{"id":103277,"date":"2026-01-13T16:11:07","date_gmt":"2026-01-13T16:11:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/103277\/"},"modified":"2026-01-13T16:11:07","modified_gmt":"2026-01-13T16:11:07","slug":"aptur-likuma-grozijumus-kas-ierobezotu-mediju-darbu-un-varda-brivibu-raksts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/103277\/","title":{"rendered":"Aptur likuma groz\u012bjumus, kas ierobe\u017eotu mediju darbu un v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbu \/ Raksts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Izg\u0101zies m\u0113\u0123in\u0101jums k\u0101rt\u0113jo reizi ierobe\u017eot mediju v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbu. Kult\u016bras ministrija (KM) sagatavojusi likuma groz\u012bjumus, kur esot paredz\u0113ti tikai tehniski preciz\u0113jumi, tom\u0113r\u00a0Latvijas \u017durn\u0101listu asoci\u0101cijas ieskat\u0101\u00a0t\u0101 glu\u017ei neesot. Ar groz\u012bjumiem tiktu krietni ierobe\u017eota mediju iesp\u0113ja ieg\u016bt inform\u0101ciju no valsts p\u0101rvaldes. Asoci\u0101cijai publiski pau\u017eot ba\u017eas par v\u0113r\u0161anos pret v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbu, Kult\u016bras ministrija atlika jaut\u0101juma skat\u012b\u0161anu otrdien vald\u012bbas s\u0113d\u0113 un kop\u0101 ar Tieslietu ministriju uzsv\u0113ra, ka \u0161\u0101di groz\u012bjumi nav j\u0101virza t\u0101l\u0101k. Jaut\u0101jums \u2013 vai \u0161\u0101ds solis bijusi apzin\u0101ta r\u012bc\u012bba vai vienk\u0101r\u0161i pavir\u0161\u012bba \u2013 joproj\u0101m ir neatbild\u0113ts.<\/p>\n<p>Aptur likuma groz\u012bjumus, kas ierobe\u017eotu mediju v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbu<\/p>\n<p>K\u0101das bija pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101s likuma izmai\u0146as<\/p>\n<p>Sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161\u0101 likuma &#8220;Par presi un citiem masu inform\u0101cijas l\u012bdzek\u013ciem&#8221; 7. panta pirm\u0101 da\u013ca noteic, ka aizliegts public\u0113t inform\u0101ciju, kas ir valsts nosl\u0113pums vai cits ar likumu speci\u0101li aizsarg\u0101ts nosl\u0113pums, kas aicina uz vardarb\u012bbu un past\u0101vo\u0161\u0101s iek\u0101rtas g\u0101\u0161anu, propagand\u0113 karu, cietsird\u012bbu, rasu, nacion\u0101lo vai reli\u0123isko p\u0101r\u0101kumu un neieciet\u012bbu, k\u016bda uz citu noziegumu izdar\u012b\u0161anu.<\/p>\n<p>Sagatavot\u0101, bet atlikt\u0101 panta redakcija paredz\u0113ja: aizliegts public\u0113t inform\u0101ciju, kas ir valsts nosl\u0113puma objekts vai cita ar likumu speci\u0101li aizsarg\u0101ta inform\u0101cija. Tostarp aizliegts public\u0113t t\u0101du inform\u0101ciju, kas aicina uz vardarb\u012bbu un past\u0101vo\u0161\u0101s iek\u0101rtas g\u0101\u0161anu, propagand\u0113 karu, cietsird\u012bbu, rasu, nacion\u0101lo vai reli\u0123isko p\u0101r\u0101kumu un neieciet\u012bbu\u00a0vai k\u016bda uz citu noziegumu izdar\u012b\u0161anu.