{"id":96265,"date":"2026-05-03T22:51:14","date_gmt":"2026-05-03T22:51:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/96265\/"},"modified":"2026-05-03T22:51:14","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T22:51:14","slug":"iran-reviewing-us-response-to-tehrans-14-point-proposal-iranian-media-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/96265\/","title":{"rendered":"Iran reviewing US response to Tehran&#8217;s 14-point proposal: Iranian Media"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tehran [Iran], May 4 (ANI): Iran&#8217;s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei on Sunday said that Tehran has received Washington&#8217;s response to Iran&#8217;s proposal through Pakistan.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking in an interview with the Iranian state broadcaster SNN TV, Baghaei said, &#8216;The United States&#8217; view on Tehran&#8217;s proposal via Pakistan has reached Iran.This perspective is currently under review, and Iran&#8217;s response will be provided after finalisation.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Baghaei stressed that Iran&#8217;s &#8217;14-point proposal&#8217; is solely aimed at ending the conflict in the region and does not address nuclear issue. <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Our 14-point plan exclusively focuses on ending the war and contains no issues related to the nuclear domain,&#8217; Baghaei said during the televised interview. <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;At this stage, our focus is on the specifics of ending the war in the region, including Lebanon,&#8217; he added.<\/p>\n<p>According to Iran&#8217;s semi-official Tasnim News Agency, Baghaei also rejected reports suggesting the proposal involved mine-clearing operations in the Strait of Hormuz. <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;The claim of mine-clearing in the Strait of Hormuz by the United States is fundamentally not part of our plan. These claims are fabricated and concocted by certain media outlets,&#8217; he said. <\/p>\n<p>The Iranian spokesperson also reiterated Tehran&#8217;s position against negotiations conducted under pressure or imposed timelines.&#8217;Iran rejects negotiations under ultimatum and deadline,&#8217; Baghaei said, according to Tasnim.<\/p>\n<p>He further explained that the proposed framework envisions &#8216;an initial halt followed by examination of details over a 30-day period.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Addressing the issue of guarantees in any future arrangement, Baghaei said, &#8216;The concept of &#8216;guarantee&#8217; in this perspective is not reliance on the counterparty&#8217;s commitment, but rather dependence on internal power and levers.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>His remarks come as a 14-point response to a proposal from the United States has been submitted by Tehran, state media outlet Tasnim news agency reported on Saturday.<\/p>\n<p>The Iranian proposal, which was reportedly delivered via a Pakistani intermediary, calls for &#8216;ending the war on all fronts, including Lebanon,&#8217; according to Tasnim.<\/p>\n<p>While the US reportedly proposed a two-month ceasefire, Tasnim noted that Tehran maintains &#8216;that the issues should be resolved within 30 days&#8217; and insists that diplomatic efforts must prioritise the &#8216;termination of the war&#8217; as opposed to simply extending a ceasefire.<\/p>\n<p>The Iranian document follows a nine-point US proposal and covers various topics, including guarantees against military aggression and the withdrawal of US military forces from the region surrounding Iran.<\/p>\n<p>The response further stipulates the release of frozen Iranian assets, the removal of sanctions, and the introduction of a &#8216;new mechanism for the Strait of Hormuz.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Iran&#8217;s state broadcaster, Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who stated that the proposal was &#8216;aimed at the permanent end&#8217; of the conflict.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Now the ball is in the United States&#8217; court to choose either the path of diplomacy or continuation of a confrontational approach,&#8217; Gharibabadi said.<\/p>\n<p>Although Iranian officials have refrained from publicly discussing the specific details of the response, US President Donald Trump stated on Saturday that he would soon review the plan.<\/p>\n<p>However, he remarked that he &#8216;can&#8217;t imagine that it would be acceptable.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Expressing his dissatisfaction with the offer, the US President warned that military options continue to remain on the table.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;They want to make a deal, but I&#8217;m not satisfied with it,&#8217; Trump told reporters. &#8216;They&#8217;ve made strides, but I&#8217;m not sure if they ever get there&#8230; They&#8217;re asking for things that I can&#8217;t agree to.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Reports suggest that Washington is demanding firm commitments regarding Iran&#8217;s nuclear programme at the start of the process. Conversely, Tehran is reportedly seeking a sequence that prioritises the easing of military and economic pressure.<\/p>\n<p>This latest proposal emerges during a fragile ceasefire that has been maintained since early April. The truce followed a period of intense conflict that began on February 28, initiated by US and Israeli strikes against Iran&#8217;s military and nuclear infrastructure. (ANI)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Tehran [Iran], May 4 (ANI): Iran&#8217;s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei on Sunday said that Tehran has received&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":96266,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[3065,4099,33842,34,179,33841,20453,6385,1600,601,69],"class_list":{"0":"post-96265","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-tehran","8":"tag-ceasefire","9":"tag-foreign","10":"tag-including-lebanon","11":"tag-iran","12":"tag-military","13":"tag-point-proposal","14":"tag-proposal","15":"tag-reports","16":"tag-review","17":"tag-states","18":"tag-tehran"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@iran\/116513097789765254","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96265"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96265\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/96266"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/iran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}