K\u0101da politisk\u0101 partija publiski prezent\u0113ja pl\u0101nu, kas attiecas uz Be\u013c\u0123ijas patv\u0113ruma un imigr\u0101cijas politikas reformu, izmantojot ar reput\u0101ciju apvelt\u012bt\u0101s pre\u010du z\u012bmes \u201cIKEA\u201d, lai pastiprin\u0101tu savu v\u0113st\u012bjumu. Lai attaisnotu \u0161o izmanto\u0161anu, min\u0113t\u0101 politisk\u0101 partija atsaucas uz savu v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbu. Spriedum\u0101 Tiesa nor\u0101da: lai noteiktu, vai min\u0113t\u0101 izmanto\u0161ana ir balst\u012bta uz \u201cpamatotu iemeslu\u201d, valsts tiesai j\u0101l\u012bdzsvaro pre\u010du z\u012bmes \u012bpa\u0161nieka ties\u012bbas uz \u012bpa\u0161umu un intereses, no vienas puses, un ties\u012bbas uz v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbu, uz kur\u0101m atsaucas tre\u0161\u0101 persona, un t\u0101s intereses, no otras puses, un neviena no \u0161\u012bm ab\u0101m ties\u012bb\u0101m nav absol\u016bta. Tiesa tom\u0113r konstat\u0113, ka konkr\u0113taj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 pre\u010du z\u012bmju \u201cIKEA\u201d izmanto\u0161ana var\u0113tu b\u016btiski kait\u0113t \u0161o pre\u010du z\u012bmju reput\u0101cijai un to \u012bpa\u0161nieka interes\u0113m. \u0160ajos apst\u0101k\u013cos ne\u0161\u0137iet, ka pre\u010du z\u012bmju \u201cIKEA\u201d izmanto\u0161ana, kas veikta ar vien\u012bgo m\u0113r\u0137i g\u016bt labumu no pre\u010du z\u012bmju reput\u0101cijas, lai nostiprin\u0101tu savu politisko v\u0113st\u012bjumu un palielin\u0101tu t\u0101 izplat\u012b\u0161anu, preval\u0113tu p\u0101r pre\u010du z\u012bmju \u012bpa\u0161nieka ties\u012bb\u0101m un interes\u0113m, ta\u010du tas j\u0101p\u0101rbauda iesniedz\u0113jtiesai.<\/p>\n
Tiesas spriedums liet\u0101 C-298\/23 | Inter IKEA Systems.<\/p>\n
2022. gad\u0101 politisk\u0101 partija Vlaams Belang preses konferences laik\u0101 publiski prezent\u0113ja savu politisko pl\u0101nu ar nosaukumu \u201cIKEA-PLAN \u2013 Immigratie Kan Echt Anders\u201d (\u201cIKEA pl\u0101ns \u2013 imigr\u0101cija tie\u0161\u0101m var b\u016bt cit\u0101da\u201d), kas bija v\u0113rsts uz Be\u013c\u0123ijas patv\u0113ruma un imigr\u0101cijas politikas reformu. \u0160iem priek\u0161likumiem pievienotaj\u0101s ilustr\u0101cij\u0101s bija ietverti apz\u012bm\u0113jumi, kuri atbilst pre\u010du z\u012bm\u0113m \u201cIKEA\u201d, k\u0101 ar\u012b person\u0101\u017ei, kas l\u012bdzin\u0101s tiem, kuri att\u0113lojami uz\u0146\u0113muma IKEA pre\u010du mont\u0101\u017eas instrukcij\u0101s. Preses konference tika p\u0101rraid\u012bta soci\u0101lajos medijos. \u0160o pre\u010du z\u012bmju \u012bpa\u0161nieks Inter IKEA c\u0113la Be\u013c\u0123ijas ties\u0101s pras\u012bbu pret apvien\u012bbu Vrijheidsfonds, kas vad\u012bja partijas Vlaams Belang kampa\u0146u, par pre\u010du z\u012bmju p\u0101rk\u0101pumu.<\/p>\n
Valsts ties\u0101 Vrijheidsfonds atzina, ka t\u0101 bija izmantojusi pre\u010du z\u012bmes \u201cIKEA\u201d bez to \u012bpa\u0161nieka piekri\u0161anas, ta\u010du apgalvoja, ka \u0161o pre\u010du z\u012bmju reput\u0101ciju esot izmantojusi, lai pastiprin\u0101tu savu v\u0113st\u012bjumu, un tas esot \u201cpamatots iemesls\u201d Savien\u012bbas ties\u012bbu aktu izpratn\u0113, ar kuru t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di esot aizsarg\u0101ta v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bba, tostarp br\u012bv\u012bba paust politiskos uzskatus un politisko parodiju.* Uzskat\u012bdama, ka \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 ir konflikts starp vien\u0101da ranga pamatties\u012bb\u0101m, proti, ties\u012bb\u0101m uz \u012bpa\u0161umu un ties\u012bb\u0101m uz v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbu, valsts tiesa v\u0113rs\u0101s Ties\u0101.<\/p>\n