<\/p>\n<p>Kult\u016bras ministrijas virz\u012bt\u0101 likumprojekta m\u0113r\u0137is ir form\u0101li p\u0101r\u0146emt Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu. Ta\u010du\u00a0Latvijas \u017durn\u0101listu asoci\u0101cijas ieskat\u0101\u00a0groz\u012bjumos &#8220;pa kluso&#8221; tiktu ieviesta \u0161\u0137ietami neb\u016btiska v\u0101rda nomai\u0146a, likuma 7. pant\u0101 aizst\u0101jot j\u0113dzienu &#8220;nosl\u0113pums&#8221; ar &#8220;inform\u0101cija&#8221;. \u0160\u0101ds it k\u0101 terminolo\u0123isks s\u012bkums<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>radik\u0101li papla\u0161in\u0101tu aizlieguma tv\u0113rumu, padarot par nepublic\u0113jamu praktiski jebk\u0101du ministriju un iest\u0101\u017eu iek\u0161\u0113jai lieto\u0161anai paredz\u0113tu inform\u0101ciju,<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>kas \u017eurn\u0101listiem ir b\u016btiska, lai nor\u0101d\u012btu uz negodpr\u0101t\u012bgu, kaitniecisku un pretlikum\u012bgu darb\u012bbu valsts p\u0101rvald\u0113.<\/p>\n<p>Asoci\u0101cijas vad\u012bt\u0101ja Anastasija Tetarenko-Supe sac\u012bja, ka<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Eiropas mediju br\u012bv\u012bbas akts ir par to, ka medijiem ir j\u0101str\u0101d\u0101 br\u012bv\u0101 vid\u0113,<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>un tas nek\u0101d\u0101 zi\u0146\u0101 nenoz\u012bm\u0113 jaunus ierobe\u017eojumus.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u013boti labi, ka ministrijas ir attapu\u0161\u0101s p\u0113d\u0113j\u0101 br\u012bd\u012b un izr\u0101vu\u0161as tos pagaid\u0101m no [vald\u012bbas] darbak\u0101rt\u012bbas. Tom\u0113r tas, ka tie\u0161\u0101m, ja m\u0113s nepaman\u012btu to, tad t\u0101 ar\u012b b\u016btu aizg\u0101jis t\u0101l\u0101k\u0101 likumdo\u0161anas proces\u0101 uz Saeimu, kur, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 politisko procesu Saeim\u0101, b\u016btu v\u0113l gr\u016bt\u0101k, iesp\u0113jams, izc\u012bn\u012bt to, ka \u0161\u0101ds likums netiktu pie\u0146emts. Un \u0161\u0101da it k\u0101 k\u013c\u016bda, it k\u0101 vienk\u0101r\u0161i varb\u016bt pavir\u0161\u012bba mums maks\u0101tu \u0101rk\u0101rt\u012bgi daudz. Nedr\u012bkst ar\u00a0\u0161\u0101d\u0101m liet\u0101m, kas skar demokr\u0101tiju un v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbu, attiekties k\u0101 pret lietu, pret ko dr\u012bkst attiekties pavir\u0161i,&#8221; teica Tetaranko-Supe.<\/p>\n<p>\u017durn\u0101listu asoci\u0101cijas ieskat\u0101\u00a0&#8220;\u0161is ir k\u0101rt\u0113jais skandalozais gad\u012bjums, kad ier\u0113d\u0146i un politi\u0137i, aizsedzoties ar \u0101r\u0113jiem normat\u012bvajiem aktiem, m\u0113\u0123ina ierobe\u017eot mediju darbu&#8221;. L\u012bdz\u012bga prakse pieredz\u0113ta jau Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Datu regulas ievie\u0161anas laik\u0101, kad datu aizsardz\u012bbas aizseg\u0101 m\u0113\u0123in\u0101ts sl\u0113pt sabiedr\u012bbai b\u016btisku inform\u0101ciju. K\u0101 ar\u012b iepriek\u0161\u0113jos centienos sl\u0113pt amatpersonu deklar\u0101cijas.<\/p>\n<p>Ba\u017eas pauda ar\u012b Latvijas Telev\u012bzijas raid\u012bjuma &#8220;Aizliegtais pa\u0146\u0113miens&#8221; vad\u012bt\u0101js, \u017eurn\u0101lists Guntis Boj\u0101rs. Vi\u0146\u0161\u00a0akcent\u0113ja, ka v\u0101rds &#8220;nosl\u0113pums&#8221; ir juridisks j\u0113dziens, kur skaidri defin\u0113ts,\u00a0kas ir nosl\u0113pums un kas nav, bet v\u0101rds &#8220;inform\u0101cija&#8221; ir jau krietni pla\u0161\u0101ks j\u0113dziens.