{"id":116213,"date":"2026-05-16T06:04:08","date_gmt":"2026-05-16T06:04:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/116213\/"},"modified":"2026-05-16T06:04:08","modified_gmt":"2026-05-16T06:04:08","slug":"strategic-balancing-how-india-is-navigating-the-iran-crisis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/116213\/","title":{"rendered":"Strategic balancing: How India is navigating the Iran crisis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>India  is sending out mixed signals. <\/p>\n<p>Its diplomatic messaging on the Iran crisis is  somewhat confusing. Is New Delhi doing a course correction and hedging its  bets? Playing both sides as it ensures its national interests in a fast-evolving  situation in the Persian Gulf, where Iran, despite unimaginable losses, has  been able to withstand the military might of two of the world\u2019s most  technologically advanced powers?<\/p>\n<p>Also read: <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederal.com\/category\/international\/modi-abu-dhabi-pm-condemns-attacks-uae-west-asia-crisis-243209\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">PM Modi in UAE: India ready to extend all possible support for peace in West Asia<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In  the immediate aftermath of the February 28 strikes by the United States and  Israel that decapitated Iran\u2019s top leadership, including Supreme Leader Ali  Khamenei, New Delhi avoided any direct condemnation. Nor was there a condolence  message for the death of a head of state of a country said to be a friend. The  Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) urged restraint, dialogue, and diplomacy,  but expressed no outrage at what Iran called an unprovoked and illegal attack  on its sovereignty.<\/p>\n<p>    India\u2019s balancing act    <\/p>\n<p>The  early signal was clear, with nearly 10 million Indian nationals working and  living in the Gulf region, New Delhi was aligning with key Gulf partners. That  perception was reinforced when Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on a brief  stopover in the UAE on Friday (May 15), condemned attacks on Emirati territory  and signed a defence framework and energy agreement with Abu Dhabi.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The  way UAE has been targeted is not acceptable\u201d, but \u201cthe way UAE has handled the  current situation with restraint is praiseworthy,&#8221; news reports quoted the  PM as saying.<\/p>\n<p>Yet,  back in New Delhi, India\u2019s role as chair of the BRICS foreign ministers\u2019  meeting produced a different picture. Lack of consensus led to the customary  joint statement being dropped at the end of the two-day meet. With Iran and the  UAE both members of an expanded BRICS platform, a consensus was out of the  question.<\/p>\n<p>Also read: <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederal.com\/category\/news\/brics-meet-iran-seeks-indias-constructive-role-pm-modi-backs-uae-243279\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">BRICS falling apart: Can India hold together a divided bloc?<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Instead,  India released a chair\u2019s statement, underscoring how internal rivalries and  divergent strategic interests are complicating BRICS\u2019 ability to present a  unified diplomatic voice. New Delhi acknowledged differences among members over  the West Asia crisis, even as all agreed on the need for a permanent end to  hostilities affecting developing economies.<\/p>\n<p>    Sanctions faultline    <\/p>\n<p>The  chair\u2019s statement criticised aggression against Iran without explicitly naming  the United States or Israel.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe  ministers condemned the imposition of unilateral coercive measures that are  contrary to international law, and reiterated that such measures, inter alia in  the form of unilateral economic sanctions and secondary sanctions, have  far-reaching negative implications for human rights, including the rights to  development, health and food security,\u201d the statement said.<\/p>\n<p>In  no uncertain terms, India took on the US for its unilateral sanctions. New  Delhi has traditionally not followed sanctions without UN approval, though  secondary sanctions, which restrict access to US financial systems, make it  difficult for countries to disregard them. Delhi had to fall in line when the  US imposed secondary sanctions on lifting Iranian oil.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey  called for the elimination of such unlawful measures, which undermine  international law and the principles and purposes of the UN Charter. They  reaffirmed that BRICS member states do not impose or support non-UN Security  Council authorised sanctions that are contrary to international law.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>    Iran welcomes stand    <\/p>\n<p>Though  the US or Israel were not mentioned, Iran\u2019s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, was  happy with the outcome. He said at a news conference in Delhi that the \u201cBRICS  meeting was highly successful. We appreciate BRICS condemning the illegal US-Israeli  aggression on Iran. Regarding the Strait of Hormuz, Iran did not start this  war; we are strictly exercising our right to self-defense.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>India,  as chair of BRICS, appears to have recalibrated its position on the Persian  Gulf since the early days of the war in February.<\/p>\n<p>Also read: <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederal.com\/category\/news\/jaishankar-to-brief-parliament-on-west-asia-crisis-opposition-seeks-full-debat-233372\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">India favours peace, return to dialogue and diplomacy: Jaishankar on West Asia war<\/a><\/p>\n<p>New  Delhi is also aware that its earlier position on Israel\u2019s war on Gaza was out  of line with much of the Global South. When South Africa, a key BRICS member,  moved against Israel at The Hague on charges of genocide in Gaza, there was  strong support for the move among developing nations. India often abstained and  broke ranks with the Global South at the UN.<\/p>\n<p>    Palestine emphasis    <\/p>\n<p>But  as BRICS chair, India issued a strong statement on Palestine, calling not just  for a Palestinian state, which it has traditionally and continuously supported,  but one with East Jerusalem as the capital. In 2017, during his first term in  office, US President Donald Trump shifted the US embassy from Tel Aviv to  Jerusalem to bolster Israel\u2019s claim to the city. The statement also condemned  settler violence in the Occupied West Bank.<\/p>\n<p>Also read: <a href=\"  https:\/\/thefederal.com\/category\/opinion\/india-foreign-policy-diplomacy-turbulent-world-225334\" target=\"_blank\">In today\u2019s global cacophony, India\u2019s challenge is to act with quiet steadiness<\/a><\/p>\n<p>    What appears, then, as mixed signalling is in fact  calibrated ambiguity. India is not choosing sides so much as managing  contradictions between its Gulf partners and Iran, between Western pressure and  Global South expectations. India is being pragmatic in a fractured geopolitical  environment. The strategy is to retain flexibility, avoid entanglement with one  or the other bloc and keep every channel open. But as a habitual cynic points  out, there is no long-term vision of foreign policy, we are stumbling from one  crisis to the next and hoping to manage.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"India is sending out mixed signals. Its diplomatic messaging on the Iran crisis is somewhat confusing. Is New&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":116214,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[9217,138,39],"class_list":{"0":"post-116213","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-persian-gulf","8":"tag-diplomatic-ties","9":"tag-india","10":"tag-persian-gulf"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@iran\/116582748180686060","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=116213"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116213\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/116214"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=116213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=116213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=116213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}