British singer Dua Lipa initiated a judicial process in a court in The United States demanding 15 million dollars in compensation for the use of her image.
Samsung alleged that an external content partner provided the photograph with guarantees that they possessed the necessary permissions for commercial distribution.
The litigation includes allegations of copyright infringement and violations of the federal Lanham Act in The United States.

Samsung Electronics broke its silence this Monday to address the legal battle initiated by pop star Dua Lipa, who is requesting 15 million dollars for the alleged appropriation of her image; the legal conflict centers on cardboard television boxes distributed in The United States during 2025 and 2026 that prominently display the artist’s face.

Loading video…

Loading Video

According to court documents, the singer discovered that Samsung featured her photograph in a massive marketing campaign without her knowledge or economic compensation; while her representatives describe the company’s stance as “insensitive,” authorities in The United States closely follow the case unfolding in a California federal court.

Samsung’s defense and external partners in The United States

In an official statement, Samsung denied any intentional misuse and explained that a partner originally supplied the image for its Samsung TV Plus streaming service; furthermore, the South Korean company clarified that it used the photograph for television packaging only after receiving explicit guarantees that all permissions for retail packaging had been obtained.

Despite the ongoing litigation, the company expressed its respect for intellectual property and its willingness to reach a constructive resolution with Dua Lipa’s team; however, the lawsuit maintains that Samsung caused “irreparable damage” by suggesting a false association between the artist and its products before consumers in The United States.

Legal implications and financial demands in The United States

The judicial complaint includes charges for trademark infringement and violation of California state publicity rights law; likewise, the singer’s lawyers emphasize that, as the owner of the photograph taken in 2024, the unauthorized commercial use represents a serious copyright violation. As the process moves forward in California, the case between Dua Lipa and Samsung regarding television packaging highlights the challenges public figures face against the exploitation of their identity by large corporations.; for our Latino community, this confrontation sets a precedent on how global brands must manage artist rights in the digital age.