{"id":88261,"date":"2026-09-08T11:04:31","date_gmt":"2026-09-08T11:04:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/japan\/88261\/"},"modified":"2026-09-08T11:04:31","modified_gmt":"2026-09-08T11:04:31","slug":"beyond-the-death-penalty-debate-human-dignity-and-justice-in-japan-global-issues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/japan\/88261\/","title":{"rendered":"Beyond the Death Penalty Debate: Human Dignity and Justice in Japan \u2014 Global Issues"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"Panelists and participants discuss Japan\u2019s death penalty at a symposium examining capital punishment through the lens of human dignity, held on September 5, 2026, at St. Ignatius Church in Yotsuya, Tokyo. Credit: Katsuhiro Asagiri \/ INPS JapanOpinion by Katsuhiro Asagiri<\/a>\u00a0(tokyo, japan)Tuesday, September 08, 2026Inter Press Service<\/p>\n

\nTOKYO, Japan, September 8 (IPS) – A symposium examining Japan\u2019s death penalty through the lens of human dignity was held on September 5 at Joseph Hall of St. Ignatius Church in Yotsuya, Tokyo.\n<\/p>\n

\"\"Brochure of the Symposium titled, \u201cRethinking the Death Penalty: With Human Dignity in View.\u201d Credit: The Association of Religious Leaders and Scholars Considering the Death Penalty<\/p>\n

Titled \u201cRethinking the Death Penalty: With Human Dignity in View,\u201d the symposium was organized by the Association of Religious Leaders and Scholars Considering the Death Penalty and co-organized by the Institute for Death and Life Studies and Social Coexistence.<\/p>\n

It was supported by eight organizations: the Jesuit Social Center, the Conference on Religion in the Modern World (CORMOS), the Japan Buddhist Federation, the International Institute for the Study of Religions, the Sophia University Institute of Grief Care, the Japanese Committee of the World Conference of Religions for Peace (WCRP), the Soka Gakkai Peace Committee, and the Institute of Engaged Buddhism.<\/p>\n

The gathering brought together legal scholars, journalists, a bereaved family member, a former prison officer, younger participants and religious figures, each approaching Japan\u2019s death penalty from a different experience and perspective.<\/p>\n

Religious studies scholar Susumu Shimazono stressed that the purpose was not to decide whether capital punishment should be abolished, but to listen and learn.<\/p>\n

The questions extended beyond punishment: how to support victims, prevent wrongful convictions and violence, and hold institutions accountable for decisions over life and death.<\/p>\n

The international picture is mixed. Amnesty International<\/a> reported that 145 countries had abolished capital punishment in law or practice by the end of 2025. Yet recorded executions rose to at least 2,707 that year, excluding unverified totals from China, North Korea and Vietnam.<\/p>\n

Japan\u2019s Justice Ministry has defended retention by citing public opinion and serious crime. But public support and justification under human rights principles are different questions.<\/p>\n

Safeguards Before Irreversible Punishment<\/p>\n

\"\"Prof. Makoto Ida. Credit: Katsuhiro Asagiri \/ INPS Japan<\/p>\n

Criminal law scholar Ryo Ida questioned whether Japan had adequately examined its system\u2019s legal and constitutional foundations. He highlighted the combination of decades on death row and notification of execution only on the day it takes place.<\/p>\n

He also distinguished wrongful convictions from sentencing errors: even where guilt is established, overlooked mitigating circumstances may lead to death rather than life imprisonment.<\/p>\n

He also expressed his view that hanging constitutes cruel punishment under Japan\u2019s Constitution.<\/p>\n

\u201cImmediate abolition of the death penalty is not the only option,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Stronger safeguards, reviewing execution methods and temporarily suspending executions were possible steps. Ida argued that victims\u2019 demands for punishment could not themselves justify capital punishment, while acknowledging their grief and anger.<\/p>\n

Deterrence required equal caution. A 2012 U.S. National Research Council review found that the studies it examined could not establish whether capital punishment increased, reduced or had no effect on homicide rates. That was not proof of no effect.<\/p>\n

