Bet \u0161\u012b un citas “Garai\u0146a” epizodes lai paliek k\u0101 dokuments. Varb\u016bt p\u0113c tam, kad b\u016bs notikusi Mi\u0137e\u013ca min\u0113t\u0101 civiliz\u0101cijas boj\u0101eja, tiem, kas n\u0101ks p\u0113c mums, t\u0101 b\u016bs viegl\u0101k saprast: k\u0101 tas n\u0101kas, ka dz\u012bvajiem uz m\u016bsu plan\u0113tas ir svar\u012bgi veidot gar\u012bgu saikni ar miru\u0161ajiem.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Just\u012bne Vernera: Vai iesp\u0113ja sasl\u0113gties ar intu\u012bciju un rado\u0161o potenci\u0101lu, tavupr\u0101t, ir pieejama visiem? Jo man ne\u0161\u0137iet, ka visi cilv\u0113ki, ar ko kop\u0101 braucam tramvaj\u0101, redz to, ko redzi tu.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Mi\u0137elis Fi\u0161ers: Fantastiski labs jaut\u0101jums. Kaut es zin\u0101tu atbildi. Es pie\u013cauju, ka ir pieejama visiem. Varb\u016bt at\u0161\u0137iras tas, k\u0101di kuram no dabas ir priek\u0161noteikumi, lai ko att\u012bst\u012btu. Gan jau, ka katram cilv\u0113kam ir dziednieka sp\u0113jas. Es zinu, ka piln\u012bgi katrs cilv\u0113ks noteikti var z\u012bm\u0113t. K\u0101ds to iem\u0101c\u0101s \u0101tr\u0101k un viegl\u0101k, bet citam tas iet l\u0113n\u0101k un gr\u016bt\u0101k, ta\u010du tas nav nekas ekskluz\u012bvs.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nB\u016bt kontakt\u0101 ar p\u0101rpasaul\u012bgo gan ir \u013coti nekomfortabli.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
K\u0101d\u0101 zi\u0146\u0101? Vai t\u0101 d\u0113\u013c n\u0101kas ko upur\u0113t vai ziedot?\u00a0<\/p>\n
Redzi, t\u0101 jau nav mana izv\u0113le. Ziedot vai upur\u0113t \u00ad\u2013\u00a0t\u0101 ir izv\u0113le. Bet es dz\u012bvoju t\u0101d\u0101 pasaul\u0113, k\u0101d\u0101 dz\u012bvoju. Es to redzu, k\u0101du es to redzu. Es varu to mazliet kori\u0123\u0113t ar medit\u0101cijas un cit\u0101m praks\u0113m, ar m\u0101kslas rad\u012b\u0161anu, bet pamat\u0101 jau t\u0101 nav mana izv\u0113le.<\/p>\n
\nEs \u013coti labpr\u0101t grib\u0113tu b\u016bt cilv\u0113ks, kuram\u00a0interes\u0113 futbols un alus ar draugiem b\u0101r\u0101.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
“Norm\u0101li citplan\u0113tie\u0161i pie mums nebrauktu.”4min<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
K\u0101di tam var\u0113tu b\u016bt plusi, sal\u012bdzinot ar m\u0101kslinieka dz\u012bvi?<\/p>\n
Es dom\u0101ju, ka es justos daudz komfortabl\u0101k. Jaut\u0101jumi, kas mani nodarbina, ir nopietni un smagi, un uz tiem nav atbil\u017eu. Protams, ka grib\u0113tos dz\u012bvot pasaul\u0113, kur\u0101 viss ir vienk\u0101r\u0161i, skaidri un paredzami. B\u016bt ier\u0113dnim. Tas nenoz\u012bm\u0113, ka es dom\u0101ju, ka b\u016bt ier\u0113dnim ir vienk\u0101r\u0161i: ka ier\u0113dnis priec\u012bgs pamostas, aiziet uz darbu, noier\u0113d\u0146o visu dienu un iet m\u0101j\u0101s \u0113st vakari\u0146as, paskat\u012bties televizoru.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Un nedom\u0101 par n\u0101vi.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Es dom\u0101ju, ka visiem cilv\u0113kiem kaut kas urd. Jaut\u0101jums ir par to, cik daudz un ar k\u0101diem l\u012bdzek\u013ciem m\u0113s varam to sl\u0101p\u0113t. To urdo\u0146u var br\u012bni\u0161\u0137\u012bgi sl\u0101p\u0113t ar m\u016bsdienu e-vidi. Es dom\u0101ju, ka tehnolo\u0123ijas att\u012bst\u0101s aizvien lab\u0101k.