Barik\u0101\u017eu laiku noz\u012bmi un j\u0113gu Latvijas v\u0113stur\u0113 ir gr\u016bti p\u0101rv\u0113rt\u0113t, jo ikviens, kur\u0161 1991. gada janv\u0101r\u012b tur bija, var teikt, ka tas bija viens no spilgt\u0101kajiem vi\u0146a dz\u012bves soci\u0101lpolitiskajiem p\u0101rdz\u012bvojumiem. Ne katrai paaudzei izdodas kaut ko l\u012bdz\u012bgu piedz\u012bvot.<\/p>\n
T\u0101 k\u0101 v\u0113sture neparedz spriedel\u0113jumus – k\u0101 b\u016btu, ja b\u016btu, tad nes\u0101ksim fantaz\u0113t par to, kas notiktu, ja p\u0113c 1991. gada 13. janv\u0101ra notikumiem Vi\u013c\u0146\u0101 barik\u0101des visp\u0101r netiktu celtas vai k\u0101 var\u0113tu att\u012bst\u012bties notikumi, ja Kremlis iz\u0161\u0137irtos par \u0161o barik\u0101\u017eu likvid\u0101ciju. Ja nu gad\u012bjum\u0101 gribas par to pafantaz\u0113t, tad j\u0101atceras, ka tie\u0161i taj\u0101 laik\u0101 pasaules uzman\u012bba bija piev\u0113rsta ne tikai mums, bet ar\u012b Kuveitas atbr\u012bvo\u0161anai \u201cL\u012b\u010da kara\u201d ietvaros.<\/p>\n
Jebkur\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 barik\u0101des bija un no m\u016bsu v\u0113stures t\u0101s nekas vairs nesp\u0113s iz\u0146emt. \u0160odien aktu\u0101l\u0101ks jaut\u0101jums ir par ko citu: k\u0101di bija latvie\u0161u tautas sap\u0146i, toreiz s\u0113\u017eot pie ugunskuriem, un k\u0101da ir realit\u0101te \u0161odien. Proti, kas no \u0161iem sap\u0146iem ir piepild\u012bjies un kas ne.<\/p>\n
Vispirms par sap\u0146iem. Vienm\u0113r j\u0101atceras, ka \u0161odienas priek\u0161status par v\u0113lamo lietu k\u0101rt\u012bbu nevar p\u0101rnest pag\u0101tn\u0113, kad realit\u0101te bija pavisam cita. 1991. gada s\u0101kum\u0101 v\u0113l bija PSRS ar 15 savienotaj\u0101m republik\u0101m, \u0100da\u017eos bija nevis NATO armijas kontingents, bet gan visa Latvija bija nokl\u0101ta ar PSRS armijas karasp\u0113ka da\u013c\u0101m. Apgroz\u012bb\u0101 bija padomju rublis, visur domin\u0113jo\u0161\u0101 bija krievu valoda un, lai izbrauktu uz \u0101rzem\u0113m, bija nepiecie\u0161ama \u012bpa\u0161a PSRS \u0101rzemju pase, kura at\u0161\u0137\u012br\u0101s no t\u0101s PSRS pilso\u0146u pases, kas toreiz bija katram pie barik\u0101\u017eu ugunskura s\u0113do\u0161ajam. V\u0113l burtiski gadu iepriek\u0161 uz \u0101rzem\u0113m visp\u0101r gandr\u012bz neviens nevar\u0113ja izbraukt. Pat ne uz Poliju vai \u010cehoslov\u0101kiju.<\/p>\n
T\u0101p\u0113c lielais sapnis \u0161iem barik\u0101\u017eu aizst\u0101vjiem bija viens – neatkar\u012bga Latvija, kur katram kabat\u0101 ir Latvijas pase, ar kuru br\u012bvi var braukt pa pasauli. Neiesl\u012bgstot s\u012bkumos, j\u0101atz\u012bst, ka \u0161is lielais sapnis kopum\u0101 ir piepild\u012bjies. Par to, k\u0101 katrs dz\u012bvos \u0161aj\u0101 br\u012bvaj\u0101 Latvij\u0101, tobr\u012bd neviens \u012bpa\u0161i nedom\u0101ja, jo galv\u0101 bija pavisam cits – augst\u0101ks m\u0113r\u0137is.<\/p>\n
Sk\u0101bo v\u012bnogu sindroms <\/p>\n