Ida nevertheless urged that public fears be taken seriously. Reform must address organized crime and reoffending, rather than simply replace one punishment with another.<\/p>\n

The Human Cost of Execution<\/p>\n

\"\"Keiko Horikawa. Credit: Katsuhiro Asagiri \/ INPS Japan<\/p>\n

Nonfiction writer Keiko Horikawa described nearly two decades of investigating the system. Her reporting challenged the assumption that victims\u2019 families speak with one voice: some welcomed death sentences; others wanted offenders to live and confront their crimes.<\/p>\n

She also recalled interviewing a former judicial research official involved in preparing the Supreme Court ruling underlying the Nagayama standard, the factors courts consider when choosing between death and life imprisonment. He disputed treating those factors as a formula for execution.<\/p>\n

Horikawa\u2019s book Kyokaishi (The Prison Chaplain) follows a Buddhist priest who accompanied condemned prisoners. She recalled his words:<\/p>\n

\u201cNo one has ever been made happy by an execution.\u201d<\/p>\n

This was his observation, not a verdict on every bereaved family\u2019s experience. It nevertheless raised a crucial distinction: completing a sentence does not necessarily end the suffering surrounding a crime.<\/p>\n

Horikawa called for suspending executions and openly examining victims\u2019 support, prison officers\u2019 psychological burdens, costs and hanging itself.<\/p>\n

A Bereaved Sister\u2019s Unanswered Question<\/p>\n

\"\"Nobuko. Credit: Katsuhiro Asagiri \/ INPS Japan<\/p>\n

Nobuko lost her brother, the director of a psychiatric clinic, in the 2021 arson attack in Osaka\u2019s Kitashinchi district. She subsequently began meeting prisoners and former prisoners to understand rehabilitation and prevent further tragedies.<\/p>\n

\u201cI want to prevent reoffending and stop more people from experiencing this grief,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

She resisted being assigned to either camp. Some bereaved people want execution; others want offenders to live with their crimes; still others cannot bear to think about the case.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think each is an expression of the grief that person carries,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

Nobuko acknowledged that offenders retain human rights. \u201cRecognizing the human rights of offenders does not, in itself, deny the human rights of victims.\u201d<\/p>\n

But who addresses the rights taken from those killed, and the needs of families left behind? Support should not depend on whether a family favors capital punishment.<\/p>\n

The United Nations\u2019 1985 declaration on justice for crime victims encompasses access to justice, fair treatment, restitution, compensation and assistance. Punishment alone is not the whole response.<\/p>\n

Nobuko asked a further question: \u201cWhat kind of society would prevent people from becoming offenders who face the death penalty?\u201d<\/p>\n

Her conversations with prisoners revealed experiences of abuse and isolation. Understanding those histories does not excuse crime. But punishment after violence cannot substitute for examining whether earlier support might have prevented it.<\/p>\n

She has begun creating opportunities for parents to share experiences. That is her choice, not an obligation other bereaved families should be expected to shoulder. Prevention also requires institutions, not merely individual goodwill.<\/p>\n

\u201cI am neither for nor against the death penalty,\u201d she said, describing her determination to keep thinking about life, guilt and suffering.<\/p>\n

\"\"Toshio Sakamoto. Credit: Katsuhiro Asagiri \/ INPS Japan<\/p>\n

Justice Must Allow for Correction<\/p>\n

Former prison officer Toshio Sakamoto argued that restrictions on outside contact make changes in condemned prisoners difficult for society to see.<\/p>\n

He also recalled his long acquaintance with Iwao Hakamada, who spent decades under sentence of death before his acquittal at a retrial in 2024. The case raises questions about interrogation, evidence disclosure and timely remedies.<\/p>\n

Trust in justice depends not only on the authority to decide, but on the ability to acknowledge and correct error before irreversible harm occurs.<\/p>\n

He also questioned increasingly lengthy life imprisonment. Japan\u2019s life sentences permit parole in law; the issue is how public safety, victims\u2019 concerns and evidence of rehabilitation are assessed in practice.<\/p>\n

For Sorane Sakihama, a graduate student from Okinawa, studying in France first challenged her assumption that capital punishment was justice for victims. International exchanges later brought her face to face with people affected by wrongful death sentences.<\/p>\n

