Mobilo sakaru operators “Bite” atteicis senioram iznom\u0101t r\u016bteri, lai vi\u0146\u0161 var\u0113tu skat\u012bties abon\u0113to telev\u012bziju. V\u012brietis uzskata, ka tas ir vi\u0146a vecuma d\u0113\u013c.\u00a0Ties\u012bbsarga biroj\u0101 nor\u0101da, ka uz\u0146\u0113mumi var izmantot m\u0101ksl\u012bg\u0101 intelekta r\u012bkus, bet, ja atteikuma gad\u012bjum\u0101 lietu neizv\u0113rt\u0113 cilv\u0113ks, tad to var uzskat\u012bt par vienu no diskrimin\u0101cijas paveidiem.<\/p>\n
\u012aSUM\u0100:<\/p>\n
Raid\u012bjuma “4. studija” skat\u012bt\u0101js Uldis \u0161\u0101 gada febru\u0101r\u012b nosl\u0113dzis l\u012bgumu ar mobilo sakaru operatoru “Bite” par “Go3 TV” piesl\u0113gumu. Diem\u017e\u0113l \u0161o pakalpojumu vi\u0146\u0161 pilnv\u0113rt\u012bgi izmantot nevar, jo br\u012b\u017eam att\u0113la nav visp\u0101r vai tas ir \u013coti nekvalitat\u012bvs. “Bites” tehniskaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 Uldim ieteica, ka vajadz\u0113tu nom\u0101t jaunu r\u016bteri, jo, visticam\u0101k, iepriek\u0161\u0113jais ir savu laiku nokalpojis. Noma esot tikai 5 eiro m\u0113nes\u012b.<\/p>\n
Uldis past\u0101st\u012bja, ka l\u012bdz\u012bgas probl\u0113mas biju\u0161as ar\u012b k\u0101dam pazi\u0146am. Jauna r\u016btera noma to atrisin\u0101jusi. V\u012brietis bijis\u00a0nepat\u012bkami p\u0101rsteigts, kad, sazinoties ar klientu apkalpo\u0161anas centru, lai nosl\u0113gtu l\u012bgumu par r\u016btera nomu, sa\u0146\u0113mis noraido\u0161u atbildi. “Bite” Uldim r\u016bteri ar pastiprin\u0101t\u0101ju nevis pied\u0101v\u0101 ieg\u0101d\u0101ties uz nomaksu, bet gan nopirkt uzreiz, kas izmaks\u0101tu ap 350 eiro.<\/p>\n
Uldis st\u0101st\u012bja: “”Bite” katru klientu individu\u0101li izv\u0113rt\u0113. Tas man lik\u0101s d\u012bvaini, jo regul\u0101ri esmu maks\u0101jis, bez probl\u0113m\u0101m. Man nav ar\u012b nek\u0101di l\u012bzingi vai kred\u012bti.<\/p>\n
\nViens t\u0101ds atsauc\u012bgs operators man skaidroja \u2013\u00a0vi\u0146\u0161 saka: “Ziniet, lieta ir t\u0101da, ka “Bitei” ir politika sl\u0113gt nomas l\u012bgumus ar person\u0101m, kas nav vec\u0101kas par 75 gadiem.” Tas man bija t\u0101ds \u0161oks. Piezvan\u012bju savam draugam. Vi\u0146\u0161 teica: “J\u0101, man ir tikai 74 gadi. Ar mani nosl\u0113dza l\u012bgumu.””<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Uldis ir 80 gadus vecs pension\u0101rs. L\u012bgums par “Go3” telev\u012bzijas pakalpojumiem paredz soda sankcijas, ja vi\u0146\u0161 l\u012bgumu ar “Bite Latvija” lauztu \u0101tr\u0101k nek\u0101 p\u0113c diviem gadiem.<\/p>\n
V\u012brietis uzsv\u0113ra: “Tagad es esmu t\u0101ds \u0137\u012blnieks. Es nevaru izmantot vi\u0146u pakalpojumus, norm\u0101li skat\u012bties telev\u012bziju. Taj\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 laik\u0101 vi\u0146i man nepal\u012bdz nodro\u0161in\u0101t internetu, lai es var\u0113tu skat\u012bties telev\u012bziju. Man t\u0101ds ne\u0113rts jaut\u0101jums \u2013\u00a0vai tad vi\u0146i p\u0101rk\u0101pj l\u012bgumu, vai vi\u0146i tie\u0161\u0101m diskrimin\u0113 cilv\u0113kus p\u0113c vecuma?”<\/p>\n
