\t\u201cThere\u2019s a universal rage we\u2019re all feeling. There\u2019s a kind of imprisonment that we\u2019re all suffering under, and it\u2019s keeping us from our sense of belonging to this earth, to ourselves, to each other and to the dignity of our own souls,\u201d Garfield says. \u201cWe are all deeply longing for a reconnection to that belonging, and it\u2019s not simple to get there because it means traveling down. It\u2019s not ascension. There\u2019s an obsession that we have right now with ascending above all of our issues and even going to another fucking planet to do it. That\u2019s going to solve nothing.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n\tThe moniker of the Ploughman is a reference to William Langland\u2019s poem Piers Plowman, which predates the Peasants\u2019 Revolt. The 14th-century work contains the first literary reference to Robin Hood, though the legend of the outlaw existed in some form as early as the 13th century. The Uprising posits that the efforts of England\u2019s lower classes helped inspire and amplify later tales of the hooded, bow-wielding outlaw seeking justice. Historians have even connected the Great Uprising to principles that would later inform the U.S. Constitution.<\/p>\n

\n\tThe Uprising ultimately contains allusions to Robin Hood and his iconography, but Garfield says the film is more interested in capturing the influential spirit of the famed outlaw. In other words, don\u2019t expect the character to announce himself as Robin Hood \u00e0 la Batman or Iron Man.<\/p>\n

\n\t\u201cThe Robin Hood aspect is more of an emergent energy and archetype within our story,\u201d Garfield says. \u201cIt\u2019s a figure that starts to emerge from the unconscious and the ground during periods of time when common folk are feeling disempowered, abused, violated and separated from the dignity of living their own lives.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n\tBelow, during a conversation with THR, Garfield also addresses Jesse Eisenberg\u2019s decision not to return as Mark Zuckerberg for Aaron Sorkin\u2019s The Social Network companion, The Social Reckoning. He then discusses his outlook on the future after playing OpenAI CEO Sam Altman in Luca Guadagnino\u2019s Artificial<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n\t***<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\tI really enjoyed The Uprising. The one caveat is I know I would\u2019ve enjoyed it even more had the recent marketing kerfuffle not happened. For whatever reason, the universe refuses to preserve the surprises in some of your movies the last five years.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\t(Garfield gives a knowing smile.)<\/p>\n

\n\tWas <\/strong>Uprising<\/strong>\u2019s allusion to Robin Hood always going to be unveiled in the marketing?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\tThis all went over my head a little bit. I\u2019m three weeks sober from social media.<\/p>\n

\n\tLucky you.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\tYeah, it feels really weird, but good. So [the marketing kerfuffle] passed me by a little bit, but I really trust Focus. I trust Paul [Greengrass]. I trust this film to find the people that it\u2019s meant to find.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n\tThe Robin Hood aspect is more of an emergent energy and archetype within our story. It\u2019s an archetype and a folk hero that predates the Peasants\u2019 Revolt, but it\u2019s a figure that starts to emerge from the unconscious and the ground during periods of time when common folk are feeling disempowered, abused, violated and separated from the dignity of living their own lives. There is this archetypal energy that starts to rise up, and I love that arc.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n\tI love the archetypes of the Green Man and Robin Hood and how they connect with the Ploughman and the other people who are struggling and realizing that the system is not in their favor. In fact, it\u2019s against them and the dignity of their souls. Their outlaw energy then comes from creating and connecting and finding belonging. Whether or not they\u2019re being given permission from on high, that belonging is an inherent birthright, a belonging to this earth, which those archetypes signify and symbolize.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\tAndrew Garfield as the Ploughman in Paul Greengrass\u2019 The Uprising<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFocus Features<\/p>\n

\n\tOne of the movie\u2019s taglines is \u201cwitness the birth of a legend,\u201d and I mention that because I covered <\/strong>The Death of Robin Hood<\/strong> a couple of months ago. Beyond just titles and taglines, both movies work rather well as bookends. Do you know if that film affected your rollout plans at all?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\tNot that I know of, no. I haven\u2019t seen that film yet, but I\u2019m very curious and excited to do so.<\/p>\n

