The fuel margins raked in by supermarkets, and other fuel retailers, rose in the last three months, the Competitions and Markets Authority<\/strong> reported this morning shows.<\/p>\n The CMA<\/strong> says fuel margins remain \u201cfar\u201d above historic levels.<\/p>\n Its data shows that supermarket fuel margins stood at 4% in 2017, but more than doubled to an average of 8.4% in the first half of 2025. Non-supermarket fuel margins were 6.4% in 2017, but the first half of this year averaged 9.8%.<\/p>\n The CMA<\/strong> says the increase in fuel margins is \u201cdeeply concerning\u201d is that fuel margins \u2013 a key indicator of retailer profit \u2013 remain far above historic levels.<\/p>\n Dan Turnbull<\/strong>, senior director of markets at the Competition<\/strong> and<\/strong> Markets<\/strong> Authority<\/strong> (CMA)<\/strong>, says:<\/p>\n Our new report<\/a> shows that drivers across the UK have been paying more at the pump in recent months. While recent price rises are partly explained by an increase in the price of oil, what\u2019s deeply concerning is that fuel margins \u2013 a key indicator of retailer profit \u2013 remain far above historic levels.<\/p>\n The Fuel Finder scheme we recommended to government will help combat this trend, pushing retailers to be more competitive as drivers are empowered with real-time pricing data \u2013 making shopping around easier than ever. Government aims to launch the scheme by the end of the year.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Key events<\/p>\n Show key events only<\/p>\n Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature<\/p>\n Closing post<\/p>\n Time to wrap up\u2026.<\/p>\n Retailers\u2019 fuel price margins are far above historic levels, according to a study by the competition regulator, sparking claims that motorists are being ripped off.<\/strong><\/p>\n The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said its findings are \u201cdeeply concerning\u201d.<\/p>\n Margins show the difference between what retailers pay for fuel and the price they sell it for.<\/p>\n The CMA\u2019s monitoring found supermarkets\u2019 fuel margins ranged from 8.0-9.1% in the three months to the end of June, while for other retailers it ranged from 9.9-10.6%.<\/p>\n Luke Bosdet, the AA\u2019s spokesperson on pump prices, said:<\/p>\n \u201cUK consumers faced by inflationary pressures on all fronts and trying to stretch their budgets as far as they can will be incensed by this confirmation of what they suspected \u2013 they continue to be ripped off at the pumps.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Donald Trump\u2019s threat to impose new tariffs from next week on branded drugs, trucks and kitchen cabinets<\/a> has raised fresh concerns for the UK pharmaceutical industry, which remains excluded from Keir Starmer\u2019s US tariff deal<\/a> agreed five months ago.<\/strong><\/p>\n Trump promised the UK \u201cpreferential treatment\u201d on pharma tariffs in May but has yet to deliver on his pledge.<\/p>\n A British government spokesperson said:<\/p>\n \u201cWe know this will be concerning for industry, which is why we\u2019ve been actively engaging with the US and will continue to do so over the coming days.<\/p>\n \u201cSectors such as pharmaceuticals are critical to our economy \u2026 so we will continue to press the US for outcomes that reflect the strength of our relationship and deliver real benefits for UK industry.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Shares in European truckmakers have fallen today \u2013 with Daimler<\/strong> Truck<\/strong> down 2.1% in late trading and Traton<\/strong> Group<\/strong> losing 2.2%.<\/p>\n European markets are ending the day in the green, though, with the UK\u2019s FTSE<\/strong> 100<\/strong> index up 63 points or 0.7% at 9277 points.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a010.58 EDT<\/p>\n Over in New York, the US stock market is also unruffled by Donald Trump\u2019s overnight tariff flurry.<\/p>\n The Dow<\/strong> Jones<\/strong> industrial<\/strong> average<\/strong> has risen by 129 points, or 0.3%, at 46,077, with the broader S&P 500<\/strong> index up 0.13%.<\/p>\n Tech stocks seem to be out of favour, again, with the Nasdaq<\/strong> index down 0.1%.<\/p>\n Share<\/a>US consumer sentiment weakens<\/p>\n We have confirmation that US consumer sentiment has cooled this month.<\/strong><\/p>\n The University of Michigan\u2019<\/strong>s consumer morale index paints a more negative picture than today\u2019s personal spending data.<\/p>\n Their index of Consumer Sentiment has dipped to 55.1 points this month, down from 58.2 in August.<\/p>\n The survey found that Americans are frustrated with high prices, and more pessimistic about labor markets, business conditions and personal expectations.<\/p>\n Those who hold large stakes in the stock market are more positive, though.