{"id":226374,"date":"2026-07-28T16:56:20","date_gmt":"2026-07-28T16:56:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/226374\/"},"modified":"2026-07-28T16:56:20","modified_gmt":"2026-07-28T16:56:20","slug":"jordan-faces-a-dilemma-in-its-growing-role-in-the-u-s-iran-war","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/226374\/","title":{"rendered":"Jordan faces a dilemma in its growing role in the U.S.-Iran war"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

AMMAN, Jordan\u00a0\u2014\u00a0When Iranian ballistic missiles repeatedly struck Jordan last week, killing three American service members<\/a> and wounding dozens of others, it brought the spotlight on a U.S. military presence the government of this desert kingdom has long worked to downplay.<\/p>\n

Jordan has been a decades-long military and counterterrorism partner<\/a> with the United States, opening its territory over the years to U.S. and other Western troops in their engagements throughout the region. But faced with a population that is overwhelmingly pro-Palestinian and suspicious of the U.S. for its all-out support of Israel, the government had kept those relationships at a low profile.<\/p>\n

But now, Jordan\u2019s growing role in the United States\u2019 war with Iran<\/a> \u2014 and the intensifying Iranian retaliation that role invites \u2014 is spurring uncomfortable conversations for the government.<\/p>\n

\u201cJordanians are trapped in a dilemma: They\u2019re being dragged into a war they didn\u2019t want, but the cause of that war is ironically the ally they bargained with to protect them in the first place,\u201d said Sean Yom, a professor of political science and Jordan expert at Temple University who wrote the book \u201cJordan: Politics in an Accidental Crucible.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cSo they\u2019re asking what\u2019s the wisdom of having this geopolitical bargain with a patron like the U.S. when one of the sources of our instability is the relationship that\u2019s supposed to guarantee our security.\u201d<\/p>\n

Since the ceasefire broke down July 8 and the U.S. began launching near-daily waves of strikes on Iran, Jordan has been targeted on nine occasions, with ballistic missiles and drones hitting U.S. assets and facilities and endangering some 4,000 service members at a number of Jordanian military bases across the country.<\/p>\n

One of those salvos, on July 17, hit a housing unit in Muwaffaq Al-Salti, a Jordanian base in the country\u2019s east, killing three U.S. service members and wounding at least four others. Also attacked were King Faisal Airbase, Prince Hassan Airbase and the airport in Aqaba.<\/p>\n

Iran\u2019s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed the strikes not only killed and wounded dozens of U.S. military personnel, but also damaged drones, helicopters, F-15 preparation hangars, radar sites, missile defense systems and munitions depots.<\/p>\n

More worryingly for Jordan, the IRGC issued statements thanking \u201chonorable people\u201d in Jordan for providing \u201csincere cooperation and precise information,\u201d which it said enabled it to target and kill \u201cdozens of American terrorist forces.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cSeize every opportunity to dismantle American institutions and expel the American occupation army from Jordan,\u201d one of the statements said.<\/p>\n

As word of the attacks spread, Jordan\u2019s government, normally reticent about foreign military deployments in the country, embarked on damage control.<\/p>\n

Officials and members of parliament swiftly condemned Tehran for violating the country\u2019s sovereignty, while the foreign ministry summoned Iran\u2019s charge d\u2019affaires in Amman, the Jordanian capital, and demanded Iran cease attacks on the kingdom. Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi, meanwhile, rejected Iran\u2019s claim that the U.S. has bases in the country.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere are no American bases in Jordan. We have American troops that are in Jordan as part of our long-standing military cooperation,\u201d he said at the Aspen Security Forum earlier this month. Safadi was referring to the 2021 defense agreement that allows U.S. forces unfettered access to 12 facilities in Jordan, including five air bases; the agreement was approved via royal decree and bypassed parliament.<\/p>\n

\u201cTheir presence is governed by a defense agreement that fully respects our sovereignty,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Yet government statements didn\u2019t do much to allay concerns. Though many Jordanians have little love for Iran, more than 300 politicians, academics, lawyers, retired military officers and tribal leaders signed an open letter last week calling on the government to withdraw from the defense agreement and keep Jordanian installations neutral \u2014 a bold move in a country where opposition to government policies (especially in security matters) can be a red line.<\/p>\n

\u201cJordan is not a party to this war. Its people should not have to bear the consequences or pay the price for policies that do not serve the nation\u2019s supreme interests,\u201d the letter said.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe urge the avoidance of the dangers associated with aligning ourselves under the American umbrella; this requires adopting a policy of genuine neutrality, based on refraining from any military or logistical involvement that serves any party to the conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n

Another sign of popular anger came Sunday: When one member of parliament exhorted the body to send condolences to Congress for the killing of the U.S. service members, others shouted him down, saying the legislature wasn\u2019t a funeral parlor to console \u201ccriminals\u201d and \u201cchild killers,\u201d in reference to the United States\u2019 support for Israel in Gaza.<\/p>\n

Jordan grapples with questions similar to those facing its gulf neighbors, all of which rely on the U.S. security umbrella that has exposed their nations to Iranian attack. But those countries\u2019 oil riches afford them leverage to push back on the U.S. presence, while Jordan \u2014 a resource-poor nation of some 11 million people \u2014 cannot.<\/p>\n

The conflict, meanwhile, has only compounded Jordan\u2019s economic woes. Tourism, which official figures say accounts for almost 15% of the country\u2019s GDP and had just begun to recover from the 2023 Gaza war, has cratered since the start of military operations against Iran. One month after the war, gas prices rose by 11%, a body blow for Jordan\u2019s perpetually anemic economy.<\/p>\n

All that has made the kingdom ever more reliant on U.S. largesse. Washington gives Amman roughly $1.45 billion annually, including around $800 million that go straight to government coffers for budgetary support. It would be hard pressed to substitute that level of support from Europe or elsewhere, experts say.<\/p>\n

At the same time, Jordan has become a vital nerve center for U.S. forces. The U.S. military has since 2019 spent hundreds of millions of dollars on upgrades for Muwaffaq Al-Salti and other facilities, according to U.S. federal contracting documents, laying aircraft aprons, taxiways, munitions depots and other infrastructure.<\/p>\n

Satellite imagery of those bases from 2019 onward show significant construction and an increasing presence of U.S. assets, including F-16s, F-18s, drones and helicopters.<\/p>\n

Now, with U.S. troops deployed in gulf nations proving vulnerable to Iranian barrages, Pentagon planners have transferred assets to locations farther away from Iran, especially Jordan.<\/p>\n

In recent days, despite a pause in operations against Iran, flight tracking sites showed brisk U.S. military traffic, with logistical aircraft \u2014 including the massive C-17 Globemaster and KC-35 fueling tankers \u2014 making repeated trips between Jordan and U.S. military hubs in Europe.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"AMMAN, Jordan\u00a0\u2014\u00a0When Iranian ballistic missiles repeatedly struck Jordan last week, killing three American service members and wounding dozens…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":226375,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[3],"tags":[64574,84,58095,1555,64573,711,394,34,654,8056,3897,4728,64575,683,36],"class_list":["post-226374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-iran","tag-all-out-support","tag-attack","tag-basis","tag-country","tag-defense-agreement","tag-drone","tag-government","tag-iran","tag-jordan","tag-other","tag-parliament","tag-role","tag-u-s-military-personnel","tag-u-s","tag-war"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@iran\/116998660562241822","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226374","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226374"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226374\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/226375"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}