Among the six oil-exporting monarchies of the Persian Gulf, the United Arab Emirates has been the most exposed to the cascading effects of the Iran war that began on February 28. From the outset, Iran responded to U.S. and Israeli strikes on its military and economic infrastructure by targeting American assets stationed across the Gulf monarchies. Yet Tehran did not confine its retaliation to military sites alone. It extended its campaign to oil facilities and broader economic targets, punishing states it viewed as complicit in U.S. operations. In doing so, Iran effectively blurred the line between military reprisal and economic warfare.
Compounding the damage, the conflict has imposed a de facto blockade on the Strait of Hormuz, choking off a critical artery of global energy trade. For the Gulf monarchies, whose prosperity depends on the steady flow of oil, gas, and commerce, the disruption has been severe. Exports have slowed to a trickle, and non-oil trade has suffered as shipping routes grow increasingly perilous.
Iran’s retaliation, however, has not been evenly distributed. States that offered more robust logistical and political support to U.S. operations—most notably the UAE and Bahrain—have borne the brunt of the attacks. Their earlier normalization of relations with Israel has only heightened their vulnerability. In recent weeks, both countries have voiced stronger backing for the U.S.-Israel campaign against Iran than their Gulf counterparts, including Oman, Qatar, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. Tehran has responded in kind, escalating drone and missile strikes against Emirati and Bahraini targets.
The economic fallout for the UAE has been swift and far-reaching. Despite its relatively diversified economy and its ability to reroute some crude exports through the Fujairah pipeline on the Gulf of Oman, overall revenues have fallen sharply. The non-oil sector—long touted as the UAE’s hedge against volatility—has also faltered. Flagship carriers Emirates and Etihad have curtailed most operations, flying far below capacity. Tourism, a pillar of Dubai’s global brand, has withered amid rising security concerns. Hotels and restaurants report steep declines in occupancy and revenue, while real estate and financial services show signs of strain. What was once a model of resilience now appears acutely vulnerable.
Against this backdrop, the UAE stunned observers on April 29 by announcing its intention to withdraw from OPEC, effective May 1. The decision sent ripples through energy markets and diplomatic circles alike, prompting a flurry of speculation about its motivations and implications.
At its core, the move reflects long-simmering economic grievances. Emirati officials have grown increasingly frustrated with what they perceive as Saudi and Russian dominance within OPEC. Not only have these larger producers—and several others—regularly exceeded their quotas, but the UAE has argued that its own production capacity justifies a higher allocation. In recent years, the country has expanded its output capacity to 4.85 million barrels per day, well above its OPEC quota of 3.41 million barrels. From Abu Dhabi’s perspective, the constraints imposed by the cartel no longer align with its economic ambitions.
Yet the decision to exit OPEC cannot be explained by economics alone. Its abruptness—and the lack of prior consultation with Saudi Arabia—revealed a deeper fracture in Gulf politics. Despite their shared membership in the Gulf Cooperation Council and a period of close alignment between 2015 and 2020, relations between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi have grown increasingly strained.
The roots of this tension are manifold. In Yemen, where the two countries once coordinated military efforts against Houthi forces, their strategies diverged sharply. Disagreements over local factions and the conduct of the war eroded their partnership. In late 2025, Saudi Arabia launched airstrikes against a Yemeni group backed by the UAE, followed by a brief ultimatum. The UAE responded by withdrawing its forces, effectively disengaging from the conflict, but the underlying tensions remained unresolved.
The UAE’s ties with Israel have further complicated its regional standing. Since normalizing relations in 2020 under the Abraham Accords, Abu Dhabi has cultivated not only diplomatic but also covert military cooperation with Israel—a relationship that has drawn increased scrutiny during the Iran war. Saudi Arabia, by contrast, has resisted normalization, conditioning any such move on the establishment of a Palestinian state. Riyadh has also expressed unease with the UAE’s willingness to move ahead independently, viewing it as a break from broader Arab consensus.
These fractures carry significant economic risks. The UAE’s success as a regional commercial hub—particularly Dubai’s role as a gateway for multinational corporations—depends in part on its integration within the Gulf and wider Middle Eastern economy. Prolonged tensions with key GCC partners could erode that position, prompting companies to reconsider their regional strategies.
At the same time, the UAE’s alignment with Israel may complicate its future relations with Iran. Despite decades of political friction and the weight of U.S. sanctions, economic ties between Tehran and Abu Dhabi have been substantial. In 2024, bilateral trade reached $27 billion, with the UAE serving as a vital re-export hub for goods destined for Iran. These networks, built over decades, are unlikely to recover quickly—especially if the UAE continues to deepen its visible partnership with Israel.
The broader regional landscape is also shifting. Iran’s blockade of Hormuz and the intensifying rivalry between Tehran and Tel Aviv have spurred new security alignments. Since 2024, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan have moved toward closer military cooperation, with Egypt signaling interest in joining. This emerging bloc, driven by concerns over both Iranian and Israeli assertiveness, may view the UAE’s posture with suspicion.
Indeed, signs of strain are already visible. Turkey has voiced concern over Abu Dhabi’s ties with Israel, while Pakistan’s role as a mediator in the Iran conflict has drawn Emirati ire. In early May, the UAE expelled a large number of Pakistani workers and recalled a $3.5 billion loan. Saudi Arabia quickly stepped in, offering Pakistan a $3 billion loan in a gesture that underscored shifting alliances and rivalries.
Taken together, these developments suggest a region in flux. The Iran war has not only intensified existing tensions among the Gulf monarchies but also accelerated a realignment of interests and partnerships. The UAE, in particular, appears to be charting a more independent course—one that leans more heavily on security cooperation with the United States and Israel, even at the risk of alienating traditional allies.
Yet it would be premature to view these divisions as permanent. The Gulf has weathered similar ruptures before. The 2017 crisis involving Qatar eventually gave way to reconciliation, driven by shared interests and external pressures. The current tensions between the UAE and Saudi Arabia may follow a similar trajectory—easing over time as the immediate pressures of war subside and the logic of regional cooperation reasserts itself.
If you’re interested in writing for International Policy Digest – please send us an email via submissions@intpolicydigest.org