<\/p>\n Surveys of Consumers <\/strong>director Joanne Hsu <\/strong>says:<\/p>\n \ufeffConsumer sentiment confirmed its early-month reading and eased about 5% from last month but remains above the low readings seen in April and May of this year.<\/p>\n Although September\u2019s decline was relatively modest, it was still seen across a broad swath of the population, across groups by age, income, and education, and all five index components. A key exception: sentiment for consumers with larger stock holdings held steady in September, while for those with smaller or no holdings, sentiment decreased.<\/p>\n This month, sentiment moved down about 9% for independents and 4% for Republicans, whereas it lifted this month for Democrats.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Personal spending in the US rose 0.6% last month for the third month in a row, new government data shows, as Americans shrugged off concerns over tariffs, inflation, and a slowing jobs market.<\/strong><\/p>\n This could ease fears that the US economy is on the cusp of a sharp slowdown.<\/p>\n Stephen<\/strong> Brown<\/strong>, deputy chief North America economist, says:<\/p>\n The rise in real consumption in August means that, given the stronger momentum going into the third quarter, we now have third-quarter consumption growth tracking as high as 3.3%, up from 2.3% last week. Third-quarter GDP growth will be as high as 4%.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>US PCE inflation in line with forecasts<\/p>\n Over in the US, the Federal Reserve\u2019s preferred inflation measure has risen in line with foreasts.<\/strong><\/p>\n The PCE price index<\/strong> increased 0.3% in August, in line with forecasts.<\/p>\n Core PCE<\/strong>, which excludes food and energy, rose by 0.2% in the month, again as expected.<\/p>\n That could cool some concerns that the Trump trade war is fuelling a surge in consumer prices.<\/p>\n PCE in line across the board, but still trending higher.<\/p>\n Core PCE (Aug): PCE (Aug): \u2014 NickTomasAZ (@ntomas67) September 26, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n The CMA has also reported that the cost of fuel across the UK increased from the end of May to the end of August 2025.<\/strong><\/p>\n The average cost of petrol rose to 133.9 pence per litre (ppl) and the average cost of diesel rose to 141.9ppl, representing increases of 1.9ppl and 3.5ppl respectively, they say.<\/p>\n The CMA adds:<\/p>\n These changes reflect, in part, changing oil prices and refining spreads, both of which are driven by global factors.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>AA hits out at “plague” of high retailer margins<\/p>\n UK motorists are being \u2018ripped off\u2019 at the pumps, the AA warns.<\/strong><\/p>\n Responding to this morning\u2019s government data showing a rise in petrol retailers\u2019 margins<\/a>, Luke<\/strong> Bosdet<\/strong>, the AA\u2019s<\/strong> spokesman on pump prices, says:<\/p>\n \u201cUK consumers faced by inflationary pressures on all fronts and trying to stretch their budgets as far as they can will be incensed by this confirmation of what they suspected \u2013 they continue to be ripped off at the pumps.<\/p>\n The most blatantly obvious sign of this is the postcode lottery of pump prices between neighbouring towns. This is where price-matching between local rivals often, in effect, gives them permission to charge significantly more than in a town down the road.<\/p>\n That means that, if a competitive retailer in one town pulls the local average 2p below the UK average while the average in a neighbouring town is allowed to go 2p above, drivers in the rip-off town lose out by 4p a litre or more than \u00a32 a tank.<\/p>\n Sadly, there are more rip-off towns than there are competitive ones.<\/p>\n AA analysis of initial use of price searches on its app shows a big demand for this information from the CMA voluntary price scheme. The fuel trade needs to mend it ways or drivers will do it for them when the Government\u2019s mandatory Fuel Finder scheme goes live early next year.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>CMA: ‘deeply concernnig’ rise in fuel margins<\/p>\n UK fuel retailers are hitting British motorists with historically high profit margins, new data shows.<\/strong><\/p>\n The fuel margins raked in by supermarkets, and other fuel retailers, rose in the last three months, the Competitions and Markets Authority<\/strong> reported this morning shows.<\/p>\n The CMA<\/strong> says fuel margins remain \u201cfar\u201d above historic levels.<\/p>\n Its data shows that supermarket fuel margins stood at 4% in 2017, but more than doubled to an average of 8.4% in the first half of 2025. Non-supermarket fuel margins were 6.4% in 2017, but the first half of this year averaged 9.8%.<\/p>\n The CMA<\/strong> says the increase in fuel margins is \u201cdeeply concerning\u201d is that fuel margins \u2013 a key indicator of retailer profit \u2013 remain far above historic levels.