Tiesa spriedum\u0101 vispirms konstat\u0113, ka ES ties\u012bbu aktos nav sniegti preciz\u0113jumi par j\u0113dzienu \u201cpamatots iemesls\u201d. Tom\u0113r attiec\u012bgo ES ties\u012bbu aktu preambulas apsv\u0113rumos likumdev\u0113js ir uzsv\u0113ris nepiecie\u0161am\u012bbu piem\u0113rot \u0161os aktus t\u0101, lai nodro\u0161in\u0101tu pamatties\u012bbu un pamatbr\u012bv\u012bbu, it \u012bpa\u0161i v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbas, piln\u012bgu iev\u0113ro\u0161anu.<\/p>\n
Tom\u0113r vienk\u0101r\u0161a atsauk\u0161an\u0101s uz ties\u012bb\u0101m uz v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbu nav pietiekama, lai konstat\u0113tu pamatotu iemeslu. Tre\u0161ai personai, kura izmanto pre\u010du z\u012bmei ar reput\u0101ciju identisku vai l\u012bdz\u012bgu apz\u012bm\u0113jumu, j\u0101izkl\u0101sta konkr\u0113ti \u0161\u012bs izmanto\u0161anas iemesli, kas saist\u012bti ar t\u0101s v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbas \u012bsteno\u0161anu, un j\u0101pier\u0101da, ka \u0161ie iemesli preval\u0113 p\u0101r \u0161\u012bs pre\u010du z\u012bmes \u012bpa\u0161nieka ties\u012bb\u0101m un interes\u0113m.<\/p>\n
Valsts tiesai, nosakot, vai tre\u0161\u0101s personas veiktajai izmanto\u0161anai ir bijis pamatots iemesls, j\u0101l\u012bdzsvaro pre\u010du z\u012bmes ar reput\u0101ciju \u012bpa\u0161nieka ties\u012bbas uz \u012bpa\u0161umu un intereses, no vienas puses, un ties\u012bbas uz v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bbu, uz kur\u0101m atsaucas tre\u0161\u0101 persona, un t\u0101s intereses, no otras puses, un neviena no \u0161\u012bm ab\u0101m ties\u012bb\u0101m nav absol\u016bta.<\/p>\n
\u0160aj\u0101 zi\u0146\u0101 valsts tiesai j\u0101noskaidro, vai tre\u0161\u0101 persona pre\u010du z\u012bmi ar reput\u0101ciju ir izmantojusi labtic\u012bgi. T\u0101 tas it \u012bpa\u0161i ir gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja min\u0113t\u0101 izmanto\u0161ana tiek veikta, lai paustu ideju vai viedokli, kas ir saist\u012bts ar pa\u0161u pre\u010du z\u012bmi, \u0161\u012bs pre\u010du z\u012bmes \u012bpa\u0161nieku, t\u0101 komercpraksi, prec\u0113m vai pakalpojumiem. Citi atbilsto\u0161ie elementi ir tostarp tas, vai pre\u010du z\u012bmes izmanto\u0161ana veicina debates visp\u0101r\u0113j\u0101s interes\u0113s, k\u0101 ar\u012b sekas, ko tre\u0161\u0101s personas veikt\u0101 pre\u010du z\u012bmes izmanto\u0161ana var rad\u012bt pre\u010du z\u012bmes \u012bpa\u0161niekam. It \u012bpa\u0161i \u0161im \u012bpa\u0161niekam nevar likt samierin\u0101ties ar izmanto\u0161anu, kas tam var\u0113tu rad\u012bt nesam\u0113r\u012bgu kait\u0113jumu vai pat apdraud\u0113t ar \u0161\u012bs pre\u010du z\u012bmes re\u0123istr\u0101ciju pie\u0161\u0137irto ekskluz\u012bvo ties\u012bbu pa\u0161u b\u016bt\u012bbu.<\/p>\n
\u0160aj\u0101 kontekst\u0101 j\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101 tre\u0161\u0101s personas veikt\u0101s pre\u010du z\u012bmes ar reput\u0101ciju izmanto\u0161anas intensit\u0101te, \u0161\u012bs izmanto\u0161anas m\u0113rogs un \u0161aj\u0101 zi\u0146\u0101 izv\u0113l\u0113t\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bba, k\u0101 ar\u012b fakts, ka tre\u0161\u0101s personas veikta izmanto\u0161ana var rad\u012bt iespaidu, ka \u0161\u012bs pre\u010du z\u012bmes \u012bpa\u0161nieks pievienojas paustajam politiskajam v\u0113st\u012bjumam vai populariz\u0113taj\u0101m politiskaj\u0101m idej\u0101m, vai pat jebk\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 t\u0101s atbalsta, lai gan \u0161\u012b \u012bpa\u0161nieka atbalst\u012bt\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas ir balst\u012btas uz neitralit\u0101ti attiec\u012bb\u0101 pret jebkuru politisko partiju vai nav sader\u012bgas ar \u0161o politisko v\u0113st\u012bjumu.<\/p>\n