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nK\u0101dreiz m\u0113s var\u0113j\u0101m aizb\u0113gt no realit\u0101tes tikai gr\u0101mat\u0101s un te\u0101tr\u012b, bet tagad iesp\u0113jas ir bezgal\u012bgas.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Dr\u012bz atliks tikai piesl\u0113gt bar\u012bbas vadam mais\u012bjumu, un var\u0113sim neb\u016bt nek\u0101d\u0101 kontakt\u0101 ar fizisko pasauli, dz\u012bvot piln\u012bgi kontrol\u0113t\u0101 vid\u0113.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Vai tas b\u016btu v\u0113rt\u0113jams k\u0101 kaut kas pozit\u012bvs, jo tad b\u016btu viegl\u0101k dz\u012bvot?\u00a0<\/p>\n
Man \u0161\u0137iet, ka j\u0101. T\u0101 gan var\u0113tu b\u016bt diezgan garlaic\u012bga dz\u012bve. Bet katram piem\u012bt savs realit\u0101tes tv\u0113rums. Jo tas ir traumatisk\u0101ks, jo tas ir ar\u012b smag\u0101ks, bet realit\u0101tes tv\u0113rumu veido ar\u012b lietas, par kur\u0101m m\u0113s neko nezin\u0101m. To veido iedzimt\u012bba, pieredze un zin\u0101\u0161anas, nemaz nerun\u0101jot par neredzamo pasauli, par kuru m\u0113s visp\u0101r neko nezin\u0101m.\u00a0<\/p>\n
V\u0113l nezin\u0101m.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Visdr\u012bz\u0101k, ka m\u0113s ejam t\u0101l\u0101k proj\u0101m no zin\u0101\u0161an\u0101m par to.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Tehnolo\u0123iju d\u0113\u013c?\u00a0<\/p>\n
J\u0101. Par tehnolo\u0123ij\u0101m run\u0101jot, tas \u0161\u0137iet lo\u0123isks atrisin\u0101jums tam, k\u0101 aizies boj\u0101 \u0161\u012b civiliz\u0101cija, kurai t\u0101pat neizskat\u0101s, ka b\u016btu k\u0101da perspekt\u012bva. Man liekas, ka Visum\u0101 no t\u0101 nekas nemain\u012bsies \u2013\u00a0aiziesim m\u0113s matriks\u0101 vai neaiziesim.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Bet vai tev ne\u0161\u0137iet, ka cilv\u0113ki visu laiku ir gaid\u012bju\u0161i pasaules galu, dom\u0101dami, ka slikt\u0101k dz\u012bvot vairs nav iesp\u0113jams?\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nPasaules gala gaid\u012b\u0161ana ir kaut k\u0101da neat\u0146emama \u0161\u012b matriksa, \u0161\u012bs simul\u0101cijas sast\u0101vda\u013ca.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Viss gan ir k\u013cuvis sare\u017e\u0123\u012bti \u2013\u00a0man k\u0101dreiz lik\u0101s, ka es kaut ko saprotu, tagad skaidrojumu ir \u013coti daudz. Nav ar\u012b neviena ne reli\u0123iska, ne filozofiska skaidrojuma, kas b\u016btu pietiekami le\u0123it\u012bms, lai es tam var\u0113tu pie\u0137erties. Piem\u0113ram, ja m\u0113s \u0146emam ideju, ka m\u0113s esam rad\u012bt\u0101ja ekstensija, kas sp\u0113j eksist\u0113t vi\u0146a rad\u012btaj\u0101 materi\u0101laj\u0101 pasaul\u0113, jo vi\u0146\u0161 pats k\u0101 gar\u012bga b\u016btne to nesp\u0113j \u2013\u00a0ka m\u0113s te esam, lai vi\u0146\u0161 var\u0113tu p\u0113t\u012bt. T\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 \u0161\u012b beigu dienu saj\u016bta varb\u016bt ir viens no meh\u0101nismiem, kas stimul\u0113 m\u016bs k\u0101 b\u016btnes, kur\u0101m ir v\u0113lme atrasties inert\u0101, dro\u0161\u0101, paredzam\u0101 vid\u0113, mekl\u0113t atbildes \u0101rpus sevis. Man tas liekas absurdi: priek\u0161 kam mums j\u0101mekl\u0113 atbildes, ja k\u0101dam, kas t\u0101s ir rad\u012bjis, t\u0101s visas ir?\u00a0<\/p>\n