<\/p>\n Dan Turnbull<\/strong>, senior director of markets at the Competition<\/strong> and<\/strong> Markets<\/strong> Authority<\/strong> (CMA)<\/strong>, says:<\/p>\n Our new report<\/a> shows that drivers across the UK have been paying more at the pump in recent months. While recent price rises are partly explained by an increase in the price of oil, what\u2019s deeply concerning is that fuel margins \u2013 a key indicator of retailer profit \u2013 remain far above historic levels.<\/p>\n The Fuel Finder scheme we recommended to government will help combat this trend, pushing retailers to be more competitive as drivers are empowered with real-time pricing data \u2013 making shopping around easier than ever. Government aims to launch the scheme by the end of the year.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>UK ‘pressing for better outcome on US pharma tariffs’<\/p>\n The UK government says it is pressing the United States on pharmaceutical tariffs in hope of a beneficial outcome, after President Donald Trump said a new 100% tariff would apply<\/a> to firms unless they build a manufacturing presence in the country.<\/strong><\/p>\n A British government spokesperson says (via Reuters):<\/p>\n \u201cWe know this will be concerning for industry, which is why we\u2019ve been actively engaging with the U.S. and will continue to do so over the coming days,\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cSectors such as pharmaceuticals are critical to our economy… so we will continue to press the U.S. for outcomes that reflect the strength of our relationship and deliver real benefits for UK industry.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>Pharma tariff threat creates uncertainty across Europe Donald Trump\u2019s overnight threat to impose 100% tariffs on pharmaceuticals from companies not based in the US has been met with fresh uncertainty across Europe.<\/strong><\/p>\n The Germans and the EU-wide trade body have expressed concern while Ireland and Brussels says it remains confident that the 15% tariff rate agreed in July will apply to European drugs exported to the US.<\/p>\n The threat also brings fresh threats to exports from the UK, which is still waiting to seal a deal delivering Trump\u2019s pledge to give it \u201cpreferential treatment\u201d promised as far back as 8 May, could be snared by any new tariffs.<\/p>\n The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations<\/strong> said \u201curgent discussions\u201d were needed to clarify Trump\u2019s intentions reiterating its position that tariffs on medicines could \u201cincrease costs, disrupt supply chains and prevent patients from getting life saving treatments\u201d.<\/p>\n Nathalie Moll, Director General, EFPIA<\/strong> said:<\/p>\n \u201cThe EU and US already have a trade agreement in place; urgent discussions are needed on how to avoid any tariffs on medicines that harm patients in the EU and the US.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Germany\u2019s VFA<\/strong> trade association said on Friday the US deal could hit Germany-based pharmaceutical businesses hard and would violate previous transatlantic trade agreements. Around 25% of Germany pharma exports go to the US, worth about \u20ac27bn in 2024, it added.<\/p>\n Ireland and Germany are two of the three EU countries with surplus trading relationships with the US and both large pharma industries.<\/p>\n Ireland\u2019s deputy prime minister Simon<\/strong> Harris<\/strong> said it would be \u201cstudying the impact\u201d of the announcement but stressed that the joint statement on 21 August about the EU US tariff deal \u201cmade absolutely clear that any new tariffs announced by the US on pharmaceuticals under its Section 232 investigation would be capped at 15% for pharma products being exported by the EU.\u201d<\/p>\n EU trade spokesperson Olof<\/strong> Gill<\/strong> confirmed this was also the view in Brussels: \u201c This clear all-inclusive 15% tariff ceiling for EU exports represents an insurance policy that no higher tariffs will emerge for European economic operators\u201d.<\/p>\n The new tariff threat comes just days after the US also opened a section 232 investigation into medical devices that can include anything from stents for the heart to prosthetic hips, X-ray machines and pacemakers.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a005.17 EDT<\/p>\n Ireland\u2019s trade minister has insisted that the agreement that US tariffs on EU pharmaceuticals would be capped at 15% remains the case, after Donald Trump\u2019s announcement of higher tariffs on the sector.<\/strong><\/p>\n Simon<\/strong> Harris<\/strong> said in a statement:<\/p>\n \u201cI want to stress that the EU and US joint statement issued on August 21 made absolutely clear that any new tariffs announced by the US on pharmaceuticals would be capped at 15% for pharma products being exported by the EU.