{"id":90579,"date":"2025-09-28T10:35:23","date_gmt":"2025-09-28T10:35:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/90579\/"},"modified":"2025-09-28T10:35:23","modified_gmt":"2025-09-28T10:35:23","slug":"top-companies-keep-talking-about-ai-but-cant-explain-the-upsides-the-irish-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/90579\/","title":{"rendered":"Top companies keep talking about AI \u2013 but can\u2019t explain the upsides \u2013 The Irish Times"},"content":{"rendered":"

The biggest US<\/a>-listed companies keep talking about artificial intelligence<\/a>. But other than the \u201cfear of missing out,\u201d few appear to be able to describe how the technology is changing their businesses for the better.<\/p>\n

That is the conclusion of a Financial Times analysis of hundreds of corporate filings and executive transcripts at S&P<\/a> 500 companies last year, providing one of the most comprehensive insights yet into how the AI wave is rippling through American industry.<\/p>\n

Big Tech giants such as Microsoft<\/a>, Alphabet<\/a>, Amazon<\/a> and Meta<\/a> have regularly extolled AI\u2019s benefits, pledging to invest $300 billion (\u20ac254 billion) this year alone to develop the infrastructure around large language models.<\/p>\n

Large companies far from Silicon Valley, from beverages giant Coca-Cola<\/a> to sportswear maker Lululemon<\/a>, are also discussing AI at ever-greater length in their regulatory filings. But they also largely paint a more sober picture of the technology\u2019s usefulness, expressing concern over cybersecurity<\/a>, legal risks and the potential for it to fail.<\/p>\n

Customer service support and data-heavy businesses have found it easiest to explain their use of the technology. Paycom, a payroll services provider, reported in filings that AI is an \u201cimportant differentiator\u201d for attracting and retaining clients.<\/p>\n

The filings do reveal a number of innovative uses of the technology. Huntington Ingalls, a military supplier, is applying AI \u201cfor battlefield decisions\u201d. Animal health group Zoetis is using the technology to speed up medical tests for horses. Dover Corporation, a manufacturer, has a new process for tracking \u201chail-damaged vehicles\u201d through to their repair.<\/p>\n

But AI adoption has not necessarily led to more growth. Dover Corporation\u2019s stock has done the best of those three companies since the launch of ChatGPT<\/a> in November 2022, almost matching the S&P 500 Equal Weighted index.<\/p>\n

[\u00a0AI\u2019s replacement of humans in HR is emblematic of what could happen across the workplaceOpens in new window<\/a>\u00a0]<\/p>\n

This index does not allow the size of the so-called Magnificent Seven tech stocks \u2013 Apple<\/a>, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Nvidia<\/a> and Tesla<\/a> \u2013 to dominate results, and is better for comparing whether a stock has performed better than others in the index.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen it comes to AI adoption, many companies aren\u2019t guided by strategy but by \u2018Fomo\u2019,\u201d said Haritha Khandabattu, senior director analyst at consultancy Gartner. \u201cFor some leaders, the question isn\u2019t \u2018What problem am I solving?\u2019 but \u2018What if my competitor solves it first?\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

The FT has used AI tools to identify these mentions of the technology in SEC<\/a> 10-k filings and earnings transcripts, then to categorise each mention. The results were then checked and analysed to help draw a nuanced picture about what companies were saying to different audiences about the technology.<\/p>\n

SEC filings require companies to disclose risks to the businesses, and are necessarily more cautious than the sales pitches made by executives on earnings calls. But the increasing array of risks described in filings appears not to be weighing on executives in the public pronouncements.<\/p>\n

Of the S&P 500, 374 companies mentioned AI on earnings calls in the past 12 months \u2013 with 87 per cent of the calls logged as wholly positive about the technology with no concerns expressed.<\/p>\n

Over the past five years, the boom of the Magnificent Seven tech stocks has driven a large portion of the S&P 500\u2019s growth.<\/p>\n

While non-tech companies are upbeat about AI, their filings suggest less clear upsides. During an earnings call in February, Coca-Cola was excited about the technology \u2013 even though the key use was in the production of a TV commercial. <\/p>\n

The FT sought to categorise the expected positive benefits of the technology. Most of the anticipated benefits, such as increased productivity, were vaguely stated and harder to categorise than the risks. Companies anticipated being able to optimise workflows through automation, and hope to achieve market differentiation through their use of AI. Some hoped to be able to use the technology to improve the personalisation of their products.<\/p>\n