Vai, tavupr\u0101t, m\u016bsu sabiedr\u012bba ir sasniegusi kaut k\u0101du kr\u012bzes punktu taj\u0101, cik atsaist\u012bju\u0161ies m\u0113s esam no realit\u0101tes? Cits no cita?\u00a0<\/p>\n
Man \u0161\u0137iet, ka nav vain\u012bgas ne tehnolo\u0123ijas, ne mor\u0101le, jo ir radies iespaids, ka\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nm\u0113s absol\u016bti akli darbojamies p\u0113c k\u0101das programmas. \u0160obr\u012bd ir akt\u012bvi iedarbin\u0101ta pa\u0161izn\u012bcin\u0101\u0161an\u0101s programma. T\u0101 ir bijusi cauri gadsimtiem, bet tagad t\u0101 ir pagriezta uz pilno re\u017e\u012bmu.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
T\u0101 ir bijusi ieprogramm\u0113ta visos Sv\u0113tajos Rakstos: ka t\u0101da lieta b\u016bs un ka to vajag. \u0160obr\u012bd t\u0101 ir aktiviz\u0113ta. Lai k\u0101 zin\u0101tnieki nekliegtu par ekolo\u0123iju, zemes sasil\u0161anu un taml\u012bdz\u012bgi. Par politiku visp\u0101r nerun\u0101sim, jo m\u0113s esam atgriezu\u0161ies atpaka\u013c lab\u0101kaj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 19. gadsimt\u0101. Faktiski jau kop\u0161 Krimas okup\u0101cijas m\u0113s esam aizmirsu\u0161i par starptautiskaj\u0101m ties\u012bb\u0101m. Lai gan starptautisko ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pumi ir biju\u0161i vienm\u0113r.<\/p>\n
\n
Velni sab\u0101z\u012bs visus tos m\u0101kslas darbus…1min<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Vardarb\u012bba un kontrole ir ar\u012b bie\u017es tavu darbu temats. Bet, run\u0101jot par sasaisti ar p\u0101rpasaul\u012bgo, tu “Garain\u012b” st\u0101st\u012bji par sp\u0113ka viet\u0101m. Kas nosaka, ka k\u0101da vieta ir sp\u0113ka vieta?\u00a0<\/p>\n
Tas ir \u013coti subjekt\u012bvi. Es t\u0101s nosaku p\u0113c fizisk\u0101m saj\u016bt\u0101m. Es pirms tam apm\u0113ram saprotu, kur t\u0101s var\u0113tu b\u016bt.\u00a0<\/p>\n
K\u0101 tu to saproti?\u00a0<\/p>\n
T\u0101s ir vietas, kur notiek d\u012bvainas, akt\u012bvas dabas izpausmes. Tie parasti ir kalni, vulk\u0101ni, bet tikpat labi tie var b\u016bt ar\u012b me\u017ei. Es par \u0161\u012bm viet\u0101m izlasu, uzzinu. Manas izj\u016btas, kad es tur nok\u013c\u016bstu, ir \u013coti fiziskas. Vispirms ir saj\u016bta, it k\u0101 zeme staig\u0101tu zem k\u0101j\u0101m \u2013\u00a0it k\u0101 es b\u016btu uz ku\u0123a vi\u013c\u0146os.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nReiz es Mehiko piedz\u012bvoju 7,8 ba\u013c\u013cu zemestr\u012bci, un man t\u0101 nenorm\u0101li patika \u2013 es biju grib\u0113jis to piedz\u012bvot. Kad t\u0101\u00a0notika, mans draugs teica: “Tagad uz\u0146em zemes ener\u0123iju”.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Es k\u0101 cigunists ar\u012b s\u0113d\u0113ju, uz\u0146\u0113mu to ener\u0123iju. P\u0113c t\u0101 notikuma es vair\u0101kas ned\u0113\u013cas nak\u0161\u0146oju uz akt\u012bviem vulk\u0101niem. Tur nakt\u012b temperat\u016bra ir m\u012bnusos, t\u0101p\u0113c tur nav ind\u012bgu kukai\u0146u\u00a0un var gul\u0113t viet\u0101, no kurienes n\u0101k tvaiks. Kop\u0161 \u0161iem notikumiem es s\u0101ku dzird\u0113t aus\u012bs \u0161alko\u0146u. T\u0101 ir \u0101rk\u0101rt\u012bgi sp\u0113c\u012bga, es p\u0113c t\u0101s tagad ar\u012b varu noteikt sp\u0113ka vietas. T\u0101 par\u0101d\u0101s ar\u012b cit\u0101s dz\u012bves situ\u0101cij\u0101s \u2013 medit\u0101cij\u0101 un taml\u012bdz\u012bgi \u2013, ta\u010du pie sp\u0113ka viet\u0101m \u0161\u012b \u0161alko\u0146a ir \u013coti izteikta.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n