\u0160aj\u0101s atceres dien\u0101s negribas piemin\u0113t v\u0113l k\u0101du lietu, bet kad tad, ja ne tagad? Runa ir par da\u017ek\u0101rt publiskaj\u0101 telp\u0101 dzirdamajiem centieniem barik\u0101\u017eu laiku noniecin\u0101t, nosaucot to par bezj\u0113dz\u012bgu pas\u0101kumu vai, v\u0113l trak\u0101k, par \u201c\u010dekas\u201d inspir\u0113tu te\u0101tri. \u0160ie noniecin\u0101t\u0101ji parasti ir cilv\u0113ki, kuri da\u017e\u0101du iemeslu d\u0113\u013c barik\u0101\u017eu pas\u0101kumos nepiedal\u012bj\u0101s.<\/p>\n
Vi\u0146i palaida gar\u0101m \u0161o vienreiz\u0113jo iesp\u0113ju izbaud\u012bt n\u0101cijas kop\u012bbas garu un tagad cen\u0161as sev un apk\u0101rt\u0113jiem iest\u0101st\u012bt, ka \u201cv\u012bnogas bija sk\u0101bas\u201d. Sevi\u0161\u0137i komiski (lai gan paties\u012bb\u0101 tra\u0123iski) tas izskat\u0101s no sal\u012bdzino\u0161i jauniem cilv\u0113kiem (zem 40-45), kuriem \u0161\u0137iet, ka tie, kas barik\u0101d\u0113s piedal\u012bj\u0101s, ir naivi mu\u013c\u0137\u012b\u0161i, bet vi\u0146i no saviem pa\u0161iedom\u0101t\u0101s \u201cgudr\u012bbas augstumiem\u201d visu zina lab\u0101k.<\/p>\n
Tie\u0161i vi\u0146i, kad barik\u0101\u017eu atceres pas\u0101kumos tiek run\u0101ts par \u0161iem augstajiem m\u0113r\u0137iem, augstpr\u0101t\u012bgi v\u012bpsn\u0101: kam\u0113r j\u016bs, dumi\u0137\u012b\u0161i, kas tur s\u0113d\u0113j\u0101t ap ugunskuriem, par augstajiem m\u0113r\u0137iem sap\u0146oj\u0101t un par to, k\u0101 t\u0101l\u0101k dz\u012bvot nedom\u0101j\u0101t, tikm\u0113r tie \u010dekisti, kas visu to organiz\u0113ja, jau dal\u012bja visu m\u016bsu kop\u0113jo mantu. Ko pret to iebilst?<\/p>\n
Tikai vienu. Cilv\u0113ki nav e\u0146\u0123e\u013ci. Vienm\u0113r, visur un visos laikos atrad\u012bsies t\u0101di, kuri tad, kad citi dz\u0113\u0161 ugunsgr\u0113ku, pal\u012bdz cilv\u0113kiem pl\u016bdos vai p\u0113c zemestr\u012bces, rak\u0146\u0101sies pa sve\u0161\u0101m atvilktn\u0113m. Vai t\u0101p\u0113c mums j\u0101noniecina nesavt\u012bgie gl\u0101b\u0113ji un j\u0101saka, ka vi\u0146i biju\u0161i mu\u013c\u0137i?<\/p>\n
K\u0101p\u0113c tik v\u0113lu tu n\u0101c? <\/p>\n
Vai t\u0101l\u0101kais var\u0113ja b\u016bt cit\u0101di? Lai ar\u012b \u0161is jaut\u0101jums ir no t\u0101 pa\u0161a plaukta – k\u0101 b\u016btu, ja b\u016btu – \u0161oreiz tom\u0113r pafantaz\u0113sim. Var\u0113ja b\u016bt cit\u0101di. Tikai pie\u0146emot \u0161o \u201cvar\u0113ja b\u016bt cit\u0101di\u201d, j\u0101pie\u0146em, ka var\u0113ja b\u016bt ne tikai lab\u0101k, bet ar\u012b slikt\u0101k. Turkl\u0101t viegl\u0101k ir iedom\u0101ties slikt\u0101ku nek\u0101 lab\u0101ku variantu. Paskaidro\u0161u.<\/p>\n
Ir sam\u0113r\u0101 viegli iedom\u0101ties situ\u0101ciju, ka Rietumeirop\u0101 gadu t\u016bksto\u0161u mij\u0101 p\u0101rsvaru g\u016bst viedoklis, ka Austrumeiropas valstis tom\u0113r \u012bsti neatbilst Rietumu standartiem un t\u0101m (l\u012bdz\u012bgi k\u0101 Turcijai) v\u0113l nav pien\u0101cis laiks tikt uz\u0146emt\u0101m ES. Tas pats un pat v\u0113l liel\u0101k\u0101 m\u0113r\u0101 attiecas ar\u012b uz NATO.<\/p>\n
L\u012bdz ar to nav gr\u016bti iedom\u0101ties situ\u0101ciju, kur\u0101 Latvija paliek \u0101rpus ES un NATO. L\u012bdz\u012bgi k\u0101 Ukraina, Moldova un citas valstis. Diez vai tas b\u016btu n\u0101cis m\u016bsu valstij par labu. Nav gr\u016bti aizfantaz\u0113ties, ka pie t\u0101da salikuma Krievija savu ekspansiju 2022. gad\u0101 var\u0113tu s\u0101kt tie\u0161i ar Baltijas valst\u012bm, nevis Ukrainu.<\/p>\n
