{"id":82987,"date":"2026-07-11T23:59:20","date_gmt":"2026-07-11T23:59:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/82987\/"},"modified":"2026-07-11T23:59:20","modified_gmt":"2026-07-11T23:59:20","slug":"delhi-hc-directs-reddit-to-disclose-details-of-anonymous-user-behind-samsung-galaxy-s26-blast-in-the-box-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/82987\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC Directs Reddit To Disclose Details Of Anonymous User Behind Samsung Galaxy S26 &#8216;Blast In The Box&#8217; Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Delhi High Court has directed Reddit to furnish the available particulars of the anonymous account behind a post titled &#8220;Samsung Galaxy S26 blast in the box&#8221; within three days. The court did not pass any immediate direction for removal of the post.  <\/p>\n<p>Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani was hearing Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.&#8217;s application seeking an interim injunction against an account operating as &#8220;Techtalkwithmalik&#8221;, besides directions to Reddit and Instagram to take down posts alleging that Samsung products, including the Galaxy S26, had caught fire or exploded.  <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Since Mr. Anand has expressed that they are unaware of who defendant No. 1 really is, defendant No.2 is directed to furnish to learned counsel for the plaintiffs the particulars of defendant No.1 &#8211; M\/s Techtalkwithmalik &#8211; as may be available with them, within 03 days.&#8221;, the court ordered.   <\/p>\n<p>Counsel for Samsung submitted that a Galaxy S26 purchased by Harshit Bhardwaj was alleged to have caught fire. According to Samsung, its service centre examined the phone and found that the battery had been pierced with a sharp object, leading to a short circuit and the battery burning.  <\/p>\n<p>Anand clarified that the proceedings were not concerned with the customer&#8217;s grievance. Instead, Samsung challenged a Reddit post titled &#8220;Samsung Galaxy S26 blast in the box,&#8221; contending that the title was false because there had been no blast and the incident had not occurred while the phone was inside its box.  <\/p>\n<p>He also referred to comments on the Reddit post questioning how the box could have remained undamaged if there had been a blast. Samsung submitted that its principal grievance was against the anonymous account operating as &#8220;Techtalkwithmalik&#8221;, whose identity was unknown.  <\/p>\n<p>Appearing for Reddit, Advocate Ankit Parhar submitted that, as a matter of legal principle, an order directing removal of the post could only be passed after hearing the account holder.  <\/p>\n<p>After hearing both sides, the court directed Reddit to provide whatever particulars of the &#8220;Techtalkwithmalik&#8221; account were available with it to Samsung&#8217;s counsel within three days.<\/p>\n<p>For Samsung: Advocates Pravin Anand, Saif Khan, Shobhit Agarwal and Prajjwal Kushwaha<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Delhi High Court has directed Reddit to furnish the available particulars of the anonymous account behind a&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":82988,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[44455,44463,44457,44461,15182,44460,44459,44458,11898,127,276,5871,223,44462,44456,8685],"class_list":["post-82987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-samsung","tag-delhi-high-court","tag-ex-parte-injunction","tag-false-claims","tag-identity-disclosure","tag-instagram","tag-justice-anup-jairam-bhambhani","tag-passing-off","tag-product-defamation","tag-reddit","tag-samsung","tag-samsung-electronics","tag-samsung-galaxy-s26","tag-samsung-group","tag-takedown-order","tag-techtalkwithmalik","tag-trademark-infringement"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82987"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82987\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/82988"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/korea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}