Vulk\u0101na kr\u0101ter\u012b nav zirnek\u013cu1min<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Es grib\u0113tu ar\u012b parun\u0101t par teksta vietu tavos darbos. Ja es saprotu pareizi, taviem kokgriezumiem vispirms ir nosaukums, kas diezgan daudz ko paskaidro par darb\u0101 notieko\u0161o. Vai tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka ar tekstu var pateikt vair\u0101k nek\u0101 vizu\u0101laj\u0101 m\u0101ksl\u0101? <\/p>\n
Es kokgriezumu speci\u0101li izv\u0113l\u0113jos k\u0101 mediju ar ierobe\u017eot\u0101m iesp\u0113j\u0101m: lietas var par\u0101d\u012bt tikai diezgan vienk\u0101r\u0161i, att\u0113lot pa\u0161u esenci. Ar\u012b tekstus es nesp\u0113ju uzrakst\u012bt garus. Es visu parasti pasaku da\u017eos teikumos. Kas attiecas uz teksta un att\u0113la attiec\u012bb\u0101m \u2013\u00a0es dom\u0101ju, ka, ja run\u0101jam par glezniec\u012bbu, piln\u012bgi noteikti vajadz\u0113tu b\u016bt t\u0101, ka gleznai nav oblig\u0101ti nepiecie\u0161ams nosaukums. Ir br\u012bni\u0161\u0137\u012bgi, ja katrs cilv\u0113ks attiec\u012bgo gleznu interpret\u0113 sav\u0101 veid\u0101. Kokgriezumiem t\u0101 ir formula: att\u0113ls kop\u0101 ar tekstu, kur\u0101 katrs v\u0101rds ir izsl\u012bp\u0113ts.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ko, tavupr\u0101t, vizu\u0101l\u0101 m\u0101ksla cilv\u0113kiem iedod t\u0101du, ko neiedod, piem\u0113ram, literat\u016bra vai m\u016bzika?\u00a0<\/p>\n
Man liekas, ka ir diezgan vienk\u0101r\u0161i. Katram ir sava funkcija, un katrs medijs vair\u0101k uzrun\u0101 noteikta tipa cilv\u0113kus. Vizu\u0101\u013cus uzrun\u0101 vizu\u0101l\u0101 m\u0101ksla, audi\u0101\u013cus uzrun\u0101 m\u016bzika. Man \u0161\u0137iet, ka tie\u0161i literat\u016bra ir br\u012bni\u0161\u0137\u012bga ar to, ka t\u0101 att\u012bsta vizu\u0101lo uztveri. Lasot gr\u0101matu, tu esi spiests vizualiz\u0113t t\u0113lus un notikumus. T\u0101 jau ar\u012b darbojas m\u0101ksla \u2013\u00a0ja tu sp\u0113j vizualiz\u0113t kaut ko, tad p\u0101r\u0113jo nosaka tikai tas, vai tu esi iem\u0101c\u012bjies z\u012bm\u0113t un gleznot. Bet, ja tu vari notur\u0113t fokusu uz att\u0113lu, tu vari to ar\u012b uzgleznot.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Un k\u0101di procesi notiek ar cilv\u0113ku, skatoties uz gleznu?\u00a0<\/p>\n