Iedom\u0101ties, ka var\u0113ja b\u016bt lab\u0101k, jau ir gr\u016bt\u0101k. 35 gadu laik\u0101 nav par\u0101d\u012bjies Latvij\u0101 t\u0101ds valstsv\u012brs\/sieva, kas liktu teikt: nu k\u0101p\u0113c tik v\u0113lu tu n\u0101c? Vai tie\u0161\u0101m nevar\u0113ji par\u0101d\u012bties agr\u0101k? Ja par \u0161\u012b 35 gadu perioda lab\u0101k\u0101 politi\u0137a titulu nomin\u0113jam Vairu V\u012b\u0137i-Freibergu<\/a> (lai k\u0101 daudziem vi\u0146a nepatiktu, citu pat iedom\u0101ties nevar. Nav t\u0101du), tad vi\u0146a izdar\u012bja visu, ko var\u0113ja – pal\u012bdzot Latvijai integr\u0113ties atlantiskaj\u0101s strukt\u016br\u0101s. Bet kas b\u016btu main\u012bjies, ja viena premjera viet\u0101 b\u016btu cits? Ja Guntara Krasta viet\u0101 b\u016btu Vilis Kri\u0161topans<\/a>? Nu bija jau abi, ar nelielu atstarpi.<\/p>\n Da\u017ek\u0101rt dzirdamas \u017e\u0113labas, ka viss b\u016btu cit\u0101di, ja b\u016btu notikusi visaptvero\u0161a lustr\u0101cija un visi vecie komunisti un \u010dekisti b\u016btu izm\u0113zti no valsts p\u0101rvaldes. Ko lai saka?<\/p>\n Devi\u0146desmitajos gados jaun\u0101 nomenklat\u016bra tikai veidoj\u0101s. Katrs ar kaut minim\u0101lu vad\u012bt\u0101ja vai organiz\u0113t\u0101ja talantu var\u0113ja br\u012bvi n\u0101kt un izpausties. Faktiski visi ce\u013ci un visas durvis bija va\u013c\u0101. Vair\u0101k nek\u0101 jebkad pirms tam un p\u0113c tam. Nek\u0101das \u012bpa\u0161as privil\u0113\u0123ijas \u201cvecajiem komunistiem un \u010dekistiem\u201d nebija. Tie\u0161i otr\u0101di, vi\u0146us visus cent\u0101s aizst\u0101t ar jauniem.<\/p>\n 30 gadus vec\u0101 fizi\u0137a Ein\u0101ra Rep\u0161es iecel\u0161ana par Latvijas Bankas prezidentu ir uzskat\u0101ms piem\u0113rs tam, k\u0101da bija kadru politika neatkar\u012bg\u0101s Latvijas s\u0101kumposm\u0101. Ja ar\u012b k\u0101ds \u201cdisidents\u201d \u013coti grib\u0113ja, bet netika k\u0101d\u0101 amat\u0101, tad nevis t\u0101p\u0113c, ka nebija notikusi lustr\u0101cija, bet gan t\u0101p\u0113c, ka prata tikai ska\u013ci run\u0101t, visu kritiz\u0113t, bet ne vad\u012bt. Var piekrist: ja b\u016btu notikusi lustr\u0101cija, tad, iesp\u0113jams, b\u016btu vair\u0101k br\u012bvu vakan\u010du, kuras var\u0113tu aizpild\u012bt tie, kas konkurences c\u012b\u0146\u0101 v\u0101j\u0101ki, bet vai tas ko dotu m\u016bsu valsts labkl\u0101j\u012bbai?<\/p>\n Pulveris iz\u0161auts <\/p>\n Bie\u017ei barik\u0101\u017eu<\/a> sakar\u0101 tiek piesaukta t\u0101 neaprakst\u0101m\u0101 vienot\u012bbas saj\u016bta, k\u0101da bija toreiz, un ar r\u016bgtumu tiek atz\u012bm\u0113ts – kur t\u0101 pazudusi? Manupr\u0101t, \u0161\u0101da gau\u0161an\u0101s ir gandr\u012bz vai b\u0113rni\u0161\u0137\u012bga. Tikpat labi var s\u016broties, kur pazudusi t\u0101 liel\u0101 m\u012bla, k\u0101da bija pirms k\u0101z\u0101m; kur pazudusi jaun\u012bba, \u201ckas nen\u0101ks vairs\u201d un taml\u012bdz\u012bgi. T\u0101p\u0113c jau m\u0113s katru gadu janv\u0101r\u012b atceramies \u0161o barik\u0101\u017eu laiku, jo tas bija vienreiz\u0113js, neatk\u0101rtojams notikums m\u016bsu paaudzes v\u0113stur\u0113. Tie\u0161i ar \u0161o vienot\u012bbu, ar m\u0113r\u0137u skaidr\u012bbu un nep\u0101rprotam\u012bbu. Tur nebija nek\u0101du \u201cviss nav tik viennoz\u012bm\u012bgi\u201d, nek\u0101du atrunu un laipo\u0161anas.