(Bloomberg) — A Suezmax tanker identified as carrying Iraqi crude is approaching India after apparently crossing the Strait of Hormuz in recent days.<\/p>\n
Most Read from Bloomberg<\/p>\n
Observable daily commercial transits of the waterway in both directions dropped to five ships on Friday from 11 the previous day. There was a slight pick-up into Saturday morning, with six seen moving through the strait, vessel-tracking data compiled by Bloomberg show.<\/p>\n
Transits into and out of the Persian Gulf remain far below prewar levels as the conflict enters a 12th week. Despite frequent pronouncements from US President Donald Trump that Iran would soon capitulate, there\u2019s no sign of the country easing its blockade of Hormuz. Tehran has made acceptance of Iran\u2019s sovereignty over the strait one of five preconditions for rejoining talks to end the war.<\/p>\n
The Suezmax tanker Karolos appeared in the Gulf of Oman on Thursday as it sailed away from the Strait of Hormuz toward India, reporting a draft that indicated it\u2019s fully loaded. The ship was previously seen near Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates a week earlier, heading in the opposite direction.<\/p>\n
The tanker is identified by ship-tracking company Kpler as carrying Iraqi crude loaded at Basra on May 10-11. An image from the European Union\u2019s Sentinel 2 satellite shows a ship of the same coloring and dimensions at one of the Basra loading buoys on the morning of May 11.<\/p>\n
Separately, the oil tanker Agios Fanourios I, halted by the US on a voyage from Iraq to Vietnam, remains in the Gulf of Oman, while the very large crude carrier Kiara M, which also crossed out of the Persian Gulf after loading at Basra, appears to have completed switching its cargo onto another ship off Oman, tracking data show.<\/p>\n
Hormuz Transits<\/p>\n
Friday\u2019s observable outbound transits included a bulk carrier and two Iran-linked vessels \u2014 a fuel tanker and a container ship \u2014 in addition to the China-linked liquefied petroleum gas carrier reported yesterday.<\/p>\n
Saturday started busy by recent standards, with a products tanker, three bulk carriers and a livestock transporter heading out of the Gulf.<\/p>\n
In a post on X, US Central Command said Friday that the military has now diverted 75 commercial ships since imposing its own blockade on Iran.<\/p>\n
Story Continues <\/p>\n
Tracking data show two possible inbound commercial transits on Friday, although neither ship sent clear signals within the strait. An oil products tanker appeared to make an inbound crossing along the waterway\u2019s southern coastline, but its subsequent signals show it covering an impossible distance.<\/p>\n
Separately, a bulk carrier appeared on tracking screens on Saturday, heading for the northern Persian Gulf. Its position when it appeared suggests it crossed the strait on Friday.<\/p>\n
Two Iran-linked tankers \u2014 an oil products carrier and an LPG carrier \u2014 crossed into the Persian Gulf on Saturday morning. Both are sanctioned by the US.<\/p>\n
If its automated signals are correct, the oil tanker would appear to have successfully evaded the US blockade, crossing the Gulf of Oman on May 9-10.<\/p>\n
Widespread interference of signals on the industry\u2019s Automatic Identification System has clouded the picture, making independent verification of ship traffic increasingly difficult.<\/p>\n
As a result, transit counts may later be revised upward when ships reappear further from high-risk waters.<\/p>\n
Even before the US barred movement to and from Iranian ports, it was common for Iran-linked vessels to \u201cgo dark\u201d when approaching Hormuz. Signals were often not restored until well into the Strait of Malacca \u2014 around 13 days\u2019 sailing from Iran\u2019s Kharg Island.<\/p>\n
NOTES:<\/p>\n
Because vessels can move without transmitting their location until they\u2019re well away from Hormuz, automated positioning signals were compiled over a large area covering the Gulf of Oman, the Arabian Sea and the Red Sea to detect those that may have departed or entered the Persian Gulf.<\/p>\n
When potential transits are identified, signal histories are examined to determine whether the movement appears genuine or is the result of spoofing \u2014 where electronic interference can falsify the apparent position of a ship.<\/p>\n
Some transits may not have been detected if vessels\u2019 transponders haven\u2019t been switched back on. Iran-linked oil tankers often steam from the Persian Gulf without broadcasting signals until they reach the Strait of Malacca about 10 days after passing Fujairah in the UAE. Other ships may be adopting similar tactics and won\u2019t show up on tracking screens for many days.<\/p>\n
This tracker will be published during heightened tensions involving Iran, and aims to capture traffic for all classes of commercial shipping.<\/p>\n
Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek<\/p>\n
\u00a92026 Bloomberg L.P.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"(Bloomberg) — A Suezmax tanker identified as carrying Iraqi crude is approaching India after apparently crossing the Strait…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":116943,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[1824,5791,7869,40159,444,102,34,1097,39,101,40160],"class_list":{"0":"post-116942","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-strait-of-hormuz","8":"tag-bloomberg","9":"tag-bulk-carrier","10":"tag-commercial-ships","11":"tag-fuel-tanker","12":"tag-gulf-of-oman","13":"tag-hormuz","14":"tag-iran","15":"tag-oil-tanker","16":"tag-persian-gulf","17":"tag-strait-of-hormuz","18":"tag-suezmax-tanker"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@iran\/116585477047721299","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116942","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=116942"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116942\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/116943"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=116942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=116942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=116942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}