Uz\u0146\u0113mum\u0101 “Bite Latvija” apstiprina, ka katra klienta kred\u012bta riskus izv\u0113rt\u0113 konkr\u0113ta sist\u0113ma, ta\u010du noliedz, ka runa noteikti ir tikai un vien\u012bgi par klienta vecumu.<\/p>\n
“Bite Latvija” p\u0101rst\u0101ve Una Ahuna-Ozola st\u0101st\u012bja, ka tiek \u0146emti v\u0113r\u0101 da\u017e\u0101di faktori: “Gan iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101 r\u0113\u0137inu maks\u0101\u0161anas k\u0101rt\u012bba, gan citi faktori. Iesp\u0113jams, ka viens no tiem ir vecums. Bet darbiniekiem, tai skait\u0101 ar\u012b man, nav inform\u0101cijas, kas ir \u0161o komponentu skaits un iemesls.”<\/p>\n
Vai vi\u0146am ir ties\u012bbas uzzin\u0101t, kas t\u0101s par pras\u012bb\u0101m? “Katrs no uz\u0146\u0113mumiem, kas sniedz \u0161\u0101dus kredit\u0113\u0161anas pakalpojumus, \u0161os kred\u012btriskus un faktorus, kas tajos tiek ietverti, ir izstr\u0101d\u0101ju\u0161i savus, vai ar\u012b tiek izmantoti glob\u0101li standarti, un tie kvalific\u0113ti k\u0101 komercnosl\u0113pums,” st\u0101st\u012bja “Bites” p\u0101rst\u0101ve.<\/p>\n
Pat\u0113r\u0113t\u0101ju ties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bbas centrs \u0161aj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 iesaka r\u012bkoties tie\u0161i t\u0101, k\u0101 situ\u0101ciju pied\u0101v\u0101 risin\u0101t “Bite Latvija”. “\u0160aj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101, kad klients saprot, ka vi\u0146am nav iesp\u0113jas ieg\u0101d\u0101ties, nepiepild\u0101s \u0161ie kred\u012btriska faktori, bet ir l\u012bgumsaist\u012bbas uz diviem gadiem par “Go3″ pakalpojuma sa\u0146em\u0161anu, n\u0101kot pret\u012b klientam, m\u0113s varam izbeigt pakalpojuma snieg\u0161anu bez \u0161\u012bm soda sankcij\u0101m,” pied\u0101v\u0101ja Ahuna-Ozola.<\/p>\n
Savuk\u0101rt Uldis negrib atkal mekl\u0113t k\u0101du citu pakalpojuma sniedz\u0113ju. Vi\u0146\u0161 to uzskata par necie\u0146u.<\/p>\n
\n“Necie\u0146a! Tas vienk\u0101r\u0161i man \u2013\u00a0principi\u0101li. Es gribu pan\u0101kt.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Lai ko man p\u0101rbaud\u012btu. Man ir pietieko\u0161i augsta pensija. Nek\u0101du kred\u012btsaist\u012bbu ne pret ko. Un cilv\u0113ks, kas ir tepat man blakus, kuram ir maz\u0101ka pensija, vi\u0146am norm\u0101li nosl\u0113dz l\u012bgumu, iedod uz nomu iek\u0101rtu, bet man ne. Un vi\u0146u pa\u0161u operators man atz\u012bstas, ka vi\u0146iem \u2013 j\u0101, l\u012bdz 75 gadiem. T\u0101 esot “Bites” politika,” sa\u0161utumu pauda Uldis.<\/p>\n
Sl\u0113gt l\u012bgumu uz diviem gadiem, lai ieg\u0101d\u0101tos pakalpojumu, bet nedot iesp\u0113ju papildier\u012bces ieg\u0101dei uz nomaksu, lai \u0161o pakalpojumu izmantotu, \u2013\u00a0\u012bsti lo\u0123iku \u0161aj\u0101 st\u0101st\u0101 nesaskata ar\u012b Ties\u012bbsarga biroj\u0101, atz\u012bm\u0113jot, ka konkr\u0113tas sist\u0113mas pie\u0146emtajiem l\u0113mumiem m\u0113dz b\u016bt m\u012bnusi.