<\/p>\n Saglab\u0101t \u0161\u0101du \u201cuzvilktu\u201d dv\u0113seles st\u0101vokli ilgsto\u0161i nav iesp\u0113jams. Tas k\u013cuva redzams jau dr\u012bz vien p\u0113c barik\u0101d\u0113m. Barik\u0101des de facto bija tr\u012bs ilgu, visai saspringtu Atmodas gadu kulmin\u0101cijas punkts. Kad t\u0101 pa\u0161a gada august\u0101 notika pu\u010ds un PSRS armijas da\u013cas ie\u0146\u0113ma visus tos pa\u0161us strat\u0113\u0123iskos objektus, ap kuriem janv\u0101r\u012b tika saceltas barik\u0101des, sabiedr\u012bba to uztv\u0113ra ar apbr\u012bnojamu mieru (vienaldz\u012bbu).<\/p>\n Var jau teikt, ka \u0161ai vienaldz\u012bbai bija objekt\u012bvs pamats – 1991. gada august\u0101 viss iz\u0161\u0137\u012br\u0101s Maskav\u0101. No mums maz kas bija atkar\u012bgs. Ja gribam b\u016bt objekt\u012bvi, tad j\u0101atz\u012bst – viss Atmodas gadu pulveris jau bija iz\u0161auts. Ja Maskav\u0101 b\u016btu uzvar\u0113ju\u0161i pu\u010disti un atjaunotu veco k\u0101rt\u012bbu, diez vai Latvij\u0101 daudziem v\u0113l b\u016btu pieticis sp\u0113ka kaut cik nopietni pretoties. P\u0113d\u0113jo teikumu pieminu k\u0101 iebildumu pla\u0161i izplat\u012btajam pie\u0146\u0113mumam, ka PSRS sabrukums bija v\u0113sturiski determin\u0113ts un tam b\u016btu bijis j\u0101notiek jebkur\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101.<\/p>\n Redzot, kas \u0161odien notiek pasaul\u0113, k\u013c\u016bst skaidrs, ka situ\u0101cija taj\u0101 laik\u0101 var\u0113ja att\u012bst\u012bties ar\u012b p\u0113c cita scen\u0101rija. Teiksim, k\u0101 \u0136\u012bn\u0101 ar saimniecisk\u0101 mode\u013ca mai\u0146u, bet saglab\u0101joties repres\u012bvajam valsts p\u0101rvaldes modelim. Nav prec\u012bzi izm\u0113rojams, cik liels bija m\u016bsu barik\u0101\u017eu pienesums PSRS sabrukuma veicin\u0101\u0161an\u0101, bet tas noteikti bija b\u016btisks un noz\u012bm\u012bgs.<\/p>\n Tam pat ir sava ietekme uz m\u016bsu pa\u0161reiz\u0113jo dro\u0161\u012bbu. \u0160\u012bbr\u012b\u017ea Krem\u013ca saimnieks lieliski atceras 1991. gada janv\u0101ra notikumus Baltij\u0101 un labi saprot – tur vi\u0146u ar s\u0101lsmaizi neviens nesagaid\u012bs (k\u0101 vi\u0146\u0161 bija iedom\u0101jies par Ukrainu). T\u0101p\u0113c varb\u016bt lab\u0101k tur\u0113ties t\u0101l\u0101k no valst\u012bm, kur neapbru\u0146ota tauta gatava celt barik\u0101des, s\u0113d\u0113t ziemas sal\u0101 pie ugunskuriem un sarg\u0101t savu zemi.<\/p>\n \u201cSoci\u0101lais taisn\u012bgums\u201d <\/p>\n Atceroties tos laikus un t\u0101 laika sap\u0146us, j\u0101atz\u012bst, ka ne viss piepild\u012bj\u0101s. Asto\u0146os gados Skandin\u0101vijas dz\u012bves l\u012bmeni nesasniedz\u0101m. \u0160obr\u012bd pat gr\u016bti iedom\u0101ties, ka asto\u0146i gadi tolaik bija visp\u0101rpie\u0146emtais termi\u0146\u0161, p\u0113c kura dz\u012bvosim k\u0101 Zviedrij\u0101.