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThis remains the case and underlines again the value of the agreement reached last month,\u201d he said, adding that Dublin and other EU member states would study the impact of Trump\u2019s announcement.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>European markets largely shrug off Trump tariffs<\/p>\n Eurpopean stock markets are largely shrugging off the impact of Donald Trump\u2019s latest tariffs, although truck makers have been jolted.<\/strong><\/p>\n The main European indices are all ending the week with gains. London\u2019s FTSE<\/strong> 100<\/strong> index is up 0.4% or 37 points at 9250, with Germany\u2019s DAX<\/strong> up 0.5% and France\u2019s CAC<\/strong> share index rising 0.8%.<\/p>\n Neil Wilson, <\/strong>UK investor strategist at Saxo<\/strong>, says stocks are shrugging off the noise around tariffs, telling clients:<\/p>\n The tariff news ought to add to the bearish narrative we\u2019ve seen take hold in equity markets this week, but so far European equity markets are rising and US futures are a bit higher.<\/p>\n Maybe [due to] weaker euro\/sterling, maybe just tariff noise can be ignored?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Truck manufacturers, though, are suffering from the prospect of a 25% tariff on their goods. Daimler<\/strong> Truck<\/strong> are now down 2.4%, while Munich-based Traton Group <\/strong>have lost 2.8%.<\/p>\n European pharmaceuticals stocks have shrugged off their earlier weakness.<\/p>\n There seem to be two reasons.<\/p>\n The EU-US trade deal caps pharma tariffs at 15%, so they should avoid the new 100% tariff announced last night<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Companies who have begun building manufacturing in the US are exempt from the new tariffs \u2013 and there\u2019s already been plenty of investment recently from, for example, Roche<\/strong> and AstraZeneca<\/strong> as mentioned earlier.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Switzerland\u2019s Roche has pointed out that one of its US units recently broke ground on a new facility.<\/strong><\/p>\n A Roche<\/strong> spokesperson has told Reuters that its Genentech unit announced plans for a facility in Holly Springs, North Carolina, on 25 August.<\/p>\n Roche<\/strong> has also made a $50bn pledge to invest in U.S. manufacturing and research and development.<\/p>\n This could indicate that Roche<\/strong> will be protected from the new pharmaceuticals tariffs, as they won\u2019t apply to companies building U.S. plants. Shares in Roche<\/strong> are up 0.2%.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Switzerland says its government departments are analysing the potential impact of pharmaceutical tariff measures announced by US president Donald Trump overnight.<\/strong><\/p>\n The Swiss economy ministry said in a statement that the relevant departments are analysing the impact of the measures together with the relevant stakeholders.<\/p>\n It noted that it did not have details of the measures announced (not an ususual situation when it comes to Trump\u2019s trade war pronouncements\u2026)<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n AstraZeneca<\/strong> has quickly shrugged off those early losses.<\/p>\n Its shares are only down 0.09% now. Perhaps traders have clocked that its US expansion plans mean it could avoid Trump\u2019s new pharma tariffs\u2026.<\/p>\n Share<\/a>Truck maker shares hit by tariffs<\/p>\n Shares in some European truckmakers have fallen in early trading, after Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff on imports of all heavy-duty trucks.<\/strong><\/p>\n Daimler Trucks<\/strong>, the major commercial vehicle manufacturer, has dropped by around 4%.<\/p>\n The Traton<\/strong> Group<\/strong>, whose brands include Scania, MAN, International, and Volkswagen Truck & Bus, are down 2.1%.<\/p>\n Neil<\/strong> Shearing<\/strong>, group chief economist at Capital<\/strong> Economics, <\/strong>says Mexico could be most affected by the new tariffs:<\/p>\n The US sources 78% of heavy truck imports from Mexico and 15% from Canada, so a key question is whether there will be exemptions for USMCA-compliant products.<\/p>\n This is unclear at present, but it\u2019s worth noting that most product-specific tariffs (with the exception of auto parts) have not had USMCA exemptions. If there\u2019s no USMCA exemption, then Mexico will be most heavily affected by the large truck tariffs.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>UK pharma stocks drop<\/p>\n Shares in UK pharmaceuticals giant AstraZeneca<\/strong> have dropped by 1.4% at the start of trading in London.<\/p>\n AstraZeneca<\/strong> are the biggest faller on the FTSE<\/strong> 100<\/strong> share index.<\/p>\n That\u2019s a slight surprise (to me, anyway), as AstraZeneca<\/strong> recently announced it will invest $50bn (\u00a337bn) in the US by 2030. That ought to satisfy Trump\u2019s position that taxes could be avoided by companies if they built manufacturing plants in America.