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ties\u012bbsarga biroja Komunik\u0101cijas un starptautisk\u0101s sadarb\u012bbas biroja vad\u012bt\u0101ja Ruta Sili\u0146a st\u0101st\u012bja: “Dr\u012bkst b\u016bt \u0161\u012b algoritmos balst\u012bt\u0101 l\u0113muma pie\u0146em\u0161ana, bet, ja ir atteikums, tas, ko paredz Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu standarti, \u2013 tad tur, kur ir \u0161is algoritms vai m\u0101ksl\u012bgais intelekts, ka beig\u0101s \u0161o l\u0113mumu pie\u0146em vai caurskata dz\u012bvs cilv\u0113ks. Tad\u00a0lai notiek \u0161\u012b konkr\u0113t\u0101 individu\u0101l\u0101 izv\u0113rt\u0113\u0161ana. \u0160eit jaut\u0101jums, vai “Bites” pus\u0113 vi\u0146iem vienk\u0101r\u0161i ir \u0161is algoritms vai m\u0101ksl\u012bgais intelekts, kas iziet cauri bezkaisl\u012bgi visiem posmiem.<\/p>\n
\nJa cilv\u0113ka, kas pie\u0146em gala l\u0113mumu, nav, tad \u0161o var saukt b\u016bt\u012bb\u0101 par vienu no diskrimin\u0101cijas paveidiem.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Pat\u00a0ne\u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 diskrimin\u0113jo\u0161o faktoru \u2013\u00a0ja galvenais iemesls gados vec\u0101kiem klientiem neizsniegt iek\u0101rtas uz nomaksu\u00a0ir cien\u012bjamais vecums, ar\u012b tas, lo\u0123iski dom\u0101jot, \u012bsti neiztur kritiku.<\/p>\n
“Ja re\u0101li \u0161aj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101, ja m\u0113s \u0161im aspektam piev\u0113r\u0161amies, nu, tad, pirmk\u0101rt, \u0161\u012bs civiltiesisk\u0101s saist\u012bbas p\u0101riet uz mantiniekiem. Un r\u016btera izmaksas jau nav nesam\u0113r\u012bgs finansi\u0101ls risks uz\u0146\u0113mumam,” sac\u012bja Sili\u0146a.<\/p>\n
Ja Uldi neapmierina pied\u0101v\u0101jums vienk\u0101r\u0161i lauzt l\u012bgumu ar “Bite Latvija” un s\u0101kt mekl\u0113t sev labv\u0113l\u012bg\u0101ku pakalpojuma sniedz\u0113ju, Ties\u012bbsarga birojs aicina vi\u0146u rakst\u012bt iesniegumu, lai situ\u0101ciju var\u0113tu izanaliz\u0113t detaliz\u0113t\u0101k.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Mobilo sakaru operators “Bite” atteicis senioram iznom\u0101t r\u016bteri, lai vi\u0146\u0161 var\u0113tu skat\u012bties abon\u0113to telev\u012bziju. V\u012brietis uzskata, ka tas…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":30718,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-30717","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-aktualitates","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-latest-news","15":"tag-latestnews","16":"tag-latvia","17":"tag-latvian","18":"tag-latviesu","19":"tag-latviesu-valoda","20":"tag-latviesuvaloda","21":"tag-latvija","22":"tag-lv","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-popularakas-zinas","25":"tag-popularakaszinas","26":"tag-top-stories","27":"tag-topstories","28":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115434577109382232","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30717"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30717\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30718"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}