Invoking the Okinawan expression \u201cNuchi du takara\u201d \u2014 life is the greatest treasure \u2014 she connected her opposition to execution with her opposition to war. She emphasized creating spaces where young people can discuss difficult issues without needing settled opinions.<\/p>\n

\"\"Sorane Sakihama, a graduate student from Okinawa, speaks about how international dialogue and her encounters with people affected by wrongful death sentences shaped her views on capital punishment, during a symposium at St. Ignatius Church in Tokyo on September 5, 2026. Credit: Katsuhiro Asagiri \/ INPS Japan<\/p>\n

From Dialogue to Accountability<\/p>\n

\"\"SDGs Goal No 16.<\/p>\n

Horikawa welcomed the symposium\u2019s new voices and willingness to move beyond fixed positions. Shimazono hoped the dialogue would continue.<\/p>\n

Sustainable Development Goal 16 does not explicitly require abolition. It does call for reducing violence, protecting children, equal access to justice, accountable institutions and inclusive decision-making.<\/p>\n

That provides a practical framework: Are victims receiving sustained support? Can doubtful convictions be effectively reviewed? Are prison staff\u2019s burdens recognized? Is prevention reducing harm? Can citizens obtain the information needed to judge the system?<\/p>\n

Disagreement over abolition need not prevent scrutiny of these questions.<\/p>\n

Can people change? What does atonement mean? How should society support victims and prevent violence? How much power over life and death should the state possess?<\/p>\n

A new dialogue on those questions began in a Tokyo church.<\/p>\n

This article is brought to you by INPS Japan<\/a> in collaboration with Soka Gakkai International<\/a> in consultative status with UN ECOSOC.<\/p>\n

IPS UN Bureau<\/p>\n

\"\"\/<\/a>\"\"\/<\/a>\"\"\/<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a9 Inter Press Service (20260908064630) \u2014 All Rights Reserved. Original source: Inter Press Service<\/a><\/p>\n

Where next?Related news<\/p>\n

Browse related news topics:<\/p>\n

Latest news<\/p>\n

Read the latest news stories:<\/p>\n

What 1.5\u00b0C Overshoot Means for Small Islands<\/a> Tuesday, September 08, 2026Beyond the Death Penalty Debate: Human Dignity and Justice in Japan<\/a> Tuesday, September 08, 2026Trump\u2019s \u201cComprehensive\u201d Gaza Peace Plan a Cover for Genocide<\/a> Tuesday, September 08, 2026UNGA 81: A United Nations at a Turning Point<\/a> Monday, September 07, 2026LIECHTENSTEIN: \u2018We Have One of the Strictest Abortion Bans in Europe\u2019<\/a> Monday, September 07, 2026Nuclear Victims\u2019 Experiences Must Be at the Heart of Global Efforts for Assistance and Remediation<\/a> Monday, September 07, 2026Bridging Digital Transformation in an ASEAN-EAEU Cooperation<\/a> Monday, September 07, 2026Midwives: The Workforce That Will Determine Maternal and Newborn Survival and Africa\u2019s Future<\/a> Monday, September 07, 2026AI: T\u00fcrk urges action before it becomes an \u2018existential risk to humanity\u2019<\/a> Monday, September 07, 2026Human rights chief T\u00fcrk renews call for end to spiralling Sudan war<\/a> Monday, September 07, 2026In-depth<\/p>\n

Learn more about the related issues:<\/p>\n

Share this<\/p>\n

Bookmark or share this with others using some popular social bookmarking web sites:<\/p>\n

Link to this page from your site\/blog<\/p>\n

Add the following HTML code to your page:<\/p>\n

Beyond the Death Penalty Debate: Human Dignity and Justice in Japan<\/a>, Inter Press Service, Tuesday, September 08, 2026 (posted by Global Issues)<\/p>\n

\u2026 to produce this:<\/p>\n

Beyond the Death Penalty Debate: Human Dignity and Justice in Japan<\/a>, Inter Press Service, Tuesday, September 08, 2026 (posted by Global Issues)<\/p>\n