<\/p>\n Kathleen Brooks, <\/strong>research director at XTB<\/strong>, explains:<\/p>\n UK Pharma giant AstraZeneca could be better placed than some of its European rivals, due to promised extra investment in the US that has already been announced, and the President\u2019s promise to treat the UK differently when it comes to pharma tariffs.<\/p>\n Thus, the FTSE 100 could be a relative \u2018safe haven\u2019 in the middle of this latest tariff storm.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Shares in fellow pharma firm GSK<\/strong> are close behind, -0.9%.<\/p>\n The overall FTSE<\/strong> 100<\/strong> is flat in early trading.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n As tariffs are paid by importers, not exporters, Trump\u2019s new levies could sharply push up the cost of some medicines for Americans.<\/strong><\/p>\n Pascal Chan, vice-president for strategic policy and supply chains at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, warned that the tariffs could harm Americans\u2019 health with \u201cimmediate price hikes, strained insurance systems, hospital shortages, and the real risk of patients rationing or foregoing essential medicines\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are already being crushed by the highest prescription drug costs in the world and this will cause them to skyrocket further,\u201d 314 Action, a US advocacy group that tries to elect scientists to office, said in a statement.<\/p>\n \u201cIf [Trump] goes through with these tariffs, people across the country will die.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n More here:<\/p>\n Share<\/a>Introduction: Trump rattles markets with new tariffs on pharmaceuticals, trucks and kitchen cabinets<\/p>\n Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy.<\/strong><\/p>\n Donald Trump has opened up a new front in his global trade wars, jolting investors.<\/p>\n Overnight, the US president announced tariffs of 100% on medicines and pharmaceutical goods imported into the US, dropping a shoe that had been dangling over the pharma industry for months.<\/p>\n In a wide-ranging move, Trump also announced 25% tariff on imports of all heavy-duty trucks, 50% tariffs on kitchen cabinets, a 50% tariff on bathroom vanities and a 30% tariff on upholstered furniture, with all the new duties taking effect from 1 October.<\/p>\n The tariffs announced by Trump do not apply to generic pharmaceuticals, and companies will be exempt if they have begun constructing new manufacturing facilities in the US.<\/p>\n Trump claimed the taxes on imported kitchen cabinets and sofas were needed \u201cfor National Security and other reasons\u201d.<\/p>\n He said the new heavy-duty truck tariffs were to protect manufacturers from \u201cunfair outside competition\u201d and said the move would benefit companies such as Paccar-owned Peterbilt and Kenworth and Daimler Truck-owned Freightliner.<\/p>\n He added:<\/p>\n \u201cWe need our Truckers to be financially healthy and strong, for many reasons, but above all else, for National Security purposes!\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n The announcement has given investors \u201ca fresh reminder about the trade war, and the impact has already been evident in Asian markets,\u201d reports Jim<\/strong> Reid<\/strong>, market strategist at Deutsche Bank<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Shares in Asia-Pacific companies with exposure to the US market have dropped today – Japan\u2019s Sumitomo<\/strong> Pharma<\/strong> are down 4.6%, and Austalia\u2019s biotechnology firm CSL<\/strong> have lost almost 2%.<\/p>\n Shares in Europe\u2019s biggest pharma companies are also set to fall when trading begins; Novo<\/strong> Nordisk<\/strong>, Roche<\/strong>, Novartis<\/strong> and Astrazeneca<\/strong> are down betweeen 1.8% and 2% on the Tradegate platform, Reuters reports.<\/p>\n That\u2019s despite the EU agreeing a trade deal with the US which appears to limit tariffs on pharma and semiconductor exports to 15%<\/a>, in line with most other sectors in the trade deal.<\/p>\n The crackdown on kitchen cabinets has hit stocks too; an index tracking Chinese-listed furniture makers has dropped around 1%.<\/p>\n New US inflation data, due this afternoon, will show whether the trade war is pushing up the cost of living for Americans.<\/p>\n The agendaShare<\/a>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
(YoY) 2.9% vs Forecasted 2.9% (Previous 2.9%)
(MoM) 0.2% vs Forecasted 0.2% (Previous 0.2%)<\/p>\n
(YoY) 2.7% vs Forecasted 2.7% (Previous 2.6%)
(MoM) 0.3% vs Forecasted 0.3% (Previous 0.2%) pic.twitter.com\/3TgIOentLW<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
![\"Lisa](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Lisa-OCarroll-byline-004.jpg\")
Lisa O\u2019Carroll<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n