{"id":83574,"date":"2025-09-24T22:05:12","date_gmt":"2025-09-24T22:05:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/83574\/"},"modified":"2025-09-24T22:05:12","modified_gmt":"2025-09-24T22:05:12","slug":"social-networking-agency-and-prosociality-are-inextricably-linked-in-economic-games","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/83574\/","title":{"rendered":"Social networking agency and prosociality are inextricably linked in economic games"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Boissevain, J. Friends of Friends: Networks, Manipulators and Coalitions (Basil Blackwell, 1974).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Watts, D. J., Dodds, P. S. & Newman, M. E. J. Identity and search in social networks. Science 296<\/b>, 1302\u20131305 (2002).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481<\/b>, 497\u2013501 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Henrich, J. & Muthukrishna, M. The origins and psychology of human cooperation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 72<\/b>, 207\u2013240 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425<\/b>, 785\u2013791 (2003).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rand, D. G. & Nowak, M. A. Human cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17<\/b>, 413\u2013425 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ohtsuki, H., Hauert, C., Lieberman, E. & Nowak, M. A. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441<\/b>, 502\u2013505 (2006).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Santos, F. C., Santos, M. D. & Pacheco, J. M. Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games. Nature 454<\/b>, 213\u2013216 (2008).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107<\/b>, 5334\u20135338 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Szab\u00f3, G. & Fath, G. Evolutionary games on graphs. Phys. Rep. 446<\/b>, 97\u2013216 (2007).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bliege Bird, R., Ready, E. & Power, E. A. The social significance of subtle signals. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2<\/b>, 452\u2013457 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Goyal, S. Networks: An Economics Approach (MIT Press, 2023).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G. & Balliet, D. Personality and prosocial behavior: a theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 146<\/b>, 30\u201390 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    van Dijk, E. & De Dreu, C. K. W. Experimental games and social decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 72<\/b>, 415\u2013438 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rapoport, A., Chammah, A. M. & Orwant, C. J. Prisoner\u2019s Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation (Univ. Michigan Press, 1965).<\/p>\n

    Book<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Berg, J., Dickhaut, J. & McCabe, K. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econ. Behav. 10<\/b>, 122\u2013142 (1995).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    G\u00fcth, W., Schmittberger, R. & Schwarze, B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3<\/b>, 367\u2013388 (1982).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Camerer, C. F. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kagel, J. H. & Roth, A. E. The Handbook of Experimental Economics 2 (Princeton Univ. Press, 2020).<\/p>\n

    Book<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dal B\u00f3, P. & Fr\u00e9chette, G. R. The evolution of cooperation in infinitely repeated games: experimental evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 101<\/b>, 411\u2013429 (2011).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    B\u00f3, P. D. Cooperation under the shadow of the future: experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games. Am. Econ. Rev. 95<\/b>, 1591\u20131604 (2005).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Battiston, F. et al. Networks beyond pairwise interactions: structure and dynamics. Phys. Rep. 874<\/b>, 1\u201392 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jusup, M. et al. Social physics. Phys. Rep. 948<\/b>, 1\u2013148 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gracia-L\u00e1zaro, C. et al. Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a prisoner\u2019s dilemma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109<\/b>, 12922\u201312926 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rand, D. G., Nowak, M. A., Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. Static network structure can stabilize human cooperation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111<\/b>, 17093\u201317098 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Perc, M. & Szolnoki, A. Coevolutionary games\u2014a mini review. BioSystems 99<\/b>, 109\u2013125 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Perc, M., G\u00f3mez-Gardenes, J., Szolnoki, A., Flor\u00eda, L. M. & Moreno, Y. Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review. J. R. Soc. Interface 10<\/b>, 20120997 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fehl, K., van der Post, D. J. & Semmann, D. Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation. Ecol. Lett. 14<\/b>, 546\u2013551 (2011).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rand, D. G., Arbesman, S. & Christakis, N. A. Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108<\/b>, 19193\u201319198 (2011).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Melamed, D., Harrell, A. & Simpson, B. Cooperation, clustering, and assortative mixing in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115<\/b>, 951\u2013956 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Su, Q., McAvoy, A. & Plotkin, J. B. Evolution of cooperation with contextualized behavior. Sci. Adv. 8<\/b>, eabm6066 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jia, D. et al. Evolutionary dynamics drives role specialization in a community of players. J. R. Soc. Interface 17<\/b>, 20200174 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Su, Q., Li, A. & Wang, L. Evolution of cooperation with interactive identity and diversity. J. Theor. Biol. 442<\/b>, 149\u2013157 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    McAvoy, A. & Hauert, C. Asymmetric evolutionary games. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11<\/b>, e1004,349 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Su, Q., Allen, B. & Plotkin, J. B. Evolution of cooperation with asymmetric social interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119<\/b>, e2113468118 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    H\u00fcbner, V., Staab, M., Hilbe, C., Chatterjee, K. & Kleshnina, M. Efficiency and resilience of cooperation in asymmetric social dilemmas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121<\/b>, e2315558121 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Peysakhovich, A., Nowak, M. A. & Rand, D. G. Humans display a \u2018cooperative phenotype\u2019 that is domain general and temporally stable. Nat. Commun. 5<\/b>, 4939 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Poncela-Casasnovas, J. et al. Humans display a reduced set of consistent behavioral phenotypes in dyadic games. Sci. Adv. 2<\/b>, e1600451 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Engle-Warnick, J. & Slonim, R. L. Learning to trust in indefinitely repeated games. Games Econ. Behav. 54<\/b>, 95\u2013114 (2006).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    King-Casas, B. et al. The rupture and repair of cooperation in borderline personality disorder. Science 321<\/b>, 806\u2013810 (2008).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    G\u00fcth, W. & Kocher, M. G. More than thirty years of ultimatum bargaining experiments: motives, variations, and a survey of the recent literature. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 108<\/b>, 396\u2013409 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Han, X. et al. Emergence of communities and diversity in social networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114<\/b>, 2887\u20132891 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cherry, T. L., Kroll, S. & Shogren, J. F. The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on public good contributions: evidence from the lab. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 57<\/b>, 357\u2013365 (2005).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nishi, A., Shirado, H., Rand, D. G. & Christakis, N. A. Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks. Nature 526<\/b>, 426\u2013429 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hauser, O. P., Hilbe, C., Chatterjee, K. & Nowak, M. A. Social dilemmas among unequals. Nature 572<\/b>, 524\u2013527 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Camerer, C.F., Fehr, E. in Foundations of Human Sociality (eds. Henrich, J. et al.) 55\u201359 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2004).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Galesic, M. et al. Human social sensing is an untapped resource for computational social science. Nature 595<\/b>, 214\u2013222 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Balliet, D., Wu, J. & De Dreu, C. K. W. Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 140<\/b>, 1556\u20131581 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Romano, A., Balliet, D., Yamagishi, T. & Liu, J. H. Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114<\/b>, 12702\u201312707 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sohn, Y., Choi, J. K. & Ahn, T. K. Core-periphery segregation in evolving prisoner\u2019s dilemma networks. J. Complex Netw. 8<\/b>, cnz021 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Almaatouq, A. et al. Scaling up experimental social, behavioral, and economic science. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31219\/osf.io\/wksv8_v1<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shi, L. et al. Freedom of choice adds value to public goods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 30<\/b>, 17,516\u201317,521 (2020).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E. & Herrmann, E. Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: the interdependence hypothesis. Curr. Anthropol. 53<\/b>, 673\u2013692 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, D. L., Schonger, M. & Wickens, C. otree\u2014an open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Exp. Finance 9<\/b>, 88\u201397 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kim, D. G. Clustering Standard Errors at the \u2018Session\u2019 Level (CESifo, 2020).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Abadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G. W. & Wooldridge, J. M. When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Q. J. Econ. 138<\/b>, 1\u201335 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V. & Niknafs, A. NbClust: an R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. J. Stat. Softw. 61<\/b>, 1\u201336 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Boissevain, J. Friends of Friends: Networks, Manipulators and Coalitions (Basil Blackwell, 1974). Google Scholar\u00a0 Watts, D. J., Dodds,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":83575,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[77],"tags":[5800,55553,184,18,5804,910,19,17,3544,5802,5801,5803,133],"class_list":{"0":"post-83574","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-science","8":"tag-behavioral-sciences","9":"tag-complex-networks","10":"tag-economics","11":"tag-eire","12":"tag-experimental-psychology","13":"tag-general","14":"tag-ie","15":"tag-ireland","16":"tag-life-sciences","17":"tag-microeconomics","18":"tag-neurosciences","19":"tag-personality-and-social-psychology","20":"tag-science"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83574"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83574\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/83575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83574"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}