\u0160aj\u0101 zi\u0146\u0101 Tiesa konstat\u0113, ka konkr\u0113taj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 pre\u010du z\u012bmju \u201cIKEA\u201d izmanto\u0161ana var\u0113tu b\u016btiski kait\u0113t \u0161o pre\u010du z\u012bmju reput\u0101cijai un to \u012bpa\u0161nieka interes\u0113m. \u0160ajos apst\u0101k\u013cos ne\u0161\u0137iet, ka pre\u010du z\u012bmju \u201cIKEA\u201d izmanto\u0161ana, ko Vrijheidsfonds veikusi ar vien\u012bgo m\u0113r\u0137i g\u016bt labumu no \u0161o pre\u010du z\u012bmju reput\u0101cijas, lai nostiprin\u0101tu savu politisko v\u0113st\u012bjumu un palielin\u0101tu t\u0101 izplat\u012b\u0161anu, preval\u0113tu p\u0101r \u0161o pre\u010du z\u012bmju \u012bpa\u0161nieka ties\u012bb\u0101m un interes\u0113m, ta\u010du tas j\u0101p\u0101rbauda iesniedz\u0113jtiesai.<\/p>\n
\n
<\/p>\n
PIEZ\u012aME. Ar l\u016bgumu sniegt prejudici\u0101lu nol\u0113mumu dal\u012bbvalstu tiesas lietas izties\u0101\u0161anas gait\u0101 var uzdot Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Tiesai jaut\u0101jumus par Savien\u012bbas ties\u012bbu interpret\u0101ciju vai Savien\u012bbas akta sp\u0113k\u0101 es\u012bbu.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Visp\u0101r\u0113j\u0101s tiesas kompetenc\u0113 ir izskat\u012bt un izlemt l\u016bgumus sniegt prejudici\u0101lu nol\u0113mumu, kas attiecas tikai uz:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
Pa\u0161u pamatlietu Tiesa vai Visp\u0101r\u0113j\u0101 tiesa neizties\u0101, ta\u010du valsts tiesai t\u0101 ir j\u0101atrisina atbilst\u012bgi Tiesas vai Visp\u0101r\u0113j\u0101s tiesas nol\u0113mumam. \u0160is nol\u0113mums ir vienl\u012bdz saisto\u0161s ar\u012b cit\u0101m dal\u012bbvalstu ties\u0101m, ja t\u0101m j\u0101atrisina l\u012bdz\u012bga probl\u0113ma.<\/p>\n
\n<\/td>\n
\n<\/tr>\n
\n
<\/p>\n
Neofici\u0101ls dokuments pla\u0161sazi\u0146as l\u012bdzek\u013cu vajadz\u012bb\u0101m, kas Tiesai nav saisto\u0161s. Faktu un tiesisk\u0101 regul\u0113juma izkl\u0101sts attiecas uz atbilsto\u0161o laikposmu un ir balst\u012bts uz lietas materi\u0101liem.<\/p>\n
Sprieduma pilnteksts un rezum\u0113jums (ja t\u0101ds ir)<\/a> tiek public\u0113ts CURIA t\u012bmek\u013cvietn\u0113 pasludin\u0101\u0161anas dien\u0101.\u00a0<\/p>\n *Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulas (ES)\u00a02017\/1001<\/a> (2017. gada 14. j\u016bnijs) par Eiropas Savien\u012bbas pre\u010du z\u012bmi 9. panta 2. punkta c) apak\u0161punkts, k\u0101 ar\u012b Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direkt\u012bvas (ES)\u00a02015\/2436<\/a> (2015. gada 16. decembris), ar ko tuvina dal\u012bbvalstu ties\u012bbu aktus attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz pre\u010du z\u012bm\u0113m, 10. panta 2. punkta c) apak\u0161punkts un 6. punkts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"K\u0101da politisk\u0101 partija publiski prezent\u0113ja pl\u0101nu, kas attiecas uz Be\u013c\u0123ijas patv\u0113ruma un imigr\u0101cijas politikas reformu, izmantojot ar reput\u0101ciju…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":288386,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[14],"tags":[23,57,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,54,55,56,21,58],"class_list":["post-288385","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-zinas-no-arvalstim","tag-aktualitates","tag-arvalstim","tag-breaking-news","tag-breakingnews","tag-featured-news","tag-featurednews","tag-headlines","tag-latest-news","tag-latestnews","tag-latvia","tag-latvian","tag-latviesu","tag-latviesu-valoda","tag-latviesuvaloda","tag-latvija","tag-lv","tag-news","tag-popularakas-zinas","tag-popularakaszinas","tag-top-stories","tag-topstories","tag-world","tag-world-news","tag-worldnews","tag-zinas","tag-zinas-no-arvalstim"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":"Validation failed: Text character limit of 500 exceeded"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288385","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=288385"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288385\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/288386"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=288385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=288385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=288385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}