{"id":62589,"date":"2026-06-24T00:05:08","date_gmt":"2026-06-24T00:05:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/62589\/"},"modified":"2026-06-24T00:05:08","modified_gmt":"2026-06-24T00:05:08","slug":"three-u-s-solar-companies-file-petition-for-ad-cvd-investigation-into-south-korea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/62589\/","title":{"rendered":"Three U.S. solar companies file petition for AD\/CVD investigation into South Korea"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A group of American solar manufacturers has filed a petition with the United States Department of Commerce requesting an anti-circumvention inquiry into companies that import solar materials from South Korea.<\/p>\n<p>The group, calling itself American Manufacturers for Energy Resilience (AMER), consists of three members: Jeffersonville PV Cells Corporation (a wholly owned manufacturing subsidiary of Canadian Solar), SEG Manufacturing Inc. and Heliene USA Inc.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The companies are asking the Commerce department to rule that crystalline-silicon photovoltaic (CSPV) cells imported from South Korea that use Chinese-origin components are circumventing existing antidumping and countervailing duty (AD\/CVD) orders on solar products from China.<\/p>\n<p>The petition specifically focuses on the effects of Hanwha Q CELLS\u2019s production of CSPV materials in Korea, noting that the company no longer has an in-country source for upstream materials like raw polysilicon, ingots and wafers, and instead gets these materials from Chinese suppliers.<\/p>\n<p>While the petition also names Korean companies HD Hyundai Energy Solutions and Shinsung E&amp;G, AMER is officially requesting a country-wide inquiry that would cover all producers and exporters of CSPV cells operating in the Republic of Korea.<\/p>\n<p>The core of AMER\u2019s legal argument is that the companies are performing only \u201cminor or insignificant\u201d processing of the Chinese materials, which AMER alleges constitutes tariff circumvention.<\/p>\n<p>Past AD\/CVD cases<\/p>\n<p>The present request from AMER finds Hanwha Q CELLS on the opposite side of the antidumping argument compared to its role in similar petitions of the recent past.<\/p>\n<p>As a member of trade groups called The American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee and the Alliance for American Solar Manufacturing and Trade, Hanwha Q CELLS USA participated as a petitioner in two AD\/CVD cases filed in 2024 and 2025.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The first case, against companies operating in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam resulted in <a href=\"https:\/\/pv-magazine-usa.com\/2025\/04\/21\/u-s-commerce-department-slaps-unexpectedly-high-tariffs-on-solar-imports\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">high tariffs on CSPV materials<\/a> from those countries in a final determination issued in April 2025.<\/p>\n<p>More recently, the Department of Commerce released a preliminary determination in the second case, against companies in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pv-magazine.com\/2026\/04\/27\/u-s-government-sets-preliminary-anti-dumping-duties-on-solar-imports-from-india-indonesia-and-laos\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">India, Indonesia and Laos<\/a>. The preliminary determination resulted in immediate AD\/CVD tariff levies of approximately 234% on solar cells from India, between 121% and 178% for Indonesia, and 103% for Laos. Final determinations in the case are expected later this year.<\/p>\n<p>While it continues to import solar cells to supply its domestic module manufacturing operations, <a href=\"https:\/\/pv-magazine-usa.com\/2026\/06\/09\/qcells-begins-production-of-solar-cells-in-cartersville-georgia\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Hanwha Q CELLS has begun to make its own solar ingots, wafers and cells<\/a> in the U.S. at its plant in Cartersville Georgia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A group of American solar manufacturers has filed a petition with the United States Department of Commerce requesting&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":62590,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[35069,31,6919,2574,15562],"class_list":["post-62589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-korea","tag-cells","tag-korea","tag-policy","tag-raw-materials","tag-silicon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62589"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62589\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/62590"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}