\n

Meta, which has spent billions of dollars to hire a team of researchers dedicated to building \u2018superintelligence\u2019, was among the Big Tech groups to warn it could incur large legal settlements over allegations \u2018that we used various copyrighted books and materials to train our artificial intelligence models’<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Filings do reveal that the companies able to give clear AI upsides include those that serve the rising AI-driven data-centre boom. Energy companies First Solar and Entergy cited AI as a demand driver.<\/p>\n

Freeport-McMoran, which has a stockpile of copper, stated that \u201cdata centres and artificial intelligence developments\u201d would support the metal\u2019s price. The company also said the technology can help with material characterisation and mineral extraction.<\/p>\n

Equipment manufacturer Caterpillar reported that its energy business was benefiting from supporting \u201cdata centre growth related to cloud computing and generative artificial intelligence\u201d.<\/p>\n

As the number of companies discussing AI has grown, fewer businesses are expressing positive views about the technology than they did in 2022. The most commonly cited concern was cybersecurity, which was mentioned as a risk by more than half of the S&P 500 in 2024.<\/p>\n

Online dating group Match warned that \u201cthe use of AI has been known to result in, and may in the future result in, cybersecurity incidents that implicate the personal data of end users of AI-enhanced services\u201d.<\/p>\n

[\u00a0AI begins to bite: Recruiters attribute a slump in professional services hiring to job automationOpens in new window<\/a>\u00a0]<\/p>\n

Companies expressed particular concern that other businesses and customers could prove to be weak links. Lululemon said it was concerned about security risks posed by advanced AI technologies, which could lead to sensitive information, such as transaction data, being compromised.<\/p>\n

Microsoft struck a dramatic tone, saying \u201c[i]neffective or inadequate AI development or deployment practices by Microsoft or others could result in incidents that impair the acceptance of AI solutions, cause harm to individuals, customers or society, or result in our products and services not working as intended\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cCompanies tend to see AI as a risk because they\u2019re not used to having systems or processes which they can\u2019t rely upon 100 per cent,\u201d said Ray Eitel-Porter, an AI governance expert and author.<\/p>\n

The second-largest concern among US companies is the fear that their efforts to introduce the technology will not be successful.<\/p>\n

Recent research led by Aditya Challapally at the MIT Media Lab found 95 per cent of generative AI pilots in the workplace failed. This was because the current generation of AI tools lack features such as long-term memory and customisation, which would make them easier to plug into existing company systems. <\/p>\n

\u201cWhen we spoke to executives, they would often say the internal tool was very successful,\u201d said Challapally. \u201cBut when we spoke to employees we found zero usage.\u201d <\/p>\n

In 174 annual reports, another common concern is the rise of regulatory and legal concerns over implementing AI.<\/p>\n

Meta, which has spent billions of dollars to hire a team of researchers dedicated to building \u201csuperintelligence\u201d, was among the Big Tech groups to warn it could incur large legal settlements over allegations \u201cthat we used various copyrighted books and materials to train our artificial intelligence models\u201d.<\/p>\n

Other companies with less AI exposure have raised similar worries. PepsiCo<\/a> said \u201cour use of artificial intelligence may result in increased claims of infringement or other claims, including those based on unauthorised use of third-party technology or content\u201d.<\/p>\n

The FT\u2019s analysis shows that companies are a lot clearer about the potential problems with AI than the upsides. <\/p>\n

\u201c[T]here can be no assurance that the usage of AI will enhance our products or services or be beneficial to our business, including our efficiency or profitability,\u201d Meta wrote in its 10k form last year. \u201cWe may not be successful in our artificial intelligence initiatives, which could adversely affect our business, reputation or financial results.\u201d \u2013 Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The biggest US-listed companies keep talking about artificial intelligence. But other than the \u201cfear of missing out,\u201d few…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":90580,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[261],"tags":[291,4186,1463,311,289,290,297,6877,982,18,19,17,33585,1722,305,292,59029,21855,59028,82,1298,384],"class_list":{"0":"post-90579","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-artificial-intelligence","8":"tag-ai","9":"tag-alphabet","10":"tag-amazon","11":"tag-apple","12":"tag-artificial-intelligence","13":"tag-artificialintelligence","14":"tag-chatgpt","15":"tag-coca-cola","16":"tag-cybersecurity","17":"tag-eire","18":"tag-ie","19":"tag-ireland","20":"tag-lululemon","21":"tag-meta","22":"tag-microsoft","23":"tag-nvidia","24":"tag-pepsi","25":"tag-securities-and-exchange-commission","26":"tag-standard-poor-s","27":"tag-technology","28":"tag-tesla","29":"tag-united-states"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90579","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90579"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90579\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/90580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}