Uz \u0161o jaut\u0101jumu var atbild\u0113t tikai subjekt\u012bvi. Es nezinu, k\u0101di procesi notiek citos cilv\u0113kos. Tie var b\u016bt \u013coti dzi\u013ci. Man pusaud\u017ea gados katarse un gar\u012bga transform\u0101cija notika \u010cur\u013co\u0146a muzej\u0101, bet est\u0113tiskie procesi var b\u016bt neizskaidrojami.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nReiz es Helsinkos apraud\u0101jos pie gleznas, kur\u0101 apsnigu\u0161\u0101 me\u017e\u0101 bija att\u0113loti putni\u0146i uz koku zariem. Tas turkl\u0101t bija labs, klasisks re\u0101lisms, kas neb\u016bt nav tas, kas mani dzi\u013ci saist\u012btu.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Kas ar mani tur notika un k\u0101p\u0113c tas mani tik dzi\u013ci aizsk\u0101ra? Es nezinu. Te jau m\u0113s varam iet iek\u0161\u0101 iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101s dz\u012bv\u0113s. Varb\u016bt es iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101 dz\u012bv\u0113 biju putni\u0146\u0161 me\u017e\u0101 un tas man atn\u0101ca atmi\u0146\u0101.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Vai tu t\u0101d\u0101 br\u012bd\u012b izj\u016bti ar\u012b k\u0101du saikni ar darba autoru?\u00a0<\/p>\n
Varb\u016bt vair\u0101k ar vi\u0146a pasauli nek\u0101 ar vi\u0146u k\u0101 person\u012bbu. Ar vietu, kur\u0101 vi\u0146\u0161 priek\u0161karu ir sp\u0113jis pav\u0113rt. Katrs to spraudzi\u0146u, kur\u0101 var pal\u016bkoties neredzamaj\u0101, atrod sav\u0101 viet\u0101.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Vai tu t\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 ar\u012b atrodi domubiedrus, kuri m\u0101ksl\u0101 redz l\u012bdz\u012bgi k\u0101 tu?\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ar to tik labi neiet. \u012asten\u012bb\u0101 \u013coti sare\u017e\u0123\u012bts jaut\u0101jums. Viens ir tas, par ko run\u0101t m\u0101kslinieks uzskata par vajadz\u012bgu. Es dom\u0101ju, ka \u0161aj\u0101 zi\u0146\u0101 es atrodu domubiedrus. Otrs aspekts ir pa\u0161a m\u0101kslinieka iek\u0161\u0113j\u0101 pasaule, person\u012bba, un tas var b\u016bt \u013coti m\u0101n\u012bgi. Mums varb\u016bt \u0161\u0137iet kaut kas viens, bet paties\u012bb\u0101 ir kaut kas cits.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nEs dr\u012bz\u0101k taj\u0101, ko es daru, izj\u016btu vientul\u012bbas saj\u016btu. Tas mirklis, kad es to neizjutu, bija diezgan \u012bss: tas bija [M\u0101kslas] akad\u0113mijas laik\u0101, kad es sadraudz\u0113jos ar J\u0101ni Vi\u0146\u0137eli. T\u0101, l\u016bk, bija kop\u012bgas pasaules un m\u0101kslas sapratne.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Mani, protams, vienm\u0113r uzrun\u0101 m\u0101kslas darbi, kuros ir humors un ironija, un laikam neuzrun\u0101 form\u0101li m\u0101kslas darbi, kuros galven\u0101 v\u0113rt\u012bba ir est\u0113tikai. Te es var\u0113tu teikt to pa\u0161u, ko teica \u010cur\u013conis. Vi\u0146\u0161 ar\u012b uzskat\u012bja, ka v\u0113st\u012bjumam ir tikpat liela noz\u012bme k\u0101 vizu\u0101lajai v\u0113rt\u012bbai. Man \u0161\u0137iet, ka \u010cur\u013co\u0146a m\u0101ksl\u0101 tas v\u0113st\u012bjums ir v\u0113rt\u012bg\u0101ks par vizu\u0101lo. Mums ir t\u016bksto\u0161iem profesion\u0101lu m\u0101kslinieku, bet t\u0101ds k\u0101 \u010cur\u013conis ir tikai viens.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n
Protests pret padomju varu gandr\u012bz liedz absolv\u0113t akad\u0113miju2min<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Kaut ko l\u012bdz\u012bgu par saviem darbiem teica Signe Baumane \u2013\u00a0ka vi\u0146a neuzskata sevi par labu z\u012bm\u0113t\u0101ju, bet ka v\u0113st\u012bjums ir svar\u012bg\u0101ks. V\u0113l viens jaut\u0101jums, par kuru vi\u0146ai bija p\u0101rdomas un kuru es uzdodu ar\u012b citiem “Garai\u0146a” varo\u0146iem \u2013\u00a0vai b\u016bt m\u0101ksliniekam ir darbs, kuru vi\u0146\u0161 dara, lai sevi uztur\u0113tu, vai m\u0101kslai tom\u0113r ir pavisam cita funkcija, kuru nevajadz\u0113tu skat\u012bt industrijas vai profesijas kontekst\u0101? Vai m\u0101ksla ir arods?\u00a0<\/p>\n
