{"id":104533,"date":"2026-01-14T15:49:09","date_gmt":"2026-01-14T15:49:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/104533\/"},"modified":"2026-01-14T15:49:09","modified_gmt":"2026-01-14T15:49:09","slug":"senats-neierosina-kasacijas-tiesvedibu-lieta-par-godu-un-cienu-aizskarosu-zinu-publicesanu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/104533\/","title":{"rendered":"Sen\u0101ts neierosina kas\u0101cijas tiesved\u012bbu liet\u0101 par godu un cie\u0146u aizskaro\u0161u zi\u0146u public\u0113\u0161anu"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sen\u0101ta Civillietu departaments ir atteicies ierosin\u0101t kas\u0101cijas tiesved\u012bbu liet\u0101, kur\u0101 fiziska persona bija c\u0113lusi pras\u012bbu pret izdevniec\u012bbu SIA \u201c\u017dURN\u0100LS SANTA\u201d par godu un cie\u0146u aizskaro\u0161u zi\u0146u atsauk\u0161anu un publisku atvaino\u0161anos.<\/p>\n

Pras\u012bt\u0101jam ir aps\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 statuss krimin\u0101lliet\u0101, kuras gaita bija piesaist\u012bjusi sabiedr\u012bbas interesi. Vien\u0101 no atbild\u0113t\u0101jas izdotajiem \u017eurn\u0101liem bija public\u0113ta intervija ar prokuroru, kur\u0161 bija viens no aps\u016bdz\u012bbas uztur\u0113t\u0101jiem min\u0113taj\u0101 krimin\u0101lliet\u0101 un piedal\u012bjies t\u0101s izmekl\u0113\u0161anas uzraudz\u012bb\u0101. Da\u013ca no intervij\u0101 uzdotajiem jaut\u0101jumiem un atbild\u0113m bija tie\u0161i saist\u012btas ar \u0161\u012bs lietas izmekl\u0113\u0161anu un atspogu\u013coja prokurat\u016bras nost\u0101ju un prokurora skat\u012bjumu uz lietas virz\u012bbu. Pras\u012bt\u0101js uzskat\u012bja, ka, public\u0113jot \u0161o interviju, atbild\u0113t\u0101ja ir izplat\u012bjusi vi\u0146a godu un cie\u0146u aizskaro\u0161as zi\u0146as, kas p\u0101rk\u0101pj nevain\u012bguma prezumpciju un rada sabiedr\u012bb\u0101 nep\u0101rprotamu priek\u0161statu par vi\u0146a vainu.<\/p>\n

Pirm\u0101s instances tiesa bija pras\u012bbu noraid\u012bjusi un atzinusi, ka inform\u0101cijas snieg\u0161ana par izmekl\u0113\u0161anas un tiesved\u012bbas norisi ir pamatota ar sabiedr\u012bbas interesi un ka \u017eurn\u0101listiem, uzdodot jaut\u0101jumus nol\u016bk\u0101 ieg\u016bt inform\u0101ciju, nebija pamata uzskat\u012bt, ka prokurora atbildes aizskartu pras\u012bt\u0101ja godu un cie\u0146u un t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di neb\u016btu public\u0113jamas. Tiesa ar\u012b nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka no intervijas satura nep\u0101rprotami izriet\u0113ja, ka krimin\u0101llieta v\u0113l tiek izties\u0101ta un gal\u012bgais tiesas nol\u0113mums taj\u0101 v\u0113l nav pie\u0146emts, t\u0101d\u0113\u013c vidusm\u0113ra las\u012bt\u0101jam nevar\u0113ja rasties priek\u0161stats par pras\u012bt\u0101ja vainu. Apel\u0101cijas instances tiesa pievienoj\u0101s pirm\u0101s instances tiesas sprieduma mot\u012bviem un uzsv\u0113ra, ka atbild\u0113t\u0101jai, lab\u0101 tic\u012bb\u0101 public\u0113jot prokurora zi\u0146ojumu sabiedr\u012bbai, bija ties\u012bbas pa\u013cauties uz to, ka sniegt\u0101 inform\u0101cija ir patiesa. Atbild\u0113t\u0101ja nebija atbild\u012bga par prokurora atbil\u017eu saturu un tai nebija j\u0101pier\u0101da, ka sniegt\u0101s atbildes par krimin\u0101llietas gaitu un pras\u012bt\u0101ja vainojam\u012bbu noziedz\u012bga nodar\u012bjum\u0101 ir patiesas. Turkl\u0101t nevain\u012bguma prezumpcija pati par sevi neliedz pla\u0161sazi\u0146as l\u012bdzek\u013ciem public\u0113t inform\u0101ciju par krimin\u0101lprocesa norisi, ja izteikumi netiek pasniegti k\u0101 gal\u012bgs spriedums par personas vainu, bet atbild\u0113t\u0101ja \u0161\u0101dus apgalvojumus publik\u0101cij\u0101 nebija iek\u013c\u0101vusi.<\/p>\n

Izskat\u012bjusi pras\u012bt\u0101ja kas\u0101cijas s\u016bdz\u012bbu, senatoru kol\u0113\u0123ija konstat\u0113ja, ka nav ac\u012bmredzama pamata uzskat\u012bt, ka p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113taj\u0101 spriedum\u0101 ietvertais lietas izn\u0101kums b\u016btu nepareizs un ka izskat\u0101majai lietai b\u016btu b\u016btiska noz\u012bme vienotas tiesu prakses nodro\u0161in\u0101\u0161an\u0101 vai ties\u012bbu t\u0101l\u0101kveido\u0161an\u0101, t\u0101d\u0113\u013c nav pamata ierosin\u0101t kas\u0101cijas tiesved\u012bbu. L\u012bdz ar atteikumu ir st\u0101jies sp\u0113k\u0101 R\u012bgas apgabaltiesas spriedums, ar kuru pras\u012bba tika noraid\u012bta.<\/p>\n

Lieta SKC-208\/2026 (C770887024)<\/p>\n

\"\"\/<\/p>\n

\u0160\u012b inform\u0101cija ir publisks pazi\u0146ojums un neatspogu\u013co LV port\u0101la viedokli. Par t\u0101s saturu atbild ies\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js. Public\u0113\u0161anas noteikumi<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Sen\u0101ta Civillietu departaments ir atteicies ierosin\u0101t kas\u0101cijas tiesved\u012bbu liet\u0101, kur\u0101 fiziska persona bija c\u0113lusi pras\u012bbu pret izdevniec\u012bbu SIA…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":104534,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-104533","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-aktualitates","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-latest-news","15":"tag-latestnews","16":"tag-latvia","17":"tag-latvian","18":"tag-latviesu","19":"tag-latviesu-valoda","20":"tag-latviesuvaloda","21":"tag-latvija","22":"tag-lv","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-popularakas-zinas","25":"tag-popularakaszinas","26":"tag-top-stories","27":"tag-topstories","28":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115894246744428999","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104533"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104533\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/104534"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}