\n\tUprising\u2019s marketing fuss reminded me a bit of the <\/strong>We Live In Time commotion<\/strong><\/a> involving the photo of you and Florence Pugh with the deranged-looking carousel horse. You can do all the right things to market an original movie, but then it\u2019s something completely random that catches fire. Is it frustrating that this is what it takes for non-franchise movies to get on people\u2019s radars these days?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\tIt\u2019s a question that feels a bit beyond my pay grade in a way. I make the films I want to make, with the themes and the soul that I want to put into the world, and whatever gets people to see them gets people to see them. We\u2019re in a time of chaos. The world has no center right now. Pattern recognition is impossible because everything is full of randomness, so there\u2019s no formula to getting people to see a film.<\/p>\n

\n\tThere\u2019s everything we can do when we believe in the story we\u2019re telling, and then there\u2019s everything we can do to make sure that people are aware of it. And however that happens \u2014\u00a0whether it\u2019s me eating chicken wings with hot sauce, or people talking about Robin Hood or a deranged horse \u2014\u00a0I just really believe in this film. Whatever gets people to see it in a communal experience, like they\u2019ve been doing all summer with other movies \u2014 that\u2019s my hope, my dream and my prayer. So bring on the deranged horse.<\/p>\n

\n\tPloughman says he\u2019s not a soldier or a man of the cloth. He\u2019s just a humble farmer according to him. But his combat skills are second to none, and he has sharp instincts on the battlefield. He can sense perfidy before it happens, and he can identify the optimal evacuation point in the throes of battle. Is he withholding his true past? Is he charmed?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\tI don\u2019t think it\u2019s either. In that era, you had to be able to fight. There was a survival instinct, and it wasn\u2019t from formal training. There was just a hunter-gatherer kind of need that you had, whether it was with animals or neighboring places or within your own village. There was a physical, rough-and-ready rhythm to men of that era. They had a protective instinct and a physical ability.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n\tIn terms of his [evacuation] instincts, I can attribute that to his closeness to the land and to nature. He has nourished in himself a kind of indigeneity and a belonging to the rhythms of nature and its seasons. It develops as the story goes because he is worn down to the essential core rawness of his own instinctive humanity. We pick up the story when he has this thin layer of identity still, a little crust around the jewel of the deep self. And then he\u2019s finally forced onto his knees in humiliation by the end.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\tAndrew Garfield as \u201cPloughman\u201d in Paul Greengrass\u2019 The Uprising<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFocus Features<\/p>\n

\n\tPloughman reaches a level of rage that I\u2019ve never seen from you on screen. Smashing a laptop is rageful, but this is something deeper and more existential. To get where you needed to go, did you channel his imagined memories or your own memories?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\tIt becomes an amalgamation. That includes not only your own personal memories and experiences, but also ancestry, imagination and empathy. Right now in the world, there\u2019s a universal rage that people are either aware of, or they\u2019re avoiding, or they\u2019re kidding themselves about. There\u2019s a universal rage we\u2019re all feeling, and there\u2019s a deep longing to reconnect to the water of life, to the source of what it is to be a human being. There\u2019s a loss of soul, and I\u2019m even emotional talking about it now.<\/p>\n

\n\tThere\u2019s a kind of imprisonment that we\u2019re all suffering under, and it\u2019s keeping us from our sense of belonging to this earth, to ourselves, to each other and to the dignity of our own souls. We are all deeply longing for a reconnection to that belonging, and it\u2019s not simple to get there because it means traveling down. It\u2019s not ascension. There\u2019s an obsession that we have right now with ascending above all of our issues and even going to another fucking planet to do it. That\u2019s going to solve nothing.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n\tI feel like the solution is the opposite, counterintuitive way, which is down. It\u2019s down through all of our pain, all of our rage, all of our agony and anguish. Our woundedness is actually the quality that connects us all. We\u2019re all deeply wounded, and underneath all of that is a connection to the deepest part of ourselves. Down there is where we find our connection to nature and to each other. That\u2019s where we realize we are the custodians of this miracle that is called life and Planet Earth, rather than dominators of it or victims to it.<\/p>\n