Es dom\u0101ju, ka tas ir l\u0101sts! (Smejas.)\u00a0<\/p>\n
Citi teiktu, ka aicin\u0101jums vai sv\u0113t\u012bba..\u00a0<\/p>\n
Protams, ka t\u0101 ir milz\u012bga sv\u0113t\u012bba, bet t\u0101 parasti nav gara \u2013 kad izdodas k\u0101ds m\u0101kslas darbs. Tie gad\u012bjumi, kad pa\u0161am pat\u012bk, bie\u017ei dz\u012bv\u0113 nenotiek. Dzirdot v\u0101rdu salikumu “rado\u0161\u0101 industrija”, man \u0161ermu\u013ci skrien p\u0101r kauliem.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nKatrs m\u0101kslinieks ir pats vain\u012bgs, ka t\u0101du profesiju izv\u0113l\u0113jies, bet, no otras puses, vi\u0146am nav bijusi izv\u0113le. Ja tu to rado\u0161o, kas tev\u012b ir, nerealiz\u0113, tad, man \u0161\u0137iet, ka person\u012bbas att\u012bst\u012bba \u0101tri vien aiziet destrukcij\u0101.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Laim\u012bgs ir m\u0101kslinieks, kas sp\u0113j sev nodro\u0161in\u0101t dz\u012bvi ar savu m\u0101kslu. Ja kaut ko t\u0101du var sasniegt, tad t\u0101 tie\u0161\u0101m ir sv\u0113t\u012bba. Bet t\u0101 ir ar jebkuru profesiju, kur\u0101 j\u016bties laim\u012bgs un kuru dari ar prieku, turkl\u0101t vari sevi uztur\u0113t \u2013\u00a0es dom\u0101ju, no dz\u012bves nav vair\u0101k daudz, ko pras\u012bt.<\/p>\n
\n
Par m\u0101kslas darbu izn\u012bcin\u0101\u0161anu1min<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bet \u0161\u012b un citas “Garai\u0146a” epizodes lai paliek k\u0101 dokuments. Varb\u016bt p\u0113c tam, kad b\u016bs notikusi Mi\u0137e\u013ca min\u0113t\u0101…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":106576,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[23,57,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,54,55,56,21,58],"class_list":{"0":"post-106575","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-zinas-no-arvalstim","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-arvalstim","10":"tag-breaking-news","11":"tag-breakingnews","12":"tag-featured-news","13":"tag-featurednews","14":"tag-headlines","15":"tag-latest-news","16":"tag-latestnews","17":"tag-latvia","18":"tag-latvian","19":"tag-latviesu","20":"tag-latviesu-valoda","21":"tag-latviesuvaloda","22":"tag-latvija","23":"tag-lv","24":"tag-news","25":"tag-popularakas-zinas","26":"tag-popularakaszinas","27":"tag-top-stories","28":"tag-topstories","29":"tag-world","30":"tag-world-news","31":"tag-worldnews","32":"tag-zinas","33":"tag-zinas-no-arvalstim"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115905539810055075","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=106575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106575\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/106576"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=106575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=106575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=106575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}