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Visticam\u0101k, jau t\u0101da visp\u0101r\u012bga inform\u0101cija uz to neattiektos. Bet taj\u0101 br\u012bd\u012b,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>ja ministrijai b\u016btu kaut k\u0101da lieta, ko vi\u0146i grib\u0113tu aizsarg\u0101t\u00a0\u2013\u00a0vai tur kaut k\u0101di iepirkumi vai kaut kas taml\u012bdz\u012bgs \u2013,<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\u0161is paver labu iesp\u0113ju vi\u0146iem uzrakst\u012bt papildu\u00a0normat\u012bvo aktu. \u0160o\u00a0inform\u0101ciju m\u0113s nevienam negribam r\u0101d\u012bt, un viss. Un tur tie pamatojumi nereti ir jaut\u0101jums\u00a0\u2013\u00a0k\u0101p\u0113c? K\u0101p\u0113c negrib kaut ko r\u0101d\u012bt? L\u012bdz\u0161in\u0113jais regul\u0113jums bija \u013coti, man liekas, norm\u0101ls.\u00a0Attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz nosl\u0113pumiem, uz b\u0113rnu ties\u012bb\u0101m ir virkne aizliegumu, k\u0101du inform\u0101ciju nedr\u012bkst public\u0113t. Un kaut k\u0101d\u0101 zi\u0146\u0101 l\u012bdz \u0161im viss ir sak\u0101rtots,&#8221; v\u0113rt\u0113ja \u017eurn\u0101lists.<\/p>\n<p>Bijis viens no 70 priek\u0161likumiem<\/p>\n<p>Tieslietu ministrija, virzot izmai\u0146as likum\u0101, Kult\u016bras ministrijai iesniegusi aptuveni 70 priek\u0161likumu, tostarp ar\u012b &#8220;tehniskus labojumus&#8221;. To vid\u016b ir priek\u0161likums, kas izsaucis \u017durn\u0101listu asoci\u0101cijas neapmierin\u0101t\u012bbu. T\u0101 v\u0113st\u012bja Kult\u016bras ministrija.<\/p>\n<p>Tieslietu ministrija gan akcent\u0113ja, ka t\u0101s kompetenc\u0113 ir sal\u0101got likumprojektu juridisko tehniku un izmantotos terminus ar citos sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161ajos likumos lietotajiem terminiem. Ministrija secin\u0101jusi, ka priek\u0161likumi par terminolo\u0123iju jau sagatavotaj\u0101 likumprojekt\u0101 ir rad\u012bju\u0161i p\u0101rpratumu un par tiem sa\u0146emti pamatoti \u017durn\u0101listu asoci\u0101cijas iebildumi, teica tieslietu ministre Inese L\u012bbi\u0146a-Egnere (&#8220;Jaun\u0101 Vienot\u012bba&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Tieslietu ministrija darba grup\u0101 par regulas p\u0101r\u0146em\u0161anu bija p\u0101rst\u0101v\u0113ta. Es saprotu, ka ir izskan\u0113ju\u0161i da\u017e\u0101di jaut\u0101jumi par terminolo\u0123iju, k\u0101 tas parasti ir, bet vienm\u0113r ir j\u0101v\u0113rt\u0113, ko konkr\u0113taj\u0101 likumprojekt\u0101 iek\u013caut, ko ne. Un to dara t\u0101 ministrija, kas virza konkr\u0113to likumprojektu. Ar mani k\u0101 ministri \u012bpa\u0161i nek\u0101da saska\u0146ojuma ar priek\u0161likuma virz\u012b\u0161anu nav bijis,&#8221; pauda tieslietu ministre.