Konkurences padome asi kritiz\u0113 Sen\u0101ta l\u0113mumu<\/p>\n
Jauns gads Latvij\u0101 s\u0101cies ar spriedzi starp ties\u012bbsarg\u0101jo\u0161aj\u0101m iest\u0101d\u0113m un Augst\u0101ko tiesu (AT), ko izrais\u012bjis Sen\u0101ta nol\u0113mums “b\u016bvnieku karte\u013ca” liet\u0101. Konkurences padome (KP) asi kritiz\u0113 AT Sen\u0101ta Administrat\u012bvo lietu departamenta spriedumu, nor\u0101dot, ka tas nepamatoti ierobe\u017eo ties\u012bsarg\u0101jo\u0161o iest\u0101\u0141u sp\u0113jas atkl\u0101t smagus konkurences p\u0101rk\u0101pumus. KP ieskat\u0101, tiesas argument\u0101cija ir p\u0101r\u0101k form\u0101la un nenov\u0113rt\u0113 b\u016btisk\u0101ko \u2013 p\u0101rk\u0101puma atkl\u0101\u0161anas un pier\u0101d\u012b\u0161anas re\u0101l\u0101s iespejas. “Tas ir b\u012b\u0101ms precedents, kas var paraliz\u0113t ties\u012bsarg\u0101jo\u0161o iest\u0101\u017eu sp\u0113ju n\u0101kotn\u0113 atkl\u0101t slepenas un aizliegtas vieno\u0161anos,” raid\u012bjumam “Nek\u0101 person\u012bga” nor\u0101d\u012bjis KP. Lietas pamat\u0101 ir Korupcijas nov\u0113r\u0161anas un apkaro\u0161anas biroja (KNAB) slepeni noklaus\u012bt\u0101s uzklaus\u012bt\u0101s sarunas, kas k\u013cuva par centr\u0101lo pier\u0101d\u012bumu t.s. “b\u016bvnieku karte\u013ca” atkl\u0101\u0161an\u0101.<\/p>\n
Pier\u0101d\u012bjumu pie\u013caujam\u012bbas str\u012bds<\/p>\n
Sen\u0101ts spriedum\u0101 nol\u0113mis, ka KNAB nevar\u0113ja d\u0101sn\u012b dal\u012bties ar operat\u012bvaj\u0101 darb\u012bb\u0101 ieg\u012btajiem materi\u0101liem, un Konkurences padome sarunas nedr\u012bgaja izmantot k\u0101 pier\u0101d\u012bjumus. AT Senatore Rud\u012bte V\u012bdu\u0161a skaidrojusi, ka Operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas likums nosaka ierobe\u017eojumus operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas pas\u0101kumos ieg\u016bt\u0101s inform\u0101cijas izmanto\u0161anai, un karte\u013ca atkl\u0101\u0161ana nav viens no likum\u0101 noteiktajiem m\u0113r\u0137iem. Tiesa gan nav apstr\u012bdejusi pier\u0101d\u012bjumu tiesiskumu un ticam\u012bbbu, bet gan piev\u0113r\u0101sies vien\u0101gi to nodo\u0161anas procesa form\u0101laj\u0101m nepiln\u012bb\u0101m. KP uzsver, ka bez krimin\u0101lproces\u0101 tiesiski ieg\u016btajiem sarunu ierakstiem \u0161\u0101da ilgsto\u0161a, slepena un mutiski \u012bstenota p\u0101rk\u0101puma pier\u0101d\u012b\u0161ana nav iesp\u0101jama. KP priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0101t\u0101 Ieva \u0160mite nor\u0101d\u012bjusi, ka Sen\u0101ta v\u0119rt\u0113jums \u0141aj\u0101 liet\u0101 ir bijis \u0161aurs un form\u0101ls, aprobe\u017eojoties tikai pier\u0101d\u012bjumu nodo\u0161anas form\u0101lajai atbilst\u012bbai, neanaliz\u0113jot jaut\u0101jumu kontekst\u0101 ar sabiedr\u012bbas intere\u017eu aizsardz\u012bbu.<\/p>\n
B\u016bvnieku karte\u013ca izcelsme un sodi<\/p>\n
Konkurences padome 2021. gada 30. j\u016blij\u0101 pie\u0146\u0113ma l\u0113mumu \u0161ai lietai, konstat\u0113jot desmit b\u016bvniec\u012bbas uz\u0146\u0113mumu ilggad\u0113ju aizliegtu vieno\u0161anos par dal\u012bbas nosac\u012bjumiem publiskajos un priv\u0101tajos iepirkumos. Kop\u0113jais piem\u0113rotais naudas sods sasniedza vair\u0101k nek\u0101 16,65 miljonus eiro. Desmit karte\u013ca dal\u012bbu pieteiku\u0161ajiem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem bija SIA “Skonto B\u016bve”, SIA “Latvijas energoceltnieks”, SIA “Velve”, SIA “Ar\u010ders”, SIA “Rere B\u016bve”, SIA “Re & Re”, SIA “RBSSKALS B\u016bvvad\u012bba”, SIA “Abora”, AS “LNK Industries” un SIA “Merks”. No \u0161iem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem SIA “RBSSKALS B\u016bvvad\u012bba” jau bija likvid\u0113ta, savuk\u0101rt SIA “Velve” nosl\u0113dza izl\u012bgumu ar KP. P\u0101r\u0113jie uz\u0146\u0113mumi apstr\u012bdeja KP l\u0113mumu Administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 apgabalties\u0101, kas to atzina par tiesisku un pamatotu.<\/p>\n
