The framework deal between the United States and Iran sets the stage for an end to the bursts of violence and debilitating disruption of energy deliveries and trade in the Persian Gulf. But don\u2019t expect economies around the globe to simply pick up where they left off before the United States and Israel began bombing Iran on Feb. 28.<\/p>\n
The war has set in motion changes that will be hard to reverse.<\/p>\n
The global energy order is being reshaped.<\/p>\n
The near shutdown in oil and gas<\/a> deliveries from the Middle East and the leap in prices are causing a shift in power. Energy producers from the Gulf to the Americas are jockeying to maintain or increase their dominance, and customers are struggling to reduce their dependency<\/a> and shore up their supply.<\/p>\n As a result, the energy market<\/a> is changing, the energy mix is changing and the energy players<\/a> are changing.<\/p>\n The profound vulnerability of countries throughout Asia, Europe and elsewhere that depend on imported energy is supercharging the hunt for alternatives. In some places, like South Korea and Japan, that has led to an increased use of dirtier fuels like coal<\/a>.<\/p>\n But over the longer term, this energy shock \u2014 the second in just four years \u2014 is likely to accelerate a transition to renewables like solar and wind as well as nuclear<\/a> power.<\/p>\n Improvements in electric battery technology and efficiency make the shift more feasible than it was when Russia\u2019s invasion of Ukraine prompted a global energy shock in 2022, said Daan Walter at Ember, an energy research group in London.<\/p>\n In many places, for instance, electric vehicles are increasingly affordable. And in April, wind and solar generated more electricity globally than gas for the first time.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is a big turnaround,\u201d Mr. Walter said. \u201cSo what was five years ago maybe barely competitive, now is almost already clearly cheaper.\u201d<\/p>\n Investments in renewables have also become a better bet, promising returns in closer to two years instead of 30, he said.<\/p>\n Relations among producers are also changing. The war heightened tensions between the United Arab Emirates<\/a> and Saudi Arabia and prompted the Emirates to leave the OPEC Plus oil cartel. The impact of that departure will be fully felt only when oil production in the region picks up. But a weakened Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries could add to volatility in oil markets.<\/p>\n The split has also encouraged the Saudis to move closer to Russia. Vladimir V. Putin, the Russian president, featured Saudi Arabia this month as the \u201cguest of honor\u201d at an economic forum<\/a> in St. Petersburg.<\/p>\n Russia, the second-largest producer of crude oil and gas after the United States, has been strengthened in other ways by the war. The Trump administration temporarily lifted sanctions imposed on Russia, allowing Moscow to pump up profits from its oil exports when its economy is ailing.<\/p>\n On the other side of the Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, Venezuela, Colombia, Argentina and Guyana are building their oil production capacity as the world looks for alternative suppliers.<\/p>\n China is a major beneficiary.<\/p>\n The push to build out and diversify energy networks is going to continue long after the war ends. And China is poised to benefit most<\/a> from the expected boon in renewables.<\/p>\n It is leagues ahead of the rest of the world in producing wind turbines, high-voltage cables, transformers, solar panels, batteries, software to manage energy flows and more.<\/p>\n China\u2019s increasing role ensuring that other countries have a dependable supply of energy amplifies its strategic influence and importance.<\/p>\n \u201cChina looks to be an out-and-out winner,\u201d analysts from Wood Mackenzie, a global energy consulting firm, concluded.<\/p>\n The Trump administration\u2019s aggressive push to halt renewable energy projects \u2014 even paying companies<\/a> to cancel wind farms \u2014 means the United States is essentially withdrawing from this global competition and ceding the industrial and technological advantage to its biggest rival.<\/p>\n The economic advantages are reinforced by geopolitical ones. The war has deepened the wedge between the United States and longtime allies in Europe, providing another opening for China to enlarge its role as an international leader.<\/p>\n Re-establishing trust will be difficult.<\/p>\n It is unclear whether shipping traffic will ever again be able to move freely through the Strait of Hormuz \u2014 the only sea route for moving oil, natural gas and other cargo out of the Persian Gulf.<\/p>\n Iran has pushed to impose fees on ships<\/a> that pass through the narrow waterway, even though such a plan could violate international agreements. Even if new payments are not codified, Iran has shown it can disrupt trade any time it wants, which raises risks and costs<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cI think the strait is never going to go back to the certainty of free passage that we\u2019ve been used to,\u201d said Maurice Obstfeld, a former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund.<\/p>\n Similarly, the trust in the region\u2019s peace, stability and growing prosperity has also been shaken.<\/p>\n \u201cThe dynamism of the Gulf economies may be impaired by the vulnerability they showed,\u201d Mr. Obstfeld said, and that \u201craises Iran\u2019s leverage in the region.\u201d<\/p>\n Iran has hurled drones and missiles at Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates and other neighbors. The damage<\/a> to Qatar\u2019s natural gas fields was extensive, affecting 17 percent of its capacity to export liquefied natural gas. In Saudi Arabia, a petrochemical complex was bombed.<\/p>\n For the Emirates<\/a>, which has billed itself as a global financial hub, trade center and tourist attraction, attacks on its five-star hotels, data complexes and a nuclear facility could scare off visitors and investors.<\/p>\n As for the United States, Mr. Trump\u2019s decision to provoke a war with Iran, combined with his chaotic policymaking, has further undermined confidence in Washington\u2019s willingness and ability to maintain global order and commerce.<\/p>\n \u201cThe capacity of the U.S. as a military force has been once again shown to be limited,\u201d Mr. Obstfeld said. And Iran\u2019s continued resistance \u201cis a huge blow to global faith in the U.S. as a provider of security.\u201d<\/p>\n For decades, a primary mission of the U.S. Navy has been to guarantee freedom of navigation on the seas, said Mark Blyth, a political scientist at Brown University. Iran\u2019s success in continuing to block ship traffic, though, has demonstrated that for all its might, the United States cannot ensure the seas will be open and free.<\/p>\n The economy has been kicked onto a path of slower growth and higher prices.<\/p>\n When economists at the World Bank began sifting through data early this year, they were pleasantly surprised. \u201cWe were starting to think about upgrading our forecasts, between January and February, because things were looking so good,\u201d said Indermit Gill, the bank\u2019s chief economist. \u201cInflation was coming down, growth was picking up, trade had kind of taken it on the chin and was still standing.\u201d<\/p>\n No more. The bank just revised its economic outlook, lowering its forecast. It now expects global growth to decline to 2.5 percent this year from 2.9 percent in 2025.<\/p>\n Inflation<\/a> is also starting to roar. In the United States, it rose for the third month in row, hitting an annual rate of 4.2 percent in May. And instead of planning for the next drop in interest rates, Wall Street is expecting the Federal Reserve to increase rates at least once this year. Last week, the European Central Bank<\/a> raised rates to 2.25 percent. \u201cThe war in the Middle East is generating inflation pressures,\u201d the bank said.<\/p>\n Higher rates have serious longer-term effects on both rich and poor countries that have already run up staggering public debts and are using a growing portion of revenue just to pay interest costs.<\/p>\n Those budgetary pressures are only going to increase as governments offer assistance to households struggling with higher energy prices and increase military budgets to cope with growing security threats.<\/p>\n