<\/p>\n<p>To, ka bija izveidota darba grupa, kur prezent\u0113ti visi groz\u012bjumi, tostarp Mediju konsultat\u012bvajai padomei, apstiprin\u0101ja kult\u016bras ministre Agnese L\u0101ce (&#8220;Progres\u012bvie&#8221;). Ar\u012b Ties\u012bbu aktu port\u0101l\u0101 redzams, ka likumprojektu saska\u0146oju\u0161as vair\u0101kas ministrijas un organiz\u0101cijas, taj\u0101 skait\u0101 Sabiedrisko elektronisko pla\u0161sazi\u0146as l\u012bdzek\u013cu padome.<\/p>\n<p>Kult\u016bras ministrija gan uzsv\u0113rusi, ka<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>t\u0101 nevienu br\u012bdi un nek\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 nav v\u0113l\u0113jusies ierobe\u017eot \u017eurn\u0101listu darbu.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Ar\u012b Agnese L\u0101ce atvainoj\u0101s par rad\u012bto satraukumu un pateic\u0101s \u017durn\u0101listu asoci\u0101cijai, ka t\u0101 v\u0113rsusi uz \u0161o uzman\u012bbu.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;K\u0101ds varb\u016bt tos bija redz\u0113jis k\u0101 tehniskus groz\u012bjumus, bet, protams, m\u0113s \u0161obr\u012bd redzam, ka tie t\u0101di nav. Nav ar\u012b j\u0101virza nek\u0101di groz\u012bjumi likum\u0101, kas nav saist\u012bti tie\u0161i ar regulas p\u0101r\u0146em\u0161anu.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>M\u0113s \u0161o situ\u0101ciju v\u0113rt\u0113sim, taj\u0101 skait\u0101 to, k\u0101 tas var\u0113ja rasties.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>V\u0113lreiz varu apliecin\u0101t, ka m\u0113s nevirz\u012bsim t\u0101dus groz\u012bjumus, pret kuriem ar\u012b ir tik skaidri iebildumi no nozares p\u0101rst\u0101vo\u0161\u0101s organiz\u0101cijas,&#8221; uzsv\u0113ra L\u0101ce.<\/p>\n<p>Jau tre\u0161dien iecer\u0113ta san\u0101ksme starp vis\u0101m iesaist\u012btaj\u0101m instit\u016bcij\u0101m, lai rastu kop\u012bgu risin\u0101jumu. \u017durn\u0101listu asoci\u0101cijas m\u0113r\u0137is ir pan\u0101kt, ka attiec\u012bgos labojumus iz\u0146em no likumprojekta un ka turpm\u0101k jebkuras izmai\u0146as, kas skar mediju darbu, izstr\u0101d\u0101tu tikai atkl\u0101t\u0101 dialog\u0101 ar mediju organiz\u0101cij\u0101m.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Izg\u0101zies m\u0113\u0123in\u0101jums k\u0101rt\u0113jo reizi ierobe\u017eot mediju v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbu. Kult\u016bras ministrija (KM) sagatavojusi likuma groz\u012bjumus, kur esot paredz\u0113ti tikai&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":103278,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-103277","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-aktualitates","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-latest-news","15":"tag-latestnews","16":"tag-latvia","17":"tag-latvian","18":"tag-latviesu","19":"tag-latviesu-valoda","20":"tag-latviesuvaloda","21":"tag-latvija","22":"tag-lv","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-popularakas-zinas","25":"tag-popularakaszinas","26":"tag-top-stories","27":"tag-topstories","28":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115888670830787329","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103277\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/103278"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}