Sen\u0101ta nol\u0113mums un sekas<\/p>\n
Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas Sen\u0101ts ir atc\u0113lis Administrat\u012bv\u0101s apgabaltiesas spriedumu un nodevis lietu jaunai izskat\u012b\u0161anai. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka liet\u0101 b\u016bs j\u0101izskata no jauna, izsl\u0113dzot no pier\u0101d\u012bjumu kopuma slepeni noklaus\u012bto sarunu ierakstus. KP nesl\u0113pj, ka “b\u016bvnieku karteli” izdevies atkl\u0101t tie\u0141i pateicoties noklaus\u012btaj\u0101m sarun\u0101m, un bez \u0141iem pier\u0101d\u012bjumiem \u0161\u0101das ilgsto\u0161as un slepenas vieno\u0161an\u0101s pier\u0101d\u012b\u0161ana b\u016btu faktiski neiesp\u0113jama. KP vad\u012bt\u0101ja Ieva \u0160mite pau\u017e ba\u017eas, ka tiesas l\u0113mums var rad\u012bt precedentu, kas iev\u0113rojami apgr\u016btin\u0101s l\u012bdz\u012bgos smagu konkurences p\u0101rk\u0101pumu atkl\u0101\u0161anu n\u0101kotn\u0113.<\/p>\n
B\u012b\u0101ms precedents vai juridisks pav\u0113rsiens?<\/p>\n
KP ieskat\u0101, Sen\u0101ta spriedums nav tikai juridisks pav\u0113rsiens vien\u0101 proces\u0101, bet gan b\u012b\u0101ms precedents, kas var paraliz\u0113t ties\u012bsarg\u0101jo\u0161o iest\u0101\u017eu sp\u0113ju n\u0101kotn\u0113 atkl\u0101t slepenas un aizliegtas vieno\u0161anas. B\u012bstam\u012bbas aspektu pastiprina tas, ka Operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas likum\u0101 nav tie\u0141i ierakst\u012bts, ka var noklaus\u012bt sarunas karte\u013ca atkl\u0101\u0161anai. Tas rada situ\u0101ciju, kur\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113mumi, kas veic nelikum\u012bgas vieno\u0161an\u0101s, var\u0113tu apzin\u0101ties, ka bez tie\u0161iem operat\u012bvajiem pier\u0101d\u012bjumiem sods nesekos. Tiek pa\u0161\u012bests, ka likumdev\u0113jam vajadz\u0113tu ieviest izmai\u0146as likumdo\u0161an\u0101, lai pilnv\u0113rt\u012bgi risin\u0101tu \u0161o jaut\u0101jumu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Konkurences padome asi kritiz\u0113 Sen\u0101ta l\u0113mumu Jauns gads Latvij\u0101 s\u0101cies ar spriedzi starp ties\u012bbsarg\u0101jo\u0161aj\u0101m iest\u0101d\u0113m un Augst\u0101ko tiesu…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":103685,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[23,22769,28,29,25026,32,33,22,667,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,25028,26,27,25027,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-103684","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-aktualitates","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-augstaka-tiesa","10":"tag-breaking-news","11":"tag-breakingnews","12":"tag-buvnieku-kartelis","13":"tag-featured-news","14":"tag-featurednews","15":"tag-headlines","16":"tag-konkurences-padome","17":"tag-latest-news","18":"tag-latestnews","19":"tag-latvia","20":"tag-latvian","21":"tag-latviesu","22":"tag-latviesu-valoda","23":"tag-latviesuvaloda","24":"tag-latvija","25":"tag-lv","26":"tag-news","27":"tag-pieradijumi","28":"tag-popularakas-zinas","29":"tag-popularakaszinas","30":"tag-slepenas-sarunas","31":"tag-top-stories","32":"tag-topstories","33":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115890589766250979","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103684","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103684"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103684\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/103685"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103684"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103684"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103684"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}