\n\tPloughman is your latest of several characters who undergoes a crisis or loss of faith. You\u2019ve also explored a character recently who exploited people\u2019s faith like King Richard II does in <\/strong>Uprising<\/strong>. Have these more recent roles \u2014\u00a0Ploughman, Jim Bakker, Jeb Pyre \u2014\u00a0altered any of your conclusions from a decade ago during <\/strong>Hacksaw Ridge<\/strong> and <\/strong>Silence<\/strong>?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\tI don\u2019t know about conclusions. God, it\u2019s a complicated thing, and it\u2019s so tough to talk about because it\u2019s so personal. But I crave what I was sharing before, which is a collective or communal connection. Our current systems are not serving our deep connection to this earth and our belonging to this life. We have to fight tooth and nail a lot for that. The world right now is very uncentered. There is no center. There is chaos. There is anxiety. There is fear. There is a disparate falling apart of our current systems, which I think is necessary and good. As that\u2019s happening, it\u2019s important for us to find our own centers and start to bring that to the [fore], so that a new system can start to be created from something that\u2019s more genuine.<\/p>\n

\n\tWhen you met Jamie Bell on the <\/strong>Uprising<\/strong> set, did either of you bring up the 2010 screen test you had in common?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\t(Laughs.) No, we didn\u2019t talk about Spider-Man. I don\u2019t think we did.<\/p>\n

\n\tThe people reading this will undoubtedly want to know your thoughts on Tom Holland\u2019s new <\/strong>Spider-Man<\/strong> movie. Have you had a chance to see <\/strong>Brand New Day<\/strong> yet?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\tI haven\u2019t seen it yet. I\u2019ve been a bit off the grid, but thank God it\u2019s still in theaters, so I\u2019m going to try and see it. I haven\u2019t seen The Odyssey yet either. I\u2019m the only person alive who hasn\u2019t seen these movies, but I hear that they\u2019re both phenomenal. So I\u2019m very, very excited to go and support my friends. The movies are back, baby.<\/p>\n

\n\tAs I just proved, you know firsthand how roles can follow you everywhere you go. I imagine there are mostly pros than cons to it, but for some people, the scale tips the other way. So how surprised were you that Jesse Eisenberg didn\u2019t want to reprise his role for <\/strong>The Social Network<\/strong>\u2019s quasi-sequel, <\/strong>The Social Reckoning<\/strong>?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\tSurprised, not surprised \u2014\u00a0I don\u2019t know. He was so quintessentially perfect in that character and in that film. I don\u2019t know the interior workings of his mind as much as I would like to because it\u2019s one of the most brilliant minds I\u2019ve ever come across. So I don\u2019t really have an opinion on it particularly, but I love Jeremy Strong, Aaron Sorkin and the whole cast [of The Social Reckoning]. Aaron is one of our great writers, so I\u2019m really excited to see it.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\tAndrew Garfield as Sam Altman and Yura Borisov as Ilya Sutskever in Artificial<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCourtesy of NEON<\/p>\n

\n\tYour upcoming movie, <\/strong>Artificial<\/strong><\/a>, is about another Zuckerbergian figure named Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI. Based on everything you\u2019ve learned, have we already rendered ourselves obsolete?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\tThe toothpaste is definitely out of the tube, but that doesn\u2019t mean we\u2019ve rendered ourselves obsolete. I have a lot of hope. I have a lot of hope that humanity will prevail and that the soul of humanity cannot be replicated and artificialized. Artificial intelligence, the name is on the tin. It\u2019s artificial. It\u2019s not soul intelligence. It\u2019s not human intelligence. That\u2019s my perspective, and God knows I\u2019ve been wrong before, but I believe deeply in human beings. I believe deeply in the unreplicable nature of the human soul and the human spirit. I want to tell stories that speak to that, and I want to stay connected to that. Listen, new tools are great, but for me, it\u2019s not going to replace the experience of going to the movie theater or the theater or seeing some live music.<\/p>\n

\n\t***
The Uprising opens September 10 in movie theaters nationwide.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Andrew Garfield is out of the loop.\u00a0 The British actor has been unplugged lately, so much so that…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":679435,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[268],"tags":[24639,3112,434,18,117,19,17,73340],"class_list":["post-679434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-celebrities","tag-andrew-garfield","tag-artificial","tag-celebrities","tag-eire","tag-entertainment","tag-ie","tag-ireland","tag-the-uprising"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ie\/117238263933593717","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/679434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=679434"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/679434\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/679435"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=679434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=679434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=679434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}