{"id":132755,"date":"2026-08-26T11:33:07","date_gmt":"2026-08-26T11:33:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/132755\/"},"modified":"2026-08-26T11:33:07","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T11:33:07","slug":"coupang-sues-korea-fair-trade-commission-over-antitrust-inspection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/132755\/","title":{"rendered":"Coupang sues Korea Fair Trade Commission over antitrust inspection"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"subtitle \" style=\"\">Coupang has sued to halt a Fair Trade Commission inspection into whether price-matching coupon costs were shifted to suppliers.<\/p>\n<p>\n        Coupang trucks are parked near the e-commerce platform&#8217;s logistics center in Seoul on Dec. 29, 2025.<br \/>\n        YONHAP\n    <\/p>\n<p>Coupang has repelled attempts by inspectors from the\u00a0antitrust watchdog to launch an on-site inspection over allegations that the e-commerce powerhouse shifted costs to suppliers.<\/p>\n<p> In rebuffing the\u00a0Fair Trade Commission (FTC) officers, the company said that it has not received a legally required notice prior to the inspection. FTC Chairman\u00a0Ju  Biung-ghi said after the failed raid on Wednesday that he will pursue criminal charges.<\/p>\n<p>Coupang&#8217;s refusal to comply with an on-site investigation by the FTC marks the first time since the regulator was established that a company has rejected an inspection outright, in this case on the grounds that &#8220;the law was applied improperly.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The commission attempted to launch inspections at Coupang on four occasions, from Aug. 19 to Friday and again on Monday, but withdrew each time. <\/p>\n<p>Investigators were seeking to determine whether Coupang improperly passed the cost of its &#8220;price-matching coupons&#8221; on to its suppliers.<\/p>\n<p>The coupons are issued automatically when a product sold on the platform is priced higher than on a competing online marketplace, bringing the actual purchase price down to roughly the lowest available. The commission is examining whether the resulting discount costs were shifted onto suppliers.<\/p>\n<p>Coupang&#8217;s argument against the investigation revolves around a notification clause in the law that was not applied.\u00a0Article 17 of the Framework Act on Administrative Investigations requires an administrative agency, as a general rule, to notify the subject of an on-site inspection in writing at least seven days in advance.<\/p>\n<p>                <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/12809625.webp\" width=\"480\" height=\"274\" alt=\"Coupang headquarters in Seoul with its logo visible behind a red traffic signal.\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"\"\/><\/p>\n<p>\n            The Korean headquarters of e-commerce platform Coupang in Songpa District, southern Seoul<br \/>\n            NEWS1\n        <\/p>\n<p>In a statement on Tuesday, Coupang said the notice requirement is &#8220;a lawful procedure that guarantees the interests and rights of the party under investigation&#8221; and that the company &#8220;plans to seek a court ruling on the commission&#8217;s failure to observe that procedure.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>However, the same article stipulates that the notice &#8220;may be presented to the person subject to investigation simultaneously with the commencement of the administrative investigation or the purposes&#8221; when &#8220;it is deemed impossible to achieve the purposes of the investigation due to an anticipated destruction of evidence.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The commission&#8217;s position is that the exception applies here because advance notice would have created a risk of evidence destruction. Coupang counters that this investigation does not meet the conditions for the exception. <\/p>\n<p>The e-commerce titan argues that the concern is not credible given that it cooperated with other extended on-site inspections at its headquarters by the commission and other government agencies from January, following a massive personal data breach.<\/p>\n<p>The outcome now rests with the courts. On Friday, Coupang filed a suit seeking to cancel the commission&#8217;s decision and disposition authorizing the on-site inspection, along with an injunction to halt the investigation.<\/p>\n<p>                <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/12802257.webp\" width=\"480\" height=\"274\" alt=\"Delivery trucks and a Coupang logo at a logistics center in Seoul.\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"\"\/><\/p>\n<p>\n            Delivery trucks wait at a Coupang logistics center in Seoul.<br \/>\n            YONHAP\n        <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It is unusual for an on-site inspection by the commission to fall apart because the company under investigation refused it,&#8221; an industry source told the JoongAng Ilbo. &#8220;Depending on the court&#8217;s decision, the commission&#8217;s overall practice of conducting on-site inspections without advance notice could be shaken, and other companies under investigation could demand procedural rights the way Coupang has.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The ruling liberal Democratic Party (DP) sharply criticized Coupang&#8217;s refusal to comply with the investigation, saying no company can stand above Korean law.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Coupang is using claims of discrimination against U.S. companies by the U.S. government and political circles as a shield to evade legitimate domestic regulation and investigation,&#8221; DP spokesperson Lee Yong-woo said Wednesday in a written statement. &#8220;The company&#8217;s double standard, enjoying enormous profits in the Korean market but invoking its status as a U.S. company only when it is time to take responsibility, is infuriating.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>BY KIM MIN-YOUNG [kim.minyoung5@joongang.co.kr]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Coupang has sued to halt a Fair Trade Commission inspection into whether price-matching coupon costs were shifted to&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":132756,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[381],"tags":[426],"class_list":["post-132755","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-coupang","tag-coupang"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132755","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132755"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132755\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/132756"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132755"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132755"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132755"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}