<\/p>\n Re\u0101l\u0101 dz\u012bve neatkar\u012bgaj\u0101 Latvij\u0101 ne visus ir lutin\u0101jusi. Ar\u012b daudzus tos, kuri pirms 35 gadiem s\u0113d\u0113ja pie ugunskuriem Doma laukum\u0101 un citur. Vi\u0146i izj\u016bt pamatotu r\u016bgtumu. M\u0113s toreiz bij\u0101m gatavi atdot visu, tai skait\u0101 dz\u012bv\u012bbu, bet mums par to tagad iedod pensiju zem iztikas minimuma.<\/p>\n Vi\u0146us var saprast, un Latvijas politi\u0137iem vajadz\u0113tu vair\u0101k dom\u0101t, k\u0101 samazin\u0101t plaisu starp lielo un mazo pensiju sa\u0146\u0113m\u0113jiem, nevis run\u0101t par \u201csoci\u0101lo taisn\u012bgumu\u201d (ko katrs iemaks\u0101jis, to sa\u0146em). \u0160o principu varb\u016bt var attiecin\u0101t uz tiem, kas darba gaitas s\u0101ka jau p\u0113c 1996. gada (kad st\u0101j\u0101s sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161\u0101 pensiju sist\u0113ma), bet ne uz tiem, kas soci\u0101lekonomisk\u0101s sist\u0113mas l\u016bzumu ar tam rakstur\u012bgo haosu piedz\u012bvoja jau darba gados. Tas ir, uz tiem, kas veidoja barik\u0101\u017eu aizst\u0101vju galveno masu.<\/p>\n Ja reiz \u0161im jaut\u0101jumam esam piesk\u0101ru\u0161ies, tad j\u0101atz\u012bst, ka galvenie barik\u0101\u017eu aizst\u0101vji bija cilv\u0113ki no laukiem. Tie\u0161i tie, kuriem \u0161odien vismaz\u0101k\u0101s pensijas, jo n\u0101kamaj\u0101 desmitgad\u0113 p\u0113c barik\u0101d\u0113m vi\u0146i bija spiesti par sant\u012bmiem str\u0101d\u0101t gateros vai me\u017e\u0101 bez l\u012bguma un bez soci\u0101laj\u0101m iemaks\u0101m. \u0160odienas lielo pensiju sa\u0146\u0113m\u0113ji uz barik\u0101d\u0113m bija reti viesi. Tikai tad, kad tur ierad\u0101s telev\u012bzijas brig\u0101de. Ar\u012b par to \u0161odien nevajadz\u0113tu izvair\u012bties run\u0101t. \u012apa\u0161i tad, kad ar nesl\u0113ptu patosu tiek piesaukts soci\u0101lais taisn\u012bgums.<\/p>\n \t\t\t\t\t\tinfo<\/p>\n Uzzini pirmais
kas interesants noticis Latvij\u0101 un pasaul\u0113,
pievienojoties mums Telegram<\/a> vai Whatsapp<\/a> kan\u0101l\u0101<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Barik\u0101\u017eu laiku noz\u012bmi un j\u0113gu Latvijas v\u0113stur\u0113 ir gr\u016bti p\u0101rv\u0113rt\u0113t, jo ikviens, kur\u0161 1991. gada janv\u0101r\u012b tur bija,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":101474,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-101473","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-aktualitates","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-latest-news","15":"tag-latestnews","16":"tag-latvia","17":"tag-latvian","18":"tag-latviesu","19":"tag-latviesu-valoda","20":"tag-latviesuvaloda","21":"tag-latvija","22":"tag-lv","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-popularakas-zinas","25":"tag-popularakaszinas","26":"tag-top-stories","27":"tag-topstories","28":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115879029132190670","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101473"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101473\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/101474"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}